
'No foreign students should be in the country right now,' says Steve Bannon: What it means for your H-1B visa and future in the US
Steve Bannon, a former White House chief strategist and staunch advocate of Trump-era nationalism, made an incendiary call for what he described as a 'complete purge' of foreign students from the country. Speaking on a podcast, Bannon stated, 'I don't think you should have any foreign students in the country right now,' warning that the continued presence of international students is elbowing out opportunities for American youth.
His remarks signal more than rhetoric—they potentially foreshadow the revival of a hardline immigration agenda under a possible second Trump administration.
A call for an exit visa, not a green card
Bannon's suggestion wasn't merely to restrict future inflow, but to ensure that international students currently studying in the US leave immediately after graduation. 'Instead of stapling a green card to their diploma,' he said, 'you staple an exit visa.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Dementia Has Been Linked To a Common Habit. Do You Do It?
Memory Health
Learn More
Undo
Boom, you are out of here.'
Such a stance, if echoed in policy, would upend the current post-study visa pipeline. At present, the F-1 student visa often serves as a bridge to Optional Practical Training (OPT), and later, H-1B sponsorship, a route that many foreign graduates from US universities depend on to begin their careers. Bannon's comments challenge this pathway head-on, positioning international students as an economic threat rather than an asset.
What does it mean for
H-1B visa
holders?
While Bannon's comments targeted students, the implications extend deep into the realm of skilled immigration, particularly the H-1B visa program. The United States approved nearly 400,000 H-1B visas in 2024, according to recent figures, with the majority being extensions for current visa holders working at tech giants such as Amazon, Microsoft, and Google.
Despite widespread layoffs across the tech sector, approximately 80,000 jobs cut this year, according to Layoffs.fyi, foreign workers continue to dominate the tech workforce.
This dynamic has stoked resentment among some American workers and fueled narratives like Bannon's, which argue that the system favors outsiders at the expense of domestic job seekers.
Compounding this, Vice President JD Vance recently warned tech firms that it is 'unacceptable' to lay off Americans while hiring foreigners, signaling bipartisan political scrutiny of the H-1B process.
The politics of global talent and national allegiance
Bannon's framing of global talent acquisition as a form of 'imperialism' invokes deeper ideological currents.
'Absorbing all the talent from across the world is not going to make the world better,' he said. 'That's how the British ran their empire.'
The remark reflects a broader nativist sentiment: That the US, rather than acting as a global hub for merit and innovation, should focus inward, preserving opportunity for its own citizens. This worldview has gained ground in recent years, particularly as the political Right paints immigration not just as a demographic issue, but as an economic and cultural one.
Labour market signals raise the stakes
The release of the July jobs report according to US media reports, which showed a steep decline in employment growth, with just 73,000 jobs added and 258,000 cut from previous months' data, adds fuel to Bannon's argument. A sluggish labour market could create the perfect storm for populist calls to restrict foreign labor, even as economists argue that immigrants often fill critical skill gaps.
While many tech firms defend their hiring practices as a necessity in a globalized, AI-driven economy, the optics of high foreign hiring amid domestic layoffs present a narrative that could be weaponized politically in the months ahead.
A warning shot or a policy preview?
Bannon may not currently hold a government post, but his remarks often serve as ideological test balloons for upcoming Republican agendas. With Trump increasingly surrounding himself with loyalists ahead of the 2026 election cycle, Bannon's statements cannot be dismissed as fringe commentary.
If this vision materializes into policy, foreign students could face rapid changes, from visa restrictions and shortened work authorization periods to tightened scrutiny of university enrolments.
In short, the traditional American dream for international students may be in jeopardy.
What international students and H-1B hopefuls should do now
Given the intensifying rhetoric, foreign students and workers are advised to stay informed and proactive:
Monitor policy shifts
:
Immigration policy
may change swiftly under a future administration. Keep abreast of
Department of Homeland Security
(DHS) and USCIS updates.
Strengthen employment documentation
: Ensure all OPT, CPT, and H-1B filings are airtight and well-documented.
Explore alternative pathways
: Consider options in Canada, Europe, or Australia if uncertainty persists in the US visa policy.
Engage with advocacy groups
: Organizations such as NAFSA, FWD.us, and local student coalitions can offer legal updates and resources.
The future of meritocracy or a turn toward nationalism?
At its heart, the debate over international students and H-1B visas is a debate about what kind of nation the US wants to be: A bastion of global meritocracy or a closed system prioritizing national loyalty over global integration.
Steve Bannon's words may seem extreme, but they reflect a sentiment that is gaining traction, and one that could soon translate into real-world consequences for the hundreds of thousands who cross oceans in search of opportunity.
As the political winds shift, one thing is clear: For international students and skilled immigrants in America, the stakes have never been higher.
Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Mint
17 minutes ago
- Mint
UCLA research frozen: $584 million grant cut stuns campus
The Trump administration has frozen $584 million in federal grants for UCLA, more than double earlier estimates, threatening hundreds of research projects. Chancellor Julio Frenk announced the massive cut Wednesday, revealing that agencies like the National Science Foundation (NSF) and National Institutes of Health (NIH) suspended funding over claims of antisemitism on campus. UCLA is the first public university targeted this way, following similar moves against private schools like Harvard and Columbia. Frenk warned the freeze would be "devastating for Americans nationwide," impacting studies on diseases, clean energy, and national security. The freeze affects 800 grants, including life-saving organ transplant research pioneered at UCLA. The cuts followed a U.S. Department of Justice report accusing UCLA of ignoring antisemitism during 2024 pro-Palestinian protests, despite the university recently paying a $6 million settlement to Jewish students over the same encampment. Federal agencies gave conflicting justifications: the NSF cited "misaligned priorities," while the Department of Energy bizarrely claimed UCLA "endangers women" by allowing transgender athletes and uses "illegal affirmative action" in admissions. UC President James Milliken slammed the move, stating: "These cuts do nothing to address antisemitism" and would be a "death knell" for medical and scientific breakthroughs. UCLA has created a safety office and antisemitism task force since the protests. Under pressure, the University of California agreed to negotiate with the Trump administration before a September 2 lawsuit deadline . The talks aim to restore funding, but precedents are worrying: Columbia paid $200 million and Brown University paid $50 million to regain their grants. Over 3,000 UCLA staff attended an emergency town hall Monday, with Vice Chancellor Roger Wakimoto warning that researchers can't even access existing funds for critical work . Frenk, whose family fled Nazi Germany, stressed UCLA's reforms but called the freeze a "cruel manipulation" unrelated to fighting hate . California Governor Gavin Newsom blasted Trump for 'weaponizing Jewish students' pain'. Organ transplant technology keeping lungs "breathing" outside bodies Asteroid-tracking systems guarding Earth from space threats Valley fever treatment research for the deadly disease Faculty warn the freeze could cancel decades of progress, like UCLA's role in creating the internet . With Columbia's settlement as a template, UCLA faces tough choices: pay massive fines or risk permanent cuts. "Every deal made makes it harder for others to resist," warned American Association of University Professors director Mia McIver . As UC negotiates, scientists statewide brace for ripple effects, hoping lifesaving work won't become collateral in a political war .


Time of India
21 minutes ago
- Time of India
EC to opposition: Get 'wrongfully excluded' to file claims
NEW DELHI: Brushing aside the allegation by opposition MPs Asaduddin Owaisi and Randeep Surjewala that the special intensive revision of electoral roll in Bihar is an exercise in disenfranchising minorities and precarious communities, the Election Commission on Wednesday asked them to get all such electors to file their claims and objections before Sept 1. "Mr Owaisi and Mr Surjewala should ensure that their state units and booth level agents (BLAs) facilitate those they complain have been wrongfully excluded to file their claims with the ERO to add them back in the electoral roll. Interestingly, even as the national party leaders have been complaining of alleged irregularities and imperfections in the roll, not a single claim or objection was filed by any of the 1.6 lakh party BLAs in the field, between publication of the roll on Aug 1 and 9 am on Wednesday," said an EC official. On the other hand, 3,659 individual electors directly filed their claims and objections during this period. Another 19,186 newly-eligible electors have also filed pleas for fresh enrolment through Form 6, along with the mandatory declaration. EC on Wednesday said it is revising the Bihar roll as per the Constitution and the extant laws, and with full transparency. "Citizens are also aware that revision of electoral roll is mandatory before every election as per Section 21(2)(a) of the Representation of the People Act, 1950, and Rule 25 of the Registration of Electors Rules 1960," said the poll panel. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Overpaying for Car Insurance? Find Out With This Quick and Easy Tool. AutoSaveMax Get Quote While the opposition parties question the purpose of the SIR exercise, EC underlined that it has also led to Bihar becoming the first state in the country to limit the number of electors per booth to 1,200, which is expected to cut queues on polling day. EC said lists of electors reported by BLOs as dead, permanently shifted, having two votes and who could not be contacted after at least three visits of BLOs were shared with all political parties and their BLAs on or before July 20, giving them ample time to report any wrongful additions or deletions.


India Today
27 minutes ago
- India Today
In numbers: Trump doubles tariffs, targets India over Russian oil trade
US President Trump will double tariffs on India to 50% this month, punishing New Delhi for buying Russian oil, citing its continued imports of Moscow's IT MATTERS This sharp escalation comes on top of a previous 25% tariff set to take effect overnight, effectively doubling the trade penalty. The move follows failed US–Russia talks over the Ukraine war and deepening tensions between Washington and New Delhi. India's energy ties with Moscow — and its role in the Brics bloc — are now at the centre of a growing geopolitical NUMBERS25% — Additional tariff rate imposed by Trump on Indian goods.21 days — Time until the new duties take effect.25% — Existing country-specific tariff already scheduled to start overnight. IN DEPTHThe measure stacks on top of the existing 25% tariffs already set to take effect, doubling the penalty for affected Indian exports. The order frames India's Russian oil trade as part of an "unusual and extraordinary threat" to US national security, putting New Delhi in the crosshairs of Washington's Russia sanctions policy. It also signals to other countries that buying Russian crude could bring similar US trade retaliation. Signed on August 6, the executive order uses emergency powers under US law. It expands earlier measures that banned Russian oil imports and targeted Moscow's hostile actions says India is "directly or indirectly" importing Russian Oil, either buying it outright or through intermediaries. In the White House's view, those purchases help fund Russia's war in Ukraine and prolong the conflict. BIG PICTUREThis is the most aggressive trade move against India since Trump's first term. This move is the sharpest escalation in US–India trade tensions in years. In 2019, Trump stripped India of special tariff-free treatment under the Generalised System of Preferences. Now, the White House is framing India's energy policy as a direct challenge to US foreign policy on Russia. WHAT THEY SAID"They're fuelling the war machine. And if they're going to do that, then I'm not going to be happy." — Donald Trump, US President- Ends