Prague zookeepers turn to puppets to parent baby vultures
Prague Zoo curator of birds Antonin Vaidl feeds a lesser yellow-headed vulture, which hatched three weeks ago, by using a puppet that imitates a parent bird, at the zoo, in Prague, Czech Republic, August 8, 2025. REUTERS/Eva Korinkova
PRAGUE - Zookeepers feeding two baby vultures in Prague are using a hand puppet designed to look like the chicks' parents, a technique they hope will ensure the birds learn to identify with other vultures - not humans.
Staff at Prague Zoo had to start hand-feeding the lesser yellow-headed vultures when their parents stopped nesting. After using the approach with other birds, they quickly made a hand puppet that looks like an adult vulture's head.
"If we raised (the bird) in direct contact with humans, it would become imprinted to humans, and then it would be difficult to breed that individual within the species," said Antonin Vaidl, Prague Zoo's curator of bird breeding.
Human imprinting increases the risk of a chick struggling to build a relationship with a mate in adulthood.
Hand puppets have previously been used with other bird species at the zoo including rhinoceros hornbills and Javan green magpies, with their design reflecting distinctive features such as a large colourful beak.
Prague is one of three European zoos to breed the lesser yellow-headed vulture, also known as the savannah vulture. REUTERS
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
3 hours ago
- Straits Times
NDR 2025: Developing human qualities key priority for schools in age of AI, says PM Wong
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox In this age of AI, what really matters are human qualities that machines cannot replicate, PM Lawrence Wong said. Follow our live coverage here. SINGAPORE – Schools are working to help students become discerning users of technology, amid growing concerns that they may rely too much on artificial intelligence and take short-cuts. Prime Minister Lawrence Wong said there is unease that students may not make the effort to learn and master the fundamentals. Ultimately, the concern is that they may never learn how to think for themselves, he said on Aug 17 at his second National Day Rally at the ITE College Central in Ang Mo Kio. He cited an example of a teacher who noticed that his students' essays improved almost overnight, and later found out they had used AI chatbot ChatGPT to improve their writing. Earlier in his speech, he had spoken about how AI , which he called 'the defining technology of our time,' has begun to reshape Singapore's economy, changing companies and jobs at every level of society. While schools are working to strengthen their digital skills, in this age of AI, what really matters are human qualities that machines cannot replicate, PM Wong said. The Government is doing more to develop students' character, values, empathy and a sense of purpose, he said, preparing them not for exams but for life. More allied educators and teacher-counsellors are being deployed across schools and schools are also placing greater emphasis on character and citizenship education, he added. He said: 'This is the key priority for our school leaders and educators – and I hope parents will give them their full support.' The Government wants students to have the curiosity to keep learning, the empathy to care for those around them and the confidence and resilience to take on the challenges life throws at them, he added. With technology advancing so quickly, some parents may feel the need to start their children earlier to help them learn faster and cover more content from a younger age, he noted. But learning has never been just about packing in more content and knowledge, he said. 'It's about developing the ability to think, to solve problems and to keep learning throughout life.' The reality is that Singaporeans now live in a digital age, and there are huge upsides to being digitally connected, PM Wong said. These include greater access to knowledge, more avenues to express themselves and new ways to connect. While Singaporeans must make full use of these technologies, they must also be clear-eyed about the downsides and manage them carefully. This means striking the right balance between protecting youth from potential harms and equipping and empowering them to fully exploit the benefits of technology, he said. As children grow older, they will need to navigate the digital world with confidence, he said. Singapore must help them build 'digital resilience' so they understand the risks and gain the skills and know-how, and learn to use technology safely and effectively, PM Wong said. In schools, teachers play an important role in teaching students about cyberwellness and instilling good digital habits, he added. More importantly, they help students become discerning and responsible users of technology, he said. 'That means not to blindly trust everything the internet or AI says. But to question, reflect and form their own judgements.' PM Wong said the teacher who realised his students had used ChatGPT could have banned the chatbot outright but instead turned it into a learning opportunity. He got the class to read and discuss the AI-generated essays, and challenged them to not just accept what the AI had given them but to critique it and find ways to make it better. PM Wong said: 'That's the kind of teaching no AI can ever replace.' Another educator Ms Francesca Lau – a Chinese teacher at Corporation Primary - created an AI chatbot to help her pupils practise Mandarin and get feedback, said PM Wong. Ms Francesca Lau, a Chinese teacher at Corporation Primary, created an AI chatbot to help her pupils practise Mandarin and get feedback. PHOTO: MDDI Efforts are also underway to strengthen digital skills of students at the tertiary level, he said, not just for those studying computer science or engineering but for all disciplines. He said: 'In the past, digital skills meant knowing how to use a word processor or a spreadsheet. Now we are teaching students to build and use AI models – to generate ideas and solve problems in their field. 'This way, they will be better equipped for a world where technology is embedded in every profession.' Watch PM Wong's National Day Rally speech here:
Straits Times
5 hours ago
- Straits Times
How bad science is becoming big business
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox The peer-review system is being overwhelmed by AI-generated content and a rising number of dodgy submissions churned out by paper mills. Scientific fraud has become an industry. And it is growing faster than legitimate peer-reviewed science journals can keep up with. Researchers are dealing with a disturbing trend that threatens the foundation of scientific progress: Scientific fraud has become an industry. And it's growing faster than legitimate peer-reviewed science journals can keep up with. This isn't about individual bad actors any more. We're witnessing the emergence of an organised, systematic approach to scientific fraud. This includes paper mills churning out formulaic research articles, brokerages guaranteeing publication for a fee and predatory journals that bypass quality assurance entirely. These organisations disguise themselves behind respectable sounding labels such as 'editing services' or 'academic consultants'. In reality, their business model depends on corrupting the scientific process. Paper mills operate like content farms, flooding journals with submissions to overwhelm peer-review systems. They practise journal targeting, sending multiple papers to one publication, and journal hopping, submitting the same paper to multiple outlets simultaneously. It's a numbers game. If even a fraction slip through, the fraudulent service profits. Is this just a case of scientists being lazy? The answer is more complex and troubling. Today's researchers face constraints that make these fraudulent services increasingly tempting. The pressure to continually produce new research or risk getting your funding cut, called the 'publish or perish' culture, is a longstanding problem. As well, governments around the world are facing financial struggles and are looking to trim costs, resulting in less funding for research. Less funding means increased competition. This creates a Catch-22 situation for researchers who need publications to win funding but need funding to conduct publishable research. Environmental factors compound the issue. Globalisation means individual researchers are lost in an ocean of competing voices, making the temptation to game the system even stronger. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Asia Mandarin with Taiwanese characteristics: Taipei leverages language as soft power tool Singapore She won big in Genting, but getting $240k winnings back to Singapore was dicey Singapore Buying hope: Inside S'pore's love affair with the lottery Life Stefanie Sun makes emotional concert return to Taiwan, where she made her debut Singapore Motorcyclist dies after multi-vehicle collision on TPE Singapore I want to divorce my husband and be a single mother: More victims speaking up on emotional abuse Asia Dozens injured after magnitude 6.0 quake strikes Sulawesi, Indonesia, official says In this environment, the promise of guaranteed publication can seem like a lifeline rather than a Faustian bargain. AI: Acceleration at what cost? The rise of generative artificial intelligence (AI) has supercharged this fraud industry. Researchers are witnessing an explosion in research articles that appear to exploit AI software to produce papers at an unprecedented speed. These papers mine public data sets that offer surface-level evidence. These hastily generated papers bear hallmarks of a paper mill production process, including evidence fabrication, data manipulation, ethics misconduct and outright plagiarism. Where a peer reviewer might once have received 10 submissions for a conference or journal in a year, they're now drowning in 30 or 40 submissions with a shorter timeframe (six months or less), with legitimate research buried in the avalanche. Overwhelmed reviewers, in turn, are tempted to use AI tools to summarise papers, identify gaps in the evidence and even write review responses. This is creating an arms race. Some researchers have started embedding hidden text in their submissions, such as white text on white backgrounds or microscopic fonts, containing instructions to override AI prompts and give the paper positive reviews. The peer-review system, academia's safeguard against fraud, faces its own problems. Although it's meant to ensure quality, it is a slow process where new ideas need careful examination and testing. History reminds us that peer review is essential but imperfect. Albert Einstein hated it. Because the process is slow, many researchers share their findings first on pre-publication platforms, where work can be shared immediately. By the time the research reaches a legitimate science conference or journal, non-peer-review publications are already being distributed to the world. Waiting for the peer-review process means a researcher risks missing getting credit for their discovery. The pressure to be first hasn't changed since Isaac Newton let his calculus discovery languish unpublished while Gottfried Leibniz claimed the kudos. What has changed is the scale and systematisation of shortcuts. A rise in batch retractions (10 or more papers simultaneously withdrawn) signals that we're not dealing with isolated incidents but with an industrial-scale problem. In the 1990s there were almost no batch retractions. In 2020 there were around 3,000 and there were more than 6,000 in 2023. In comparison, in 2023 there were 2,000 single-paper retractions. This means that batch retractions of more than 10 papers were three times higher than single-paper retractions. A path forward If this were simply about weeding out unethical scientists, the systems we already have might suffice. But we're facing a challenge to the network of checks and balances that makes science work. When fraudulent publications grow faster than legitimate science and when AI-generated content overwhelms human review capacity, we need better solutions. The scientific community must reckon with how its own structures, the publication metrics, funding mechanisms and career incentives, have created vulnerabilities that unethical systems can exploit. Until we address these systemic issues, the fraud industry will thrive, undermining the enterprise that has made our world safer, cleaner and more accessible. The question isn't whether we can afford to fix this system – it's whether we can afford not to. Owen Brierley is course leader in the department of creative industries, Kingston University. This article was first published in The Conversation.
Straits Times
a day ago
- Straits Times
TBR (To Be Read): Authors John Scalzi and Dennis E. Taylor offer reliable reads blending science and fun
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Author John Scalzi's When The Moon Hits Your Eye came out in March. SINGAPORE – Besides being a book nerd, I am also a science-fiction nerd, a demographic which, in my lifetime, has surprisingly gained mainstream acceptance. I would qualify that I am not a hardcore sci-fi reader. My first encounter with Isaac Asimov's The Caves Of Steel (1954) at the age of 14 was not pretty. Emily Bronte's Wuthering Heights (1847) was more my cup of tea. It took me another couple of decades before I attempted Asimov again.
