
US predators pounce in deals frenzy: Chip designer Alphawave backs £1.8bn bid £3.7bn as Spectris is eyed by Advent
Foreign predators have scooped up two cutting-edge UK-listed firms.
The deals announced yesterday are another blow to the battered prestige of the London Stock Exchange.
Chip designer Alphawave revealed that it had agreed to a £1.8billion takeover by America software giant Qualcomm.
And scientific instruments maker Spectris said it was 'minded to recommend' a £3.7billion approach by US private equity firm Advent.
Each firm is being snapped up at nearly twice its market capitalisation – the latest evidence that the bombed out London market is leaving its listed firms severely undervalued.
Charles Hall, head of research at broker Peel Hunt, said it showed an 'urgent rethink' is needed.
The deals mark the latest setback to the City's ambitions to attract promising growth firms and see them flourish as UK public companies.
Instead, firms are stampeding for the exits as they are taken over or choose to cross the pond themselves in search of higher valuations.
Yesterday's announcements threatened to overshadow efforts by ministers to showcase Britain's attractiveness to cutting edge companies, at the start of London Tech Week – with a starring role at the event for Jensen Huang, the boss of chip giant Nvidia.
Darius McDermott, managing director at research group FundCalibre, said: 'It's a telling contrast – the Prime Minister courts Jensen Huang just as another UK tech success story, Alphawave, is set to be acquired by an American buyer.'
Coming just days after fintech firm Wise said it would switch its listing from London to New York, it was 'another sign of UK public markets' fragility', McDermott added.
The deal also follows the departures to Wall Street in recent months of betting giant Flutter, building materials firm CRH and equipment hire group Ashtead.
Speaking at the start of London Tech Weak, Founders Forum boss Carolyn Dawson said the Wise move should be a 'resounding wake-up call' for the City.
Peel Hunt's Hall said there had been 30 bids for major UK companies so far this year at a total value of £25billion, with Spectris and Alphawave the largest.
At the same time, there had been just one UK initial public offering at a valuation of more than £100million.
'Companies in the UK seem to be far more attractive to acquirers than investors,' Hall said last night.
'The root cause is the consistent outflow of capital from domestic markets.
'If we want UK equity market to thrive, an urgent rethink is required to ensure that UK capital backs UK companies.'
And noting the big premiums of 85 per cent and 96 per cent offered by the buyers of Spectris and Alphawave, Hall added: 'The scale of premiums show how undervalued the UK market is.'
Canada-based Alphawave designs chips for data centres, facilities that physically store data, for example for cloud computing. Alphawave listed in London in 2021 in what was then a coup for the City alongside a series of other UK listings, including Wise.
For buyer Qualcomm, the takeover helps it diversify away from smartphone chips – a market it dominates but where phone makers such as Apple are increasingly opting for in-house processors.
Meanwhile, UK-based Spectris disclosed yesterday that it had received several earlier approaches from Advent, which must make a formal offer by July 7 or walk away, under UK takeover rules.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
NHS, houses, nuclear submarines: Labour sets out its spending plans
The last few weeks have proved difficult for Rachel Reeves. In public, the news has been dominated by Labour's U-turn on the winter fuel allowance. In private, the Treasury has been caught up in wrangle after wrangle with ministers, all negotiating what their departments would receive in the spending review. Reeves' speech to parliament on Wednesday announcing the review was a chance to tell a more positive story – particularly for a government accused of lacking direction and ambition. As economics editor Heather Stewart reports, there were some big winners: health, defence, and housing. Yet at the same time, day-to-day spending for some departments – such as local government or the environment – seems very tight. So, asks Helen Pidd, will Labour allow those services to come under even more pressure, or will Reeves have to eventually raise taxes to fund them too?


Times
an hour ago
- Times
Has remote working opened a global talent pool for businesses?
As competition for skilled staff intensifies, firms can take advantage of a 24/7 workforce across time zones Caption here pls.... Major events in recent years have resulted in more professionals working in a flexible mix of home and office settings, even across borders – but forward-thinking employers have enjoyed the benefits of hybrid setups for much longer. Now, more businesses are beginning to recognise the considerable potential upsides of taking a similar approach, with a borderless workforce. In fields like tech, fintech and creative industries such as gaming – where competition for talent is especially fierce – being able to search in a far larger talent pool from all over the world can make a significant difference when it comes to successful recruitment. Offering the ideal candidate the flexibility to work where they choose also makes them far more likely to say yes. For companies weighing economic pressures and geopolitical uncertainty, a remote workforce can offer a compelling solution to persistent hiring headaches – but there are wider benefits too. With technology powering a round-the-clock business culture, organisations that are able to keep projects moving by handing them off across time zones gain a serious edge over competitors. Productivity doesn't stop at close of play. This is before the additional practical incentives are considered – reduced office costs, regionally adjusted remuneration rates and the ability to have local teams engaging directly with international clients. Secondary factors also come into play. For companies focused on ESG, operating in a more sustainable way through distributed teams can become a meaningful part of their environmental and social impact profile. Of course, managing teams across multiple world regions brings challenges of its own. From embedding a brand's ethos and rolling out consistent working practices, to ensuring full compliance with local tax and employment law, complexity can multiply quickly. One of the fastest-growing HR tech companies in the world, Deel has the expertise to help organisations make this kind of transformation a reality. Deel's intuitive platform cross-references legal frameworks across more than 100 countries, giving businesses everything they need to hire internationally at speed and scale – without the need to set up full operations in each region or wade through regulatory red tape. Instead of hiring local professional employer organisations in every new market, Deel offers businesses a single, legally compliant, tech-led solution. Its Global Payroll platform, for instance, consolidates payroll across multiple countries into one streamlined system – easy to update, monitor and use for data reporting. Valued at $12 billion [£9.4 billion] in its most recent funding round, Deel supports over 35,000 businesses in more than 150 countries. With this extensive global reach, Deel has become a leading voice in international employment trends. Its 2024 report, The State of Global Hiring , offers valuable insights into how and where companies are building cross-border teams. Deel works with startups, scale-ups and larger enterprises alike, providing a single platform to manage everything from onboarding to offboarding – including contracts, tax documentation and global payroll – with efficiency and full compliance. Acting as both legal shield and operational backbone, Deel enables UK companies to build global teams without the friction of international hiring. It's a way to sidestep domestic talent shortages and fill key skill gaps – bringing the future of work within reach today. This a commercial article paid for by our advertising partners Visit to request a free demonstration and see how your business could be transformed


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Three-quarters of parents have bought children beauty products in the last year
Three-quarters of parents have bought their children beauty products in the last year, a survey suggests. Parents have spent £111 on average on items such as lip balms (41%), face moisturisers (39%), and cleansers (37%), according to the poll for cashback and rewards site Rakuten. Other popular items bought for children aged eight to 17 included lip gloss or lipstick (32%), body moisturiser (30%), face masks (28%), skin oil (22%), mascara (22%), makeup remover (21%) and foundation (19%). A typical adult spends £148 on beauty products a year, the study found. Of the 75% of parents who bought beauty products, 41% said they did so to boost their child's confidence, while 24% saw it as a way to bond with their children. Fathers were more willing to spend on their children's beauty regimes, buying £144 worth of items per year compared with the average £82 paid for by mothers. Bola Sol, from Rakuten, said: 'With skincare and make-up routines and trends taking over social media, it's no surprise that younger children are asking for more luxurious beauty products. 'All parents want to make their kids happy, but it's also important to balance that with your budget. A great way to do this is by tracking products for when they go on sale, and where possible, bag even more savings by using a cashback provider such as Rakuten to make the purchase through.' OnePoll surveyed 1,000 UK parents with children aged eight to 17 between May 28 and June 15.