If we don't change course, this country is doomed
What to say about Wednesday's Spring Statement? The truth is that it barely matters. The Government has achieved its primary aim, which is to match one very large predicted number, ie, that of taxation, with another, spending, in 2030.
It's all guesswork. No one really believes in the welfare savings, the growth figures, or much else. But the numbers add up somehow. One side gives it ritual support, the other ritual opposition. And the world moves on.
The event is meaningless, not because things are going well, but because they are going very badly indeed.
If they are honest with themselves, Starmer and Reeves will be staring in alarm at what their stewardship has done so far to the British economy. They remind me of nothing so much as two incompetent magicians – the Incredible Starmo and his glamorous assistant Rachel – who have been doing the Smashed Watch Trick, fail to switch the Rolex in time, and now realise that under the cloth they've got a jumble of broken parts and one very angry audience member. Now they stare at each other in horror and wonder 'What are we going to do?' The Spring Statement has bought them some time. But it hasn't solved their problem.
Unfortunately, they are playing with their hammer not on an expensive timepiece but on the British economy. And they clearly don't know what to do now. They are boxed in. Their philosophy and their party tell them that state action will get the economy going again. Yet virtually everything they have done achieves the opposite.
And there is more to come: the Employment Bill killing jobs and enterprise, the Renters' Reform Bill wrecking the property market further, the net zero target destroying industry, the plethora of regulators, and the huge increase in tax, spending and borrowing to pay for it all – a jump of over 2 per cent of GDP in just two years. If we were going to spend all that money, couldn't we at least have put it into doubling defence spending rather than paying off trade union shakedowns?
Starmer and Reeves are now at the mercy of events. They might get lucky and be saved by some miraculous AI-fuelled change of circumstances.
Much more likely is that events will turn against them. Productivity won't go up as the OBR says it will. Tariffs will slow the global economy. Defence spending will need to increase further. And their own policy measures will make everything worse.
So this week's tinkering to meet the fiscal rules in five years' time means nothing. Almost certainly the crisis will be on them sooner than that. As Dr Dan Mitchell, prominent US economist and commentator put it this week: 'I've been assuming that Italy will be the next country to suffer an economic and fiscal crisis, but the UK is heading in the wrong direction so rapidly that I may need to change my prediction.'
So much is obvious to any intelligent observer not blinded by the stream of meaningless drivel emitted by government figures in the past 24 hours. But seeing that is the easy bit.
After all, Reeves is not entirely wrong in blaming her predecessors. It's just that she hasn't done anything different herself. The last Conservative government pushed up spending and raised taxes. It was just as committed to net zero. It had its own Rental Reform Bill. Indeed at least Reeves is doing some planning reform; the Tories dumped Robert Jenrick's planning reforms after one bad by-election.
The truth is there hasn't been any real attempt to get to grips with Britain's underlying problems for 30 years or so. Tony Blair and Gordon Brown benefited from the reforms of Lady Thatcher and John Major. They used this beautiful inheritance to make things worse: to push up taxes and spending, to begin the energy policy madness, to start importing large numbers of people, and to launch the process of collectivisation and over-regulation.
None of this was durably reversed under the Tories and Lib Dems. Most of the problems got worse. That's why productivity growth is now not far off zero and why GDP per head is actually falling.
Someone now needs to offer a proper, serious alternative. Either the Tories or Reform or both need to start explaining the problems and setting out what they would do instead. Otherwise voters will start thinking that no one can fix the country's difficulties. They aren't far off that now. Then they really will start giving up on mainstream politics.
What needs to be done is obvious. As I keep saying, we need a plan, over a decade or more, to reverse the power of the state and bring back economic and political freedom.
If we want growth back, tax, spend, and regulation need to come back down to early Blair government levels. Yes, that will be painful. But continuing on the current track will be even more so. The first thing to do when you're on the wrong path is to turn round. Meanwhile, we must all put up with the Incredible Starmo and Reeves Show. Roll up, roll up, and watch their next trick: the Amazing Disappearing British Economy.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Revolutionary War-era reenactment being held at Hagerstown City Park
HAGERSTOWN, Md. () — This Saturday, everyone is invited to a Revolutionary War-era reenactment at the Hagerstown City Park. Living historians will showcase military drills on the grounds of the Jonathan Hager House and there will also be a reenactment of battlefield experiences from the 18th century. Hagerstown rallies for return of Vietnamese woman detained by ICE Matt Penrod gives guided tours of the Hager House and City Park grounds. The people here rebelled. This was the first community, really, of all the colonies, to stand up to the British to repudiate the Stamp Act. This was in 1765,' he said. Saturday's activities will be held from 10 a.m. until 4 p.m. and will feature black powder firing demonstrations and a showcase of firearms from the Revolutionary War era. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Rayner faces Labour backbench call to ‘smash' existing housebuilding model
Angela Rayner could face a backbench rebellion from MPs demanding a 'progressive alternative to our planning system'. Labour's Chris Hinchliff has proposed a suite of changes to the Government's flagship Planning and Infrastructure Bill, part of his party's drive to build 1.5 million homes in England by 2029. Mr Hinchliff has proposed arming town halls with the power to block developers' housebuilding plans, if they have failed to finish their previous projects. He has also suggested housebuilding objectors should be able to appeal against green-lit large developments, if they are not on sites which a council has set aside for building, and put forward a new duty for authorities to protect chalk streams from 'pollution, abstraction, encroachment and other forms of environmental damage'. Mr Hinchliff has told the PA news agency he does not 'want to rebel' but said he would be prepared to trigger a vote over his proposals. He added his ambition was for 'a progressive alternative to our planning system and the developer-led profit-motivated model that we have at the moment'. The North East Hertfordshire MP said: 'Frankly, to deliver the genuinely affordable housing that we need for communities like those I represent, we just have to smash that model. 'So, what I'm setting out is a set of proposals that would focus on delivering the genuinely affordable homes that we need, empowering local communities and councils to have a driving say over what happens in the local area, and also securing genuine protection for the environment going forwards.' Mr Hinchliff warned that the current system results in 'speculative' applications on land which falls outside of councils' local housebuilding strategies, 'putting significant pressure on inadequate local infrastructure'. In his constituency, which lies between London and Cambridge, 'the properties that are being built are not there to meet local need', Mr Hinchliff said, but were instead 'there to be sold for the maximum profit the developer can make'. Asked whether his proposals chimed with the first of Labour's five 'missions' at last year's general election – 'growth' – he replied: 'If we want to have the key workers that our communities need – the nurses, the social care workers, the bus drivers, the posties – they need to have genuinely affordable homes. 'You can't have that thriving economy without the workforce there, but at the moment, the housing that we are delivering is not likely to be affordable for those sorts of roles. 'It's effectively turning the towns into commuter dormitories rather than having thriving local economies, so for me, yes, it is about supporting the local economy.' Mr Hinchliff warned that the 'bottleneck' which slows housebuilding 'is not process, it's profit'. The developer-led housing model is broken. It has failed to deliver affordable homes. Torching environmental safeguards won't fix it—the bottleneck isn't just process, it's profit. We need a progressive alternative: mass council house building in sustainable communities. — Chris Hinchliff MP (@CHinchliffMP) June 6, 2025 Ms Rayner, the Deputy Prime Minister and Housing Secretary, is fronting the Government's plans for 1.5 million new homes by 2029. Among the proposed reforms is a power for ministers to decide which schemes should come before councillors, and which should be delegated to local authority staff, so that committees can 'focus their resources on complex or contentious development where local democratic oversight is required'. Natural England will also be able to draft 'environmental delivery plans (EDPs)' and acquire land compulsorily to bolster conservation efforts. Mr Hinchliff has suggested these EDPs must come with a timeline for their implementation, and that developers should improve the conservation status of any environmental features before causing 'damage' – a proposal which has support from at least 43 cross-party MP backers. MPs will spend two days debating the Bill on Monday and Tuesday. Chris Curtis, the Labour MP for Milton Keynes North, warned that some of Mr Hinchliff's proposals 'if enacted, would deepen our housing crisis and push more families into poverty'. He said: 'I won't stand by and watch more children in the country end up struggling in temporary accommodation to appease pressure groups. No Labour MP should. 'It's morally reprehensible to play games with this issue. 'These amendments should be withdrawn.'
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Miliband's latest misstep will pile unnecessary costs upon developers
Ed Miliband's attempt to lead this country was resoundingly rejected at the ballot box in 2015. Given his influence within the present Government, he may have had the last laugh. The Energy Secretary appears to have emerged triumphant in a clash with embattled Chancellor Rachel Reeves, securing the future of a £13 billion funding allocation for insulating properties across Britain, and very possibly triggering further tax rises this autumn. Having secured access to the fruits of your wallet, Mr Miliband has now turned his sights to redefining British architecture. Under plans revealed today, developers will be forced to install solar panels in the 'vast majority' of new houses, and gas boilers will effectively be banned in newbuilds in favour of heat pumps. The Energy Secretary claims that the moves could save households £500 a year on their energy bills, but appears to have neglected to consider the likely effect on development costs. There are few objections to people choosing to install solar panels, or choosing to buy a house with a heat pump. That builders confronted with market demand are not already supplying them suggests, however, that any premium people are willing to pay for these features will not cover the costs of installing them. The last thing Britain's capacity constrained housing market needs is another effort to pile unnecessary costs upon developers. Measures to ease building are drastically needed. Regrettably, Mr Miliband seems to think otherwise. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.