Ministry for Primary Industries to review controls for tomato virus
Photo:
Tomatoes NZ
Ministry for Primary Industries says it will review its current controls after Australia changed its strategy to deal with a highly contagious virus affecting tomatoes, capsicums and chillies.
Across the Tasman
, biosecurity experts and industry representatives have declared tomato brown rugose virus not technically feasible to eradicate and moved to a management strategy.
'Tomato virus' was first detected in South Australia last August and has also been found on a farm in Victoria.
It is not harmful to humans but infected fruit can ripen irregularly or be deformed.
It can also reduce crop yields by 70 percent.
Biosecurity New Zealand deputy director-general Stuart Anderson said MPI had controls in place that were "working well for New Zealand and prevented any issues for our tomato growers after the discovery of tomato brown rugose fruit virus (ToBRFV) at sites in South Australia last August".
He said a ban on all Australian tomato imports remained in place, even though only Australian tomatoes from Queensland, an area free from the virus, were imported here.
"We made the decision to
suspend imports
from all Australian states out of an abundance of caution. As part of the actions we took, tomato and capsicum seeds from Australia require testing for the virus prior to arrival in New Zealand, a requirement already in place for other countries where the virus is present. That requirement remains.
"Although Australia has announced they will no longer be pursuing eradication, all of the controls that have been in place to limit spread of the virus remain."
There was nothing to suggest the virus was here but MPI's chief biosecurity officer would conduct a review of what Australia has in place to manage the risk, and New Zealand's import rules "to ensure that our settings remain reasonable", he said.
"New Zealand imports Australian capsicums from Queensland. ToBRFV has not been reported in any parts of Australia in capsicums and has not been detected in Queensland. We are closely monitoring the situation in Australia and if there is any significant change in distribution, or which crops it is affecting, we will review the current import rules.
"We continue to work closely with New Zealand's tomato sector. We have asked New Zealand industry representatives to assist by sharing any information they have that may inform our decision-making. We also meet regularly with Australian officials to maintain a continued understanding of the situation."
MPI said growers should continue to check their biosecurity practices. "As always... be vigilant and contact us on our pests and diseases hotline (0800 80 99 66) if [you] notice problems with [your] tomatoes".
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

RNZ News
7 hours ago
- RNZ News
Jailed rapist Gareth Ward refuses to quit Australian state parliament
Gareth Ward was last month found guilty of sexually abusing two young men Photo: Supplied / NSW government An Australian politician has refused to stand down despite being jailed for rape, sparking an urgent court battle to expel the sex offender from a state parliament. New South Wales state politician Gareth Ward was last month found guilty of sexually abusing two young men, aged 18 and 24, between 2013 and 2015. The 44-year-old right-leaning politician has refused to stand down from state parliament, despite sitting in prison while awaiting sentencing for his crimes. State Premier Chris Minns said Ward had "no shame", pledging to move a motion that would expel him from parliament. But Ward has so far stymied these efforts, obtaining a temporary injunction late on Monday that prevented the Labor government from removing him. Leader of the House Ron Hoenig said the government would seek an urgent hearing this week to have the injunction lifted. "The issue is, as you would appreciate, of considerable significance," Hoenig told reporters on Tuesday. "The house needs to be able to make its judgement to protect itself. And we will be seeking a review of the judge's decision." Ward said he planned to appeal his convictions, and should remain in parliament until this appeal is heard. - AFP Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

RNZ News
8 hours ago
- RNZ News
Cat throwing and online abuse: SPCA staff facing more threats on the job
SPCA staff say they are dealing with verbal abuse on a daily basis. Photo: RNZ / Angus Dreaver SPCA staff say an increasing amount of physical and verbal threats is one of the primary reasons for leaving the job. There have been 70 incidents of verbal and physical threats reported so far this year, but the animal welfare protection agency believes the numbers are much higher, with some staff just putting up with daily abuse. In one case, a worker in Hawke's Bay had a cat thrown at them. SPCA general manager for animal services Dr Corey Regnerus-Kell told Checkpoint there had been assaults, vandalism, physical threats, vehicles attacked with batons and a lot of abuse on social media. He said the abuse was directed at staff around the country who were just trying to do the best job they could. "One of the primary reasons we actually see people leave is because of the abuse that they received. The team work tirelessly, making very hard decisions every day and they all want to help as much as they can, but they also know that at the end of the day they are a charity and they can only do as much as they can within those means. "Sadly we've had to put the Christchurch centre into numerous levels of lockdown, so whether they have been real or perceived threats, we do take the safety of staff very highly at SPCA and we do want to make sure people are protected." Regnerus-Kell said the SPCA was hoping for a bit more empathy and compassion when people contacted them to ask for help. "If people actually listen to the help we are offering, and not just hearing 'no, we won't take them', then I think we will be on the track to success." He said the case of a cat being thrown at staff was another instance where the organisation struggled to get across what it could and could not do. Dr Corey Regnerus-Kell says there have been assaults, vandalism, physical threats, and attacks on vehicles. Photo: SPCA Regnerus-Kell said the SPCA was there for the sick, injured and vulnerable animals in the community. "So those animals that can't really fend for themselves, so if there is a new litter of puppies that has just been born and abandoned on the side of the road, those are the animals we would look at. "We don't help the owned, healthy animals, and we have to be really clear that owning an animal is a responsibility, not a right. The SPCA is not here to be a rehoming service, the onus is on the owner." He said the issue was about managing the resources it had. "If everybody who didn't want an animal came to us there is just no way we could cope, and that's the same with every rescue group across the country. "We're doing our best, where we can." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

RNZ News
9 hours ago
- RNZ News
Labelling rules ease for genetically-modified food made without new DNA added, amid reform
Food Safety Minister Andrew Hoggard. (File photo) Photo: RNZ / Angus Dreaver The appetite for food made with the use of gene technologies will be tested in New Zealand, amid ongoing regulatory reform and an easing of food labelling requirements. Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) approved updated definitions for genetically-modified (GM) food in the Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code in June for review, following public consultation. In late July, Food Safety Minister Andrew Hoggard and his Australian counterparts decided to adopt them. Food produced using new breeding techniques, including gene editing, will not need to be labelled as "GM" on the food label, if novel or new DNA was not introduced in the process. Simultaneously, the government was considering a new regulatory regime for gene technologies used outside the laboratory, after it attracted 15,000 submissions during select committee earlier this year. Minister Andrew Hoggard told RNZ last week, there was some vocal opposition to FSANZ's P1055 proposal during public consultation from those who "don't believe in [genetic engineering]." "There was still some vocal opposition, so that was taken onboard. Obviously, there was support from a lot of industry and scientific groups," he said. Andrew Hoggard said producers could still choose to disclose gene technologies to label it as such. (File photo) Photo: 123RF Hoggard said in removing the requirement, producers could still choose to disclose gene technologies used throughout production on the label. "There's nothing stopping anyone who is producing food that doesn't have any new breeding technologies to label it as such. We're not outlawing that people don't have to put these labels on." He said it came down to consumer's choice. "So if the organic sector, for example, doesn't want to allow these new breeding techniques in their production, then people who also think they don't want to consume food that's had new breeding techniques used in them, then they can just buy organic and know that 'okay, that hasn't been used'. "If this is something you're not worried about, then just go ahead shopping as normal," he said. "If it is something you are concerned about, producers who will be using the old methodologies will still be able to highlight on the packaging that, 'hey, we don't use the X, Y and Z' or 'we don't do this or that'. And you just need to go and look for that food." Hoggard said to the best of his knowledge, no health issues had been raised from the consumption of GMO products, like soya bean for example. Meanwhile, GE-Free New Zealand spokesperson Jon Carapiet said the eased labelling requirements took informed choices away from the consumer. GE-Free New Zealand spokesperson Jon Carapiet. Photo: RNZ "It's really fundamentally unethical to take away the ordinary consumer's choice in the supermarkets," Carapiet said. "It's all about trust, and to say 'we're not gonna even trust you to make your own decisions anymore'... is really wrong." He said the assertion that shoppers concerned about GM food would simply buy organic food instead was "disingenuous". "The average consumer certainly can't afford to go and buy organics on everyday basis. I wish they could, but they can't," he said. "So to say all the ordinary people of New Zealand don't deserve the right to choose, I think that's very wrong." Carapiet said supermarkets could ask their suppliers to disclose the use of gene technologies throughout production to ensure transparency and to inform shoppers about the product they were buying. "I think that in the coming months, if this does go ahead, companies will have to go above and beyond the food authority standards. "If the food authority FSANZ says 'no you can have GM crops and GE foods unlabelled in the supermarket', then it's going to be for the supermarkets to voluntarily label it." In a written statement, a Foodstuffs spokesperson said it took food safety "very seriously" and complied fully with the Australia and New Zealand Food Standards Code, including all labelling requirements. "Customers have the right to know what's in the food they're buying," they said. "As part of our supplier agreements, we require partners to disclose country of origin information, and any environmental or social claims must be accurate and substantiated." They said the same approach applied to food made using gene technologies, including GM ingredients. "Any changes to regulation in this space will be carefully reviewed, and we'll continue to ensure our labelling provides customers with accurate and transparent information, so they can make informed choices." A Woolworths New Zealand spokesperson said it will make sure its retail items complied with labelling rules. "If the labelling rules in New Zealand change then we would ensure all products comply with labelling requirements," they said. A government report on the Gene Technology Bill was expected on August 22. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.