
With the US DOJ targeting two Chinese nationals, here's everything you need to know about the unauthorized export of AI chips to China
The United States Department of Justice (DOJ) has arrested two Chinese nationals for alleged smuggling of advanced American artificial intelligence technology to China. The two individuals now face serious charges for their millions of dollars' worth of unauthorized exports AI chips.
This case came to highlight, at a time when there have been increased efforts made by the US government to enforce stricter export controls on cutting-edge semiconductor tech, which is critical for the development of AI.
Here is all you need to know about the case and the accused.
Who are the accused and why are they being targeted?
As per reports, there are two accused in this case—Chaun Geng, 28 and Shiwei Yang, 28. Coming from Pasadena and El Monte, respectively, these Chinese nationals got arrested this week.
As alleged by the Department of Justice, the accused operated a California-based company named ALX Solutions, which was founded shortly after strict US export controls over advanced chips were implemented in 2022.
In over three years, the accused, between October 2022 and July 2025, illegally exported tens of millions of dollars' worth of sensitive technology. The exports that required Commerce Department licenses included powerful Nvidia H100 AI chips smuggling.
Additionally, in December 2024, the company even sent GeForce RTX 4090 GPUs, which, as per the court documents, were checked by the US customs.
The authorities have also revealed that law enforcement seized the accused's phones during ALX Solutions' office search. They uncovered communications that discussed evasion tactics, including routing the shipments through Malaysia and Singapore.
While Geng, who handled the finances, has been identified as the permanent resident, Yang, who was the secretary of the firm, has been reported to have allegedly overstayed her visa.
The third employee, who is the Chief Executive, has not been named in the available documents, as per reports.
All the convicted now face felony charges under the Export Control Reform Act. If the accused is convicted, they could both receive 20 years of federal prison. As of now, Geng has been released on bond of $250,000, while Yang has been awaiting the detention hearing, which has been scheduled for August 12, 2025.
Chinese nationals' unauthorized export operation
The alleged scheme included routing the shipments via intermediary countries to hide the final destination—China. As per the DOJ's ALX Solutions allegations, they shipped over 20 shipments to the freight forwarding companies in Malaysia and Singapore, the nations that are known as the common transit points, for the illicit technology shipments China. Quite crucially, ALX did not receive payment even once from the intermediary firms.
The payments received by ALX originated from companies based in Mainland China and Hong Kong. It included the notable $1 million payment, which was received in January 2024.
The court documents have even detailed the specific invoice of approximately. $28.4 million, where it was claimed by ALX that a customer in Singapore ordered Nvidia H100 chips. These purchases were made from Super Micro Computer, a supplier. However, as per the US officials, there's no evidence that the chips arrived in Singapore.
They even said that the named customer company did not exist at the listed address, adding further upon Chinese nationals smuggling charges.
Why are the AI chip exports being called illegal?
The United States has stricter control over advanced AI chips. This is especially true for the Nvidia H100 because of the potential AI and military applications. Since 2022, the licences to make shipments to China have been made mandatory, but ALX Solutions, as alleged, has bypassed the rules, falsely declaring Singapore-based end-users.
The investigators, though, as per reports, have found no evidence of the chips reaching claimed destinations.
It's been emphasized by Nvidia that the diverted chips will receive no updates, service or support, calling smuggling a nonstarter or a losing proposition. The company emphasized that smuggling such products undermines the compliance frameworks they have with their legitimate partners. As for Super Micro, it has stated its commitment to AI chip export compliance. Further comments were declined in the ongoing case of artificial intelligence technology export.
Catch Rani Rampal's inspiring story on Game On, Episode 4. Watch Here!
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hindu
10 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Mending ties: On state visit of Philippines President to India
The state visit of Philippines President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. to India that ends on Friday (August 8, 2025), and his meetings with Prime Minister Narendra Modi provided a hard power edge to the two countries, with historical-cultural ties between them, by signing a Strategic Partnership Agreement. On his first visit to India since taking office in 2022, Mr. Marcos has taken a strong position against Chinese incursions in the West Philippine Sea, and has been keen to engage India more closely. Coinciding with his visit, the Indian Navy held its first joint maritime exercises with the Philippine Navy in the South China Sea area. The drills were criticised by China. India has consistently supported the 2016 UNCLOS tribunal arbitration award in favour of the Philippines, calling on China to respect the multilateral order in the Indo-Pacific, and Mr. Marcos appreciated this. Moreover, while India has signed dozens of such Partnership Agreements worldwide, for the Philippines, India is only its fifth Strategic Partner — after Japan, Vietnam, Australia, and South Korea. The Philippines is also the first export destination for the BrahMos missile, and Mr. Marcos is understood to have expressed interest in buying more Indian military hardware. The two sides signed agreements to enhance strategic cooperation, including an exchange of Terms of Reference for all three services and the Coast Guard. They also agreed to free up visas and begin direct flights. There is no substantial bilateral trade at present — $3.3 billion in 2024-25 — but investments are growing as technology and pharma companies have tied up in many areas. The Marcos-Modi meetings sent out a more comprehensive message for India's ties with South East Asia. The Philippines is the incoming chair for ASEAN in 2026, and the coordinator for the ASEAN-India comprehensive strategic partnership. The invitation to Mr. Marcos was also a way of easing relations that have been riled by Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal's unnecessarily abrasive remarks in June, where he called many ASEAN countries the 'B-team of China', and mocked the 2009 ASEAN-India Trade in Goods Agreement (AITIGA). The government has since moved to fast-track talks to revise the AITIGA, with talks in Delhi next week. India and the Philippines have separately discussed launching talks for a Preferential Trade Agreement (PTA), indicating India's intention to keep negotiating for a more liberalised trade regime globally even as it faces the brunt of the U.S.'s tariffs and penalties. The visit is a reminder that India's interest in peace and security in the Indo-Pacific is not restricted to the Quad grouping, and that it is mindful of strengthening ties with all the countries in the region, especially as it essays the current geopolitical turbulence with bigger global powers.


India.com
10 minutes ago
- India.com
DNA Decodes: How Trump-Munir Bond Is Threatening China's Influence In Pakistan
US President Donald Trump is infamous for turning foes into friends and friends into foes in pursuit of a good deal. But every friendship has its limits and layers. When two individuals with differing status and worldviews appear unusually close, it often signals shared interests driving a strategic alliance. Such a bond has now emerged between Trump and Pakistan's military chief, Field Marshal Asim Munir. In today's DNA, we analysed this unique and strategic equation between Trump and Munir, highlighting its broader geopolitical implications for South Asia. #DNAWithRahulSinha #DNA #USA #DonaldTrump #USTarrif #China #AsimMunir @RahulSinhaTV — Zee News (@ZeeNews) August 7, 2025 China's Investment in Pakistan China's footprint in Pakistan is vast: bilateral trade stands at INR 19,000 crore; CPEC alone has drawn INR 54,000 crore (now stalled); the power sector has absorbed INR 28,000 crore across hydropower, coal, and LNG; infrastructure projects, including roads, railways, and ports, total INR 11,000 crore. Moreover, Pakistan imports 80% of its military hardware from China at subsidized rates. On top of this, China has extended INR 24,000 crore in loans, with interest repayments proving burdensome. This heavy reliance has sparked fears that Pakistan could become a Chinese colony. In response, the US is working to bring Pakistan back into its strategic orbit. As Washington's influence grows through Munir, Beijing's grip weakens — a trend that has unsettled China. Frequent visits to Pakistan by Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi reflect these concerns. For China, the Trump-Munir proximity is a major red flag. Further complicating matters, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian's recent visit to Pakistan is seen as a backchannel effort — reminiscent of General Yahya Khan's role in the 1970s — to broker US-Iran ties, with Munir again as the quiet mediator. Munir Protecting US Interests Beyond geopolitics, Munir is also seen as protecting Trump's interests. During his White House visit, Munir handed Trump symbolic 'balloons,' supported his Nobel Prize bid, and now oversees a major crypto deal involving the Trump-linked World Liberty Council worth INR 17,000 crore. In return, Trump appears to be offering Pakistan strategic assurances. US military aid, reduced under Biden, has resumed, with INR 330 crore allocated for F-16 support. During Operation Sindhu, Pakistan received IMF relief worth INR 20,000 crore. Trump has also signed oil deals to support Pakistan's exploration ambitions, even suggesting Pakistan could one day export oil to India. The growing Trump-Munir axis marks a significant realignment in regional geopolitics. Trump's quiet endorsement of Munir as Pakistan's de facto leader signals a move that could reshape power balances in South Asia, particularly by sidelining China's influence over Islamabad.


Economic Times
16 minutes ago
- Economic Times
‘To call India's fast-growing economy ‘dead' is so Trumpian —the US President is undermining faith in American statistics'
Alan Blinder Synopsis Alan Blinder, former Federal Reserve Vice Chair, critiques Trump's economic policies, highlighting the contractionary effects of tariffs and the undermining of statistical agencies. He expresses concern over the future of global trade due to the US's shift away from globalization. Alan Blinder, former Vice Chair of the Federal Reserve, is Gordon S. Rentschler Memorial Professor of Economics and Public Affairs at Princeton University. He spoke with Srijana Mitra Das about tariffs — in a Trumpian world: ADVERTISEMENT Q. Donald Trump has called the Indian economy 'dead' — what is your view?A. India's economy doesn't look 'dead' to most people. If you went back a few decades, perhaps you could have used that euphemism — but certainly not now. India has been growing fast — to call it a 'dead economy' is very Trumpian. Q. You've written about how Donald Trump is now playing with the risk of causing negative GDP growth in the US — could you elaborate? A. Yes. Tariffs — although the President doesn't like to use this word — are taxes. In particular, they are sales taxes — and discriminatory sales taxes against foreign goods that don't apply to American goods are contractionary. Raising tariffs thus is a stagflationary shock. It pushes up prices and takes away purchasing power from Americans. That makes it contractionary on real output and consumer spending — we are just starting to see this. I will also mention the crackdown on undocumented or immigrant labour in the United States — this is reducing the labour force. If you have a given amount of demand growth and the labour force isn't keeping pace, GDP growth slows and might even turn negative. I think 'slows' is more likely here. Q. President Trump also recently fired the US Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) chief, saying their data presented was inaccurate, even 'rigged' to dent his image — how likely is all that?A. All data is inaccurate. Yes, there were big revisions here and there will probably be revisions next month as well. But to suggest this was part of political manipulation to make Donald Trump look bad is ridiculous — it's more than ridiculous. It's actually quite evil and it is undermining the faith the whole world has in American statistics which are considered the gold standard. The BLS is possibly the most outstanding statistical agency in the world. To think they fiddled numbers to make Trump look bad is simply ludicrous. ADVERTISEMENT Q. What does this indicate about the future of statistical organisations? A. It's troubling. The next thing that may come up with a 'bad' number in Donald Trump's mind is the Bureau of Economic Analysis in the Commerce Department, where GDP figures and much else — such as the measure of inflation the Fed focuses on — come from. This is setting a horrible example of what might be done with other statistical agencies. It's not even limited to economic statistics — President Trump and his administration are shutting off information channels about health, climate change and a variety of things. Q. President Trump says tariffs will increase US productivity — do they work like that? ADVERTISEMENT A. It's very unlikely. The only reason I don't say a flat 'No' is if you protect a particular industry. A common example in the United States, one that's been getting protection for 60 years, is steel. The American steel industry can grow behind the protective tariff, keeping out foreign won't enhance productivity but it will create some jobs in the steel industry — at the cost of many more jobs in industries that use steel. If you rack up how many jobs there are in US steel — it's not that many anymore — against how many jobs there are in US industries that use steel as an input, it's not even close. So, tariffs won't be a source of economic progress, although they might bring back some manufacturing jobs that are now abroad. Q. What is the future of global trade, given Donald Trump's precedents? ADVERTISEMENT A. I'm quite pessimistic about that. For the last 70 years, as globalisation expanded, the United States was always in the lead, pushing it. We had some backsliding now and then but we've basically supported globalisation and we're pushing the other way around. I don't know how long this is going to last. President Trump is in office for four years. Hopefully, this won't continue beyond that and we can dismantle some of the damage he's done. But some damage will be permanent. The world will need a new leader or leaders pushing towards open trade and globalisation now. Of course, this will be hard without the United States of America, the biggest economy on Earth — earlier, trade was backed by Americans and most other big economies. But the effort to bring trade back in the Trump era will now have to come from outside the United States. Q. Given everything going on, are there thoughts you'd like to share with Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell? A. Yes — hang in there. He's said two significant things. First, he's not going to resign before his term or be pushed out by President Trump. Second, the Fed will continue to call its shots on monetary policy the way it always has, looking at the economy's needs — and not listening to political overlords. ADVERTISEMENT Alongside, I should now add the last jobs report we had does cast a negative light on job growth and probably economic growth in the US. That strengthens the case to cut rates. If you had asked me before this last report if the Fed should cut rates at its next meeting in September, I'd have said, 'Probably not'. If you ask me today, given this data, I would likely say, 'Yes'. They'd both be close calls. I'm not sure what's in Jay Powell's head — but, to me, that last jobs report pushes towards a cut. Views expressed are personal (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel) (Catch all the Business News, Breaking News, Budget 2025 Events and Latest News Updates on The Economic Times.) Subscribe to The Economic Times Prime and read the ET ePaper online. NEXT STORY