logo
Conservationists, Yukon First Nation say decision on Whitehorse dam could help salmon

Conservationists, Yukon First Nation say decision on Whitehorse dam could help salmon

CBC17-04-2025

Some Yukoners say there's a lot the territorial and federal governments have done right with a recent decision of theirs on the Whitehorse dam.
Earlier this month, the governments waved the project through and onto the licensing phase — which is in the purview of the Yukon Water Board — but subject to a raft of new provisions, many of which deal with salmon, First Nations' land use and, connected to those, vested rights. The board is responsible for issuing water licences.
And it's those changes that some take as a sign of progress — correcting what the Yukon Environmental and Socio-economic Assessment Board either missed or fell short of in its evaluation of the project.
Yukon Energy has been working to relicense the dam for some time. The company is seeking a 20-year licence from the regulator. It initally proposed a 25-year licence, but that changed when Yukon Energy and Premier Ranj Pillai, Kwanlin Dün First Nation and Ta'an Kwäch'än Council signed an agreement for a 20-year term instead. Carcross/Tagish First Nation did not sign that agreement.
"Hopefully this will be a turning point for the facility and things can be done better going into this new license, whatever length that might be," said Catherine Ford-Lammers, a Carcross/Tagish First Nation citizen and the nation's lead on the file.
"I think the evaluation report, when it came out, was definitely lacking those hard concrete mitigations. It was a bit disappointing," Ford-Lammers said.
"Hopefully, all the parties can come together and I guess agree on the best mitigations regardless of costs or any of that sort of engineering plans and just really help to bring those salmon back."
Among other things, the governments are requiring Yukon Energy to immediately improve fish passage — including downstream passage — to reduce fish getting sucked into, for example, the turbines and killed until long-term plans are in place. Otherwise, they are calling on the company to develop a Traditional Knowledge framework and to create an annual monitoring program to determine fish passage and mortality rates.
Elizabeth MacDonald, vice chair of the Yukon Salmon Sub-committee, said the decision could help lead to fewer salmon killed by the dam.
As reported by CBC News, roughly one-third of year-old wild smolts swimming through the dam could be killed.
"If Yukon Energy can alter the way the turbines are operated or put exclusions in for juvenile fish or give them another route that's safer, then we could decrease that mortality -- the less deaths, the more that are gonna survive, which is better for the population," MacDonald said.
Asked whether there are any shortcomings with the decision, MacDonald said impacts of the hatchery on wild salmon aren't spelled out. That's an issue the sub-committee advocated to have included in the project assessment.
"And the hatchery has helped maintain the population, but maybe hasn't kept them as wild as we'd like to see," she said, noting that wild fish are more adapted to their environments.
"There's a lot of evidence around decreased success of the offspring, but also maybe smaller fish," MacDonald said. "We wanted to try and avoid those. And one way to do that is by decreasing the hatchery involvement in the program."
Sebastian Jones, wildlife analyst with the Yukon Conservation Society, said decision bodies usually water down assessments. In this case, the reverse is true, he said.
Jones credits the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) with remaining unmoveable during a crucial time for the salmon.
"I am pleased that the federal decision body, primarily DFO, was not swayed by local political considerations and stood up for salmon and its habitat," Jones said in an email.
In August, Kwanlin Dün First Nation and Ta'an Kwäch'än Council endorsed a long-term licence, saying in a letter the needs for electricity are too great to delay.
Jones told CBC News recently the project should have been assessed by, if not the executive committee, a panel review, owing to the complexity of the project and vast implications.
Yukon Energy seeks stopgap
Yukon Energy's current operating licence expires May 31. With that, the company is up against the clock and in the middle of a regulatory process far outside of its control.
That's why it's applied for a 60-day licence — a stopgap, in a bid to keep the dam running and your lights on.
In its application, it appears Yukon Energy doubts the long-term licence will be relicensed in time.
The company says the 60-day licence would ensure operations won't be disrupted, while freeing up more time to address outstanding concerns.
If approved by the water board, Yukon Energy would be allowed to run the dam from June 1st to July 30th. The application doesn't deviate from the way the company currently operates the dam.
"No such renewable alternative is available in the Yukon, and in the near term, existing capacity would need to be replaced with new thermal generation capacity to maintain dependable winter supply, which would take about two years to assess and permit," the application states.
Yukon Energy presents a hypothetical scenario where the dam is taken offline and replaced with fossil fuel plants. The application states in this instance greenhouse gas emissions would greatly impact the territory's climate change goals — that is reducing emissions by 45 per cent by the end of the decade. Emissions would increase by 192 kilotonnes of CO2 per year, equivalent to a 30 per cent increase over the territory's total emissions in 2020, the application states.
Ford-Lammers calls the prospect of a short-term licence disappointing and a double standard.
"We've been saying throughout this whole process for the past three years that they should be seeking a short term licence," she said.
The Carcross/Tagish First Nation wants to see no longer than a 10-year licence granted by the regulator.
Ford-Lammers said this would ensure safeguards for salmon are quickly delivered.
"This time that we're in with climate change and so many unknowns. It just doesn't seem that we should be going with long term water use licenses anymore," Ford-Lammers said.
The Yukon Water Board has launched a public engagement period on the relicensing project. That process closes on May 16.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Public divided on Bill 5 but say Indigenous rights are more important than speed: poll
Public divided on Bill 5 but say Indigenous rights are more important than speed: poll

Global News

time2 hours ago

  • Global News

Public divided on Bill 5 but say Indigenous rights are more important than speed: poll

Public sentiment is divided on the Ford government's controversial new mining law, according to fresh polling, which indicates people are in favour of speeding up projects but not at the expense of First Nation rights or labour laws. New polling from Liason Strategies for the National Ethnic Press and Media Council of Canada gauged the mood of Ontarians as the government passed Bill 5 into law. The legislation makes a number of changes, among them is the power for the government to create so-called special economic zones, where municipal, environmental or labour laws could be bypassed. The government has indicated the Ring of Fire will be one such area, potentially along with Highway 401 and Ontario's fleet of nuclear power stations. The law's passage at Queen's Park last week sparked a storm of protests and backlash from First Nations leaders, who fear it will infringe on their rights and labour unions, who worry about workers' rights. Story continues below advertisement First Nations groups, in particular, have promised a summer of disruption in response to the legislation — potentially blocking railways, highways and mines in the north. Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy Liaison's polling shows public opinion on the legislation itself is evenly split. About half of those polled (49 per cent) said they were following the legislation somewhat or very closely as it passed through the legislature. Opinion of its value was also split. Forty-four per cent of those polled said they were in favour of it, while 41 per cent said they were opposed. Fifteen per cent of people said they were unsure. 'Given the poll's margin of error, this is a pretty close result,' David Valentin, principal at Liason Strategies, said in an interview on Focus Ontario. 'It's not probably where the premier wants to see it, which is somewhere closer to 60 or 65 per cent, but it's also not where the opposition would like to see it, with overwhelming opposition. So, we've got a sort of mixed result.' The poll also asked people to rank various issues against the importance of fast-tracking key construction projects. Sixty-three per cent of respondents said fast-tracking was more important than municipal bylaws, and 58 per cent favoured speeding up projects over following environmental regulations. Story continues below advertisement On the other hand, 64 per cent of people said respecting Indigenous rights was more important than speeding up projects, and 56 per cent of those polled said it was more important to follow labour laws than to speed up projects. The polling points to public opinion sitting behind two groups who have been most vocal in their opposition to Bill 5. 'It shows you that when it comes to Indigenous leaders and labour leaders, they've gotten their message out, their message has resonated, and Ontarians agree with them: Yeah, you can speed up the process, but you're not going to suspend labour laws,' Valentin said. Last week, Bill 5 received Royal Assent and became law, with Ontario Premier Doug Ford saying he wants to designate the Ring of Fire as a special economic zone 'as quickly as possible.' At the same time, the government is promising to consult with First Nations leaders before any major changes are made using the new powers. Valentin said the lack of examples for what a special economic zone will be was potentially making it harder for people to form a strong opinion in favour or against the legislation. 'What does it actually mean? Which regulations, which laws are going to be suspended? Which groups are ultimately going to be impacted?' he said. 'They've written the law so they can do a lot of things — OK, what are the specifics of that going to be? I think that might be why people perhaps have a hard time understanding what the ultimate effects of the bill are.'

Two First Nations working on roads to Ring of Fire don't support new mining law
Two First Nations working on roads to Ring of Fire don't support new mining law

Toronto Sun

time4 hours ago

  • Toronto Sun

Two First Nations working on roads to Ring of Fire don't support new mining law

Bill 5 seeks to speed up development, particularly mining projects Published Jun 09, 2025 • 1 minute read Two First Nations in and around the Ring of Fire that signed deals with the provincial government are speaking out against a new Ontario law. Aroland First Nation Chief Sonny Gagnon says his community objects to the law known as Bill 5, which seeks to speed up development, particularly mining projects. The legislation passed last week allows Ontario to suspend provincial and municipal laws by creating so-called special economic zones for certain projects it chooses. Ontario intends to name the mineral-rich Ring of Fire as the first such zone, but the law has created a firestorm of anger among many First Nations. Aroland signed a shared-prosperity agreement with the province in January for major upgrades to roads that lead to the Ring of Fire, but Gagnon says they have never given consent to mine the region. Marten Falls First Nation also has an agreement with the province as it leads the development of another proposed road to the area, and its chief says he cannot support the law as it is written _ though he hopes Ontario can correct course with consultation. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account Canada Sunshine Girls World Golf Editorial Cartoons

Two First Nations working on roads to Ring of Fire do not support new mining law
Two First Nations working on roads to Ring of Fire do not support new mining law

Global News

time4 hours ago

  • Global News

Two First Nations working on roads to Ring of Fire do not support new mining law

Two First Nations in and around the Ring of Fire that signed deals with the provincial government are speaking out against a new Ontario law. Aroland First Nation Chief Sonny Gagnon says his community objects to the law known as Bill 5, which seeks to speed up development, particularly mining projects. The legislation passed last week allows Ontario to suspend provincial and municipal laws by creating so-called special economic zones for certain projects it chooses. Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy Ontario intends to name the mineral-rich Ring of Fire as the first such zone, but the law has created a firestorm of anger among many First Nations. Aroland signed a shared-prosperity agreement with the province in January for major upgrades to roads that lead to the Ring of Fire, but Gagnon says they have never given consent to mine the region. Story continues below advertisement Marten Falls First Nation also has an agreement with the province as it leads the development of another proposed road to the area, and its chief says he cannot support the law as it is written — though he hopes Ontario can correct course with consultation.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store