
A U.S. Businessman Is Sentenced to 5 Years in Prison in China
The businessman's family, as well as a longtime human rights activist, say the case is an example of the arbitrary nature of law enforcement in China. They have urged the Chinese government to release the businessman, David Lee, on humanitarian parole, noting that he had been hospitalized for 10 days and that they believed he had suffered a stroke.
Mr. Lee's sentencing on April 23 came as tensions between the United States and China were at their highest point in years, inflamed by President Trump's tariffs. There were no signs that the case was related to the tensions, but it could add another source of friction to the relationship.
Mr. Lee was found guilty of intentional injury and 'picking quarrels and provoking trouble,' a vague charge that China often uses against people it perceives as a threat to social stability. In the written verdict, the judge said that Mr. Lee, 61, had been involved in three altercations in 2000 and 2001, one of which led to a man's death.
But the family of Mr. Lee, who held a green card at the time and became an American citizen in 2002, said his role in those incidents was minor. He was briefly detained then released without charges, and he assumed the case was closed, his wife, Louise Lin, said. Over the next two decades, he traveled to China nearly every month for his work as a wholesale lighting supplier for Home Depot.
Mr. Lee sometimes spent months at a time in China with no issue, Ms. Lin said. 'If you know you're in trouble, of course you're not going to go back,' said Ms. Lin, who lives in California.
He often returned to Hebei Province, where he grew up. That was also where he was abruptly arrested in the elevator bank of his hotel last April, while going to breakfast with Ms. Lin, she said. She said she did not know why Mr. Lee was being targeted.
Ms. Lin has not been able to see her husband since he was detained, except for once briefly when he appeared in court, she said. But she had heard from representatives of the United States Embassy, who were allowed to visit him, that he was in poor health and appeared to have lost around 50 pounds.
John Kamm, the founder of the Dui Hua Foundation, a California-based organization that works to free political prisoners in China, said that Mr. Lee should have been released on humanitarian grounds, as China has done in the past, when a person is at risk of dying.
He argued that the sentence was too heavy, and reflected the 'appalling state of U.S.-China relations.' He noted that Mr. Lee was arrested while the White House and the Chinese government were negotiating the releases of other American prisoners.
Reached by phone, the judge in the case, Lin Sen, declined to comment. The Chinese Foreign Ministry did not respond to a request for comment. The United States Embassy in Beijing declined to comment.
The main incident in the case took place in March 2001, in Mr. Lee's hometown, Baoding, in Hebei. According to the indictment, Mr. Lee, after learning of a business dispute involving an acquaintance, drove three people to the site of the dispute, where they began fighting with another group, using knives taken from the trunk of Mr. Lee's car. One of the men in the opposing group was stabbed and died. Then Mr. Lee and his acquaintances drove away.
The people whom Mr. Lee drove were sentenced to prison. Mr. Lee, according to the verdict, said that he had not gotten out of the car. Other witnesses said the same.
In the United States, people convicted of driving getaway cars have been charged with murder and received prison sentences ranging from a few years to life.
The judge in China said he sentenced Mr. Lee more lightly because he was an accessory rather than a direct participant in the violence. Ms. Lin acknowledged that, since her husband had driven the car, she would have accepted a short prison sentence. But she thought five years was excessive.
The police detained Mr. Lee after the fight, but prosecutors did not authorize his formal arrest, the verdict said. He was 'released on guarantee,' a form of bail. (Under Chinese law, criminal suspects must be released after 35 days if investigators have not gathered enough evidence to press charges. But the investigation can remain open.)
About a month later, Mr. Lee flew to the United States.
The court accused Mr. Lee of jumping bail, but Ms. Lin said that her husband had not been aware of any travel restrictions. She noted that he had not been formally arrested, and that he started returning regularly to China around 2004 or 2005, without incident.
His lawyers have filed an appeal.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Newsom calls for special November election to block Trump from 'rigging' 2026 midterms
Gov. Gavin Newsom, Democratic lawmakers and their allies on Thursday launched a special-election campaign to ask California voters to approve new congressional districts to decrease the size of the state's Republican delegation — a move that could determine control of Congress next year and stymie President Trump's agenda. The effort is a response to GOP-led states, notably Texas, attempting to redraw their congressional maps to decrease Democratic ranks in the narrowly-divided U.S. House of Representatives at Trump's behest. Newsom, speaking to a fired-up partisan crowd at the Japanese American National Museum in downtown Los Angeles, said the effort by Republicans represented a desperate effort by a failed president to hold on to power by keeping Congress under Republican control. "He doesn't play by a different set of rules. He doesn't believe in the rules," Newsom said. "And as a consequence, we need to disabuse ourselves of the way things have been done. It's not good enough to just hold hands, have a candlelight vigil and talk about the way the world should be. We have got to recognize the cards that have been dealt, and we have got to meet fire with fire." The governor was joined by Sens. Alex Padilla and Adam Schiff; Rep. Pete Aguilar, (D-San Bernardino), the chair of the House Democratic Caucus, and union leaders essential to providing the funding and volunteers to convince Californians to vote for the "Election Rigging Response Act." The proposed California ballot measure would temporarily toss out the congressional districts enacted by the state's voter-approved, independent redistricting commission. "Our union stands in full support of this ballot initiative. We are ready to do whatever it takes to stop this power grab and fight back against any and all attacks on our democracy, on our students and on public education," said Erica Jones, the secretary treasurer of the California Teachers Assn., which represents 310,000 public school teachers. She said school children have suffered because of the Trump administration's immigration raids, as well as cuts to healthcare funding, after school programs and teacher trainings. "Our students deserve better," she said. "The majority of Americans are not with him on these vicious attacks. So what does Trump want to do? Rig the next election and steal our right to fair representation? He wants to stack the deck to keep slashing public services to pad the pockets of his billionaire donors." Outside the political rally, Border Patrol agents gathered and arrested at least one person. Newsom told the crowd inside that he doubted it was a coincidence. Supporters of the independent commission that currently draws California's congressional maps criticized Democrats' efforts to conduct a highly unusual mid-decade redistricting plan. For Newsom's plant to work, the Democratic-led state Legislature must vote in favor of placing the measure on the ballot in a special election in November, and then the final decision will be up to California voters. "Two wrongs do not make a right, and California shouldn't stoop to the same tactics as Texas. Instead, we should push other states to adopt our independent, non-partisan commission model across the country," said Amy Thoma, spokesperson for the Voters First Coalition, which includes Charles Munger Jr., the son of a billionaire who bankrolled the ballot measure that created the independent commission. Munger will vigorously oppose any proposal to circumvent the independent commission, she said. Since voters approved independent congressional redistricting in 2010, California's districts have been drawn once per decade, following the U.S. Census, by a panel split between registered Democrats, registered Republicans and voters without a party preference. The commission is not allowed to consider the partisan makeup of the districts, nor protecting incumbents, but instead looks at "communities of interest," logical geographical boundaries and the Voting Rights Act. The current map was drawn in 2021 and went into effect for the 2022 election. Newsom is pushing to suspend those district lines and put a new map tailored to favor Democrats in front of voters on Nov. 4. That plan, he has said, would have a "trigger," meaning a redrawn map would not take effect unless Texas or another GOP-led state moved forward with its own. Sara Sadhwani, who served on the redistricting commission that approved the current congressional district boundaries, said that while she is deeply proud of the work she and her colleagues completed, she approved of Newsom's effort to temporarily put the commission's work aside because of the unprecedented threats to American democracy. "These are extraordinary times, and extraordinary times call for extraordinary measures," said Sadhwani, citing the immigration raids, the encouragement of political violence and the use of National Guard troops in American cities. "And if that wasn't enough, we are watching executive overreach that no doubt is making our founding fathers turn in their graves, and we have to take action. These are the hallmarks of a democracy in peril." If voters approved the ballot measure, the new maps would be in effect until the independent commission redraws the congressional boundaries in 2031. To meet Newsom's ambitious deadline, the state Legislature would need to pass the ballot language by a two-thirds majority and send it to Newsom's desk by Aug. 22. The governor's office and legislative leaders are confident in their ability to meet this threshold in the state Assembly and state Senate, where Democrats have a supermajority. Newsom first mentioned the idea in mid July, meaning the whole process could be done in about five weeks. Generally, redrawing the state's electoral lines and certifying a measure to appear before voters on the ballot are processes that take months, if not more than a year. Trump's prodding of Texas Republicans to redraw their congressional maps to create five new GOP seats has kicked off redistricting battles across the nation. That includes Florida, Ohio, Indiana and Missouri, where Republicans control the statehouse, and New York, Maryland, Illinois, New Jersey, Oregon and Washington, where Democrats are in power. Democratic lawmakers in Texas fled the state to block the Republican-led legislature from approving a new map that would gerrymander congressional districts to favor of the GOP. The Democrats maneuver worked, since it prevented the legislature from have a quorum necessary to approve the measure. A second special session is expected to begin Friday. The absent lawmakers are facing threats of fines, civil arrest warrants and calls for being removed from office; Texas Gov. Greg Abbott has vowed to call repeated special sessions until the map is approved. In California, the gerrymandering plan taking shape behind closed doors would increase the Democratic Party's dominance in the state by making five House districts more favorable to Democrats, according to a draft map reviewed by The Times. Those changes could reduce by more than half the number of Republicans representing California in Congress. The state has the nation's largest congressional delegation, with 52 members. Nine are Republicans. A Northern California district represented by Rep. Doug LaMalfa (R-Richvale) could shift to the south, shedding rural, conservative voters near the Oregon border and picking up left-leaning cities in Sonoma County. Sacramento-area Rep. Kevin Kiley (R-Rocklin) would see his district shift toward the bluer center of the city. The plan would also add more Democrats to the Central Valley district represented by Rep. David Valadao (R-Hanford), who has been a perennial target for Democrats. Southern California would see some of the biggest changes: Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Bonsall) would see his safely Republican district in San Diego County become more purple through the addition of liberal Palm Springs. And Reps. Young Kim (R-Anaheim Hills) and Ken Calvert (R-Corona) would be drawn into the same district, which could force the lawmakers to run against each other. The plan would also shore up Democrats who represent swing districts, such as Reps. Dave Min (D-Irvine) and Derek Tran (D-Orange). It could also add another district in southeast Los Angeles County, in the area that elected the first Latino member of Congress from California in modern history. A similar seat was eliminated during the 2021 redistricting. Times staff writer Taryn Luna contributed to this report from Sacramento. Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times. Solve the daily Crossword


USA Today
15 minutes ago
- USA Today
How many US presidents (besides Trump) has Putin met? The answer may surprise you.
President Donald Trump will sit down with Russian President Vladimir Putin on Friday for a summit in Anchorage, Alaska, marking the seventh meeting between the two world leaders. The summit, which will focus on ending the war in Ukraine, will be held at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, a military installation. It will be the first meeting between Trump and Putin on American soil. Putin has met all five U.S. presidents who were in office since he came to power in 2000. In Trump's first term, he and Putin met face-to-face six times in five locations around the world. Here's where they have met. Can't see our graphics? Click here to reload page. The summit is a 'listening exercise,' and the goal for Trump 'is to walk away with a better understanding of how we can end this war,' White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a news briefing Aug. 12. Putin has visited the United States before, even spending time with President George W. Bush at the Bush family home in Kennebunkport, Maine, in 2007. But the Alaskan conference is the first visit by a Russian leader to the state, which the United States bought from Russia in 1867 for $7.2 million. That equals about $156.4 million today, according to What other U.S. presidents have Putin met? Putin has met five U.S. presidents: Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, Barack Obama, Joe Biden and Donald Trump. How does Putin compare with other Russian leaders? Trump said he hopes the meeting with Putin will lead to a second meeting between himself, Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, where the two sides can reach a peace agreement, USA TODAY reported. CONTRIBUTING Swapna Venugopal Ramaswamy, Tom Vanden Brook, Joey Garrison, Kathryn Palmer and Ben Adler SOURCE USA TODAY Network reporting and research; Reuters; State Department archive


Los Angeles Times
15 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Trump says Putin wants a deal as Kremlin says Ukraine war aims remain ‘unchanged'
ANCHORAGE — Vladimir Putin is lavishing praise on President Trump ahead of their high-stakes summit in Alaska on Friday, thanking his host for 'energetic and sincere efforts to stop the fighting' in Ukraine over three years since the Russian leader attempted to conquer the country. Trump, at the White House, also expressed optimism ahead of the talks, telling reporters he believes Putin 'would like to see a deal' after suffering more than a million Russian casualties on the battlefield. Yet Russian Foreign Ministry officials said Wednesday that Putin's war aims remain 'unchanged.' And an aggressive Russian advance along the front lines this week provided evidence to military analysts that Moscow has no plans to implement a ceasefire. It was a day of diplomatic maneuvering ahead of an extraordinary visit from a Russian president to the U.S. homeland, and the first audience Putin has received with a Western leader since the war began. 'It's going to be very interesting — we're going to find out where everybody stands,' Trump told reporters in the Oval Office on Thursday. 'If it's a bad meeting, it'll end very quickly. And if it's a good meeting, we're going to end up getting peace in the very near future.' Putin's positioning ahead of the summit, and Trump's eagerness for a deal, continue to fuel worries across Europe and in Ukraine that the Alaska negotiations could result in a bilateral agreement designed by Moscow and endorsed by Washington that sidelines Kyiv. In London, Britain's prime minister, Keir Starmer, hosted Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on Thursday, offering support for Trump's effort while placing the onus on Putin to 'prove he is serious about peace.' 'They agreed there had been a powerful sense of unity and a strong resolve to achieve a just and lasting peace in Ukraine,' 10 Downing Street said in a statement. Trump said the Alaska summit, to be held at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage, is meant to 'set the table' for direct talks between Putin and Zelensky that could include himself and European leaders. But addressing reporters, Trump suggested that denying Putin dominion over all of Ukraine — and allowing him to hold on to the territories he has seized militarily — would be concession enough from Moscow. The president had said in recent days that land 'swapping' would be part of an ultimate peace settlement, a statement rejected by Kyiv. 'I think President Putin would like to see a deal,' Trump said. 'I think if I weren't president, he would take over all of Ukraine.' 'I am president, and he's not going to mess around with me,' he added. Russian state media reported Thursday that Putin had gathered his advisors to inform them of 'how the negotiation process on the Ukrainian crisis is going.' Trump, 'in my opinion, quite energetic and sincere efforts to stop the fighting, stop the crisis and reach agreements that are of interest to all parties involved in this conflict,' Putin said. But U.S. efforts to get Russia to halt the fighting have proved futile for months, with Moscow pressing forward in an offensive that has secured incremental gains on the battlefield. 'Putin thinks that he is winning this war militarily,' said Frederick Kagan, director of the Critical Threats Project, which collaborates with the Institute for the Study of War to produce daily battlefield assessments on the conflict. 'He's also confident that Western support for Ukraine, and particularly U.S. support, will break, and that when it does, Ukraine will collapse, and he'll be able to take control of the whole thing.' 'It's been his theory of victory for a long time,' Kagan said, 'and it's a huge part of the problem, because he's not going to make any concessions so long as he's confident that he's winning.' Russian incursions along a strategic portion of the front line, near a crucial Ukrainian logistics hub, spooked Ukraine's supporters earlier this week. While serious, Kagan said that Russia does not hold the territory, and said that the conditions for offensive Russian operations had been set over the course of months. 'The Russians continue to have the initiative, and they continue to make gains,' he added. 'The first step in changing Putin's calculation about the war is to urgently help the Ukrainians stop the gains.' Zelensky, after meeting with Starmer in London, said that he and the British leader had 'discussed expectations for the meeting in Alaska and possible prospects.' 'We also discussed in considerable detail the security guarantees that can make peace truly durable,' Zelensky said, 'if the United States succeeds in pressing Russia to stop the killings and engage in genuine, substantive diplomacy.' Trump and Putin plan on arriving of the U.S. airbase within moments of one another, and are expected to meet on the tarmac before retreating into a private meeting. Afterward, Trump and Putin will take questions from the press, the White House said.