US predators pounce in deals frenzy: Chip designer Alphawave backs £1.8bn bid £3.7bn as Spectris is eyed by Advent
Foreign predators have scooped up two cutting-edge UK-listed firms.
The deals announced yesterday are another blow to the battered prestige of the London Stock Exchange.
Chip designer Alphawave revealed that it had agreed to a £1.8billion takeover by America software giant Qualcomm.
And scientific instruments maker Spectris said it was 'minded to recommend' a £3.7billion approach by US private equity firm Advent.
Each firm is being snapped up at nearly twice its market capitalisation – the latest evidence that the bombed out London market is leaving its listed firms severely undervalued.
Charles Hall, head of research at broker Peel Hunt, said it showed an 'urgent rethink' is needed.
The deals mark the latest setback to the City's ambitions to attract promising growth firms and see them flourish as UK public companies.
Instead, firms are stampeding for the exits as they are taken over or choose to cross the pond themselves in search of higher valuations.
Yesterday's announcements threatened to overshadow efforts by ministers to showcase Britain's attractiveness to cutting edge companies, at the start of London Tech Week – with a starring role at the event for Jensen Huang, the boss of chip giant Nvidia.
Darius McDermott, managing director at research group FundCalibre, said: 'It's a telling contrast – the Prime Minister courts Jensen Huang just as another UK tech success story, Alphawave, is set to be acquired by an American buyer.'
Coming just days after fintech firm Wise said it would switch its listing from London to New York, it was 'another sign of UK public markets' fragility', McDermott added.
The deal also follows the departures to Wall Street in recent months of betting giant Flutter, building materials firm CRH and equipment hire group Ashtead.
Speaking at the start of London Tech Weak, Founders Forum boss Carolyn Dawson said the Wise move should be a 'resounding wake-up call' for the City.
Peel Hunt's Hall said there had been 30 bids for major UK companies so far this year at a total value of £25billion, with Spectris and Alphawave the largest.
At the same time, there had been just one UK initial public offering at a valuation of more than £100million.
'Companies in the UK seem to be far more attractive to acquirers than investors,' Hall said last night.
'The root cause is the consistent outflow of capital from domestic markets.
'If we want UK equity market to thrive, an urgent rethink is required to ensure that UK capital backs UK companies.'
And noting the big premiums of 85 per cent and 96 per cent offered by the buyers of Spectris and Alphawave, Hall added: 'The scale of premiums show how undervalued the UK market is.'
Canada-based Alphawave designs chips for data centres, facilities that physically store data, for example for cloud computing. Alphawave listed in London in 2021 in what was then a coup for the City alongside a series of other UK listings, including Wise.
For buyer Qualcomm, the takeover helps it diversify away from smartphone chips – a market it dominates but where phone makers such as Apple are increasingly opting for in-house processors.
Meanwhile, UK-based Spectris disclosed yesterday that it had received several earlier approaches from Advent, which must make a formal offer by July 7 or walk away, under UK takeover rules.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
21 minutes ago
- Sky News
Spending review 2025: Cutting agricultural budget could be 'catastrophic' for nature, farmers and charities warn
The National Trust and RSPB have joined forces with farmers to warn the government that cutting the agricultural budget could be "catastrophic" for nature and rural businesses. In a letter to food security and rural affairs minister Daniel Zeichner, exclusively seen by Sky News, a dozen of the biggest rural industry organisations say they are "deeply concerned" about rumoured cuts that will be made to the agricultural budget in Wednesday's spending review. Chancellor Rachel Reeves will set out budgets for each government department for the rest of this parliament, set to end in 2029. The letter says cutting funding for existing and new environmental farming schemes will be "catastrophic" to the government's aims for the environment. "Many of the environmental features present in the countryside and enjoyed by the public will be under threat and will disappear," the letter says. "This would be a poor legacy for this government." Sir Keir Starmer's government has made getting to net zero by 2050 a key goal, already initiating several policies to restrict carbon emissions and make the UK greener since winning the election last July. However, the government shocked farmers in March when it shut down applications for the Sustainable Farming Incentive (SFI), which rewards farmers for managing their land in environmentally sustainable ways, with just a few hours' notice as they said a cap had been reached for the year. The rural organisations say the Environmental Land Management (ELM) scheme payments are "critical to the government's statutory targets on environmental improvement", including the main goal of halting the decline of biodiversity. 3:26 The letter states farmers and landowners are fully committed to environmental schemes, with 77,000 live agri-environment scheme agreements, according to the latest government figures, "with millions of hectares under environmental land management". "So much good has been done by these agreements, the oldest of which has run for decades," the letter says. "The unprecedented engagement in the Sustainable Farming Incentive (SFI) is testament to the appetite of farmers and land managers to rise to the challenge and do more." The letter finishes with: "The industry would like to have your assurances that this critical work will continue to be funded at the same level." David Wilson, a farmer for 53 years, told Sky News it took many years for farmers to get on board with the environmental schemes but they are now joined up, and reducing funding could damage years of work and be a backwards step for not just the UK's environment, but the world's. "This is ultimately about sustainability. To produce good food, you need good ecology and reducing this funding could damage the UK's ecology and our food security," he added. A return to intensive farming Alex Robinson, 39, a farmer from Gloucestershire with 424 hectares, said the schemes have been "a lifeline for nature", with birds, bees and wildflowers returning - including 14 red-listed bird species, many that had not been seen in decades. His farm's soil health is improving, which means he can grow more resilient nutrient dense crops for people to eat. If funding is cut he said he "may have no choice but to return to intensive farming methods sooner than the soils are ready for", with wildflowers and field margins becoming "difficult to justify", which will put the UK's climate, biodiversity and long-term food security "in real danger". Government will be abandoning nature Signatory Victoria Vyvyan, farmer and president of the Country Land and Business Association (CLA), said: "If sustainable farming contracts are cut, government won't just abandon nature - it will abandon its own environmental and legal commitments. "The Sustainable Farming Incentive is working - for farmers, for nature, for the public, and for the Treasury. It's bringing back wildlife, cleaning up rivers, and restoring the health of our soil. "Take away the funding for nature contracts, and farmers will be pushed back to intensive methods - forced to undo years of progress. Nature will suffer as well as farmers, and on the environment, it will go against everything government claims to agree with." The letter has been signed by the heads of The National Trust, the National Farmers' Union (NFU), the RSPB, the Soil Association, the CLA, the Tenant Farmers Association, the Game and Wildlife Conservation Trust, the Nature Friendly Farming Network, the Central Association of Agricultural Valuers, the National Federation of Young Farmers' Clubs, the British Institute of Agricultural Consultants and the Agricultural Industries Confederation.
The Independent
33 minutes ago
- The Independent
Legal aid lawyers face chaos following cyber attack, says representative body
Legal aid lawyers are facing 'administrative chaos' in the aftermath of a cyber attack amid fears more providers will leave the sector, a representative body has said. The Legal Aid Agency's (LAA) digital services, which are used by legal aid providers to log their work and get paid by the Government, were taken offline following the data breach in April. Payments for the publicly funded work initially stopped and legal aid applications are not able to be formally granted at the moment. This has left legal aid law firms, often small businesses, to decide whether to take on the risk of cases and hope they will be approved and paid retrospectively. Chris Minnoch, chief executive of Legal Aid Practitioners Group (LAPG), said that lawyers have called the representative body 'in tears' having 'sleepless nights' waiting on news and payments coming through from legal aid because of the cyber attack. 'They've been on the verge of collapse because they hadn't had payments for one or two weeks,' he told the PA news agency. 'What a cyber attack like this brings to the front of your mind is that the legal aid scheme is teetering on the precipice of collapse. 'If it goes and if lawyers just say, 'I can't do this anymore', it has profound consequences for almost every aspect of society, because we are talking about the law of everyday life.' Those eligible to apply for legal aid include domestic violence and modern slavery victims, people involved in care proceedings or at risk of homelessness, as well as people accused of criminal offences. The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) previously said a 'significant amount of personal data' of people who applied to the LAA since 2010, including criminal records, was accessed and downloaded in the cyber attack. The Government became aware of the hack on April 23, but realised on May 16 that it was more extensive than originally thought, and took the system offline. Mr Minnoch said it was 'unforgivable' for an organisation of that size to not have a business continuity plan that anticipated this sort of fallout. 'You'll have a number of providers that, by the end of this digital disaster we're dealing with, won't be there anymore because they just couldn't afford to, and a number of others that just say, 'I just I can't take this anymore',' he said. 'Every time there is some sort of crisis that befalls the legal aid scheme, you end up with fewer lawyers willing to do it at the end of it.' An MoJ source had put the breach down to the 'neglect and mismanagement' of the previous government, saying vulnerabilities in the LAA's systems have been known for many years. The attack happened as the MoJ was working on replacing the internal system with a new version hoped to be up and running in the coming weeks. At the end of May, the LAA brought in a scheme for civil legal aid providers to be able to receive payments based on their average billing until the system is back online, when lawyers will then submit specific bills and applications. On June 4, payments were sent to more than 1,700 solicitors and barristers who took up the offer. Payments for criminal legal aid cases separately have also resumed, the MoJ said. Mr Minnoch added that while the civil legal aid payments should have been done two weeks earlier, they were an important step forward, effectively loaning providers cash while they cannot claim money owed to them. 'I think one of the ways they need to mitigate this is by being as flexible as possible with providers, once the situation is restored to some sort of business as usual, because they're going to be punch drunk by the end of this, they're already punch drunk,' he said. There are also concerns the move will create a backlog of providers trying to push through all their cases that need to be claimed in a short period of time when the system is back up and running, to effectively gain the income to repay the loan as quickly as possible. Jenny Beck KC, co-chair of the LAPG, said: 'There's administrative chaos in an already beleaguered and fragile supplier base. 'Nobody does it because it's a very sensible business proposition. People do it because they genuinely care about vulnerable people and they want to help them.' Ms Beck, who runs a family law practice, said her firm's workload is 60% legal aid work helping extremely vulnerable people such as domestic abuse survivors who need protection orders. She told PA a 'good proportion' of clients are reliant on legal aid to access their rights which is a 'massive access to justice issue'. Of the legal aid work, Ms Beck, who is also a member of the Law Society's access to justice committee, added: 'We'll have to supplement it with private income sources, because it's anxiety provoking to be working at risk on cases that we haven't an absolute guarantee that we're going to be paid.' 'I am going to continue to work at risk because I cannot leave my clients vulnerable. 'But I know that many other firms are very concerned about taking that risk.' Nicola Jones-King, Law Society council member for legal aid, said that while taking the risk for certain types of cases is 'okay' when it is known legal aid will be granted, there is more concern for means and merit tested applications for legal aid such as in housing or cases against police action. 'If it's a slightly more challenging or unusual case, or it's a case where you need to assess merits and means, that's more problematic obviously for the solicitor to take that on that risk,' she said. The risk also applies in cases that already have legal aid granted, but then need further approval to continue the funding at different stages in the proceedings. Stuart Nolan, managing director at DPP Law Ltd and chairman of the Law Society's criminal law committee, said his firm's criminal law department is made up of about 95% of legal aid cases and could sustain the current situation 'at a cost' for a couple of months before feeling the pinch. 'The impact is so far reaching, clogged criminal justice system, this is prospect of more delays,' he said. 'The quicker it's sorted out, the better for everyone.' A Ministry of Justice spokesperson said: 'We understand the challenges this situation presents for legal aid providers – we are working as fast as possible to restore our online systems and have put in place contingencies to allow legal aid work to continue safely with confidence. 'These measures include setting up an average payment scheme for civil legal aid cases, resuming payments on criminal legal aid cases, putting in place processes for urgent civil application approvals and confirming that criminal applications made in this time will be backdated.'
Finextra
40 minutes ago
- Finextra
Barclays to roll out Microsoft Co-Pilot to 100,000 staff
Barclays Bank is to extend its delivery of Microsoft Co-Pilot AI agents to 100,000 staff worldwide. 0 Microsoft 365 Copilot will be integrated into the bank's own staff productivity tool, creating a single agent for employee self-service such as booking business travel, checking policy compliance, or finding answers to HR-related questions. An agentic dashboard accessed by Microsoft Viva will be deployed to help staff with 'moments that matter', like booking desks or annual leave, as well as serving personalised news and announcements. Craig Bright, Group CIO and deputy Group co-chief operating officer, Barclays, says: 'At Barclays, we've been leveraging the power of AI, and now GenAI, to drive deeper insights, improve efficiency and create more intuitive experience across the organisation. 'Our roll-out of Copilot, integrated with our colleague productivity tool, is a significant step forward in simplifying the way we work, making it easier to get things done." The agreement follows a successful initial deployment of Microsoft 365 Copilot across 15,000 Barclays employees and builds on the bank's adoption of Microsoft Teams as its preferred collaboration platform, and the deployment of Microsoft Viva Engage as its employee community tool.
