Megha Vemuri reacts to MIT ban, trolling after pro-Palestine speech: 'I can handle the attention, positive and negative'
Indian-origin Megha Vemuri who stirred a major controversy by speaking up for Palestine in her graduation speech at MIT reacted to both the praises and the brickbats that she received following her action.
"I can handle the attention, positive and negative, if it means spreading that message further," Vemuri told CNN. Vemuri gave her commencement speech Thursday and got an instant backlash from MIT as the institute informed her that she and her family would not be allowed to take part in Friday's ceremony.
MIT said the institute respects freedom of expression but not what Vemuri did as she submitted a different speech which was approved and then caught the administration unawares when she blamed MIT for its Israeli ties and called it complicit in the genocide.
The MIT, however, will not hold Vemuri's degree back and she will get her degree, an MIT spokesperson told CNN.
Vemuri received huge backlash from MAGA commentators who accused her of selfishly hijacking the event and disregarding the sentiments of the Jewish students at the event. Since her parents are from India, Indian commentators also slammed her for not speaking about the suffering of the Hindus but picking Palestine to come across as 'woke'.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Thị trường có dấu hiệu suy thoái không?
IC Markets
Đăng ký
Undo
'What I am dealing with right now is absolutely nothing compared to the people of Palestine, and I'd take on much more if it meant helping their cause,' Vemuri said.
Vemuri said her family stood by her and she was not disappointed when she was not allowed to walk the stage on the second day event. 'I see no need for me to walk across the stage of an institution that is complicit in this genocide,' Vemuri said. 'I am, however, disappointed that MIT's officials massively overstepped their roles to punish me without merit or due process, with no indication of any specific policy broken,' she added.
Amid the backlash, Megha Vemuri, a neuroscience graduate from MIT, has deleted her LinkedIn and X accounts.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
11 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
What are mail-in ballots? Here are the countries that use this voting method
When Donald Trump posted on social media this week vowing to 'get rid of mail-in ballots,' he lit up an argument that has been following him since the last election cycle. CNN notes the former president went so far as to claim the US is 'the only country' that uses mail-in voting, blaming the system for what he called 'massive voter fraud.' Donald Trump has claimed that the US is the only country to use mail-in ballots.(AFP) What is a mail-in ballot? Voters receive a ballot at home, fill it out, and then return it by mail or drop it off at a secure location. The process is often used by Americans overseas, members of the military, seniors, or anyone who cannot make it to a polling station. Also read: No voting machines, no mail-in ballots: Donald Trump plans US election revamp Mail-in ballots: Where else are they used? Plenty of other democracies use the same method. Canada, the United Kingdom, Germany, Australia, and Switzerland all allow their citizens to vote by mail. The rules are not identical - in some places you have to request a ballot, in others it is sent automatically - but the principle is the same. Far from being abandoned, mail-in ballots are part of normal election practice around the world. Even inside the US, it is not a partisan thing. Utah, a Republican-led state, has mailed ballots to its voters for years. Its elections, like those in other states that lean heavily on mail voting, have not been rocked by widespread fraud. That undercuts Trump's line that 'all others gave it up.' Also read: What do 'skibidi', 'delulu', and 'tradwife' mean? Gen Z slang added to Cambridge Dictionary Fraud concerns and security issues surrounding mail-in ballots Election experts say there is always a sliver of risk, but the scale matters. Out of millions of ballots cast in federal elections, cases of fraud are rare. David Becker, who runs the nonpartisan Center for Election Innovation & Research, told CNN, 'Our elections are more secure, transparent, and verified than ever before in American history, thanks to the thousands of professional election officials of both parties, at the state and local level, that oversee them.' Trump also argued that states must run elections the way the president directs. This runs counter to the US Constitution. Article I, Section 4 makes clear that states control how elections are conducted unless Congress steps in. Richard Hasen, an election law professor at UCLA, called Trump's view 'wrong and dangerous,' adding that any executive order to ban mail-in voting would be tossed out in court. For now, the facts stand: mail-in ballots are legitimate, widely used, and firmly embedded in both US and global elections. FAQs: 1. What is a mail-in ballot? It's a ballot sent to a voter by mail, filled out at home, and returned by post or drop box. 2. Which countries use mail-in voting? Countries like Canada, the UK, Germany, Australia, and Switzerland allow it. 3. Does mail-in voting cause widespread fraud? No, experts say cases exist but are extremely rare. 4. Can the US president ban mail-in ballots? No, election rules are set by states and Congress, not the president. 5. Why is mail-in voting important? It gives access to voters who cannot get to polling places, such as overseas citizens and the elderly.
India.com
11 minutes ago
- India.com
Trump will be unhappy with this 200 number as India makes things easier for China, takes this big step to...
New Delhi: US President Donald Trump has invited trouble without any effort. His move to put pressure on India seems to be backfiring. The whole game has suddenly changed with India and China coming closer in the tariff war. Now India has done something that can hurt Trump a lot. The government is making it easier for China to invest money in India. This is a big sign of improvement in the relations between the two countries. All this is happening at a time when Trump has imposed an additional tariff of 25% on India. This will increase the tariff on Indian goods in America to 50% from August 27. Trump has imposed this tariff due to buying Russian oil. What is the government doing to settle the Chinese FDI? The government is preparing to quickly settle the FDI (Foreign Direct Investment) proposals coming from Chinese companies. For this, the government has given instructions to simplify the approval process. According to sources, the Inter-Ministerial Committee (IMC) headed by the Home Secretary will now work on these proposals expeditiously. A meeting of the IMC was also held last week. A senior official said, 'We have clear instructions. Reduce the time taken to process applications.' According to sources, proposals from non-critical sectors like renewable energy, manufacturing and electronics are still being considered. Dixon Technologies' FDI proposal is also under review. It includes two Chinese partners. 200 FDI proposals are awaiting approval Under Press Note 3, about 200 FDI proposals from China are pending. According to this rule, approval has to be taken from the government before investing in countries sharing a land border with India. The government can dispose of them quickly after getting approval from the IMC and the Cabinet Secretariat. Many Chinese companies have been waiting for their proposals to be approved for a long time. However, officials have also made it clear that this move should not be seen as India's soft stance towards China. A source said, 'India's engagement with Chinese FDI should not be seen through the prism of its relations with the US.'
Time of India
14 minutes ago
- Time of India
Peter Navarro to India: Act like a US partner or pay the price
New Delhi: US President Donald Trump's trade adviser Peter Navarro on Monday criticised India's crude oil imports from Russia, calling the move "opportunistic" and warning that if India "wants to be treated as a strategic partner of the US, it needs to start acting like one". In an opinion piece in the Financial Times, Navarro alleged that India was "now cosying up to both Russia and China" and argued that New Delhi's Russian crude purchases must stop as they were financing Moscow's war in Ukraine. His comments come ahead of Prime Minister Narendra Modi's meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping later this month, even as Chinese foreign minister Wang Yi visits New Delhi for talks on the disputed border. "This two-pronged policy will hit India where it hurts-its access to US markets - even as it seeks to cut off the financial lifeline it has extended to Russia's war effort," Navarro wrote. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Crossout 2.0: Supercharged Crossout Play Now Undo He said India's reliance on Russian crude was "opportunistic and deeply corrosive of global efforts to isolate Putin's war economy". The remarks assume significance as US trade negotiators have postponed their planned August 25-29 visit for the sixth round of Bilateral Trade Agreement talks , the first tranche of which is targeted for conclusion by autumn. Live Events Trump has already imposed a 50% tariff on Indian goods, including a 25% penal levy for continued purchases of Russian oil, despite the external affairs ministry's assertion that India is being unfairly singled out while the US and EU continue to source energy from Moscow. While the 25% tariff on Indian goods entering the US took effect on August 7, the additional 25%, announced as penalty for crude and defence imports from Russia, will kick in on August 27. "India acts as a global clearing house for Russian oil, converting embargoed crude into high-value exports while giving Moscow the dollars it needs," Navarro wrote, adding that it was risky to transfer cutting-edge US military capabilities to a country "cosying up to both Russia and China".
