
What went Bryan Kohberger's way — and what didn't — at evidence motions hearing
Bryan Kohberger's defense struggled with prosecutors over what evidence should and shouldn't be allowed in his upcoming quadruple murder trial at a full-day hearing in front of Judge Steven Hippler in Boise, Idaho, on Wednesday.
Kohberger, 30, faces four charges of first-degree murder in the deaths of Madison Mogen, 21; Kaylee Goncalves, 21; Xana Kernodle, 20; and Ethan Chapin, 20. He also faces a felony burglary count.
Hippler decided some motions from the bench but said he would announce other orders later in writing — including his findings on defense motions to strike the death penalty as a potential punishment due to Kohberger's diagnosis of autism and defense claims the prosecutors have missed key discovery deadlines.
Defense attorney Anne Taylor cited the recent Lori Vallow case, in which the court threw out the death penalty over missed deadlines. Kohberger, however, has waived his right to a speedy trial, and Hippler asked Taylor why she hadn't raised the issue months ago or requested more resources, like a half-dozen additional paralegals to help her go through discovery.
Deputy Latah County Prosecutor Ashley Jennings also flat out denied Taylor's accusations that prosecutors were slow-walking discovery and said everything the defense has asked for has been provided, a point that Taylor conceded in front of the judge.
[It's] all incriminating evidence, that's why the state is offering it.
"This motion is not about withheld discovery," she said. It was instead about a vast amount of data, dozens of terabytes, that she said will take years to go through. Hippler told her he expects most of it is irrelevant surveillance video that doesn't need to be gone through, but he said he would likely require the prosecution to certify that it has disclosed all potentially exculpatory evidence that it is aware of and that the defense has not already flagged.
He said he would issue a written order later.
After arguments over Kohberger's alibi, which prosecutors say cannot be corroborated by anyone other than the defendant himself, the judge and both sides appeared to agree that defense expert Sy Ray could testify about Kohberger's whereabouts at the time his phone was shut off, more than an hour before the murders. But Latah County Prosecuting Attorney Bill Thompson made clear that is not an alibi.
"Who is gonna say he was out driving around looking at the stars?" Hippler asked Taylor.
She said her client has a right to remain silent.
"The question is whether you have a witness who is going to testify to that," Hippler said.
Hippler partially agreed to a defense motion to block prosecutors from using the words "murderer," "psychopath" and "sociopath" in the trial, but noted that what the defense had asked for amounted to issuing "an order that says the state shall not commit prosecutorial misconduct."
He said he expected the rules to be followed, that the term "murderer" could potentially be used during closing arguments, and that the words "psycho-" and "sociopath" could not be used unless an expert evaluation determined they accurately apply to Kohberger, something that has not happened as of Thursday.
As for "inflammatory evidence" that the defense wants kept out of trial, like overuse of gruesome crime scene photos, Hippler said the murders were "brutal and horrific" and he expected the evidence to reflect that.
In one key moment, Taylor claimed that the defense had uncovered a new lead regarding a potential alternate suspect and was investigating. In another, she said there are a hundred hours of interviews with people who knew Kohberger from Washington State University — and many of them had "unkind things to say about him."
Kohberger was studying for a Ph.D. in criminology there. The campus is about 10 miles from the University of Idaho crime scene.
Prosecutors revealed that they do not expect any of the inconclusive DNA samples under Mogen's fingernails to belong to Kohberger — because they believe the attacker wore clothes to sufficiently cover himself up. The defense sought unsuccessfully to have a 2020 college essay Kohberger wrote about crime scene handling for DeSales University, where he studied for a master's degree in criminal justice, excluded from the trial.
Judge Hippler also took issue with a defense expert witness who he said accused prosecutors of severe misconduct involving discovery materials regarding Kohberger's phone tracking records without evidence.
"I don't want theatrics," he told Kohberger's defense. "I don't want accusations that aren't supported."
At issue are timing advance records, detailed location data from a phone that is only preserved for seven days. The prosecution's initial search warrant sought this information in November. Kohberger wasn't identified as a suspect until Dec. 19. Jennings said she did not have the records. Hippler asked Taylor what evidence she had that they even exist.
The hearing touched on other issues, such as whether Kohberger's immediate family has a right to courtroom seating. Prosecutors noted that some relatives will be on the witness list, and as such, shouldn't be allowed to observe testimony in the case prior to taking the stand themselves.
While Kohberger's defense attorney Elisa Massoth said the family has "no interest in helping" the prosecution and predicted that prosecutors would only call one relative, "at best," Jennings revealed that prosecutors intend to call "a few."
The defense wanted the 911 audio blocked from being played before the jury. Hippler said he would likely allow it but redact some statements that could be considered hearsay. Similarly, he said he would consider redacting portions of a traffic stop in which Kohberger had a back-and-forth with the officer in the months before the murders. Prosecutors said they intended to use it to show his ownership of the white Hyundai Elantra.
Massoth took issue with referring to Kohberger's car as the suspect vehicle.
"You don't get to, and I don't get to, tell the state how to try their case unless they're violating the rules of evidence," Hippler said.
Hippler appeared unsympathetic to the defense's opposition to including Kohberger's Amazon records, which show the purchase of a Ka-Bar knife and sheath set before the murders as well as searching the app for the same items after the murders.
GET REAL-TIME UPDATES DIRECTLY ON THE TRUE CRIME HUB
"Maybe I'm completely out to lunch, but as I understand it, to buy something on Amazon, you gotta put it in your shopping cart and hit purchase," the judge said.
Hippler said he would take a defense motion to block surviving roommate "DM" from using the phrase "bushy eyebrows" during her testimony. Taylor also revealed that in addition to DM's text messages and phone history that were released last month, the roommate's phone data shows she was also editing photos, saving new contacts, using social media and "a whole lot more."
Hippler said that while older adults may pick up the phone and call someone, younger people are just as likely to reach out over social media.
"I'll be interested to hear the testimony of the two young ladies," he said, referring to DM and the other surviving roommate, identified in court documents as "BF."
Kohberger could face the death penalty if convicted, unless Hippler rules in his favor on one of the motions to strike it. A judge entered not guilty pleas on his behalf in May 2023.
The trial is expected to begin on Aug. 11.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Brickbat: Failure To Report
Seven police officers in West Palm Beach, Florida, face charges related to an unauthorized high-speed chase that ended in a fatal crash in Boynton Beach, killing Marcia Pochette and her pregnant daughter, Jenice Woods. The officers pursued suspect Neoni Copeland at speeds up to 119 mph, despite it being against department policy because they only wanted to conduct a routine interview. Copeland crashed into the victims' car, but the officers did not aid or even check on the victims, and they left without notifying authorities in Boynton Beach. The officers also failed to activate their body cameras, notify supervisors, or file paperwork. Three of the officers face two counts of leaving the scene of a crash involving death—a first-degree felony—while all seven face one count of official misconduct, a third-degree felony. The post Brickbat: Failure To Report appeared first on
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Ohio's innovative approach to protecting domestic violence survivors
A domestic violence awareness ribbon. (Stock photo from Getty Images.) People who are convicted of a misdemeanor crime of domestic abuse or subject to a qualifying protective order aren't allowed to have firearms according to federal law, but actually separating them from their guns is another matter. Often, abusers can deny having or refuse to surrender their firearms, and in states that have not passed their own versions of the federal ban — which, among other limitations, does not itself mandate how or when subjects should relinquish guns they already have in their possession — the process can be even more precarious. Ohio is one of the states that hang in the balance. Judges in Ohio have the discretion to require the surrender of firearms because of a civil protection order — a temporary order to remove guns from a potentially dangerous person — but there is no legal statute requiring the relinquishment of firearms following an order. In Ohio, more than 188,000 people are victims of intimate partner violence annually, and the state loses $1.2 billion every year because of the pervasive violence, according to a 2025 report by the Ohio Domestic Violence Network. But Ohio is not unique; access to firearms is a key factor in the lethality of intimate partner violence. Research studies estimate that, in instances where a domestic abuser has access to a gun, a victim is five times more likely to die, and the rate of intimate partner firearm homicides in the United States is substantially higher than in other similar-income countries. The Advisory Committee on Domestic Violence through the Supreme Court of Ohio noticed that because of the disconnect in federal and state law, there was a gap in potential abusers surrendering their firearms. The committee came up with an unusual solution: paperwork. Members argued that the lack of legal follow-up after the issuance of protection orders could be remedied by the state's 10-F Form, implemented in 2021. When law enforcement goes to serve a protection order, they use the form to ask a subject if they have access to firearms, securing them if so, keeping them in storage, or noting whether they deny having access to weapons at all. Then the form gets placed in a court's docket, leaving a paper trail if there's a violation later. 'This really is a tool that can be used as a way to clarify, does someone have weapons, and if this person is lying, it could be the basis of another charge or a violation of that protection order,' said Alexandria Ruden, a member of the advisory committee and a supervising attorney with Legal Aid Society of Cleveland. Ruden, who has worked in domestic violence law for four decades, emphasized that shootings are among the most common ways victims are killed. She and her colleagues have participated in training sessions on the 10-F Form across Ohio. But she explained that there are roadblocks to successful implementation, like having a place to store weapons after they have been seized. Though Ruden emphasized the practicality of the form, she said the need for a state statute is crucial to truly protect victims. 'If we were able to codify federal law regarding qualifying protection orders, and the qualifying misdemeanor crimes of domestic violence, then the implementation of this form would be much easier to work with,' Ruden said. The difference in state approaches can have significant consequences for victims. 'The place you live, not only the state but the county that you live in, can dictate what protections under the law that you have, and how safe you will be,' said Dr. April Zeoli, a professor at the University of Michigan School of Public Health who has researched the relationship between firearm access and intimate partner violence. 'We see these differences when it comes to domestic violence protection order firearm restrictions,' Zeoli told me. 'States that have these restrictions see decreases in domestic violence partner homicide compared to states that don't, and that is very frustrating.' Different states are implementing strategies to address intimate partner gun violence. In 2017, Washington became the first state to alert domestic violence survivors when an abuser tries to buy a gun. Other recent efforts have focused on securing financial support for those at risk, like Colorado's voter-approved gun tax to fund services for domestic violence victims. Earlier this year, Illinois passed a law clarifying the surrender process, requiring law enforcement to quickly seize firearms from people with protection orders against them. In Louisiana, even as federal laws have weakened, local leaders are still committed to keeping firearms out of the hands of abusers. Lafourche Parish Sheriff's Lieutenant Valerie Martinez-Jordan spearheaded an innovative firearm divestiture program that has since spread across the deep-red state. (Read my colleague Alma Beauvais's story for more.) These varied approaches are innovative, but as in Ohio, they are not being implemented without challenges. Some of the Trump administration's recent budget cuts have targeted domestic violence services. The actions on the federal level will have residual effects for organizations throughout the country. Still, the state actions show momentum for addressing the relationship between firearm violence and domestic violence. The 10-F form is just one example of recent efforts that are focused on less punitive approaches. Ruden, who has worked in intimate partner violence law since the Domestic Violence Act was enacted in 1979, told me that she looks forward to the day that she's 'out of a job,' but that there's a lot of work left to do. Often, she said, creating policies to counter intimate partner violence is a process that takes two steps back after taking a step forward. Still, these innovations represent hope. 'I am hopeful even now that what we are able to do with this particular piece is to focus on getting law enforcement to ask' about guns when a protection order is served, Ruden said. ''Do you have weapons?' or 'Let me take your weapons.'' SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Deputies seeks owner of malnourished horse found in Maricopa County
The Brief A visibly malnourished horse was found wandering in Maricopa County near 66th Avenue and Ellis Drive. The sheriff's office would like to find its owner so that it can figure out why the horse wasn't receiving proper care. MARICOPA COUNTY, Ariz. - The Maricopa County Sheriff's Office is hoping someone can come forward so it can figure out how a wandering horse ended up in the condition it's in. What we know The brown and white horse was found in a neighborhood near 66th Avenue and Ellis Drive in the south Phoenix area. "The horse is now safe and receiving care, but we need help identifying the owner or how the horse ended up in this condition," the sheriff's office said in a Facebook post on June 12. What we don't know If you have information, contact MCSO at 602-876-TIPS (8477).