ACT Runs Tasman Candidates, But Ex-MP Goes Independent In Nelson
In Tasman, Daniel Shirley was hoping to be elected in the Richmond Ward while Dave Ross was running for the Motueka Ward, both as part of the ACT Local campaign.
Shirley said he has worked on local orchards, established ATM and aged-care businesses in Australia, before settling in Tasman around 11 years ago where he has worked in construction and engaged in cryptocurrencies.
He said he had been considering running for council as an independent but had been drawn to ACT after the party announced the campaign, despite acknowledging that he was not a traditional supporter of the party.
'I think it's the best opportunity in a long time to make a difference for the community,' Shirley said.
'The problems are getting bigger, the costs are getting higher, and I don't want to be the first generation that leaves our town worse off for our kids than we've had it before.'
ACT Local offered candidates 'a fair bit of support', a benefit for someone who would be a first-term councillor without political experience, he added.
'It gives me a bit more encouragement to stand behind my convictions… I don't feel like I'm just standing there by myself.'
Ross echoed similar sentiments, acknowledging that he knew 'absolutely nothing' about local government but said ACT Local would provide 'some back-up'.
He decided to run because he said he had seen a 'groundswell of dissatisfaction' with Tasman District Council's services and conduct, and had his own challenges engaging with the council.
'I could sit at home, and I can bitch and I could moan about them, or I can actually put my name forward and see if I can do anything to change it.'
Despite living in Mahana, outside the ward boundaries, Ross was running for election in Motueka as he had more connections to the town where he had worked as a pharmacist for about 25 years before retiring.
Both men said their main focus would be reducing the rates increases and ensuring council work was focused on core services, in-line with the ACT Local campaign's central tenet.
Tasman's last three average rates increases have all been more than 8 per cent.
Shirley also specifically highlighted fixing congestion and revitalising Richmond as priorities, while Ross wanted to increase transparency at the council.
They both said they wouldn't be told how to vote by ACT Party officials.
Their candidacies come as a former ACT MP is running for a spot on Nelson City Council, but independently of the party's Local campaign.
Chris Baillie said he would still 'certainly' have ACT's principles, but thought he could 'best serve' Nelson as an independent if elected at-large.
Parliamentary parties shouldn't be present in local government, he said, but added that councils should 'enact the direction of Government'.
'Anything that I would do for council would be for Nelson first, and then making sure it aligns with the direction that the Government is going.'
Indeed, like the ACT Local candidates, Baillie's priority was also on reducing the rates increases, specifically pointing to a 51 per cent rates increase he received during the Covid-19 pandemic.
While the leadership of Nelson City Council has changed since then, and Baillie said first-term mayor Nick Smith has had a 'good three years', he didn't think the current make-up of the council was able to keep rate increases low.
'I just don't think the ratepayers' money is being well spent,' he said.
'If you're not entirely happy with the direction of things, then rather than sit on the sidelines and whinge, try and get involved… I'll do my best to steer [council] where I think it should go.'
In addition to lowering the rates increases, Baillie, who ran the Honest Lawyer pub in Monaco, wanted to see greater support for local businesses.
'Walking down Trafalgar Street is quite sad at the moment because of the inactivity that's going on, and I think we can do a lot better to encourage businesses, to help businesses out.'
He said the current council term's focus on business had solely been a debate on if sandwich boards should be banned, and that the city had become a 'laughing stock' after international cricket matches were almost lost due to alcohol advertising rules.
'Nelson City Council has the reputation of being difficult to deal with. I think we should start saying 'yes' a lot more.'
In addition to his parliamentary and publican experience, Baillie highlighted his past experience as a police officer and high school teacher in the city for many years.
'I have the proven passion for the place, and I just want to see it do better.'
Candidate nominations for the local elections close on 1 August.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
8 hours ago
- Scoop
Dunne's Weekly: Oppositions Seldom Win, But Governments Often Lose
That Oppositions do not win elections, but governments lose them is a well-established political maxim. Elections are essentially a judgement on the performance of the government of the day. Seldom does the capability of the Opposition to govern come into the calculation, if the government has lost public favour. Elections are therefore more about getting rid of an unpopular government than the risk of installing an often-unprepared Opposition in power. Moreover, voters often have short memories. A recent poll showed many people believe it is time for another group of parties to govern in New Zealand, despite it being less than two years since that same group was unceremoniously turfed out of office and does not yet seem to fully appreciate the reasons why. Indeed, although the Opposition has not yet released any specific policy, its general attitude seems to be that it will just pick up where it left off last time and resume the same sort of policy approach and style of government voters rejected so clearly at the last election. That is why Labour was able to get away last week with criticising the government's handling of the ongoing cost-of-living crisis without offering any alternative of its own, because, frankly, as the Opposition, its views do not matter. Next year's election will be more a referendum on the government's performance than a critique of the Opposition's alternative. This is not unique to New Zealand. Last year's Labour landslide victory in the British general election was more a repudiation of fourteen years of Conservative rule, than an endorsement of Labour. Now, having rejected the Conservatives so overwhelmingly, and to date being less than impressed with Labour's offering, it is hardly surprising that British voters are flocking in droves to the untried Reform Party. The New Zealand equivalent of that phenomenon has been the increase in support for minor parties, New Zealand First and the Greens in particular. So much so that the next election, and which parties form the next government, could come down to how well the minor parties perform, rather than the major parties they could be expected to align with in government. Given that context, it is not altogether surprising that there is mounting speculation the current government could be the country's first one-term government in 50 years. But, so far, the evidence for that happening is not strong. The National/ACT/ New Zealand bloc has led in most opinion polls since the end of 2021. Today, the latest rolling average of polls shows the coalition government ahead of its rivals by just under 4%, and still able to form a majority government. At the same point in the electoral cycle three years ago, the then Labour Government was trailing the then-Opposition National/ACT/ New Zealand bloc by just under 5%. Nevertheless, National's position is precarious. Its vulnerability, which this column has highlighted many times previously, is its increasing dependence on its coalition partners to get across the electoral line. Until recently, the Prime Minister has shrugged this point aside, saying it is just one of the realities of MMP. However, in recent weeks there has been a perceptible change in the government's tempo, with a slew of major policy announcements from National in a variety of areas, from a new infrastructure plan, a new funding model for general practices, an end to building open-plan classrooms, and even the controversial changes to electoral enrolment provisions, National has shown a new determination in seeking to dominate the political agenda on its terms. No longer does it seem happy to let its coalition partners control the policy agenda as they appear to have done throughout the government's term. With the election just over a year away National looks to have moved centre-stage in terms of the government's performance. It knows that to win the next election the coalition government needs to first lock-in the support of those who voted for it last time, before trying to drag in additional other voters from across the political divide. So, National's current moves are a deliberate attempt to claw back supporters who may have deserted it for ACT or New Zealand First, because they have seen them as more boldly defined. Without locking-in that core government support into National's column, National's position will become shakier and its prospects more uncertain. Things are not quite as challenging for Labour, however. Because it is in its first term in Opposition and because one-term governments are a rarity – only two (both Labour) in the last century – while there may be increasing hope, there is not yet any real expectation that it can win in 2026. That immediately relieves some of the pressure of expectation of returning to office so quickly. Similarly, because governments lose elections rather than Oppositions win them, the level of scrutiny on Labour's promises will always be less than that on the government's promises. That will change a little as the election nears, but for Labour, right now, the longer it can keep getting away with criticising the government and not offering any constructive alternative, the better. None of this means a Labour-bloc victory at the next election is unlikely or impossible. With polls showing increasing disapproval of the country's current direction, it must be acknowledged there is a greater chance of this occurring. And yet again, it will be a case of the government losing, rather than the Opposition winning.
Scoop
12 hours ago
- Scoop
Eliminating DEI Appointments A Step Closer
ACT is celebrating the passage of Public Service Amendment Bill through its first reading in Parliament which will remove divisive DEI appointments and strip out the ideological rot embedded in the public sector. The Bill reflects commitments made in ACT's coalition agreement. Diversity mandates were implemented by the Labour-NZ First-Green Government. 'Taxpayers don't care about your race or sex – they care if you can deliver them essential services,' says ACT Public Service spokesperson Todd Stephenson. 'With ACT in Government, we're putting public servants' focus back on solving the problem, instead of the demographics of the person solving it. 'We've long called out the obsession with diversity targets and virtue signalling. Now we're cutting it out. ACT's coalition agreement secured a commitment 'to clarify the role of the public service, drive performance, and ensure accountability to deliver on the agenda of the government of the day,' and this bill is delivering on it. 'The identity of the person procuring life-saving medicines, improving the education system, or responding to natural disasters doesn't matter – so long as it's the person with the best skills and experience doing it. 'We're proud to see more of ACT's influence driving real change. Every New Zealander deserves to be judged on their ability and achievements, not their identity – we're making sure that happens.'
Scoop
15 hours ago
- Scoop
Mining Positivity Internationally Recognised
Today's passing of the Crown Minerals Amendment Act is the cherry on top of a great week for mining, says New Zealand Minerals Council chief executive Josie Vidal. "To make the most of international interest in mining in New Zealand, untap the potential of critical minerals, and make a greater contribution to jobs, exports and the economy, we need enabling legislation such as the Crown Minerals Amendment Act," Vidal says. "One of the significant aspects of this law for us, is that the emphasis on promoting mining goes back into the purpose statement of the Act. This is important because it shows the world that the New Zealand Government understands the value of our mining industry and that gives export markets and investors confidence. "The positivity around mining has been reflected in the respected international analysis of policy and investment attractiveness in 82 mining jurisdictions globally by the Fraser Institute in its Annual Survey of Mining Companies, 2024, released this week. "After languishing near the bottom of rankings for too many years, due to uncertainty about the environment for mining, New Zealand has made a massive leap and is now ranked higher than any Australian jurisdiction on the Investment Attractiveness Index - at 12th of 82, compared with 43rd of 86 in 2023 - and 15th of 82 on the Policy Perception Index, compared with 50th of 86 in 2023. "This week we also hosted an event to discuss science in the sector, and it was heartening to see the buzz around the critical minerals the world needs and what is available in New Zealand, and how we can add value and be part of the global supply chain. "Professor Chris Bumby, Chief Scientist (Materials) at the Robinson Research Institute within Victoria University of Wellington spoke about the potential for value-add processing of New Zealand's critical mineral resources. He pointed out why metals production matters - 'today's world is built from metals and tomorrow's world will require a whole bunch more', he said. "He highlighted New Zealand opportunities included critical minerals vanadium, titanium, zirconium, tungsten, and antinomy, among others, and the value New Zealand minerals bring to the world's steel production. "New Zealand science and research stands out globally and Science, Innovation and Technology Minister Shane Reti also spoke about the work the Government is doing to further enable science and technology to advance our country in a rapidly changing high-tech world. "There is so much exciting work happening in our minerals industry and it is important to have enabling laws that back our claims that New Zealand is open for business, and that the Fast-track Approvals Act is allowed to work as it is intended and is not derailed by vexatious detractors," Vidal says.
