logo
What are bonds? Risks, rewards, when to buy and why they're so important

What are bonds? Risks, rewards, when to buy and why they're so important

Independent22-04-2025

When most people think of investing, their minds will jump to the stock market.
But there's another key player in investment that quietly powers economies while providing important stability for portfolios: bonds.
Although generally less well understood by investors than shares, t​he global bond market is enormous. It's currently valued at around $140 trillion (£105tn) - more than the stock market at $124tn (£93tn).
Bonds play a fundamental role in the world economy as they provide crucial funding for both governments and companies. For investors, high quality bonds - such as those issued by the UK or US governments - are seen as a safe place to earn a return on their money.
Here, we look at what bonds are, their risks and rewards and why they play a vital function on the health of economies.
What are bonds?
A bond is essentially an 'IOU' note. When you buy a bond, you are lending money, usually to a government (government bonds) or company (corporate bonds).
In return, the borrower promises to repay the money you have lent in full after a set amount of time such as five, ten or even 30 years.
In the meantime, they must also pay you a fixed rate of interest for the duration of the agreed term (known as a coupon). This provides you with a predictable amount of income on your investment over a known timescale.
Dividends from shares, as a comparison, can rise and fall with the stock markets. Therefore, bonds mostly appeal to investors who are looking for a stable income and a predictable final return.
'Bonds are traditionally seen as 'steady Eddies' of the investment world,' said Jason Hollands, Managing Director at wealth manager Evelyn Partners. 'They can appeal to lower risk investors and are often held alongside shares to help offset some of the risks of investing in equities.'
Once they've been issued, bonds can be bought and sold on a secondary market for below or above their original price. Their price moves according to perception of how likely it is the bond will be repaid, as well as interest rates set by central banks: when interest rates rise, bond prices fall and vice versa.
The yield of a bond is the amount of interest it pays to its owner, expressed as a percentage of the price. When the price of a bond falls, its yield therefore rises.
For example, you buy a bond for £1,000 and it pays you £50 per year in interest. This means your yield is five per cent. If you buy that same bond for £900 (because it got cheaper), you'll still get £50 in interest so your yield is higher at 5.56 per cent.
What are the risks and rewards?
Government bonds are issued and backed by a country's central government. In the UK, government bonds are known as gilts, while in the US they are known as treasuries. Bonds from developed countries are considered very low risk and as a result, typically offer low interest rates.
Hollands said: 'Major G7 developed market economies like the UK and US are seen as virtually free of default risk, hence UK government bonds are known as 'gilt-edged' securities.
'The UK's public finances may be challenging, but the chances of the UK government going bust and being unable to meet its obligations to borrowers is extremely low.'
Corporate bonds are issued by companies and are considered riskier than gilts or treasuries, as a company's financial health can fluctuate and affect its ability to repay its debts. However, as is usually the case in investing, higher risk comes with higher potential reward.
The balance of these will depend on what type of company is issuing the bond. 'Investment grade' bonds are issued by large, stable companies (such as Microsoft or Apple) with strong financials. These are considered relatively safe and therefore come with lower yields. The quality ratings of bond issuers reflect their credit-worthiness and generally range from AAA (highest) to D (lowest).
'High yield' bonds (also known as junk bonds) are issued by companies with lower credit ratings and have a higher chance of default. These are attractive to investors willing to take on more risk for more potential return.
Bonds are not just investment tools; they are core to how governments finance themselves and have enormous influence over the health of economies.
Governments generally spend more than they raise in taxes so they borrow money to fill the gap, usually by selling bonds to investors. Rising bond yields can increase borrowing costs for governments and slow economic growth.
Gilt yields recently hit their highest level in 30 years, according to Reuters, largely in response to Donald Trump's tariffs sparking a sharp rise in treasury yields. The tariff war has prompted fears of a US recession, unusually making it seem riskier to lend to the US. In response, investors have sold treasuries in huge quantities, driving down their price and sending the yield higher, making future government debt more expensive to issue. This was seen as a driving force behind Trump being forced to step back from his initial tariff announcement, with a 90-day pause.
Hollands said: 'When bond yields rise, as they have done in recent months, it is a serious problem for governments, as it puts the cost of borrowing up, meaning more of the public finances are spent on interest payments.'
Bond yields also have a ripple effect on the wider economy. Yields from bonds issued by stable governments like the UK and US serve as a benchmark for interest rates. When yields rise, it signals that borrowing costs are likely to increase. As a result, everything from mortgages to business loans can become more expensive.
Hollands said: 'Lower bond yields are therefore good for the economy, making it easier and less costly for governments, companies and home buyers to borrow money, whereas higher bond yields can be attractive to those looking to lock-in a better return than cash savings rates.'
When investing, your capital is at risk and you may get back less than invested. Past performance doesn't guarantee future results.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Japan trade negotiator Akazawa says he made progress in US tariff talks
Japan trade negotiator Akazawa says he made progress in US tariff talks

Reuters

time2 days ago

  • Reuters

Japan trade negotiator Akazawa says he made progress in US tariff talks

TOKYO, June 7 (Reuters) - Japan had made some progress in a fifth round of trade talks with U.S. officials aimed at ending tariffs that are hurting Japan's economy, Tokyo's chief tariff negotiator said. "Tariffs have already been imposed on autos, auto parts, steel and aluminum, and some of them have doubled to 50% along with 10% general tariff. These are causing daily losses to Japan's economy," Ryosei Akazawa, said in Washington on Friday after talks with officials, including Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick. Akazawa declined to say what progress they had made. The latest round of talks may be the last in-person meeting between senior Japanese and U.S. officials before the Group of Seven (G7) leaders summit that starts on June 15, where U.S. President Donald Trump is expected to meet Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba. Japan also faces a 24% tariff rate starting in July unless it can negotiate a deal with Washington. "We want an agreement as soon as possible. The G7 summit is on our radar, and if our leaders meet, we want to show what progress has been made," Akazawa said. "Still we must balance urgency with a need to guard our national interests," he added. Last month Japan's trade negotiator said U.S. defence equipment purchases, shipbuilding technology collaboration, a revision of automobile import standards and an increase in agricultural imports could be bargaining chips in tariff talks. In a bid to reach an agreement with the U.S., Japan is also proposing a mechanism to reduce the auto tariff rate based on how much countries contribute to the U.S. auto industry, the Asahi newspaper reported on Friday. Akazawa said Japan's position has not changed and that the tariffs are not acceptable.

Australia PM rules out relaxing biosecurity rules ahead of Trump meeting
Australia PM rules out relaxing biosecurity rules ahead of Trump meeting

Reuters

time3 days ago

  • Reuters

Australia PM rules out relaxing biosecurity rules ahead of Trump meeting

SYDNEY, June 6 (Reuters) - Australia will not relax its strict biosecurity rules during tariff negotiations with the United States, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said on Friday ahead of a potential meeting with U.S. President Donald Trump at the G7 summit this month. Australia has restricted the entry of U.S. beef since 2003 due to the detection of bovine spongiform encephalopathy, known as mad cow disease, but it exports beef worth A$4 billion ($2.6 billion) annually to the United States, its largest market. "We will not change or compromise any of the issues regarding biosecurity - full stop, exclamation mark. It's simply not worth it," Albanese told ABC Radio. Trump in April singled out Australian beef, while announcing a 10% baseline tariff on all imports. Years of dry weather have shrunk U.S. cattle numbers to their lowest since the 1950s, but Australia, with a herd swelled by wet weather, is flush with supply, offering lower prices and lean cuts that the U.S. lacks. A report in the Sydney Morning Herald newspaper on Friday, citing unidentified government officials, said Australian authorities were reviewing whether to allow entry of beef products from cattle raised in Mexico and Canada but slaughtered in the U.S., as the Trump administration has demanded. But Albanese said no such concessions were being considered as those imports still posed risks to the Australian cattle industry. Australia is one of the few countries the U.S. normally runs a trade surplus with, a point often made by Australian officials and lawmakers arguing against Trump's tariffs. The country recorded a rare trade surplus with the U.S. in January after gold exports surged due to global economic uncertainties. Albanese said he was looking forward to a "face-to-face" meeting with Trump but did not specify when that would happen. "We've had three conversations that have been constructive, they've been polite and they've been respectful. That's the way I deal with people," Albanese said. "There are obviously issues, not between Australia and the United States. It's not like Australia has been singled out for any particularly egregious treatment. It's across the board." ($1 = 1.5368 Australian dollars)

How EU takes bigger defence role is main Europe-US issue, Costa says
How EU takes bigger defence role is main Europe-US issue, Costa says

Reuters

time3 days ago

  • Reuters

How EU takes bigger defence role is main Europe-US issue, Costa says

BRUSSELS, June 5 (Reuters) - The main issue in relations between the European Union and the United States is the EU taking on more responsibility for its own defence, while the trade dispute is only a distraction, the chairman of EU leaders Antonio Costa said on Thursday. Speaking to reporters ahead of talks with U.S. President Donald Trump at the Group of Seven leaders meeting in Canada next week and a NATO summit in two weeks, Costa said the 27-nation European Union should focus on the main issue. "The main issue is the United States wanting to rebalance the burden sharing on European defence. This is the real main issue," Costa said. "The United States has legitimately decided that they have new strategic priorities and we need to agree with the United States how during the coming years we can rebalance the burden-sharing on European defence in the most fair and effective way with very important concerns: never, never, never undermine the deterrence effect of Article 5 of the NATO Treaty," Costa said. European leaders have been scrambling to boost their defences against a potential Russian attack after the Trump administration made clear since it took office that the U.S. was no longer willing to be the main guarantor of Europe's security. At the same time, the EU and the U.S. are in negotiations on rebalancing their trade relationship, with Washington pushing to reduce its trade deficit with Europe in trade in goods. Washington has already imposed 50% tariffs on EU steel and aluminium and 25% tariffs on cars and car parts, in addition to a 10% tariff on most other goods. The EU is preparing its own retaliation package. "We need to ...focus on the main issue: how to rebalance the burden sharing on European defence. If we start creating other kinds of problems between us, we are only creating irritants, losing the focus on the main issue," Costa said. NATO leaders -- which includes 23 European Union countries -- are to discuss on June 24-26 whether to boost defence spending to 5% of GDP from the current 2% following a call for such higher spending from Trump. Costa said that a few years ago boosting European defence capabilities was seen as undermining NATO, but the same action now was seen as the best way to preserve the transatlantic relationship. He also said the amounts spent on defence were secondary to how they were spent and the best option was for EU countries to coordinate their efforts and spending to create a collective defence capability. "Whether we need to increase spending to 3.5%, 5%, etc is not the question, because we are not looking at a magic number. We need to define ...what are the capabilities we need to build, what are the gaps we need to fill, and how we could invest in these capabilities in the coming years," Costa said. "Nobody is talking about a European army. What we need is to have one, very robust and effective, deterrence and collective defence system. And that's why what we need to do, is invest together ... based on the plans approved by NATO," he said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store