logo
Socially vulnerable Americans bear the brunt of disaster displacement

Socially vulnerable Americans bear the brunt of disaster displacement

Fast Company21-05-2025
People often think of disasters as great equalizers. After all, a tornado, wildfire, or hurricane doesn't discriminate against those in its path. But the consequences for those affected are not 'one-size-fits-all.'
That's evident in recent storms, and in the U.S. Census Bureau 's national household surveys showing who is displaced by disasters.
Overall, the Census Bureau estimates that more than 4.3 million Americans had to leave their homes because of disasters in 2024, whether for a short period or much longer. It was the fourth-costliest year on record for disasters. However, a closer look at demographics in the survey reveals much more about disaster risk in America and who is vulnerable.
It suggests, as researchers have also found, that people with the fewest resources, as well as those who have disabilities or have been marginalized, were more likely to be displaced from their homes by disasters than other people.
Decades of disaster research, including from our team at the University of Delaware's Disaster Research Center, make at least two things crystal clear: First, people's social circumstances—such as the resources available to them, how much they can rely on others for help, and challenges they face in their daily life—can lead them to experience disasters differently compared to others affected by the same event. And second, disasters exacerbate existing vulnerabilities.
This research also shows how disaster recovery is a social process. Recovery is not a 'thing,' but rather it is linked to how we talk about recovery, make decisions about recovery, and prioritize some activities over others.
Lessons from past disasters
Sixty years ago, the recovery period after the destructive 1964 Alaskan earthquake was driven by a range of economic and political interests, not simply technical factors or on need. That kind of influence continues in disaster recovery today. Even disaster buyout programs can be based on economic considerations that burden under-resourced communities.
This recovery process is made even more difficult because policymakers often underappreciate the immense difficulties residents face during recovery.
Following Hurricane Katrina, sociologist Alexis Merdjanoff found that property ownership status affected psychological distress and displacement, with displaced renters showing higher levels of emotional distress than homeowners. Lack of autonomy in decisions about how to repair or rebuild can play a role, further highlighting disparate experiences during disaster recovery.
What the census shows about vulnerability
U.S. Census data for 2023 and 2024 consistently showed that socially vulnerable groups reported being displaced from their homes at higher rates than other groups.
People with less high school education had a higher rate of displacement than those with more education. So did those with low household incomes or who were struggling with employment, compared to other groups.
While the Census Bureau describes the data as experimental and notes that some sample sizes are small, the differences stand out and are consistent with what researchers have found.
For example, research has long pointed to how communities composed predominantly of Black, Hispanic, Native American, and Pacific Islander residents have disproportionately worse recovery trajectories after a disaster, often linked to aspects such as housing tenure and land-use policies. Though reporting individual experiences, the Census Bureau's findings are consistent with this research, noting a higher rate of displacement for these groups.
lack investment in storm protection measures.
The morass of bureaucracy and conflicting information can also be a barrier to a swift recovery.
After Hurricane Sandy, people in New Jersey complained about complex paperwork and what felt to them like ever-changing rules. They bemoaned their housing recovery as, in researchers' words, a ' muddled, inconsistent experience that lacked discernible rationale.'
Residents who don't know how to find information about disaster recovery assistance or can't take time away from work to accumulate the necessary documents and meet with agency representatives can have a harder time getting quick help from federal and state agencies.
Disabilities also affect displacement. Of those people who were displaced for some length of time in 2023 and 2024, those with significant difficulty hearing, seeing, or walking reported being displaced at higher rates than those without disabilities.
Prolonged loss of electricity or water due to an ice storm, wildfire, or grid overload during a heat emergency can force those with medical conditions to leave even if their neighbors are able to stay. That can also create challenges for their recovery. Displacement can leave vulnerable disaster survivors isolated from their usual support systems and healthcare providers. It can also isolate those with limited mobility from disaster assistance.
Helping communities build resilience
Crucial research efforts are underway to better help people who may be struggling the most after disasters.
For example, our center was part of an interdisciplinary team that developed a framework to predict community resilience after disasters and help identify investments that could be made to bolster resilience. It outlines ways to identify gaps in community functioning, like healthcare and transportation, before disaster strikes. And it helps determine recovery strategies that would have the most impact.
Shifts in weather and climate and a mobile population mean that people's exposure to hazards are constantly shifting and often increasing. The Coastal Hazard, Equity, Economic Prosperity, and Resilience Hub, which our center is also part of, is developing tools to help communities best ensure resilience and strong economic conditions for all residents without shortchanging the need to prioritize equity and well-being.
We believe that when communities experience disasters, they should not have to choose among thriving economically, ensuring all residents can recover, and reducing risk of future threats. There must be a way to account for all three.
Understanding that disasters affect people in different ways is only a first step toward ensuring that the most vulnerable residents receive the support they need. Involving community members from disproportionately vulnerable groups to identify challenges is another. But those, alone, are not enough.
If we as a society care about those who contribute to our communities, we must find the political and organizational will to act to reduce the challenges reflected in the census and disaster research.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

As a mom, society expects me to be the default parent. My husband is just as capable as I am.
As a mom, society expects me to be the default parent. My husband is just as capable as I am.

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

As a mom, society expects me to be the default parent. My husband is just as capable as I am.

When my daughter was a newborn, people would ask me who was taking care of her when I was out. It made me realize that mothers are universally assumed to be the default parent. Parental leave still tends to be better for the birthing person, signaling that the other parent is secondary. When my daughter was a newborn, almost every time I left my New York City building, someone would ask, "Who's taking care of the baby?" Without missing a beat, I'd nonchalantly say, "Oh, I left her with a clean diaper and a bottle of milk. She should be good for a few hours." The not-so-surprising reality was that her dad was with her. But for some reason, no one assumed that, because, apparently, fathers are mythical creatures when it comes to childcare. Small interactions like the ones I had during my daughter's first year reveal a much more pervasive societal problem: mothers are universally assumed, if not expected, to be the default parent. Even when dads are fully capable, present, and kicking butt at the whole parenting thing. Moms are often the default parent The default parent phenomenon in heterosexual relationships is embedded in every aspect of life. It's how schools call mothers first when a child is sick, or only follow up with the mom via email for administrative tasks. It's in the pediatrician's office, where questions are directed to mom even when both parents are present. It's in the well-meaning people who ask, "Is Dad babysitting?" as if dads are temporary caregivers who swoop in like superheroes when needed. It's not called babysitting when it's your own kid. I'm not giving my husband pizza money and paying for his Uber ride to another home at the end of the night. All of this is interesting (exaggerated for effect) and moderately comical, but it's also important because default parent status creates an uneven distribution of responsibilities and reinforces unhealthy mentalities toward childcare and family life. Mothers, regardless of employment status outside the home, shoulder the majority of childcare responsibilities. Even in households where both parents work full-time, mothers spend significantly more time on childcare and are more likely to adjust their careers to accommodate family needs. Moms are not better than dads There's a powerful, albeit completely incorrect, narrative that mothers have some biological ability to parent that fathers lack. We absolutely don't. I, personally, had a much harder time adapting to parenthood than my husband. This narrative ignores the reality that parenting skills are learned, not instinctually programmed by gender. My husband didn't emerge from his mother's cozy womb knowing how to change diapers any more than I did. We both figured it out through the time-honored tradition of trial, error, and the absolute horror of getting peed and pooped on, sometimes at the same time. Workplace policies and societal structures continue to reinforce traditional gender roles. Paternity leave continues to be limited in the US, sending the clear message that fathers are secondary parents. Flexible work arrangements are marketed primarily toward mothers, not parents. Even family restrooms and changing tables in men's restrooms are inconsistent, physically reinforcing that childcare happens in women's spaces. It's 2025, men can handle a diaper change without oversight and without the world blowing up. Third, and perhaps most insidiously, we as a society have internalized these expectations. I catch myself "gatekeeping" parenting tasks, swooping in to change an outfit my husband picked out for our 15-month-old because it doesn't "match." I've had to recognize my own role in perpetuating the default parent problem and acknowledge that "my way" isn't the only right way to parent. As it turns out, children survive (and thrive) just fine with slightly crooked ponytails and mismatched socks. Both parents need to be recognized equally Breaking free from the default parent trap requires multidimensional action. On a personal level, parents need to have direct and frequent conversations about how society places uneven expectations on mothers and fathers. This means challenging these assumptions not just within the household but also in the wild. For dads, it means fully embracing parenthood without waiting to be asked or directed. It means becoming the parent who knows the pediatrician's phone number, remembers that Wednesday is show-and-tell day, and notices when the children's pants are getting too short. And we mothers are not off the hook. This means letting go of the idea that we need to control everything to prove our maternal worth. It means stepping back and allowing our partners to develop their own parenting approaches and styles, even when they differ from ours. We also need policies that recognize both parents as equally capable and responsible. This includes robust parental leave for all parents, workplace flexibility for all parents, and a conscious effort to shift how we talk about and portray parenthood in media and daily conversations. Companies marketing to families need to recognize fathers as legitimate consumers of baby, kid, and family products, not bumbling idiots who need "mom-approved" items. Dads can also tell if a diaper is absorbent or if a stroller is easy to fold. The default parent problem won't disappear overnight. But by recognizing it, naming it, and actively working to dismantle it just as swiftly as my daughter demolishes her Magnatile castles, we can create a more equitable parenting ecosystem. My hope is that by the time my daughter becomes a parent, if she chooses to, no one will ask her who's watching her baby when she's not around. People will assume what should be obvious: her child has two capable parents, both equally responsible for their care. Read the original article on Business Insider Solve the daily Crossword

Cherry Creek School District hopes to improve teacher shortage with program to recruit and train aspiring educators
Cherry Creek School District hopes to improve teacher shortage with program to recruit and train aspiring educators

CBS News

timean hour ago

  • CBS News

Cherry Creek School District hopes to improve teacher shortage with program to recruit and train aspiring educators

Cherry Creek Schools in the southern part of the Denver metro area is finding a way to address the national teacher shortage by growing and training their own teachers. Through a program, aspiring teachers get hands-on experience with the support of district teachers, while still attending college. The Aspiring Educator Pathway program is now in its second year and has more than doubled in size since starting. The program has grown from 16 apprentice and aspiring teachers last year to now nearly 60 this year. All the apprentice teachers have been paired with mentor teachers at 15 schools across the district. For the past couple weeks, they've also met to prepare for the start of the school year. Shae Brock worked in a 5th grade classroom last year as part of the aspiring educator pathway program. "It was something that was super exciting for me, and I knew it could be super life changing," said Brock. Brock attends the Community College of Aurora, which has a partnership with Cherry Creek School District for the program. While students take college classes, they also work full-time in a classroom and will become licensed teachers when they graduate. Melissa Klemenz, is the assistant director of the program, and said in traditional teacher-prep programs, students go to school for 3 ½ years and then during their last semester, they begin student teaching. She added that's why the district's superintendent worked to come up with a better way to prepare teachers. She said the goal is to recruit and retain teachers in the district and also provide the best education to students. "We really believe that educators need better preparation to in order to be the best for their students in the classroom," said Klemenz. "There is a teacher shortage, and so the more that we can have teachers that are prepared and feel comfortable in the classroom, as well as growing our own pathway to become teachers, will really help students benefit." In the first year of the program, Klemenz said there was improved student assessment and more positive classroom environments. For mentor teachers like Katrina Shroyer, she's also seen the growth in her students. "They have another person that cares about them, that wants them to be successful, that is there to impact their growth," said Shroyer. "We were a team and because they (apprentice teachers) were there every day, they knew the kids just like I knew them. As part of the four-year-program, mentees get more than 4,500 hours of experience inside the classroom, compared to 700 hours through a traditional pathway or regular student teaching. "I was in kindergarten as a student teacher, but it wasn't as intense as this program. I would go to school about two days a week and only be at the school part time," said Brock. "I think during student teaching, I was missing so many key opportunities that was Important for my journey as a teacher." The program also addresses student debt. While apprentice teachers are working at the district, their costs for college classes each year drops down to $15,000. Not only is Brock working a full-time job and getting a paycheck, but she's also getting a jumpstart in her career. "I really have been immersed in a school and school environment and working alongside with a teacher in their classroom, and what it's like to co-teach," said Brock. "I've learned a lot about how to build relationships with students, lesson planning, and, you know, really knowing what it takes to become a teacher," said Brock. This year as part of the program, the district also launched a Special Education Aspiring Educator Pathway. With special education position hard to fill, people are not going into that field of education as often. More than 20 teacher apprentices have signed up are focused in special education. Cherry Creek School District teachers will return to their classrooms this week and the apprentice teachers will also be joining them to get classrooms prepared and ready to welcome students back next week.

Opinion: How Well Do Middle Schools Prepare Students for HS? Here's a New Way to Find Out
Opinion: How Well Do Middle Schools Prepare Students for HS? Here's a New Way to Find Out

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Opinion: How Well Do Middle Schools Prepare Students for HS? Here's a New Way to Find Out

Education savings accounts in Texas. Open enrollment in Missouri. Each week seems to bring a new story and more education options for American students. But to make the most of these new opportunities, families need the full picture. So, what information do they have currently? And what additional data would it make sense for them to have? Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for The 74 Newsletter When it comes to public schools, whether neighborhood schools, magnets, or charters, the most common data points are academic achievement and year-to-year growth in math and reading, as measured on standardized tests. Although this information is crucial — something is very wrong if the kids can't pass the tests — critics from both sides of the aisle rightly note that it doesn't capture everything that families should want to know about a school's academics. For example, what about subjects like history and science, which are tested less frequently than reading and math? What about foreign languages, the arts and other subjects that aren't tested at all? And what about all the stuff that good schools impart that tests don't capture, like critical thinking, teamwork, self-discipline and respect for others? Related For years, education reformers who believe that data are critical to improving America's schools but recognize the limitations of standardized tests have struggled to answer these questions. That's why a recent analysis that explores a new and potentially powerful measure of school quality called high school readiness is so exciting. As the name suggests, the basic idea is to capture how well a middle school prepares its students for the next stage of their education by quantifying its effects on high school grades—or to be more precise, ninth-grade grade-point averages. The report finds that middle schools have a significant impact on students' future grades. For example, in North Carolina and Maryland, attending a middle school with a strong high school readiness score boosted a student's ninth-grade GPA by approximately one-tenth of a grade point. Effect of Attending a Middle School with a Higher High School Readiness Score on Ninth-Grade GPA One-tenth of a grade point may not sound like much, but it's enough to keep a marginal student out of the University of California or Texas A&M. And that increase is fairly impressive when you consider the number of factors that can affect GPA, from the quality of a student's elementary school to his or her socioeconomic circumstances and home life. Related Importantly, schools' influences on GPAs aren't necessarily the same as their effects on test scores. In fact, the two are only weakly correlated. Middle Schools That Boost Students' Test Scores Don't Necessarily Boost Their High School GPAs In other words, analyzing middle schools' effects on grades reveals something new and different about how schools serve students — which the many families who don't care exclusively about test scores might want to consider when choosing a school. While it may seem strange to suggest evaluating middle schools based on their students' high school readiness, many states already do something similar at the high school level, where indicators of college and career readiness have long been an accepted part of school report cards. And while there are technical challenges associated with isolating middle schools' effects on high school grades, most states already provide publicly available school report cards, and most already collect data on students' high school GPAs. So, with a bit of number-crunching and some clear messaging, a new high school readiness indicator could give families the information they're looking for — and begin to move America's education system away from its obsession with standardized tests and toward a broader concept of student success. As educational options expand, so should the information available to families. Test scores alone will never paint a complete picture of school quality or student success. But in the age of big data, there is no shortage of paint. Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store