Watch: Kim Jong-un weeps over soldiers killed fighting for Putin
Kim Jong-un appeared to weep during a ceremony honouring North Korean soldiers who died while fighting alongside the Russian army.
The North Korean dictator had tears in his eyes as he watched footage of the battlefield in an operatic show marking the one-year anniversary of Pyongyang's defence pact with Moscow.
On a giant screen behind an orchestra, images were shown of Kim kneeling and placing his hands on a coffin draped in the North Korean flag. He gulped and breathed rapidly in the footage broadcast on state media.
In separate clips, the 41-year-old was seen approving plans for North Korean military operations in Russia's Kursk region, where they deployed late last year to help Moscow drive out a Ukrainian bridgehead.
The ceremony on Sunday came days after Kim inaugurated a new seaside resort, watching on as a citizen whizzed off the end of a curved water slide.
Then he was accompanied on the weekend by his daughter, Kim Ju-ae, who stood and applauded as a singer performed on stage in front of images of North Korean soldiers and tanks bearing the 'Z' symbol.
According to the British Ministry of Defence, around 6,000 North Koreans have been killed or wounded while fighting in the Kursk region.
Analysts said Kim's public acknowledgement of the cost of the operation may have been intended to soothe public discontent, although only six coffins were shown in the ceremony.
North Korea's supreme leader was shown approving plans for Kursk on three dates: October 22, December 12 and December 22 last year.
Local media reports said he had issued 'offensive operations orders to special operations units', casting him rather than Moscow as directly responsible for their instructions.
Vladimir Putin visited Kursk after Russia's army pushed the Ukrainian army out of its foothold in the country, which once spanned roughly 1000 square kilometres.
North Korean soldiers initially suffered huge casualties as they charged at the Ukrainian lines across open fields. But they proved themselves on the battlefield over time, said Rob Lee, a senior research fellow at the Foreign Policy Research Institute.
'It is an open question, if North Korea was not taking part, what the position of Kursk would be right now,' he said on the Russia Contingency podcast in March. 'Without them, [the Ukrainians] could probably have held the pocket longer.'
Ukrainian officials Mr Lee spoke to 'had a pretty high opinion of the North Korean soldiers. They thought they're very physically fit, very tough, pretty competent'.
'Tactically, they were employed, I think, poorly by the Russians. But at the squad level, they have pretty good tactics, good marksmanship, and they don't surrender.'
South Korea's National Intelligence said last Thursday that Pyongyang may deploy an additional 6,000 troops to support Moscow. Sergei Shoigu, a close ally of Putin, said that 5,000 construction personnel and 1,000 mine removal engineers would be dispatched this summer.
Last year, Kim signed a mutual defence pact with Moscow, agreeing to send missiles, ammunition and troops to the battlefield. In return, South Korea's intelligence agency says that Pyongyang is likely receiving technical advice on satellite launches and missile guidance systems.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
22 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump's hidden goal in Alaska was to break the China-Russia axis
The Alaska summit between President Trump and his Russian counterpart, Vladimir Putin, was more than a high-stakes encounter over the Ukraine war. It signaled America's recognition that its own missteps have helped drive Russia closer to China, fueling a de facto alliance that poses the gravest threat to U.S. global preeminence since the Cold War. Washington's miscalculations helped build the China-Russia partnership it now fears most. In a world where the U.S., China and Russia are the three leading powers, the Alaska summit underscored Trump's bid to redraw the great-power triangle before it hardens against America. The president's Alaska reset seeks to undo a policy that turned two natural rivals into close strategic collaborators, by prioritizing improved U.S.-Russia ties. Trump's signaling was unmistakable. In a Fox News interview immediately after the summit, he blasted his predecessor. 'He [Biden] did something that was unthinkable,' Trump said. 'He drove China and Russia together. That's not good. If you are just a minor student of history, it's the one thing you didn't want to do.' The remark captured the essence of America's dilemma. Two powers that are historic rivals — one vast in land and resources, the other populous and expansionist — have been pushed into each other's arms by Washington's own punitive strategies. For decades, the bedrock of U.S. grand strategy was to keep Moscow and Beijing apart. President Richard Nixon's 1972 opening to Beijing was not about cozying up to Mao Zedong's brutal regime, but about exploiting the Sino-Soviet split by coopting China in an informal alliance geared toward containing and rolling back Soviet influence and power. That strategy helped the West win the Cold War, not militarily but geopolitically. Since 2022, however, Washington has inverted that logic. In response to Putin's invasion of Ukraine, the U.S. unleashed unprecedented sanctions designed to cripple Russia economically. Instead, the sanctions drove the Kremlin toward Beijing while tightening Putin's grip on power. What had been an uneasy partnership has become strategic collaboration against a common adversary — the U.S. Rather than playing one against the other, America finds itself confronting a two-against-one dynamic, with China as the primary gainer. Western sanctions have effectively handed resource-rich Russia to resource-hungry China. Beijing has also chipped away at Russian influence in Central Asia, bringing former Soviet republics into its orbit. Meanwhile, despite the grinding war in Ukraine, Russia remains a formidable power. Its global reach, military capacity and resilience under sanctions have belied Western hopes that it could be isolated into irrelevance. On the battlefield, Russia holds the strategic initiative, strengthening Putin's bargaining hand and reducing his incentive to accept any ceasefire not largely on his own terms. The uncomfortable truth for Washington is that it risks losing a proxy war into which it has poured vast resources. The legacy-conscious Trump recognizes this. His push for a negotiated end to the war is not a retreat but an attempt to cut losses and refocus U.S. strategy on the larger contest with China that will shape the emerging new global order. Among the great powers, only China has both the ambition and material base to supplant the U.S. Its economy, military spending and technological capabilities dwarf that of Russia. Yet Beijing remains the main beneficiary of America's hard line against Moscow. In fact, sanctions and Western weaponization of international finance have turned China into Russia's financial lifeline. Russia's export earnings are now largely parked in Chinese banks, in effect giving Beijing a share of the returns. China has also locked in discounted, long-term energy supplies from Russia. These secure overland flows, which cannot be interdicted by hostile forces, bolster China's energy security in ways maritime trade never could — a crucial hedge as it eyes Taiwan. Far from weakening Beijing, U.S. policy has made it stronger. A formal China-Russia alliance would unite Eurasia's vast resources and power — America's ultimate nightmare, as it would accelerate its relative decline. The Ukraine war has drained U.S. focus even as China expands influence in the Indo-Pacific, the true theater of 21st-century geopolitics. This is why the Alaska summit mattered. Trump and Putin seemed to recognize that improved ties could reshape the global balance of power. For Trump, the goal is clear: Reverse America's blunder, separate Moscow from Beijing and refocus power on the systemic challenge posed by China. Critics call this appeasement, but it echoes Nixon's outreach to Mao: exploiting geopolitical rivalries to keep the U.S. globally preeminent. Washington needs similar clarity today, not doubling down on a failing proxy war, but easing tensions with Russia while strengthening deterrence in the Indo-Pacific, where the stakes are truly global. Trump's tariff-first approach, evident in his punitive approach toward India, has already hurt important partnerships. Yet his instinct on the U.S.-China-Russia triangle could be transformative. If he can begin to pry Moscow away from Beijing — or even sow just enough mistrust to prevent a durable Sino-Russian alliance — he will have altered the trajectory of world politics. America need not befriend Russia — it need only prevent Russia from becoming China's junior partner in an anti-U.S. coalition. That requires ending the Ukraine war and creating space for a geopolitical reset. The Alaska summit was only a first step. But it acknowledged what U.S. policymakers resist admitting: continuing the current course will further strengthen China and entrench America's disadvantages. A shift in strategy is not weakness. It is the essence of grand strategy — recognizing when old approaches have outlived their usefulness. If Trump can reengineer the strategic geometry of the great-power triangle, he will have preserved America's place at the apex of the global order.
The Hill
22 minutes ago
- The Hill
Live updates: Redistricting efforts take stage in California, Texas
Redistricting takes center stage on Wednesday, with California and Texas state lawmakers set to consider their efforts to gerrymander congressional districts to benefit Democrats in the West and Republicans in the Lone Star State. California Republicans have sued the state to stop the effort. Meanwhile, Newsom's social media trolling of Trump is racking up kudos from Democrats. High-level and behind-the-scenes discussions are aiming to find a peace deal for Ukraine and Russia, in the days after President Trump's meetings with presidents of both nations and European allies. NATO's military leaders will convene Wednesday to discuss the unfolding possibility of a Russia-Ukraine peace deal. Gen. Dan Caine, chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and top U.S. military leaders met Tuesday night with European counterparts on Ukraine, a Trump administration official told NewsNation. Trump is working toward a meeting between Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and Russian President Vladimir Putin, who appears to be gaining a stronger hand in talks. Kirill Dmitriev, a Putin ally, on Wednesday accused Europe of getting in the way of progress. In D.C., Trump has only one event on his public schedule, a swearing-in ceremony at 4 p.m.
Forbes
23 minutes ago
- Forbes
Chipmakers' Stocks Drop As Trump Administration Reportedly Seeks Equity For Grants
Key semiconductor stocks slid in Asia and the U.S. in premarket trading Wednesday, following a report the Trump administration may seek equity in any such firms awarded federal grants under the Biden-era CHIPS Act. Lutnick said the government want to acquire an equity stake in Intel in exchange for grants earmarked under the CHIPS Act. NurPhoto via Getty Images According to Reuters, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is considering a plan in which the U.S. government will gain equity stakes in chip-producing companies in exchange for grants given to them under the CHIPS Act. In an interview with CNBC on Tuesday evening, Lutnick specifically named Intel and said, 'We should get an equity stake for our money…which was already committed under the Biden administration.' Although Lutnick did not offer specifics, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters on Tuesday that the deal being worked on with Intel could see the government gain a 10% stake in the chip maker. The Reuters report noted that Lutnick could expand this condition to other companies that are set to receive grants under the CHIPS Act, including the likes of Micron, TSMC and Samsung. The report added that much of the grant money earmarked for these companies under the CHIPS Act has not yet been disbursed. Intel's shares fell more than 1% to $25.02 in early trading Wednesday after surging nearly 7% on Tuesday. Shares of AMD, which fell more than 5.4% on Tuesday, were down 1.4% more in the premarket. Micron's shares fell 5.16%. In Asia, TSMC's Taipei-listed shares fell 4.2% to $37.51(TWD 1,135), while Korean chip-making giant SK Hynix dropped 2.9% to $182.74 (KRW 255,500). What About Nvidia's Shares? Nvidia's shares inched up to $175.85 in early trading on Wednesday, rising 0.1%. Unlike Intel and AMD, Nvidia hasn't received any grants under the CHIPS Act, as it doesn't make its own chips and instead relies on companies like TSMC and Samsung. President Donald Trump has repeatedly bashed the Biden-era CHIPS Act and has threatened to scrap it. In his address to a joint session of Congress in March, the president said the CHIPS Act was a 'horrible, horrible thing,' adding: 'We give hundreds of billions of dollars, and it doesn't mean a thing. They take our money, and they don't spend it.' Crucial Quote Lutnick told CNBC earlier: 'The Biden administration literally was giving Intel for free, and giving TSMC money for free, and all these companies just giving them money for free. Donald Trump turns that into saying, 'Hey, we want equity for the money. If we're going to give you the money, we want a piece of the action.'' Tangent Earlier on Tuesday, Japanese investment giant SoftBank announced it had agreed to a deal to purchase $2 billion worth of Intel stock at $23 per share.
