Final verdict nears in SIS's legal battle to annul ‘deviant' fatwa
The Federal Court is set to rule on the constitutionality of a fatwa issued by the Selangor religious authorities declaring the organisation 'deviant' for subscribing to 'liberalism' and 'religious pluralism'.
PETALING JAYA : The Federal Court is set to rule on Thursday in a high-profile case involving a fatwa by the Selangor religious authorities that labelled women's rights group Sisters in Islam Forum (Malaysia) (SIS) a 'deviant' organisation.
SIS is appealing a 2023 Court of Appeal ruling that dismissed its challenge against a fatwa issued by the Selangor Islamic religious council (Mais) 11 years ago.
In 2014, Mais had decreed that SIS had deviated from the teachings of Islam by purportedly subscribing to 'liberalism' and 'religious pluralism'.
Case history and contentions
In October 2014, SIS, a company limited by guarantee established under the Companies Act 1965, filed for judicial review. It contended that the fatwa was unconstitutional and could not be imposed on a corporate entity governed by civil law.
The case has since evolved into a constitutional battle over whether religious edicts can be enforced against non-religious organisations, and whether the civil courts have jurisdiction to review them.
In its court filings, SIS also argued that certain terms used in the fatwa, such as 'liberalism' and 'pluralism', were vague and undefined, making enforcement arbitrary and open to abuse.
The group questioned whether state religious authorities could direct federal bodies like the Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission (MCMC) to enforce such orders, raising concerns over the overlap of power between state religious authorities and federal jurisdiction.
In 2016, the High Court dismissed SIS's leave application on jurisdictional grounds, but the Court of Appeal later reversed that decision, allowing the inter partes hearing to take place.
In 2019, the High Court heard the case on its merits and dismissed it, holding that the fatwa was not a final decision and, therefore, was not amenable to a judicial review.
In 2022, the Federal Court, on an application by SIS, declared Section 66A of the Administration of the Religion of Islam (State of Selangor) Enactment 2003 to be unconstitutional.
The provision had attempted to grant shariah courts the power to hear and decide judicial reviews against decisions made by the state's religious councils or committees.
In March 2023, the Court of Appeal in a 2-1 decision, upheld the High Court's 2019 ruling.
However, the dissenting judge on the panel ruled that a fatwa cannot be enforced on a company, as the shariah jurisdiction is only meant to attach to individuals who profess the Islamic faith.
Arguments in the Federal Court
In the Federal Court, SIS argued that the fatwa violated its constitutional rights to freedom of expression, association and religion.
It also said the fatwa was issued without due process, as the organisation was not given the opportunity to defend itself.
Mais and the state fatwa committee, for their part, argue that they had the necessary jurisdiction to issue the fatwa.
They claim the fatwa is consistent with Islamic teachings, and that SIS was merely seeking to undermine their religious authority.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
an hour ago
- Malay Mail
‘Deviant' or not? Sisters in Islam awaits Federal Court verdict today on Selangor fatwa
Today, Federal Court to decide on Sisters in Islam's challenge against Selangor fatwa labelling it deviant KUALA LUMPUR, June 19 — Muslim women's rights group Sisters in Islam (SIS) will find out today whether it will remain labelled 'deviant' in Selangor, and whether its publications risk seizure or its website could be blocked. For more than 10 years, SIS has been challenging a Selangor fatwa which labels it as deviant, and this court battle will finally come to an end today at the Federal Court. The Federal Court's five-judge panel, chaired by Chief Justice Tun Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat, is expected to deliver its decision this morning on whether the Selangor fatwa is valid and applies to SIS. Here's a quick guide to all you need to know ahead of today's upcoming decision: 1. What is SIS? SIS, founded in 1988 and which operates through the company SIS Forum (Malaysia), is known for pushing for law reforms and promoting women's rights. It has also been giving free legal advice to Muslims in Malaysia on their legal rights under Islamic family law and local laws on Shariah criminal offences. 2. What does the Selangor fatwa against SIS say? On July 31, 2014, the Selangor state government gazetted a fatwa which declared SIS Forum (Malaysia) and any individual, organisation or institution who hold on to 'liberalism and religious pluralism' as 'deviants' from Islamic teachings. The fatwa also says: Any publications with elements of liberalism and religious pluralism should be banned and can be seized. The Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission (MCMC) is to block social websites that go against Islamic teachings and hukum syarak (Islamic law). Any individuals holding on to liberalism and religious pluralism should repent and return to Islam. Since the fatwa or religious edict was gazetted, it became legally-binding in Selangor. 3. What did SIS want in its constitutional challenge? On October 31, 2014, SIS Forum (Malaysia) filed for judicial review in the civil courts to challenge the constitutionality and legality of the Selangor fatwa. The court challenge named three respondents: the Selangor Fatwa Committee, the Selangor Islamic Religious Council (Mais) and the Selangor state government. In short, here are the court orders that SIS Forum (Malaysia) wanted the High Court to make: to declare the state's fatwa goes against federal laws (Printing Presses and Publications Act 1984's Section 7 and the Communications and Multimedia Act's Section 3) and the Federal Constitution (Article 5, 8, 10, 11) to declare that the fatwa cannot apply on SIS Forum as it is a company, and as the Selangor Islamic authorities only have jurisdiction over individuals professing the religion of Islam to quash or cancel the fatwa. 4. What did the High Court and Court of Appeal say? On August 27, 2019, the High Court dismissed SIS Forum's fatwa challenge as it ruled that the civil courts have no jurisdiction to hear the case, and that the Shariah courts should be the one to hear and decide it. The High Court also said the fatwa did not go against federal laws and the Federal Constitution, and that the fatwa applies to SIS Forum even though it is a company as its directors are Muslim. On March 14, 2023, the Court of Appeal in a 2-1 decision also dismissed SIS Forum's fatwa challenge, with the majority agreeing with the High Court. Following those court rulings, SIS Forum appealed to the Federal Court. 5. What the Federal Court was asked to decide today Over two days of hearings on December 2, 2024 and on March 12, 2025, the Federal Court was asked to consider 10 complex questions about the Federal Constitution and other laws. Some of the key issues covered by these questions are whether fatwas that are gazetted would become subsidiary laws, and whether the civil courts would then have the power to review the constitutionality and legality of gazetted fatwas. Other issues covered are the procedures that the Selangor fatwa committee should follow under a 2003 Selangor state law when making fatwas, such as whether it should have given SIS the opportunity to be heard first, and if the making of such fatwas cannot restrict or prohibit the constitutionally-guaranteed right of freedom of expression. Other key issues are on whether companies can be treated as persons professing the religion of Islam, and whether the Selangor Fatwa Committee has the power to include directives — such as to ban publications and to block websites — to the federal government or the state government when making fatwas. In short, the Federal Court was asked to consider if fatwas can apply to companies like SIS Forum, and if Selangor had followed procedures in making this fatwa and if the fatwa goes against constitutional rights such as equality, freedom of expression, freedom of religion. 6. What about that other Federal Court decision? And what is Section 66A about? Just months after SIS started its judicial review case in the civil courts to challenge the fatwa, Selangor amended a state law to introduce Section 66A to give Selangor's Shariah courts the power to carry out judicial reviews. The High Court in August 2019 had actually mentioned Section 66A as enabling SIS to apply for a judicial review of the fatwa in the Shariah courts, while also ruling that it is the Shariah courts that have the power to review the Selangor fatwa against SIS. SIS then filed a separate court case at the Federal Court to challenge Section 66A. On February 21, 2022, the Federal Court declared Section 66A as invalid and unconstitutional as it said Selangor does not have the powers to make the law to give judicial review powers to Shariah courts, and also made it clear that only civil courts have judicial review powers. SIS's fatwa challenge then continued on, and its lawyers have also relied on the Federal Court's 2022 decision to say that civil courts have the power to review fatwas based on constitutional matters and that companies cannot profess a religion. 7. Why is the SIS court challenge important? Today, the Federal Court will have a chance to make clear whether state religious authorities can apply fatwas on companies, and also the scope of powers and role played by state religious authorities as well as the procedures required, among other things. In a list of Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) provided to the media earlier this week, SIS explained that it filed the judicial review 'not to challenge Islam', but to defend its constitutional rights as a civil organisation and to uphold justice in line with Islamic values. 'This case is not simply about a single fatwa or one organisation — it is a landmark test of constitutional boundaries affecting the rule of law in Malaysia,' SIS explained in its compilation of information about the case.
Free Malaysia Today
10 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Yusoff Rawther wants Anwar's reference appeal heard on July 21
Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim is appealing the High Court's refusal to refer eight legal questions to the Federal Court for determination arising from a civil suit brought by former research assistant Yusoff Rawther. PUTRAJAYA : Lawyers for former research assistant Yusoff Rawther have requested that Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim's appeal, seeking to refer several legal and constitutional questions to the Federal Court, be expedited and fixed for hearing on July 21. In a letter to Court of Appeal president Abang Iskandar Abang Hashim, the Law Practice of Rafique said the appeal records were complete, as the High Court had issued its written grounds for dismissing Anwar's application. 'A case management can be held earlier so that the appeal can be heard and disposed of on July 21,' the letter sighted by FMT read. The lawyers said the appeal was limited to questions of law as there are no facts in dispute. On June 10, a three-member Court of Appeal bench allowed Anwar an ad interim stay of a civil suit brought by Yusoff against him, and fixed July 21 for the full hearing of the stay application. The appeals court also fixed the appeal proper for case management on Sept 2. Rafique Rashid Ali, who is representing Yusoff, confirmed the matter. As a result of the ad interim stay, the trial of the suit, scheduled to begin on June 16 before Justice Roz Mawar Rozian, was vacated. Roz Mawar had on June 4 dismissed Anwar's reference application, ruling that none of the eight questions posed had succeeded in crossing the threshold set out in Section 84 of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964. In her 21-page judgment, she held that the application was misconceived on jurisdictional grounds and rested on speculative doctrines which lacked a constitutional basis. Anwar wants the apex court to rule on whether Articles 5(1), 8(1), 39, 40 and 43 of the Federal Constitution grant him qualified immunity from the suit filed by Yusoff four years ago. The suit relates to events which allegedly took place before Anwar took office on Nov 24, 2022. Yusoff, a grandson of the late Penang consumer advocate SM Mohamed Idris, claims he was assaulted at Anwar's home in Segambut in October 2018. He is seeking general, special, aggravated and exemplary damages, as well as interest, costs and other relief deemed fit by the court. Anwar denies the claim and has filed a countersuit.
Free Malaysia Today
10 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Asean agrees to enhanced power grid deal, new energy roadmap
Energy transition and water transformation ministry secretary-general Mad Zaidi Karli said senior energy officials have agreed on the terms of an enhanced memorandum of understanding for the Asean Power Grid. KUCHING : Asean energy officials have agreed on several key regional initiatives to strengthen energy cooperation and connectivity. Energy transition and water transformation ministry secretary-general Mad Zaidi Karli announced today that senior energy officials have agreed on the terms of an enhanced memorandum of understanding for the Asean Power Grid (APG). 'This will be signed in October during the Asean Ministers on Energy Meeting,' he told a press conference after the 43rd Asean Senior Officials' Meeting on Energy which concluded here today. Zaidi also confirmed that officials have endorsed the policy document outlining the second phase (2026-2030) of the Asean Plan of Action for Energy, which continues the region's focus on energy security, market integration and the clean energy transition. In a recent interview with FMT, energy transition and water transformation minister Fadillah Yusof said Asean is also exploring a code of conduct for external energy partners amid growing engagement with dialogue partners, including the US and Russia. The three-day meeting, hosted by the ministry from June 16 to 18, saw the participation of 250 delegates across Asean countries, the Asean Secretariat, the Asean Centre for Energy, and dialogue partners from China, Japan, Russia and the US. Other outcomes The ministry said other key outcomes of the three-day meeting included the launching of the Asean-Russia Capacity Building on Energy Statistics project and renewing the Asean-Russia energy cooperation framework for 2026-2028. Russia's Elena Vikulova, deputy head of its directorate of international cooperation, said there is strong potential for Asean-Russia energy cooperation given the region's surging energy demand. In a statement, the ministry said senior officials from Australia, the US, Russia, South Korea, China and Japan discussed advancing energy efficiency measures, sustainable biofuels and renewable energy deployment during the 30th East Asia Summit Energy Cooperation Task Force Meeting. It also said the International Energy Agency presented its Southeast Asia Energy Outlook 2025, while the International Renewable Energy Agency shared renewable energy trends around the world. Additionally, the Asian Development Bank presented its 2025-2026 work plan, which focuses on clean energy transitions and sustainable infrastructure development, while also making 'significant progress' in discussions on the APG with energy senior officials. Earlier today, South Korea's trade, industry and energy first secretary Heegang Kim said in his opening remarks that the nation is set to launch a nuclear cooperation project with Asean to systematically support the region's readiness to introduce nuclear power plants. Another new initiative Kim announced was the transfer of the Korean electrical safety management system to Asean member states from the Korea Electrical Safety Corporation.
