logo
Net zero: ‘I can't support a policy that demands a blank cheque'

Net zero: ‘I can't support a policy that demands a blank cheque'

The Australian18-05-2025

Garth Hamilton. Picture: David Beach
You can now listen to The Australian's articles. Give us your feedback.
You can now listen to The Australian's articles.
'Authority forgets a dying king.' Tennyson's reflection on the last days of Camelot rings as true for King Arthur as it does for Peter Dutton.
In the chaos of the last weeks of the campaign the one constant was Liberal supporters wanting my acknowledgment that something had gone wrong.
Anthony Albanese hadn't claimed ground on the right. The nation's mood had not swung to the left.
The principles of conservatism had not been found suddenly wanting and the long, proud history of the Liberal Party rewritten as a series of unfortunate events.
What people could see clearly was that we had lost our way.
Losing one's way rarely has a single point of misstep but rather a series of landmarks that reveal to you the growing suspicion that you are not where you were supposed to be.
What is certain for the Liberal Party in our coming review of the 2025 election is that before Christmas we were headed in the right direction. Within a few weeks of the new year it was clear that we were not.
Peter Dutton was engulfed by the chaos in the last weeks of the campaign. Picture: Martin Ollman
My purpose is not to identify those mistakes, to trace back breadcrumbs in the forest, but rather to highlight the difference between a political party and the values it is built upon. Values don't make mistakes, people do.
As surely as we have made mistakes in the past, we will do so again in the future. It would be a mistake now to think the current issues that plague the Liberal Party are the result of mistakes made only in the last term.
Before Christmas voters could see something of our values but when they came to those polling booths they could see so much that was unreconciled within us, the tangled webs that three terms of government under three different leaders had left us in.
We were still carrying on, somewhat valiantly, shouldering policies and counter-policies out of obligation to long-lost causes.
The best thing about Peter Dutton was that he brought peace and stability to our party. The worst thing about Peter Dutton was that he brought peace and stability to our party.
No one knows why former PM Scott Morrison agreed to the net-zero plan. Picture: Richard Dobson
We needed to rid ourselves of some of that baggage. We needed to have a few internal policy fights to test our resolve. Thomas Jefferson believed every generation needs a new revolution, and I believe the new generation of Liberals needs that too.
I didn't enter politics to carry the crosses of previous iterations of the Liberal Party but rather to apply its values to the problems of today. It's the values that bind me, not their application.
I'm not sure why Scott Morrison decided to agree to net zero. I have no interest in tracing back the steps or committing to memory the logic that took him to that outcome.
What I do know is that I cannot support any policy that demands a blank cheque and defers the costs of today on to the taxpayers of tomorrow.
No matter how righteous a cause, even in war, there is a horizon beyond which a civilised nation cannot allow itself to drift.
Our economy cannot be funded by the labours of our children.
The Liberal Party has been the safe harbour Australians have sought when their thoughts turn to the troubled waters of tomorrow. We've been that because our economic credentials have been excellent for generations.
However, our relatively recent support of blank-cheque policies such as net zero have not gone unnoticed by the Australian voting public.
To round out the narrative, turn to our support of the ever-growing NDIS, a funding model that is so totally flawed and yet has an assured growth profile well off into the future.
I could include defence spending on helicopters we've decommissioned and submarines we've cancelled. I could speak to our management of the federation that sees the states compete only for budget blowouts, new taxes, bureaucratic latency and record low housing approvals.
The point is that we've changed, we've lost the economic argument. That's the hard truth.
The Liberals under Sussan Ley and Ted O'Brien need to follow their values to rediscover favour with voters. Picture: AFP
The good news is that we don't have to turn backwards, to chase those breadcrumbs, to find our way again. Just as you can follow the morning sun to head east, we can follow our values to head home.
We're a centre-right party. If we move towards smaller government, balanced budgets, the individual above the state, we will always be headed in the right direction, and Australians with a mind to tomorrow will follow us.
This won't be an easy path and I've no doubt we've many policy fights ahead. But it's time to acknowledge the peace the Liberal Party enjoyed in the last term, the unity and stability we praised ourselves for, came at a cost.
Like all bad politics, that cost has been passed on to the next generation. We now have to deal with it.
Garth Hamilton is an LNP member of the House of Representatives

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Joe Biden says he's 'feeling good' in first remarks after cancer diagnosis announced
Joe Biden says he's 'feeling good' in first remarks after cancer diagnosis announced

ABC News

time25 minutes ago

  • ABC News

Joe Biden says he's 'feeling good' in first remarks after cancer diagnosis announced

Former US president Joe Biden says he is "feeling good" and his "prognosis is good" in his first public comments since his prostate cancer diagnosis. Speaking to press after he gave a speech at the Veterans Memorial Park in New Castle, Delaware, on Friday local time, Mr Biden said everyone was optimistic about his recovery. "I'm feeling good." Last week Biden's office said the former president had been diagnosed with an "aggressive form" of prostate cancer that has spread to his bones. He was diagnosed after experiencing urinary symptoms, and he and his family are reviewing treatment options with doctors, according to the statement. The former president said he was already undergoing treatment for cancer, which entailed taking a pill. "It's all a matter of taking one particular pill for the next six weeks and then another one," he said. "It's not in any organ, my bones are strong, so I'm feeling good." Mr Biden spoke at an annual gathering marking Memorial Day at Veterans Memorial Park in his home state of Delaware, not far from his home in Wilmington. The event coincided with the 10th anniversary of his son Beau's death. It also comes amid renewed questions about Biden's mental and physical health after the recent publication of a book about his fitness for office. He dropped his re-election bid in July 2024 after a disastrous debate against Donald Trump, after which those in his party questioned whether he could continue as the party's nominee. Questions about his decline and how the White House staff reacted to it are at the centre of a recent book by Jake Tapper and Alex Thompson, which has renewed the debate. Asked on Friday if he had a response to recent questions about his mental and physical health, he smiled and appeared to get his words mixed up. "You can see I'm mentally incompetent and I can walk and I can beat the hell out of both of them," he said. In response to Democrats who question whether he should have initially run for re-election at all, he said: "Why didn't they run against me then? Because I'd have beaten them." AP

'Unjustified': PM-Trump talks push after tariff hike
'Unjustified': PM-Trump talks push after tariff hike

The Advertiser

timean hour ago

  • The Advertiser

'Unjustified': PM-Trump talks push after tariff hike

Pressure is again mounting for Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to personally meet with Donald Trump amid fresh alarm over the US president's "unjustified" tariff hike on steel imports. Mr Trump on Saturday announced plans to increase tariffs on foreign imports of steel from 25 to 50 per cent to "further secure the steel industry in the United States". The latest decision could impact Australia's industry, which exported more than $414 million worth of iron and steel to the US in 2024. Trade Minister Don Farrell says the tariffs are unjustified and not the act of a friend. "They are an act of economic self-harm that will only hurt consumers and businesses who rely on free and fair trade," Mr Farrell said on Saturday. "We will continue to engage and advocate strongly for the removal of the tariffs." Opposition trade spokesman Kevin Hogan said the latest move was concerning for Australian jobs and the coalition expected the US to honour its obligations under both nations' free trade agreement. "The Albanese government needs to double its efforts to protect our steel industry and local jobs for our steel workers," he said in a statement. "This is why it is imperative that the Australian prime minister personally meets with President Trump ... to develop a personal rapport with the United States president and protect Australian industries." The US imported 289 product categories in 2024, costing $US147 billion ($A229 billion), with nearly two-thirds of those aluminium and one-third steel, according to Census Bureau data from the US International Trade Commission. The 25 per cent tariffs on steel and aluminium were among the earliest implemented following Mr Trump's return to the White House in January and came into effect in March. Australia will continue to push for Mr Trump to drop his tariffs after a US federal court blocked his Liberation Day taxes on imported goods from going into effect. Goods from Australia are subject to a 10 per cent baseline tariff, while all steel and aluminium imports to the US face 25 per cent tariffs before Mr Trump's latest announcement. The New York-based Court of International Trade found the US president had overstepped his authority by imposing the tariffs. The administration launched an appeal, decrying "unelected judges" should not decide how to address a "national emergency". Labor has sought to temper expectations on whether it can land a deal with the US to remove the tariffs. Pressure is again mounting for Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to personally meet with Donald Trump amid fresh alarm over the US president's "unjustified" tariff hike on steel imports. Mr Trump on Saturday announced plans to increase tariffs on foreign imports of steel from 25 to 50 per cent to "further secure the steel industry in the United States". The latest decision could impact Australia's industry, which exported more than $414 million worth of iron and steel to the US in 2024. Trade Minister Don Farrell says the tariffs are unjustified and not the act of a friend. "They are an act of economic self-harm that will only hurt consumers and businesses who rely on free and fair trade," Mr Farrell said on Saturday. "We will continue to engage and advocate strongly for the removal of the tariffs." Opposition trade spokesman Kevin Hogan said the latest move was concerning for Australian jobs and the coalition expected the US to honour its obligations under both nations' free trade agreement. "The Albanese government needs to double its efforts to protect our steel industry and local jobs for our steel workers," he said in a statement. "This is why it is imperative that the Australian prime minister personally meets with President Trump ... to develop a personal rapport with the United States president and protect Australian industries." The US imported 289 product categories in 2024, costing $US147 billion ($A229 billion), with nearly two-thirds of those aluminium and one-third steel, according to Census Bureau data from the US International Trade Commission. The 25 per cent tariffs on steel and aluminium were among the earliest implemented following Mr Trump's return to the White House in January and came into effect in March. Australia will continue to push for Mr Trump to drop his tariffs after a US federal court blocked his Liberation Day taxes on imported goods from going into effect. Goods from Australia are subject to a 10 per cent baseline tariff, while all steel and aluminium imports to the US face 25 per cent tariffs before Mr Trump's latest announcement. The New York-based Court of International Trade found the US president had overstepped his authority by imposing the tariffs. The administration launched an appeal, decrying "unelected judges" should not decide how to address a "national emergency". Labor has sought to temper expectations on whether it can land a deal with the US to remove the tariffs. Pressure is again mounting for Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to personally meet with Donald Trump amid fresh alarm over the US president's "unjustified" tariff hike on steel imports. Mr Trump on Saturday announced plans to increase tariffs on foreign imports of steel from 25 to 50 per cent to "further secure the steel industry in the United States". The latest decision could impact Australia's industry, which exported more than $414 million worth of iron and steel to the US in 2024. Trade Minister Don Farrell says the tariffs are unjustified and not the act of a friend. "They are an act of economic self-harm that will only hurt consumers and businesses who rely on free and fair trade," Mr Farrell said on Saturday. "We will continue to engage and advocate strongly for the removal of the tariffs." Opposition trade spokesman Kevin Hogan said the latest move was concerning for Australian jobs and the coalition expected the US to honour its obligations under both nations' free trade agreement. "The Albanese government needs to double its efforts to protect our steel industry and local jobs for our steel workers," he said in a statement. "This is why it is imperative that the Australian prime minister personally meets with President Trump ... to develop a personal rapport with the United States president and protect Australian industries." The US imported 289 product categories in 2024, costing $US147 billion ($A229 billion), with nearly two-thirds of those aluminium and one-third steel, according to Census Bureau data from the US International Trade Commission. The 25 per cent tariffs on steel and aluminium were among the earliest implemented following Mr Trump's return to the White House in January and came into effect in March. Australia will continue to push for Mr Trump to drop his tariffs after a US federal court blocked his Liberation Day taxes on imported goods from going into effect. Goods from Australia are subject to a 10 per cent baseline tariff, while all steel and aluminium imports to the US face 25 per cent tariffs before Mr Trump's latest announcement. The New York-based Court of International Trade found the US president had overstepped his authority by imposing the tariffs. The administration launched an appeal, decrying "unelected judges" should not decide how to address a "national emergency". Labor has sought to temper expectations on whether it can land a deal with the US to remove the tariffs. Pressure is again mounting for Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to personally meet with Donald Trump amid fresh alarm over the US president's "unjustified" tariff hike on steel imports. Mr Trump on Saturday announced plans to increase tariffs on foreign imports of steel from 25 to 50 per cent to "further secure the steel industry in the United States". The latest decision could impact Australia's industry, which exported more than $414 million worth of iron and steel to the US in 2024. Trade Minister Don Farrell says the tariffs are unjustified and not the act of a friend. "They are an act of economic self-harm that will only hurt consumers and businesses who rely on free and fair trade," Mr Farrell said on Saturday. "We will continue to engage and advocate strongly for the removal of the tariffs." Opposition trade spokesman Kevin Hogan said the latest move was concerning for Australian jobs and the coalition expected the US to honour its obligations under both nations' free trade agreement. "The Albanese government needs to double its efforts to protect our steel industry and local jobs for our steel workers," he said in a statement. "This is why it is imperative that the Australian prime minister personally meets with President Trump ... to develop a personal rapport with the United States president and protect Australian industries." The US imported 289 product categories in 2024, costing $US147 billion ($A229 billion), with nearly two-thirds of those aluminium and one-third steel, according to Census Bureau data from the US International Trade Commission. The 25 per cent tariffs on steel and aluminium were among the earliest implemented following Mr Trump's return to the White House in January and came into effect in March. Australia will continue to push for Mr Trump to drop his tariffs after a US federal court blocked his Liberation Day taxes on imported goods from going into effect. Goods from Australia are subject to a 10 per cent baseline tariff, while all steel and aluminium imports to the US face 25 per cent tariffs before Mr Trump's latest announcement. The New York-based Court of International Trade found the US president had overstepped his authority by imposing the tariffs. The administration launched an appeal, decrying "unelected judges" should not decide how to address a "national emergency". Labor has sought to temper expectations on whether it can land a deal with the US to remove the tariffs.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store