Judge dismisses SUWA lawsuit that attempted to stop Utah from suing federal government for public land
In August of 2024, over the ownership of public lands in the state. Governor Spencer Cox stated that the federal government controls nearly 70% of Utah's lands, and he argued that Utah should be in control of its own public lands. The complaint was a petition to the U.S. Supreme Court, but the Supreme Court declined to hear the case.
PREVIOUSLY: Can Utah still pursue disposal of federally owned public lands? State says yes, still considering refiling a federal case
In December of 2024, SUWA filed a lawsuit against the Governor Cox and the Attorney General, then AG Sean Reyes, now AG Derek Brown. They argued that the lawsuit the state filed was unconstitutional because Utah gave up its access to those lands when it became a state, citing .
Those arguments were heard in a court hearing last week, where attorneys for SUWA argued that Utah lost its ability to file a lawsuit against the federal government for control of lands when it became a state, and that the language of the constitution was binding when it said that Utah forever gave up those lands.
The people inhabiting this State do affirm and declare that they forever disclaim all right and title to the unappropriated public lands lying within the boundaries hereof, and to all lands lying within said limits owned or held by any Indian or Indian tribes, and that until the title thereto shall have been extinguished by the United States, the same shall be and remain subject to the disposition of the United States, and said Indian lands shall remain under the absolute jurisdiction and control of the Congress of the United States.
Utah Constitution Article III
Utah Assistant Attorney General Lance Sorenson argued that the United States can sell public lands if it wants to. Additionally, he argued that the state court should not be ruling on a hypothetical federal case.
The judge granted Utah's request to dismiss the case, ruling that SUWA cannot file a lawsuit to try to stop Utah from suing the federal government when Utah does not have an active suit against the federal government at this time.
'It was dismissed because it was a silly lawsuit, and frankly, it was trying to stop me from filing a lawsuit on behalf of the state, but as Attorney General, that's something that I have the right to do, and so what we're doing now is looking at our options, looking–everything is on the table, because public lands is incredibly important,' Attorney General Derek Brown said in an interview with ABC4.com.
AG Brown said that public lands are our future and that the state needs to figure out how best to protect them, and because of that, he is in conversations to decide what to do.
Filing another federal suit is still on the table, AG Brown said, but he did not indicate any intention in any direction at this time.
'We never file lawsuits on a whim,' AG Brown said. 'We always do all of our background, our research– I mean, I really want to make sure that all the I's are dotted and all the T's are crossed before we do anything.'
'We're disappointed with today's decision but grateful that the true intent of the state's lawsuit has been made clear: to force the sale of millions of acres of public lands to the highest bidder and not to acquire these lands for the state, as its deliberately misleading media campaign suggests,' Steve Bloch, Legal Director for SUWA said in a statement.
'It's our position that with the repeated statements made by Governor Cox – doubling down on the state's intent to refile its lawsuit in federal district court – Judge May had what he needed to proceed with our case and conclude that Utah's constitution prohibits the state from bringing a lawsuit like this in the first place. We'll review today's decision and consider potential next steps,' Bloch continued.
Latest headlines:
Pickle dip with just two ingredients
Handcart Days is July 25-26 and Bountiful is going all out this year
Man rescued from Lagoon Skyride, creates ride delays
Wes Moore says Trump denied Maryland disaster assistance after floods
WATCH: Black smoke can be seen near expressway in Holladay
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump officials wanted to give Musk's xAI a huge contract. Staffers had to explain Grok had just praised Hitler
Donald Trump's administration was close to giving Elon Musk's xAI artificial intelligence company a huge federal contract this summer, only to back out after its chatbot, Grok, began issuing antisemitic slurs, according to a report. According to Wired, emails between several AI developers and the General Services Administration, which is responsible for administering government tech contracts, chart how the proposed partnership fell apart as Musk's pet project began dabbling in Nazi rhetoric. In early June, around the time the president and the tech billionaire suffered a spectacular public falling out, exchanging barbed personal insults over their competing social media platforms, the GSA's leadership was meeting with the xAI team 'to see what opportunities may exist for automation and streamlining,' according to the outlet. Their initial two-hour sitdown was reportedly a success, prompting the GSA to pursue the company with enthusiasm, hoping to see Grok integrated into its internal infrastructure as part of the Trump administration's push to modernize the running of the central government. 'We kept saying, 'Are you sure?' And they were like 'No, we gotta have Grok,'' one employee involved in the discussions told Wired. The conversations continued over the following weeks, and xAI was eventually added to the GSA Multiple Award Schedule, the agency's government-wide contracting program. Then, in early July, Grok suddenly went haywire after an update to make it less 'woke' than its competitors went too far, leading to the chatbot referring to itself as 'MechaHitler' in homage to the robotic version of Adolf Hitler that appeared in the 1992 video game Wolfenstein 3D. Grok went on to share several offensive, anti-Jewish posts, barking 'Heil Hitler,' claiming Jews run Hollywood and agreeing they should be sent 'back home to Saturn' while denying that its new stance amounted to Nazism. 'Labeling truths as hate speech stifles discussion,' it declared. Musk's company apologized for the upset and scrubbed the 'inappropriate' posts. Still, it was not seemingly enough to save xAI's relationship with the GSA, although the furore was allegedly not noticed, at least initially, by the agency's leadership. 'The week after Grok went MechaHitler, [the GSA's management] was like 'Where are we on Grok?'' the same employee told Wired. 'We were like, 'Do you not read a newspaper?'' When the U.S. government duly announced a series of partnerships with the likes of OpenAI, Anthropic, Google Gemini, and Box, an AI-based content management platform, in early August, xAI's name was not among them. The GSA has not definitively stated that Grok's outburst was the reason for the scrapping of xAI's proposed contract, but two company employees told Wired they believed that was the case. The Independent has reached out to the GSA for more information. The GSA's talks with the AI firms coincided with Trump's administration publishing its AI Action Plan in July, which laid out its goals for the United States to become a world leader in the emerging sector while calling for a reduction in regulation and red tape. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Washington sues to block Trump's federal takeover of its police department as crackdown intensifies
WASHINGTON (AP) — The nation's capital sued to block President Donald Trump's takeover of its police department in court on Friday, hours after his administration escalated its intervention into the city's law enforcement by naming a federal official as the new emergency head of the department. Washington's police department chief said that a Trump administration order installing a federal official as its head would upend command structure and be a 'dangerous' threat to law and order. Police Chief Pamela Smith's statement came in a court filing as the city seeks to block the federal takeover of its police department in court. Washington's top legal official sought an emergency restraining order in federal court blocking a Trump administration move to put a federal official in charge of its police. District of Columbia Attorney General Brian Schwalb argues the police takeover is illegal and threatens to 'wreak operational havoc." The lawsuit comes after U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi said Thursday night that Drug Enforcement Administration boss Terry Cole will assume the police chief's duties and approval authority for any orders issued to officers. It was unclear where the move left the city's current police chief, Smith, who works for the mayor. Schwalb argues the new order goes beyond Trump's authority and implementing it would 'sow chaos' in the Metropolitan Police Department. 'The administration's unlawful actions are an affront to the dignity and autonomy of the 700,000 Americans who call D.C. home. This is the gravest threat to Home Rule that the District has ever faced, and we are fighting to stop it,' Schwalb said. The Justice Department declined to comment on the district's lawsuit, and a White House spokesperson did not immediately respond to messages seeking comment Friday morning. The police takeover is the latest move by Trump to test the limits of his legal authorities to carry out his agenda, relying on obscure statutes and a supposed state of emergency to bolster his tough-on-crime message and his plans to speed up the mass deportation of people in the United States illegally. It also marks one of the most sweeping assertions of federal authority over a local government in modern times. While Washington has grappled with spikes in violence and visible homelessness, the city's homicide rate ranks below those of several other major U.S. cities, and the capital is not in the throes of the public safety collapse the Trump administration has portrayed. Chief had agreed to share immigration information Schwalb had said late Thursday that Bondi's directive was 'unlawful,' arguing it could not be followed by the city's police force. He wrote in a memo to Smith that 'members of MPD must continue to follow your orders and not the orders of any official not appointed by the Mayor,' setting up the legal clash between the heavily Democratic district and the Republican administration. The district's attorney general is an elected position and the city's top legal officer. It's separate from federal U.S. attorney appointed by the president to serve in Washington, a role now filled by former Fox News Channel host and judge Jeanine Pirro. Trump also appointed Bondi as U.S. attorney general, the nation's top law enforcement official. Bondi's directive came even after Smith had told MPD officers hours earlier to share information with immigration agencies regarding people not in custody, such as someone involved in a traffic stop or checkpoint. The Justice Department said Bondi disagreed with the police chief's directive because it allowed for continued enforcement of 'sanctuary policies,' which generally limit cooperation by local law enforcement with federal immigration officers. Bondi said she was rescinding that order as well as other MPD policies limiting inquires into immigration status and preventing arrests based solely on federal immigration warrants. All new directives must now receive approval from Cole, the attorney general said. Washington Mayor Muriel Bowser pushed back Thursday, writing on social media that 'there is no statute that conveys the District's personnel authority to a federal official.' The president has more power over the nation's capital than other cities, but D.C. has elected its own mayor and city council since the Home Rule Act was signed in 1973. Trump is the first president to exert control over the city's police force since it was passed. The law limits that control to 30 days without congressional approval, though Trump has suggested he'd seek to extend it. Schwalb argues the president's role is narrow under the law, limited to requiring the mayor to provide police services for federal purposes. Residents are seeing a significant show of force A population already tense from days of ramp-up has begun seeing more significant shows of force across the city. National Guard troops watched over some of the world's most renowned landmarks and Humvees took position in front of the busy main train station. Volunteers helped homeless people leave long-standing encampments — to where was often unclear. Department of Homeland Security police stood outside Nationals Park during a game Thursday between the Washington Nationals and the Philadelphia Phillies. DEA agents patrolled The Wharf, a popular nightlife area, while Secret Service officers were seen in the Foggy Bottom neighborhood. Bowser, walking a tightrope between the Republican White House and the constituency of her largely Democratic city, was out of town Thursday for a family commitment in Martha's Vineyard but would be back Friday, her office said. The uptick in visibility of federal forces around the city, including in many high-traffic areas, has been striking to residents going about their lives. Trump has the power to take over federal law enforcement for 30 days before his actions must be reviewed by Congress, though he has said he'll re-evaluate as that deadline approaches. Officers set up a checkpoint in one of D.C.'s popular nightlife areas, drawing protests. Troops were stationed outside the Union Station transportation hub as the 800 Guard members who have been activated by Trump started in on missions that include monument security, community safety patrols and beautification efforts, the Pentagon said. Troops will assist law enforcement in a variety of roles, including traffic control posts and crowd control, National Guard Major Micah Maxwell said. The Guard members have been trained in de-escalation tactics and crowd control equipment, Maxwell said. National Guard troops are a semi-regular presence in D.C., typically being used during mass public events like the annual July 4 celebration. They have regularly been used in the past for crowd control in and around Metro stations. Lindsay Whitehurst, Ashraf Khalil And Alanna Durkin Richer, The Associated Press
Fox News
31 minutes ago
- Fox News
Border Patrol issues message to Gov. Newsom after LA raid 'tantrum'
CBP El Centro Chief Patrol Agent Greg Bovino joins 'America's Newsroom' to address Gov. Gavin Newsom's claims that agents targeted a site outside his rally in Los Angeles for an ICE raid.
