logo
Jagdeep Dhankhar's abrupt exit says three things about the Modi govt

Jagdeep Dhankhar's abrupt exit says three things about the Modi govt

The Print3 days ago
Any doubts about the circumstances of his exit were removed when Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who is notably prompt and polite on social media, did not post an affectionate goodbye message on X when Dhankhar announced his resignation. In fact, Modi waited till the following day before posting an unusually cool message. Noting that Dhankhar had had many opportunities to serve the country, the Prime Minister wished him good health. An unkind observer might summarise the post as saying 'you got lots of good jobs; now run along'.
It's clear that Dhankhar did not leave happily. And that ill-health was not the primary reason for his sudden departure. He was either pushed or he jumped just before he could be pushed. The sequence of events makes this clear. At 5:30 pm, his office was releasing details of his programme for the days ahead. In a matter of hours after that, he suddenly resigned.
Yes, it's okay to feel bad for Jagdeep Dhankhar, no matter what your views are on his performance as Chairman of the Rajya Sabha or as Governor of West Bengal before that. No Vice President of India deserves to end his tenure in this strange and abrupt way. It diminishes a senior constitutional office, which is never good for Indian democracy.
What does Dhankhar's departure tell us about this government and how it functions?
Well, I reckon it tells us three things.
Disruptor of plans
The first is that Dhankhar clearly committed some cardinal sin—at least in the Prime Minister's eyes. Judging by the organised leaks that have followed his exit, it may have had something to do with the effort to impeach Justice Yashwant Varma, from whose home a large amount of cash was allegedly recovered. As the judge has refused to resign, impeachment proceedings were the logical next step. The Opposition submitted a notice for the removal of Justice Varma and Dhankhar, as the Chairman of the Rajya Sabha, accepted it.
This seems fairly unexceptionable——except that, according to the leaks, by accepting the Opposition notice, Dhankhar disrupted one of the government's best-laid plans. The plan had been for the government to move against the judge and to use his example to launch a broader attack on the judiciary. By letting the Opposition take the first step, Dhankhar disrupted this scheme. And, as per the leaks, someone in authority reportedly called Dhankhar that evening and berated him. Angry words were exchanged, and Dhankhar was either told to quit or put in a position where he had no other choice.
Though this version of events has been systemically circulated, I find it hard to believe. The only two people who could berate the Vice President of India are the people Dhankhar has spent a decade pleasing. Given his behaviour in the recent past, it seems unlikely that he would get angry with them for berating him. He is more likely to have grovelled and said sorry.
Moreover, would anyone as powerful as our country's top leaders be so agitated over a relatively minor issue that they would force the Vice President of India out of office? It just doesn't add up. Stranger things have happened in politics, but it's hard to shake the feeling that there was more to Dhankhar's exit.
The second lesson from this episode is that no matter how hard you try to please the powers that be, your position is never secure. I know and like Dhankhar—who, contrary to his public image, is actually a sharp and amiable fellow. He's able to laugh at himself and has friends across the political spectrum. Despite the caricature, he is not a humourless Hindutva stormtrooper. He was part of the Chandrashekhar government, later joined the Congress, and only came to the BJP in 2003 when he was in his 50s.
The reason he got so far in the Modi era was that he was willing to function as an effective hatchet man for the government. Sent to West Bengal as Governor to create problems for Mamata Banerjee, he performed with admirable zeal, regularly getting into tussles with the state government and throwing obstacles in its way.
Most Governors restrain themselves in their public utterances, believing it is improper to criticise the state government or to attack the Chief Minister. Dhankhar saw no need for that. Not only was he vocal about what he regarded as Mamata's failings, but he had no hesitation in travelling around the country to tell people how badly the state was being governed and how unreasonable Mamata was being with him.
I once chaired a panel in Mumbai where Dhankhar and Shashi Tharoor were guests. Both Tharoor and I were a little startled by how eager Dhankhar was to rip into Mamata. But because he can be sharp and witty, he pulled it off—dismissing our efforts to suggest he was breaking with the convention that a Governor should rise above politics.
In election after election, the BJP has failed to stop the Trinamool Congress. Dhankhar remained the source of its only successful attempts to needle or deter Mamata. That is probably why Modi made Dhankhar Vice President.
Till Dhankhar came along, most of us saw the Vice President's role as largely ceremonial. But his tenure was a reminder that the real importance of the office lies in the role of Rajya Sabha Chairman.
Once again, Dhankhar did for Modi what he had first done in the Kolkata Raj Bhavan—picking fights with MPs (including a famous exchange with Jaya Bachchan), being unperturbed by allegations that he was biased toward the central government, and breaking with precedent by launching frontal attacks on institutions like the judiciary.
I thought that he had performed even better than Modi could have expected, risking his own reputation and stature while cheerfully trampling over all conventions and standards of propriety for the sake of the government.
And yet, here we are today. A guy who spent a decade as the government's hitman is suddenly out, and the Prime Minister does not seem at all sorry to see him go.
Also read: Report leak, global headlines pinned Air India crash on dead pilots. But nothing adds up
India's most opaque government
There is a third lesson from Dhankhar's exit; one that we should all have learned by now. When it comes to what is really going on in this government, nobody knows anything.
While the search for a Vice Presidential nominee was in progress, political observers and commentators came up with lists of potential candidates. I don't think Dhankhar's name even featured on most of those lists. And even if it did, he was never a front-runner. Most journalists kept looking for potential future Presidential candidates or focusing on identity politics. (As in: which community does the government want to please?) Few people worked out that Narendra Modi had made a shrewd calculation: the job is about managing the Rajya Sabha, so let's find a hatchet man who can do that.
It has been the same with Dhankhar's departure. No commentator had noticed that Modi had tired of him or figured out what the Vice President had done to displease his masters. All the theories now doing the rounds are post-facto attempts to find explanations that fit the facts, and frankly, none of them is entirely convincing.
Narendra Modi is the only Prime Minister in Indian history to run a government that is so opaque that nobody knows what is really going on or what will happen next. There are no unwitting leaks, and even now, after he has been in office for over a decade, nor does any political commentator have enough insight into how the Prime Minister's mind works. Predictions about cabinet reshuffles are always wrong. Every nominee to a constitutional post is always a surprise. And everyone struggles to find explanations after events have passed us by.
Perhaps one day we will find out what Dhankhar did wrong and why he was forced out. Till then, I will feel a little sorry for him. He tried so hard to please his political masters by throwing all conventions to the wind. But somehow, even that was not enough for the powers that be.
Vir Sanghvi is a print and television journalist, and talk show host. He tweets @virsanghvi. Views are personal.
(Edited by Ratan Priya)
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

UK deal ‘gold standard' for FTAs; will retaliate if UK CBAM hurts India's interest: Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal
UK deal ‘gold standard' for FTAs; will retaliate if UK CBAM hurts India's interest: Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal

Indian Express

time22 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

UK deal ‘gold standard' for FTAs; will retaliate if UK CBAM hurts India's interest: Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal

Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal on Saturday said the India-UK trade deal can serve as a gold standard for India's trade negotiations with other partners, as it opens India's doors for business while protecting sensitive sectors. He added that India will retaliate if the UK's carbon tax, set to come into effect on January 1, 2027, harms India's interests. 'Our effort is that the Indian industry gets preferential access over our competition, and I think this [UK FTA] can become a gold standard to ensure that India protects its sensitive sectors and opens the doors, particularly in highly labour-intensive sectors, and allows high-quality goods, technology and other products to come to India,' the minister said at a press briefing here. Goyal said most of India's free trade agreements (FTAs) are with countries that do not compete with India on anything, and that under the deal, the UK will be sending products which are in short supply in India. 'In every respect, this is an agreement which opens far greater opportunities for India than any other agreement,' the minister said. On concerns that the UK's Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) could negate the tariff concessions India has received under the trade deal, Goyal said: 'Currently there is no CBAM in effect. So it cannot be addressed in the FTA. But India is a sovereign country, and if our export interests are hurt, we will react and retaliate, or 'rebalance'. I can assure everyone that no unilateral measure will go away without a proportionate response,' he said. 'There is a lot of opposition to CBAM in the EU as well, as the EU's cost of manufacturing and housing will become costlier, and so the sufferer will be the industry in the EU,' Goyal reiterated. A government official had said that India and the UK have arrived at a diplomatic understanding on CBAM, and that India will 'rebalance' the negative effect of CBAM by taking countermeasures. It has communicated its concern over CBAM in a 'note verbale'. However, the rebalancing measure is not part of the legal text, which has raised concerns over India's ability to address the CBAM issue legally. The Indian Express had reported on May 6 that CBAM was a major point of contention between the two countries and had been holding up the agreement. India had proposed a 'rebalancing mechanism' provision within the deal which would require the UK to compensate Indian industry for losses incurred due to the regulation. The paper reported that the 'rebalancing mechanism' article had been inserted into the 'general exceptions' chapter of the negotiating text between the two countries. This would have enabled India to claim compensation for its losses and ensure the UK does not raise a dispute against India at the World Trade Organisation (WTO). However, the UK likely did not agree to the same. Goyal said India and the UK plan to address the issue of critical minerals together, stating that 'concentration of certain supply chains in certain geographies' is a common problem, and both countries plan to work jointly on this. The India-UK Vision 2035, a document outlining the broader collaborative goals of the free trade agreement between the two, stated that both countries will work together to develop cutting-edge technology and research, building on the Technology Security Initiative. This will focus on future telecoms, artificial intelligence and critical minerals, laying the ground for future collaboration on semiconductors, quantum, biotechnology and advanced materials. To further cooperation in critical minerals, the two countries will also establish a UK-India Critical Minerals Guild to 'transform financing standards and innovation', according to a joint statement by the two. India has protected all sensitive sectors, including dairy, rice and sugar, in the free trade agreement with the UK, Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal said on Saturday. The pact will help boost exports of labour-intensive products like footwear, textiles, and gems and jewellery, he added. 'We have protected all the sensitive sectors of India… we have not opened those areas for the UK… Zero compromise and extensive benefits make it a phenomenal free trade agreement (FTA),' Goyal said. Ravi Dutta Mishra is a Principal Correspondent with The Indian Express, covering policy issues related to trade, commerce, and banking. He has over five years of experience and has previously worked with Mint, CNBC-TV18, and other news outlets. ... Read More

PM Modi wraps up Maldives visit with diplomatic outreach, attends Independence Day celebrations
PM Modi wraps up Maldives visit with diplomatic outreach, attends Independence Day celebrations

New Indian Express

time22 minutes ago

  • New Indian Express

PM Modi wraps up Maldives visit with diplomatic outreach, attends Independence Day celebrations

Muizzu, who came to power in 2023 amid calls to reduce India's footprint, struck a very positive tone throughout the visit. 'India has long stood as the Maldives' closest and most trusted partner,' he said. 'Our collaboration spans a wide range of areas, from security and trade to healthcare, education, and beyond touching the everyday lives of our citizens… In pursuing our national goals, India's partnership remains invaluable.' In a significant move, Modi held a 'meaningful' interaction with leaders from various Maldivian political parties. 'The participation of leaders across the political spectrum underscores the bipartisan support for the strong and time-tested India-Maldives friendship,' he said. The Prime Minister also met former President Mohamed Nasheed and engaged with the Indian community, saying, 'The Indian diaspora continues to be one of the strongest bridges between India and the world. We are very proud of our diaspora.' The visit also saw Modi meet with Vice President Uz Hussain Mohamed Latheef, who said it was 'an honour' to call on the Indian Prime Minister. 'As this year marks 60 years of formal diplomatic relations with India, the Prime Minister and I reflected on the journey of friendship and reciprocal support our countries have undertaken. I hope that the strong cooperation with India continues to grow and strengthen,' Latheef said. Modi also met Speaker of the People's Majlis Abdul Raheem Abdulla and welcomed the formation of the India-Maldives Parliamentary Friendship Group. 'India remains committed to supporting capacity building in the Maldives,' he said.

Closely monitoring situation: India on Thailand-Cambodia clashes
Closely monitoring situation: India on Thailand-Cambodia clashes

The Hindu

time22 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

Closely monitoring situation: India on Thailand-Cambodia clashes

As military clashes between Thailand and Cambodia continued, India on Saturday (July 26, 2025) said it is closely monitoring the unfolding situation and hoped for cessation of hostilities. At least 32 people have been killed and nearly 1,50,000 displaced in the border clashes between the two Southeast Asian countries that erupted on Thursday (July 24, 2025). In its reaction to the conflict, the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) advised Indian travellers in the region to contact the respective embassies in the two countries for any assistance. Our response to media queries regarding the developments between Thailand and Cambodia ⬇️ 🔗 — Randhir Jaiswal (@MEAIndia) July 26, 2025 "We are closely monitoring the situation along the border between Cambodia and Thailand," MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said. "India has close and friendly relations with both countries and hopes that both sides will take measures for a cessation of hostilities and prevention of further escalation," he said. The Indian embassies in Thailand and Cambodia have already issued separate advisories for Indian travellers. The Indian mission in the Thai capital urged all Indian travellers to check updates from authorities in the country before visiting tourist attractions in troubled areas. It called on Indians to avoid travelling to seven provinces as suggested by the Tourism Authority of Thailand. Thailand is a popular destination for Indian tourists. In 2024, around 2.1 million Indian tourists visited the country. The Indian embassy in Phnom Penh also advised Indian citizens in Cambodia to avoid travelling to border areas. "In view of the ongoing clashes at the Cambodia-Thailand border, Indian nationals are advised to avoid travelling to the border areas," it said in a post on social media.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store