logo
British backpacker pleads guilty to fatal e-scooter crash in Australia

British backpacker pleads guilty to fatal e-scooter crash in Australia

ITV News2 days ago
An English backpacker has pleaded guilty after fatally crashing into a father-of-two while riding an e-scooter under the influence of alcohol in Australia.
Alicia Kemp, from Redditch, Worcestershire, appeared in Perth Magistrates' Court via video link from prison on Monday, charged with dangerous driving causing death under the influence of alcohol.
The 25-year-old was over the Australian legal limit when she crashed into Thanh Phan, 51, while riding through Perth's city centre on May 31.
Thanh Phan hit his head on the pavement and later died in hospital after suffering a brain bleed. Kemp and the scooter's passenger received minor injuries.
Another charge of causing harm to a passenger while under the influence of alcohol was dropped.
Investigators estimated she was driving at about the maximum speed of a rental e-scooter, 12 to 16 mph, when she crashed into Mr Phan, the court was told at an earlier hearing. Mike Tudori, Kemp's lawyer, told reporters outside the court that his client was 'nervous and worried" as 'a young foreign national girl' in an Australian jail.'She's obviously done something stupid at the time,' he said, according to Australian Associated Press.
'She obviously wasn't thinking, level-headed and there's consequences, and she just wants to get on with her life.'Mr Phan's death put the issue of e-scooter regulations into Australia's national spotlight, prompting the City of Perth and several other local councils to suspend hire services indefinitely.
Kemp will remain in custody and is due to appear before Perth District Court on October 31, when a date will be set for her sentencing.
In Australia the charge of dangerous driving causing death carries a maximum penalty of 20 years in prison.
Under Western Australian law, e-scooter riders must wear a helmet, be sober, carry no passengers and be over 16 years old.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

FA imposes eight-week ban on former referee Coote for Klopp comments
FA imposes eight-week ban on former referee Coote for Klopp comments

Reuters

time8 hours ago

  • Reuters

FA imposes eight-week ban on former referee Coote for Klopp comments

Aug 12 (Reuters) - Former Premier League referee David Coote was sanctioned and given an eight-week ban by the Football Association on Tuesday in relation to comments he made about former Liverpool manager Juergen Klopp in a video that went viral last year. Coote had been sacked by English soccer referees' body PGMOL after a video, recorded in July 2020, circulated on social media showing the official allegedly abusing Klopp and after a full investigation, his position was deemed untenable. The 43-year-old was charged by the FA in June and an independent Regulatory Commission has now imposed an eight-week suspension and mandatory face-to-face education programme on him. Coote had admitted the charge. "It was alleged that contrary to FA Rule E3.1 the referee acted in an improper manner and/or used abusive and/or insulting words about Jurgen Klopp in a video that was recorded around July 2020 and appeared on social media in November 2024," the FA said. "It was also alleged that his actions constitute an 'Aggravated Breach', which is defined in FA Rule E3.2, as they included a reference – whether express or implied – to nationality." Europe's soccer governing body also said Coote was banned from any UEFA refereeing activity until June 2026. Coote has apologised for his actions. The Sun also published a video which the newspaper said showed Coote appearing to snort white powder during his time working as a match official at Euro 2024.

Drone 'narco subs' laden with drugs 'could be operating in the UK'
Drone 'narco subs' laden with drugs 'could be operating in the UK'

Metro

timea day ago

  • Metro

Drone 'narco subs' laden with drugs 'could be operating in the UK'

Drone 'narco subs' could be operating in UK waters as a new way to transport drugs, according to an expert. South American cartels regularly try and smuggle drugs to Britain via cargo ships, with packages moved to a floatation device closer to shore, before being picked up by smaller boats. These boats, often fishing vessels or rigid-hull inflatables (RHIBs), are often intercepted by UK authorities – but there are now fears criminals could be using drone 'narco subs'. Manned semi-submersible vessels – dubbed 'narco subs' – have long been used to smuggle drugs – especially in South America. But in recent years there have been a small number of incidents where authorities have uncovered unmanned underwater vessels built to smuggle narcotics. In 2020 Spain's Policia National seized three underwater drones 'narco subs' due to be sailed from Morocco and over the Strait of Gibraltar. The unmanned semi-submersibles were said to be capable of carrying up to 200kg (441lbs) of cargo. Then on July 2 this year the Columbian Navy said it had seized an unmanned semisubmersible vessel in Caribbean waters that was able to transport up to 1.5 tonnes of cocaine, according to Naval News. One UK expert said there's a chance drone 'narco subs' are already operating in the UK. 'I've not seen evidence of it yet, but it's plausible,' Peter Walsh, author of Drug War: The Secret History, told the Daily Mail. 'When gangs use boats to pick up drugs there's always the risk of those onboard being caught. Then you don't only lose your drugs – they could flip on you too. 'That means there would be a double advantage of using unmanned drones for this type of trafficking.' In an interview with Naval News, open source intelligence analyst, H. I. Sutton, said a typical unmanned narco sub 'runs low in the water with just the air inlets and communications antenna above water'. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video 'This will make it very difficult to detect, although no more so than the crewed equivalent,' he explained. Mr Sutton said the challenge criminals could face with this new method of smuggling is keeping the engine running. 'There is no crew aboard to fix it if it breaks down. This will however be baked into the risk-benefit calculation,' he added. Manned semisubmersibles and fully fledged submarines carrying drugs are rarer in Europe than South America, but authorities have come across a few. The first submarine linked to smuggling drugs in Europe was seized off the coast of Spain in 2006. In 2019, police stopped a 65-foot 'narco sub' off the coast of Galicia and discovered three men on board. It's thought the vessel had made it all the way across the Atlantic from Columbia. Mr Walsh thinks manned subs or semi-submersible could possibly be in operation across the English channel, though acknowledges the poor sea conditions and the fact it's a busy shipping route could 'complicate it'. More Trending Therefore, he said, it would make more sense to transport it by sea to Spain and bring it over land to the UK. The National Crime Agency (NCA) told Metro it was aware of 'narco subs' being used to smuggle cocaine from South America but it had not seen the method used in the UK and did not currently see it as a significant threat. Last year, the NCA seized nearly five tonnes of cocaine that suppliers were attempting to bring to the UK using the 'at-sea drop-off' (ASDO) method. All these cases involved boats not submarines. Thirty six individuals were arrested as a result, it said. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Aunt of child who starved to death after parents put him on vegan diet speaks out MORE: Prison officer admits having an 'inappropriate relationship' with inmate MORE: Girl, 16, and boys aged 14 and 15 arrested over death of man on Isle of Sheppey

Maxwell reveals the genuine connections between Clinton and Epstein
Maxwell reveals the genuine connections between Clinton and Epstein

Daily Mail​

timea day ago

  • Daily Mail​

Maxwell reveals the genuine connections between Clinton and Epstein

Of all the weird decorations – from a stuffed black poodle to a framed collection of fake eyeballs – that Jeffrey Epstein acquired for his New York mansion, possibly no item invited quite so many questions as a painting of President Clinton sprawled suggestively on an Oval Office chair, wearing a blue dress and heels. It wasn't as immediately disturbing as the first-edition copy of Lolita – Vladimir Nabokov's notorious 1955 novel in which a man develops a sexual obsession with a 12-year-old girl – which Epstein kept displayed in his office. Or the paintings of unclothed women, and large silver ball and chain he kept in the massage room where he allegedly [expletive] local schoolgirls. However the prominently displayed 2012 Clinton portrait – created by Australian satirical artist Petrina Ryan-Kleid and inspired by the stained blue dress worn by White Office intern Monica Lewinsky during her sexual liaison with the libidinous president – raised questions that went far beyond Epstein's questionable taste in art. Insiders claimed it showed how close Epstein was to Clinton, a man usually surrounded by sycophants, that he could make light of such a painfully sensitive subject. Epstein, who also displayed in his living room a signed and framed photo of him and Clinton grinning at each other, delighted in 'collecting' famous people as friends and associates. It not only flattered his huge ego but made him seem more respectable to the girls and women on whom he preyed. And while President Clinton would naturally have been one of that collection's prize exhibits, he has always strenuously insisted he barely knew Epstein and only once visited his seven-floor Manhattan town house. However, the Daily Mail can reveal that Ghislaine Maxwell (pictured), Epstein's longtime companion and convicted accomplice in his sexual abuse of young women, has now contradicted Clinton's claim that Epstein was never more than an acquaintance. Questioned about Bill Clinton and his family during her controversial interrogation by the US Justice Department two weeks ago, Maxwell insisted she and Epstein knew Clinton well, according to sources familiar with the conversation. Maxwell – who became sufficiently close to the Clintons to attend the 2010 wedding of their daughter Chelsea – said she had been a friend of the 42nd president for some time and had flown around the world in his company. She also said he'd given her private gifts. The interview with Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche took place behind closed doors in a courthouse in Tallahassee, Florida, near the jail where Maxwell was serving her 20-year sentence. (She has since been transferred.) Were Maxwell's attempts to link Epstein to the Clintons a ploy to endear her to Trump, who hates the Democrat family and could, as president, pardon her? She certainly won't want to alienate the White House. But it is also understood that Maxwell resents the Clintons' decision to distance themselves from her following her public disgrace. The relationship between Clinton and Epstein is now once again centre of a scandal that won't go away, after the former president and wife Hillary were subpoenaed to testify about Epstein to a congressional investigation. Clinton and his wife, a former Secretary of State whose 1999 Senate run benefited from a $20,000 contribution from Epstein, will be compelled to testify in October before the Republican-led 'House Oversight Committee'. A raft of senior federal officials, including five former attorney-generals and two FBI chiefs, have also been summoned to be grilled on what they know, amid continuing accusations from angry MAGA supporters that the Trump administration is engaged in a cover-up over the Epstein scandal. The bipartisan House Committee says it is examining how federal agencies handle sex-trafficking cases and offer plea deals, and specifically the prosecution of Epstein and Maxwell. In 2008, the former escaped with a minimal custodial sentence that's been described as a mere 'slapped hand' after agreeing an extraordinarily lenient deal with Florida's federal prosecutors. Bill Clinton has consistently denied any knowledge of Epstein's 'terrible crimes' or involvement in any wrongdoing. And that, scoff critics, is despite the fact that flight logs show that he flew at least 26 times on Epstein's private jets – planes which the staffed with teenage girls in an alleged attempt to entice the powerful men on board. However, Clinton has been repeatedly challenged over his claims that his relationship with Epstein was fleeting. Only last month the Wall Street Journal reported that Clinton had been among friends and associates who were asked by Maxwell to write a tribute to Epstein for a commemorative book celebrating his 50th birthday in 2003. In a handwritten note, Clinton said: 'It's reassuring isn't it, to have lasted as long, across all the years of learning and knowing, adventures and [illegible word], and also to have your childlike curiosity, the drive to make a difference and the solace of friends.' Hardly the sort of insight, surely, that one might have gained from merely a passing acquaintance. Perhaps it was no surprise then that James Comer, the committee's Republican chairman, didn't mince words in his recent letters to the Clintons, mentioning how Bill has admitted flying on Epstein's private plane and how 'during one of these trips, you were even pictured receiving a 'massage' from one of Mr Epstein's victims'. Comer also mentioned claims that Clinton once 'pressured Vanity Fair not to publish sex trafficking allegations' against his 'good friend Mr Epstein', adding there are 'conflicting reports' about if he 'ever visited Mr. Epstein's island'. The congressman told Mr Clinton: 'You were also allegedly close to Ms Maxwell, an Epstein co-conspirator, and attended an intimate dinner with her in 2014, three years after public reports about her involvement in Mr Epstein's abuse of minors'. Comer's letter to Hillary cited a further connection, noting that Maxwell's nephew was employed by Mrs Clinton's 2008 failed presidential campaign and then hired by the State Department after she became Secretary of State. At least they were spared mention of a 2020 book, A Convenient Death: The Mysterious Death Of Jeffrey Epstein, by reporters Alana Goodman and Daniel Halper, which sensationally claimed Clinton had an affair with Maxwell. A Clinton spokesman dismissed the allegation as a 'total lie'. The House committee certainly has enough on its agenda to make the Clintons shift uncomfortably in their seats (if they don't try to claim 'executive privilege', which allows senior members and former members of the US government to withhold information in certain circumstances). And while it's clear that even Trump's most loyal supporters want greater transparency over the Epstein scandal, critics have pointed out that congressional Republicans will be doing the President a favour by distracting attention from their leader's own controversial association with Epstein. Trump himself has over the years repeatedly urged the media to focus attention on Clinton's relationship with the predator – particularly his reported visits to Epstein's Caribbean home, dubbed '[expletive] Island' – rather than on his own links. During his recent trip to Scotland, sitting beside Keir Starmer, Trump claimed: 'I never went to the island, and Bill Clinton went there supposedly 28 times.' For the record, Clinton insists he never visited the island, Little St James, although at least three people claim they saw him there. In 2019, it was revealed that Virginia Giuffre, who accused both Epstein and Prince Andrew of sexual abuse, had years earlier told her lawyers that she and two 'lovely girls' from New York once flew there with him some time after his presidency ended in January 2001. The late Giuffre, who alleged she was a teenage 'sex slave' for Epstein and his friends, said they all joined Epstein and Maxwell for a dinner at which Clinton teased the women with 'playful pokes' and 'brassy comments', adding 'there was no modesty between any of them' before leaving with the pair at the end of the night. In an unpublished memoir, she wrote: 'Strolling into the darkness with two beautiful girls around either arm, Bill seemed content to retire for the evening.' According to Giuffre, who never accused Clinton of any wrongdoing, when she asked Epstein what the ex-president was doing there, he laughed and answered cryptically: 'He owes me a favour.' Giuffre added: 'He never told me what favours they were. I never knew. I didn't know if he was serious.' Steve Scully, an IT contractor who worked for Epstein on the island, said he once saw Clinton with Epstein at his villa on the estate. Scully, a father of three girls, said there were photos of topless women everywhere on the island and he eventually left Epstein's employ because he became uncomfortable about the groups of young girls who appeared to be underage. And in 2020, Doug Band, Clinton's former key aide and confidant for 20 years, told Vanity Fair that Clinton visited '[expletive] Island' in January 2003 after he'd flown the previous year with Kevin Spacey and Epstein on the latter's capacious Boeing 727 (the plane nicknamed the Lolita Express) during a 'humanitarian' five-country trip to Africa for the Clinton Foundation. Band said Epstein gave him 'bad vibes' and he'd repeatedly advised his boss to have nothing to do with him, but to no avail. (In 2006 – the same year that Clinton accepted a $25,000 Epstein donation to his foundation – the latter was charged in Florida with 'procuring a minor for prostitution'.) A Clinton spokesman repeated the ex-president's insistence that he'd never visited the island and provided Vanity Fair with details of his movements at the time that clashed with Band's chronology.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store