logo
I Was at the L.A. Protests. They're Nothing Like What You're Seeing on TV.

I Was at the L.A. Protests. They're Nothing Like What You're Seeing on TV.

Yahoo11-06-2025
On Sunday afternoon, I drove to the Los Angeles ICE protest down by Temple and Alameda. It's around 14 miles from my house and miraculously only took 35 minutes that day. Maybe people were already down at the protest, or maybe they were at the L.A. Pride Parade, or maybe they were just at brunch, but even the chronic arterial blockage on the 101 at Silver Lake Boulevard was moving pretty nicely. I pointed myself to the southeast side of where I knew the protests to be because I know a cheap parking lot down there. I situated myself right near the Geffen wing of the Museum of Contemporary Art, with the Barbara Kruger Untitled (Questions) mural on the exterior wall: Who is beyond the law? Who is bought and sold? Who is free to choose? I went and chanted and was home safe and sound by 7 p.m. And now the Marines are here.
As with the fires earlier this year, people from all corners and chapters of my life have been texting to check in ever since. Also like the fires, everything happening in Los Angeles right now is happening around the corner and a world away. If you didn't know, if you didn't want to know, you could pretty easily keep not knowing. Los Angeles is crazy vast. It feels more like a patchwork of little cities than the great big city it is. That Sunset Fire was five miles away from where we live, from where we sat watching it on local news. We didn't even smell it until long after it had been contained. Our go bags didn't even move from the entryway to the car. We were protected by a freeway, by a distance that isn't actually that far.
For Sunday, I had made a loose plan to meet up with a couple of friends who were also heading downtown. They'd gone to City Hall, and up where they were, at that end of it, the LAPD were trying to move the crowd, to kettle them using flashbangs and rubber bullets. I was a seven-minute walk from where this was happening and wouldn't have known if we hadn't been texting and trying to find each other.
Where I was, things were peaceful and as orderly as these things get. As I crossed 1st Street on Alameda to approach a denser area, protestors were directing traffic. Warning cars that they might end up stuck in a crowd of people, giving them alternate directions to the freeway. Warning us pedestrians, 'Have an exit plan. They're about to declare this unlawful.' There was a skirmish line of officers, a bunch of protestors just close and just far enough. There were chants and signs, American flags and Mexican flags. There were abuelitas handing out cold bottles of water. There were dogs. There were people asking to pet the dogs. It was as peaceful and orderly as these things get, but there was the unshakable sense that it could all go to shit in an instant. It did not.
After an hour or so, I went back toward my car, and there was an L.A. Pride block party around Angel City Brewery at 2nd and Alameda. I went in and another one of my friends made his way over to meet me. We each had a couple of pints of its limited-edition LGBTQ-IPA and roamed. DJs, face-painting, knockoff labubus, sweet and savory crepes. A block and a half from the unrest that was so violent and dangerous that the National Guard had been deployed, there was a packed and positive block party. Once you tuned out the white noise of the three choppers circling low overhead, you wouldn't have known anything was happening at all.
There was black smoke in my rear view mirror on the drive back, and I thought, Well, that ain't good. It wasn't until I got home and turned on the local news that I found out it was Waymo driverless cars being burned. Five of them. When I turned on the national news after dark, that was pretty much all I saw: The black smoke and flaming carcasses of five empty cars owned by Google or something. Not the concerned citizens that showed up for their neighbors just to be greeted by flash grenades and rubber bullets. If you got all of your information from cable news, burning cars were all you'd think happened.
Donald Trump called in the Marines the next morning, and they drove in from Twenty Nine Palms. They're here now, I guess. Right now, the local news is doing a segment on Father's Day gift ideas. The president thinks the situation is dangerous enough to require the military, but KTLA does not think it is important enough to preempt a piece on backgammon sets and coffee mugs repurposed from MLB game bats. They're here now, I guess, 700 strong, and nobody seems to know what they're going to do, nor even where they're going to stay or what they're going to eat, because now we know that nobody budgeted for the lodging or meals of the 2,000 National Guard members who've been sent here, who woke up on the cold stone floor of some federal building.
The ICE activity we are protesting is allegedly being directed by White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller. On Monday, The Wall Street Journal reported that Miller called a meeting of ICE officials last month and directed them to 'just go out there and arrest illegal aliens.' Not to target 'the worst of the worst,' as the president had indicated. Not even to target criminals or gang members at all. But to roll up to a Home Depot where day laborers gather. To post up outside of a grammar school graduation in a neighborhood with a high percentage of undocumented residents. Just go and grab them and pull them away from their homes and their babies and their lives. Just lock them up. Now, that's what they're doing. That's what we're protesting. And if it turns out their papers actually are in order, which it has more than a few times, then tough shit.
As with New York, just about everyone who tells you Los Angeles is a crime-ridden hellhole has never actually spent time here. That's why it's so surprising that Stephen Miller is a Los Angeles native—well, kind of. He's from Santa Monica, twelve miles and anywhere from a forty five- to ninety-minute drive from here. To have a friend who moves to the West Side is to have a friend you never see anymore. To have an afternoon meeting on the West Side is to have your whole day spoken for. It's not that far, but it's a world away.
There's a video that made the rounds in the early days of the first Trump administration, when Miller was a lower-level spokesghoul. It's our boy as a Santa Monica High School student and worth taking a fresh look at now that we know he's one of the architects of this ICE campaign of random terror. Look at this:
There he is. The sneer for which he'd come to be known is already fully formed. His beard is largely too embarrassed to have anything to do with his face. He's got the general look of someone you'd see juggling outside of a Barenaked Ladies show because he's afraid to go inside the Barenaked Ladies show because someone in there might be doing pot. He's arguing for his right to leave his trash behind. And he seems to want to be cheered for it.
Los Angeles is crazy vast. Santa Monica High School is twelve miles from where I sit writing. If I left right now, I'd be there in an hour. But do you know what's one half of one mile, one ten-minute walk away from Santa Monica High School? The beach. A really nice, clean, and well-maintained beach, as a matter of fact. Miller could have been taking a surf lesson, eating some Dippin' Dots, or watching a majestic sunset over the Pacific Ocean. Instead, he's sneering to a crowd about his right as a white person to leave his mess behind for a brown person to clean up.
This behavior is rancid. This rancid behavior is motivated by a rancid worldview that is the kind of rancid you really don't grow out of. This is rancid, and now it's backed up by the United States government, and now the United States government is backed up by the United States military. These raids are the acting out of that entitled and bigoted and absolutely rancid worldview. That's what we're protesting. And on the whole we're doing it more peacefully than most groups of people who take to the streets after their city's team wins or loses the Stanley Cup.
We do not need your help.
Anyway, the Marines are here, and we're all just kind of waiting. Around the corner and a world away. And I'm thinking of Barbara Kruger's questions that hung above the protest I attended on Sunday. Who follows orders? Who salutes longest? Who dies first? Who laughs last?
You Might Also Like
Kid Cudi Is All Right
16 Best Shoe Organizers For Storing and Displaying Your Kicks
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Who's REALLY ‘destroying democracy' — after failing to win voters legitimately?
Who's REALLY ‘destroying democracy' — after failing to win voters legitimately?

New York Post

time37 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Who's REALLY ‘destroying democracy' — after failing to win voters legitimately?

'Destroying democracy' — the latest theme of the left — can be defined in many ways. How about attempting to destroy constitutional, ancient and hallowed institutions simply to suit short-term political gains? So, who in 2020, and now once again, has boasted about packing the 156-year-old, nine-justice Supreme Court? Who talks frequently about destroying the 187-year-old Senate filibuster — though only when they hold a Senate majority? Who wants to bring in an insolvent left-wing Puerto Rico and redefine the 235-year-old District of Columbia — by altering the Constitution — as two new states solely to obtain four additional liberal senators? Who is trying to destroy the constitutionally mandated 235-year Electoral College by circumventing it with the surrogate 'The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact?' Does destroying democracy also entail weaponizing federal bureaucracies, turning them into rogue partisan arms of a president? So who ordered the CIA to concoct bogus charges of 'collusion' to sabotage Donald Trump's 2016 campaign, the 2016-2017 transition, and the first 22 months of Trump's first term? Who prompted a cabal of '51 former intelligence officials' to lie to the American people on the eve of the last debate of the 2020 election that the FBI-authenticated Hunter Biden laptop was instead the work of a 'Russian intelligence operation?' Who ordered the FBI to connive and partner with social-media conglomerates to censor accurate news deemed unhelpful to the 2020 Biden campaign? Who pulled off the greatest presidential coup in history by using surrogates in the shadows to run the cognitively debilitated Biden presidency, then by fiat canceled his reelection effort and finally anointed as his replacement the new nominee Kamala Harris, who had never won a single primary delegate? Who ordered FBI SWAT teams to invade the home of a former president because of a classification dispute over 102 files out of some 13,000 stored there? Who tried to remove an ex-president and leader of his party from at least 25 state ballots to deprive millions of Americans of the opportunity to vote for or against him? Who coordinated four local, state and federal prosecutors to destroy a former and future president by charging him with fantasy crimes that were never before, and will never again be, lodged against anyone else? Who appointed a federal prosecutor to go after the ex-president, who arranged for a high-ranking Justice Department official to step down to join a New York prosecutor's efforts to destroy an ex-president, and who met in the White House with a Georgia county prosecutor seeking to destroy an ex-president — all on the same day — a mere 72 hours after Trump announced his 2024 reelection bid? Who but the current Democrats ever impeached a president twice? Has any party ever tried an ex-president in the Senate when he was out of office and a mere private citizen? When have there ever been two near-miss assassination attempts on a major party presidential candidate during a single presidential campaign? Who destroyed the southern border and broke federal law to allow in, without criminal or health background audits, some 10 million to 12 million illegal aliens? Who created 600 'sanctuary jurisdictions' for the sole purpose of nullifying federal immigration law, in the eerie spirit of the renegade old Confederacy? Who allowed tens of thousands of rioters, arsonists and violent protesters over four months in 2020 to destroy over $2 billion in property, kill some 35 people, injure 1,500 police officers and torch a federal courthouse, a police precinct and a historic church — all with de facto legal impunity? How do the purported destroyers of democracy find themselves winning 60% to 70% approval on most of the key issues of our times, while the supposed saviors of democracy are on the losing side of popular opinion? How does a president 'destroy democracy' by his party winning the White House by both the popular and Electoral College vote, winning majorities in both the Senate and House by popular votes and enjoying a 6-3 edge in the Supreme Court through judges appointed by popularly elected presidents? So what is behind these absurd charges? Three catalysts: One, the new anguished elitist Democratic Party alienated the middle classes through its Jacobin agenda and therefore lost the Congress, the presidency and the Supreme Court, and now has no federal political power. Two, the Democratic Party is polling at record lows and yet remains hellbent on alienating the traditional sources of its power — minorities, youth and Independents. Three, Democrats cannot find any issues that the people support, nor any leaders to convince the people to embrace them. So it is no surprise that the panicked Democrats bark at the shadows — given that they know their revolutionary, neo-socialist agenda is destroying them. And yet, like all addicts, they choose destruction over abandoning their self-destructive fixations. Victor Davis Hanson is a distinguished fellow of the Center for American Greatness.

Pence: ‘I fully support' Trump's deployment of National Guard to DC
Pence: ‘I fully support' Trump's deployment of National Guard to DC

The Hill

time37 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Pence: ‘I fully support' Trump's deployment of National Guard to DC

Former Vice President Pence said on Sunday he 'fully' supports President Trump's approach to combating crime in Washington, D.C., through his recent crackdown on the nation's capital. 'I welcome his decision to deploy the National Guard and essentially federalize the D.C. Police Department. I know that it's all now working in a very cooperative way,' Pence said in an interview on CNN's 'State of the Union.' 'I think it's important what the president is doing. I fully support it. And I think the American people welcome the president taking decisive action to ensure the streets of our nation's capital are safe and also continues to provide resources across the country to make all of our cities and towns and communities safe,' Pence added. The National Guard started ramping up its presence in Washington on Thursday, deploying troops to the National Mall and Metro stations after the president announced the move earlier in the week in what he portrayed as a crackdown on crime in the nation's capital. The White House said more than 1,600 personnel were involved in operations across the city on Wednesday, making 45 arrests, mostly targeting immigrants who lacked permanent legal status. While the Guard had a relatively small footprint in the city earlier this week, by Thursday, all of the roughly 800 Army and Air National Guard troops Trump ordered to the streets had mobilized for duty, the Pentagon confirmed. On Saturday, South Carolina Gov. Henry McMaster (R) announced the deployment of 200 National Guard troops to Washington, just hours after West Virginia Gov. Patrick Morrisey (R) announced between 300 and 400 National Guard troops would be traveling to the nation's capital.

NY Dems aim to de-mask ICE agents to scare them off their raids — NOT to protect the public
NY Dems aim to de-mask ICE agents to scare them off their raids — NOT to protect the public

New York Post

timean hour ago

  • New York Post

NY Dems aim to de-mask ICE agents to scare them off their raids — NOT to protect the public

Supporters claim a bill introduced by Democratic state lawmakers last month banning ICE agents and police from wearing masks during raids will ensure safety and prevent authoritarianism. One backer, Sen. Patricia Fahy, fumes that ICE is 'operating like masked militias' and 'paramilitary secret police' and so must be reined in. Nonsense: The awkwardly and misleadingly named Mandating End to Lawless Tactics Act is actually little more than an attempt to thwart immigration enforcement by making ICE agents fear for their personal safety. It joins similar efforts in other states and in Congress to 'unmask ICE.' In the words of GOP Sen. George Borrello, 'This bill is driven by ideology, not a genuine concern for public safety.' The Left's hypocrisy on this issue is staggering. Progressives — including many of the MELT Act's supporters in the Legislature — have opposed mask bans for criminal suspects and rioters, such as Nassau County's common-sense ban, which has exceptions for law enforcement. Yet for all their sympathy for those involved with the criminal-justice system, they have no qualms about painting cops as criminals and subjecting them to mask bans. If these lawmakers truly cared about public safety, they'd go after the rioters and real criminals who've routinely hidden their identities to evade accountability following the 2020 George Floyd unrest and Oct. 7 demonstrations. ICE and other law enforcement don't mask up because they have machinations of becoming a 'paramilitary secret police.' They do so to keep themselves and their families safe from multinational gangs such as Tren de Aragua. Facial-recognition technology, now rapidly improving due to AI, gives anyone — including nefarious actors like Antifa or cartel members — the ability to reverse image search the unmasked face of an ICE agent. They can then obtain and post their names, addresses and information about their relatives to social media. While the Justice Department can prosecute those responsible for such doxxing, it is nonetheless a frequent threat to agents and loved ones. Addresses of hotels where agents stay during operations are routinely spread on social media so that protesters can harass them. Agitators are so well-organized that an app was created to report and rush to ICE raid locations, as seen in Los Angeles riots this year. The Department of Homeland Security has reported an 830% increase in assaults on ICE personnel this year, attributed to an increase in doxxing and rhetoric against agents. Worse still, even if the MELT Act passes, its effects would be largely symbolic. Lawmakers like Fahy clearly don't understand federalism. Because the Constitution gives federal law precedence, any federal regulation would immediately supersede the MELT Act if passed, rendering it largely symbolic. Additionally, federal agents are immune from state criminal prosecution when acting within the scope of their authority. The MELT Act would also require that all law enforcement agents display their names or badge numbers on their uniforms, hamstringing the plainclothes units of local New York police departments, which now must only provide this information verbally. Some of the bill's supporters mention a more realistic point that masking without wearing identification might allow for easier impersonation of ICE officers. They might also argue that a lack of masking deters possible police misconduct, despite the widespread use of body cameras. Those are valid concerns. But there are ways to protect the public even with masked law enforcement. Public-education campaigns should remind residents that ICE agents and other law enforcement are legally required to identify themselves as police as soon as it is practicable and safe to do so. New Yorkers under arrest should keep in mind their constitutional protections, such as the right to remain silent and the right to an attorney. Masked or not, imposters can still pose as ICE or any other law-enforcement officers. Requiring names or badge numbers does nothing if there's no reliable way to immediately verify the person's legitimacy. The answer isn't a largely symbolic law to neuter real agents; it's to strengthen identification through local cooperation. The only way to fully reassure New Yorkers is cooperation between local police and ICE, whether via collaborative task forces, such as through the federal 287(g) program already adopted by several counties, or by having nearby officers accompany raids to keep public order, which would help quickly debunk any imposters. This type of public partnership would not be a political statement about immigration, rather a commonsense way to put the public at ease and ensure all involved in raids are safe. The MELT Act is symbolic theater that punishes law enforcement while doing nothing to realistically stop imposters. New Yorkers would be safer if lawmakers scrapped this bill and instead fostered real cooperation between local police and ICE to deter fraud and protect both the public and the agents doing dangerous work. Paul Dreyer is a cities policy analyst at the Manhattan Institute.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store