We Tested 7 Ways to Make Bacon — One Was the Clear Winner
Baking bacon on a foil-lined sheet pan at 400°F for about 22 minutes yields evenly crisp, flat strips and lets you cook up to 10 slices at once — the test kitchen's clear winner.
For smaller batches, starting bacon in a cold cast-iron skillet slowly renders fat, keeps shrinkage minimal, and turns out consistently crispy slices in roughly eight minutes.
Microwave, sous vide, hot-skillet, grill-pan, and air-fryer methods produced tough or uneven bacon, demanded more hands-on attention, or couldn't match the oven's capacity.As far as I'm concerned, bacon goes with just about everything. From melty egg sandwiches and grilled burgers to crisp salads and even sweet ice creams, that combination of salty, savory, and slightly smoky flavor is the perfect complement to any meal of the day. When it comes to how bacon is prepared, however, there are really two camps — one for those who like an evenly crispy, well-rendered strip of bacon, and another for those who like it a bit chewier.
I happen to fit in the evenly crispy, well-rendered strip of bacon camp, but how I achieve that perfectly cooked bacon is incredibly inconsistent. Sometimes I layer bacon strips in a cold cast-iron skillet and slowly cook them over a low heat, carefully flipping every so often to ensure even cooking. Other times I'm in a hurry or focused on another element of a meal and I simply lay them on a foil-lined baking sheet and bake them until crispy. With that in mind, we tested seven different methods for cooking bacon to determine which produced the best results. Read on to find out which method we liked best.
A word about our method
Before getting into the results, it's important to note these cooking methods were all conducted in our professional test kitchen, though all of our equipment and tools are the same used in a home kitchen. In addition, all tests used Smithfield Applewood Smoked Bacon for consistency purposes. The tests did not use center-cut or thick-cut varieties of bacon, which may produce different results.
All of the methods we tested (oven, cold start in a skillet, hot skillet, air fryer, grill pan, sous vide, and microwave) technically worked, but their effectiveness at producing evenly crisp, well-rendered, and slightly chewy bacon varied greatly.
A quick spin in the microwave
Cook Time: 5 minutesTotal Time: 5 minutesRating: 5/10
Method: The fastest and most convenient way to cook bacon is in the microwave. Start by placing slices of bacon on a plate lined with two layers of paper towels. Cover the bacon with two more layers of paper towels then microwave on high for 1 minute per slice of bacon. For crispier bacon, continue microwaving on high in 30-second intervals.
Results: Our testers found cooking bacon in the microwave produced the worst results. The bacon was overly tough, chewy, and lacked everything that makes bacon so delicious (there was no browning or rendered fat). At best, one tester said it could be used for bacon bits, but another said this was the one method they would never consider using under any circumstance.
Pros: Using a microwave to cook bacon is super-simple, but that's about the only good thing to say about it.
Cons: The results of cooking bacon in a microwave were simply not good. The bacon turned out unpleasant, chewy, and tough.
A long sous vide soak
Cook Time: 12 hoursTotal Time: 12 hours, 5 minutesRating: 6/10
Method: This method requires an immersion circulator to slowly cook the bacon at a consistent temperature for a very long time, until the bacon is ultra-tender. Prepare an immersion circulator in a water bath according to the manufacturer's directions and set it to 145°F. Then place an unopened package of bacon in the bath and cook it for at least 12 hours or up to 48 hours. When you are ready to serve, remove the bacon from the bath, carefully open, and cook on a cast-iron griddle over medium-high heat until browned on both sides, about 2 minutes per side.
Results: What makes sous vide cooking so ideal is the controlled, even cooking for larger proteins. It ensures delicate proteins aren't overcooked and makes for an incredibly tender final product. But that doesn't mean it's an ideal kitchen gadget for all applications, and it happens to be a bit overkill for preparing slices of bacon. It actually produced fine results, similar to some of our other favorite methods, but it simply takes too long for only decent outcomes for us to recommend hauling out an immersion circulator.
Pros: The bacon turned out quite good but certainly not better than other methods.
Cons: Using an immersion circulator to cook slices of bacon is overkill, to say the least. It takes at least 12 hours and the payoff is just not worth it. Of course, you also need to have an immersion circulator to use this method.
Starting in a hot skillet
Cook Time: 10 minutesTotal Time: 10 minutesRating: 7/10
Method: This is the method you may be most familiar with as it simply calls for cooking slices of bacon in a preheated skillet. For this method use a 12-inch cast-iron skillet heated over medium, then arrange bacon strips in a single layer. You can likely only fit 4 slices comfortably. Cook the bacon until crispy, about 7 minutes. Flip the bacon often and adjust the temperature as needed to avoid burning.
Results: If you prefer your bacon more chewy than crispy, then this is the method for you. Because the skillet is already hot by the time the bacon hits the pan, the bacon tends to seize a bit. That means you'll experience noticeable shrinkage and overall uneven cooking. It also takes some time to cook a full package of bacon since you can really only fit 4 slices in the skillet without overcrowding the pan.
Pros: This is one of the easiest ways to cook bacon as you only need a large skillet. It's also relatively fast compared to other methods and produces decent results.
Cons: The bacon will seize in a hot skillet and shrink, actually creating uneven cooking. The final product is quite inconsistent, too, with some parts of the bacon crispy, while others are chewy.
Grilling in a pan
Cook Time: 10 minutesTotal Time: 10 minutesRating: 8/10
Method: Similar to the hot skillet method, simply heat a large grill pan over medium, arrange slices of bacon in an even layer, and cook until crispy, about 8 minutes. Be sure to adjust the heat and flip frequently to prevent burning.
Results: The grill pan method ranks just a bit higher than the hot skillet method simply because you may be able to cook more bacon in a grill pan compared to a round skillet. But the end results are nearly identical to cooking in a hot skillet. This method requires your complete attention as you'll need to control the heat and flip often to avoid burning. Bacon cooked in a grill pan has chewy bits and crispy areas, which is how some people like their bacon. This method is recommended by testers if you don't have the countertop appliance in the next method.
Pros: Similar to the hot skillet method, using a grill pan is easy and relatively convenient. It slightly edges out the hot skillet method simply because you may be able to fit more slices of bacon on a grill pan rather than a round skillet.
Cons: This also produces inconsistent results, with chewy and crispy bits of bacon throughout the testing process. You also need to give the bacon your full attention as it cooks to avoid burning.
Air-frying
Cook Time: 25 minutesTotal Time: 30 minutesRating: 9/10
Method: Using an air fryer to cook bacon has the advantage of hands-free cooking, but it comes with some compromises. Start by preheating an air fryer to 350°F for 10 minutes, then arrange 4 bacon slices flat on the bottom of the air fryer basket. Be sure to leave at least 1/2-inch space between each slice for even air flow. Cook until the bacon is crispy, about 8 minutes, flipping halfway through.
Results: This is the test kitchen's go-to method for anyone who prefers bacon with contrasting textures. Some parts of the bacon will be pleasantly chewy while others will be thoroughly rendered and crispy. Yes, this is hands-off cooking, but you can only fit about 4 slices in an average-size air fryer basket. While this is a solid option, our top two methods really outshine every other on this list so far.
Pros: The air fryer is hands-free cooking, producing pleasantly chewy bacon, albeit a bit inconsistent compared to other methods.
Cons: You can only fit about 4 slices of bacon in an average-size air fryer basket, plus it's difficult to achieve uniformly crispy strips of bacon.
Starting in a cold skillet
Cook Time: 10 minutesTotal Time: 10 minutesRating: 9/10
Method: Instead of preheating a 12-inch cast iron skillet, simply layer in slices of bacon to the cold skillet then turn the heat to medium. Cook until crispy, about 8 minutes, flipping often and reducing heat to prevent burning.
Results: This was the test kitchen's recommended method if you are only planning to cook 1 to 4 slices of bacon, as it produces consistently crispy, well-rendered bacon. Also, starting bacon in a cold skillet means it won't shrink as much and instead will lay fairly flat. If you want to make a BLT or club sandwich and need just a few crispy slices of bacon, this is the ideal method for that. But if you want to cook more bacon with similar crispy, flat results, our final entry is the method for you.
Pros: This is one of the best methods for achieving consistently crispy slices of bacon. The bacon will also stay relatively flat as it cooks, meaning minimal shrinkage. It's perfect anytime you want to cook just a few slices of bacon at one time.
Cons: You will need to give the bacon some attention as it cooks, adjusting heat to avoid burning. You can only cook 4 slices of bacon at one time.
Winner: Baking bacon in the oven
Cook Time: 25 minutesTotal Time: 30 minutesRating: 10/10
Method: To cook lots of bacon at once, start by preheating the oven to 400°F with a rack in center position. Line a baking sheet with aluminum foil and arrange 10 bacon slices in a single layer. Bake until crispy, about 22 minutes, rotating the pan from front to back halfway through cooking.
Results: The absolute best way to cook evenly crispy and consistent bacon, and a lot of it at once, is in the oven. This was the test kitchen's favorite method as it struck all the important factors: hands-off cooking, perfectly crispy bacon, up to 10 slices at once, and consistent results over multiple tests. This is also one of the simplest methods, which goes to show that sometimes the easiest, fuss-free methods produce the best results.
Pros: You can make a lot of bacon at one time and the results are very consistent. It's the most ideal way to cook bacon if you like evenly crispy strips of bacon. This is also almost entirely hands-free, meaning it's mostly fuss-free.
Cons: It takes a while to cook bacon in the oven compared to other methods.
Final Takeaways
While there is no wrong method when it comes to cooking bacon (aside, perhaps, from microwaving), it's clear that if you love evenly crispy bacon and want little hands-on effort, then the oven is not only the easiest method, it's also the best.
Read the original article on Food & Wine
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
27 minutes ago
- New York Times
After 50 Years of Writing, Jamaica Kincaid Insists She's Still an Amateur
In June, I visited Jamaica Kincaid at her home in Vermont, and not long after we met, she walked me over to a bust of Thomas Jefferson looming over a shaded corner of her garden, introducing me to him like he was an old friend or a hostage. 'Very controversial, but we will explain,' she said. 'When summer is over, he spends the winter in the basement.' Then, she showed me a plant called the twin-leaf, which has one frond divided into two nearly identical leaflets. 'The two halves are not identical — is that Jefferson or no?' Kincaid asked, showing me the fraternal leaves with professorial wonder and not a small amount of delight. Its scientific name, Jeffersonia diphylla, was given to it by the botanist Benjamin Smith Barton, one of Thomas Jefferson's contemporaries, 'before anyone thought of his twin nature,' she said, of the president's duality. Kincaid is an admirer of Jefferson's writing on horticulture, so when she discovered this plant, it appealed to her; she saw that it spoke to his fundamental contradiction as both a theorist of democratic liberty and slaver. 'One has to contemplate these histories,' Kincaid said. 'And so, I find him a good person to have a conversation with.' At 76, Kincaid is both youthful and monumental, a down-to-earth person possessed of a towering intellect. Although she has shrunk some over the years, she still stands at nearly six feet. Her dark brown hair was parted down the center of her scalp, woven into two cute plaits, little commas curling near her shoulders. She wore a silver watch with the clock face on the inside of her wrist as a tribute to her late father. Her laugh, which I heard often, was filtered through her accent, an undulating Antiguan inflection that swayed like a gently rocked boat. Kincaid's sprawling garden sits on a bountiful property in North Bennington, beside a house originally built and inhabited by Robert H. Woodworth, a pioneer of time-lapse photography. Here she begins developing her ideas, influenced by the cultivated wildness outside. In an essay included in her new book, 'Putting Myself Together: Writing, 1974-,' to be published on Aug. 5 by Farrar, Straus and Giroux, she asserts that, rather than creating a garden in the conventional way — overdetermined by the gardener's expectations — she favors a looser approach. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Woman Says Her Mother-in-Law Is 'Ruining' Her New Home by Moving in Just Months After She Got Married
"At this point it's taking away from our life and a chance to start a potential family," she writes on RedditNEED TO KNOW A newly-married woman says her mother-in-law is "ruining" her home and marriage after moving in with her and her husband In a post on Reddit, the woman writes about her husband's mother's "hoarding" tendencies Now, she is at a crossroads about whether to continue her marriageA 23-year-old woman says her mother-in-law is "ruining" her home — and her marriage — after moving in with her and her husband. In a post published on Reddit, the woman writes that she and her husband have only been married for a few months and had just moved into a new home when he invited his mother to move in with them. "At this point it's taking away from our life and a chance to start a potential family," she writes, adding that her husband was raised solely by his mom and the two are very close. The woman writes that their home is a four-bedroom, with two rooms upstairs and two rooms downstairs. "We agreed to give MIL the downstairs rooms and the patio. So she has two rooms, then upstairs it's our kitchen, living room, then me and my husband's room and my husband's office," she writes. "I thought [we would] at least we will have our own level basically. I was wrong." She continues: "When we moved in, husband refused to buy much furniture being that MIL has a bunch of belongings, like almost hoarder level. The entire kitchen is full of her many Knick knacks and every possible type of dish/container you can think of... she has her items in almost every single space in the home, including my husband's office, despite her having two bedrooms downstairs and a big patio." The woman adds that her mother-in-law often uses her and her husband's balcony, rather than her own patio, which is twice the size. To make matters worse, the mother-in-law has now asked her long-term boyfriend to move in, too. "I just don't know how I'm going to go on in this relationship for long-term if this keeps happening," she writes. "We've been trying for a baby and at this point before that even happens I need to make sure that she's going to eventually leave and get her own place." Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from juicy celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. Other Reddit users are offering advice in the comments, with one writing: "If this is how he is during the honeymoon phase it will only get worse the more 'tied' to him you become. I'd go back to my parents house and stay there until he pulls his head out or you find a good lawyer for divorce/annulment." Adds another Reddit commenter: "Oh honey, you are just a baby. You are way too young to be dealing with crap like this. You need to leave, like yesterday." Read the original article on People Solve the daily Crossword
Washington Post
an hour ago
- Washington Post
Asking Eric: Aunt and uncle hear nothing after sending check
Dear Eric: Last August, my husband and I told his niece that we would help with her daughter's college expenses. We sent $2,000 to the college for the first semester. We received a thank-you text from his niece but nothing from the student. We eventually told the grandmother, my husband's sister, that we expected something from the student recognizing that we had sent some money. Finally, a thank-you note came in the spring. After receiving the thank-you note, we sent another $2,000 to the university. Now it is July, and we have received nothing from the girl. What do we do? Ask again for a thank-you note from the girl, stay quiet and give more money, or stay quiet and quit giving money? Are we expecting too much? I think we should just cut her off. There are three younger children that we also want to help with their college but now we question doing anything. — Aunt and Uncle Aunt and Uncle: Let's get the basics out of the way up top. The student should absolutely be sending you thank-you notes, unprompted. She's old enough to know that and should be mature enough to do it. Thank-you notes are not a dying art, though they've long been a source of cultural consternation. In 1999, a reader wrote to Ann Landers about not receiving a thank-you note after a wedding and asked if it was a new trend. We've been having this conversation for decades. (Ann's response: 'No, it's NOT a new trend. It's an attempt to escape the tedious job of writing thank-you notes and, in my book, inexcusable.') I think you should go to the source, i.e., the student herself. And this aspect of my advice prompts a question. You write that you've been in communication with your niece and your sister-in-law, but I'm curious what relationship you have with the student. If you don't have a close relationship with her, there's a world where one could imagine she thinks a thank-you text is sufficient. This is not a world of which I approve. Speaking to her directly and resetting the relationship might help. You can tell her, 'we're happy to give this money, but it's important that when people do nice things for you, you acknowledge them.' You can also — let's be clear — stop sending the checks and move on. But this life lesson will be valuable. Dear Eric: My daughter is getting married next year at a location that is about a six-hour drive from here and accessible only by ferry. It will be an outdoor wedding so there may be a lot of walking and uneven terrain. I don't know whether or not to invite my oldest friend. I don't want to offend her by not inviting her, but I also don't want her to feel obligated to travel that distance and that terrain with her mobility issues or to buy a wedding present. I want her to know that she is a valued friend without burdening her. What is the best approach? — Torn Friend Friend: Honesty can be so kind. It allows you to be clear in your intent and also offers your friend the chance to make an informed decision. So, give her the full picture, just as you laid it out here. 'Of course you're invited to the wedding, but I want to sincerely take the pressure off. I've been worried about how strenuous an experience it will be.' Here you can talk about travel and terrain details. Then, use the phrase that you used in your letter. 'You're a valued friend, but I don't want to burden you. So, think about it, but know you're welcome to stay home or to come and join us.' Dear Eric: I am writing in response to the letter from 'Burial Conflict,' about the couple who wanted to be buried together but were concerned about the response from their children from their first marriages, who wanted their individual parents to be buried together. Once the couple discusses plans, they could contact a funeral director, who would help them to finalize their plans, in detail and in writing, and prepay the funeral costs. They could also purchase burial sites. If their children ever inquire about burial plans, they can simply say that their funeral is planned and paid for. I write as a member of the clergy with 55 years of experience in ministry. I have known many people who have preplanned and prepaid their funerals. This always makes it easier for survivors, whether the family is in harmony or in discord. — Burial Plans Plans: Thank you for this great suggestion. Others also suggested that, in addition to a funeral director, the letter writer should also talk with their attorney to make sure their wishes were clearly recorded. (Send questions to R. Eric Thomas at eric@ or P.O. Box 22474, Philadelphia, PA 19110. Follow him on Instagram and sign up for his weekly newsletter at 2025 Tribune Content Agency, LLC.
