Partial blindness hasn't stopped Oklahoma State's Stailee Heard from leading the Cowgirls into NCAAs
STORRS, Conn. (AP) — Stailee Heard never set out to become a role model or the face for those who deal with visual impairment.
The leading scorer for the Oklahoma State women's basketball team that will face South Dakota State in the first round of the NCAA women's basketball tournament on Saturday has never let the fact that she is blind in her right eye stop her from realizing her dreams. She isn't about to start now.
'I get that a lot actually because I don't tend to like telling people that because I don't want them to think of it as an excuse,' said Heard, who was born without vision in her right eye. 'This is how I have been my whole life, I know nothing different so it is pretty cool how people can look at that and say you are a good basketball player but now that they know you are blind in one eye, it is even better.'
There might have been those who doubted whether her lack of vision in her right eye would keep Heard from realizing her dream of playing major college basketball. Those messages never came from friends and family members.
'My parents, they really pushed that and that was their message all the time,' Heard said. 'I never backed down. They never had to push that on me. I never backed down or shied away from it.'
The fact that the Oklahoma State coaching staff didn't realize Heard was blind in one eye when they first started to watch the 5-foot-11 sophomore from Sapulpa, Oklahoma play speaks volumes about her game.
'She is so humble,' Oklahoma State women's basketball coach Jacie Hoyt said. 'It is not something that she talks about very much. I wish she did because it is so incredible and inspiring.
'I think she is such a great poster child for our program because we are very much about embracing adversity, not making excuses, not playing the victim. She is all about that. She doesn't do any of that. There aren't very many players in the country who would be able to handle that the way that she does.'
Heard has enjoyed a breakout sophomore season highlighted by a 34-point game against Texas Tech in the Big 12 quarterfinals and 25 points in the loss to Baylor in the semifinals.
Heard, who leads Oklahoma State in scoring at 16.7 points per game, and with an average of 8.1 rebounds, joins Micah Gray as the Oklahoma natives projected to start in Saturday's NCAA tournament opener. She is more than happy to talk to the high school players who come to see the Cowgirls play and let them know that they don't need to leave Oklahoma to make an impact on the basketball court.
'Being close to home means a lot,' Heard said. 'A lot of people come and we can show these youngsters, especially the high school players who come and watch, I always come and talk to them. I think it means a lot.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fast Company
36 minutes ago
- Fast Company
NCAA agrees to $2.8 billion settlement. Here's how it changes college sports
The business of college sports was upended after a federal judge approved settlement between the NCAA and former college athletes on June 6, 2025. After a lengthy litigation process, the NCAA has agreed to provide $2.8 billion in back pay to former and current college athletes, while allowing schools to directly pay athletes for the first time. Joshua Lens, whose scholarship centers on the intersection of sports, business, and the law, tells the story of this settlement and explains its significance within the rapidly changing world of college sports. What will change for players and schools with this settlement? The terms of the settlement included the following changes: The NCAA and conferences will distribute approximately $2.8 billion in media rights revenue back pay to thousands of athletes who competed since 2016. Universities will have the ability to enter name, image, and likeness, or NIL, agreements with student-athletes. So schools can now, for example, pay them to appear in ads for the school or for public appearances. Each university that opts in to the settlement can disburse up to $20.5 million to student-athletes in the 2025-26 academic year, a number that will likely rise in future academic years. Athletes' NIL agreements with certain individuals and entities will be subject to an evaluation that will determine whether the NIL compensation exceeds an acceptable range based on a perceived fair market value, which could result in the athlete having to restructure or forgo the deal. The NCAA's maximum sport program scholarship limits will be replaced with maximum team roster size limits for universities that choose to be part of the settlement. Why did the NCAA agree to settle with, rather than fight, the plaintiffs? In 2020, roughly 14,000 current and former college athletes filed a class-action lawsuit, House v. NCAA, seeking damages for past restrictions on their ability to earn money. For decades, college athletics' primary governing body, the NCAA, permitted universities whose athletics programs compete in Division I to provide their athletes with scholarships that would help cover their educational expenses, such as tuition, room and board, fees, and books. By focusing only on educational expenses, the NCAA was able to reinforce the notion that collegiate athletes are amateurs who may not receive pay for participating in athletics, despite making money for their schools. A year later, in 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously ruled in a separate case, Alston v. NCAA, that the NCAA violated antitrust laws by limiting the amount of education-related benefits, such as laptops, books, and musical instruments, that universities could provide to their athletes. The ruling challenged the NCAA's amateurism model while opening the door for future lawsuits tied to athlete compensation. It also burnished the plaintiffs' case in House v. NCAA, compelling college athletics' governing body to take part in settlement talks. What were some of the key changes that took place in college sports after the Supreme Court's decision in Alston v. NCAA? Following Alston, the NCAA permitted universities to dole out several thousand dollars in what's called ' education benefits pay ' to student-athletes. This could include cash bonuses for maintaining a certain GPA or simply satisfying NCAA academic eligibility requirements. But contrary to popular belief, the Supreme Court's Alston decision didn't let college athletes be paid via NIL deals. The NCAA continued to maintain that this would violate its principles of amateurism. However, many states, beginning with California, introduced or passed laws that required universities within their borders to allow their athletes to accept NIL compensation. With more than a dozen states looking to pass similar laws, the NCAA folded on June 30, 2021, changing its policy so athletes could accept NIL compensation for the first time. Will colleges and universities be able to weather all of these financial commitments? The settlement will result in a windfall for certain current and former collegiate athletes, with some expected to receive several hundred thousands of dollars. Universities and their athletics departments, on the other hand, will have to reallocate resources or cut spending. Some will cut back on travel expenses for some sports, others have paused facility renovations, while other athletic departments may resort to cutting sports whose revenue does not exceed their expenses. As Texas A&M University athletic director Trev Alberts has explained, however, college sports does not have a revenue problem—it has a spending problem. Even in the well-resourced Southeastern Conference, for example, many universities' athletics expenses exceed their revenue. Do you see any future conflicts on the horizon? Many observers hope the settlement brings stability to the industry. But there's always a chance that the settlement will be appealed. More potential challenges could involve Title IX, the federal gender equity statute that prohibits discrimination based on sex in schools. What if, for example, a university subject to the statute distributes the vast majority of revenue to male athletes? Such a scenario could violate Title IX. On the other hand, a university that more equitably distributes revenue among male and female athletes could face legal backlash from football athletes who argue that they should be entitled to more revenue, since their games earn the big bucks. And as I pointed out in a recent law review article, an athlete or university may challenge the new enforcement process that will attempt to limit athletes' NIL compensation within an acceptable range that is based on a fair market valuation. The NCAA and the conferences named in the lawsuit have hired the accountancy firm Deloitte to determine whether athletes' compensation from NIL deals fall within an acceptable range based on a fair market valuation, looking to other collegiate and professional athletes to set a benchmark range. If athletes and universities have struck deals that are too generous, both could be penalized, according to the terms of the settlement. Finally, the settlement does not address—let alone solve—issues facing international student-athletes who want to earn money via NIL. Most international student-athletes' visas, and the laws regulating them, heavily limit their ability to accept compensation for work, including NIL pay. Some lawmakers have tried to address this issue in the past, but it hasn't been a priority for the NCAA, as it has lobbied Congress for a federal NIL law.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Report: Bengals releasing veteran linebacker after 6 seasons
The Cincinnati Bengals are reportedly parting ways with a veteran linebacker after six seasons. [DOWNLOAD: Free WHIO-TV News app for alerts as news breaks] Germaine Pratt was expected to be released by the team on Monday, according to Tom Pelissero of the NFL Network. Advertisement The Bengals have not yet announced Pratt's release themselves. Pelissero said the move would give the team $5.6 million in salary cap savings. TRENDING STORIES: Pratt was drafted in the third round in 2019 and started 88 games over 66 seasons, according to the Associated Press (AP). The AP also reported that Pratt requested a trade during the offseason as he was entering the final season of a three-year contract. He finished ninth in the NFL in 2024 with 143 tackles, two forced fumbles, two fumble recoveries, and two interceptions. Pratt sealed the Bengals' first playoff win during the 2021 Super Bowl run with an interception in the final seconds against Las Vegas. It was Cincinnati's first playoff victory in 31 seasons. [SIGN UP: WHIO-TV Daily Headlines Newsletter]
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Colleges can now begin paying athletes directly following $2.8B landmark settlement
CHICOPEE, Mass. (WWLP) – Following a multibillion-dollar landmark settlement, colleges can now begin paying athletes directly. Athletes express concern over NCAA settlement's impact on non-revenue sports A federal judge approved the deal between the NCAA on Friday for Division One athletes. The NCAA can now pay thousands of current and former athletes who competed in college at any time from 2016 to now. A share of nearly $2.8 billion in damages is expected to be paid out over the next decade. 22News spoke to the community about this significant shift in the world of college sports. 'It feels good, like knowing that athletes are finally getting the money they deserve, especially after colleges make a lot of money off of athletes. So, I mean, definitely it's a great achievement for them. I'm proud of them,' said Rahman Martin of Springfield. During the decade-long agreement, the annual cap starts at roughly $20 million per school. It will then go up every year. Athletes will receive these new payments in addition to their scholarships and other benefits. WWLP-22News, an NBC affiliate, began broadcasting in March 1953 to provide local news, network, syndicated, and local programming to western Massachusetts. Watch the 22News Digital Edition weekdays at 4 p.m. on Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
