logo
US judge halts plan to transfer Oak Flat land for contested Arizona copper mine

US judge halts plan to transfer Oak Flat land for contested Arizona copper mine

Independent10-05-2025
A U.S. district judge on Friday temporarily halted the federal government's plans to transfer land in eastern Arizona for a massive copper mining project amid protest by Native American groups that consider the area sacred.
Apache Stronghold and its supporters have been fighting for years to stop the transfer of Tonto National Forest land known as Oak Flat to Resolution Copper. Meanwhile, the company has touted the economic benefits for the region and says it's worked with Native American tribes and others to shape the project.
U.S. District Judge Steven Logan said halting the land transfer would merely delay the production of copper and jobs and revenue to Arizona if it's ultimately upheld. On the other hand, he said Apaches would lose legal access to an ancestral, sacred site if the transfer proceeded.
He said the balance of equities 'tips sharply' in favor of Apache Stronghold. He granted an injunction that will be in place until the U.S. Supreme Court resolves an appeal to reconsider a decision from a panel of judges that refused to block the land transfer for the mine.
Logan, however, denied Apache Stronghold's request to have the injunction extend beyond the Supreme Court's resolution of the case.
'We are grateful the judge stopped this land grab in its tracks so that the Supreme Court has time to protect Oak Flat from destruction," Wendsler Nosie Sr. of Apache Stronghold said in a statement Friday.
A statement from Resolution Cooper said the ruling simply maintains the status quo and anticipates the U.S. Supreme Court will decide soon whether to take up the case.
The fight over Oak Flat dates back about 20 years, when legislation proposing the land transfer was first introduced. It failed repeatedly in Congress before being included in a must-pass national defense spending bill in 2014.
President Donald Trump in his first administration released an environmental review that would trigger the land transfer. Former President Joe Biden pulled it back so the federal government could consult further with tribes.
Then, the U.S. Forest Service in April announced it would forge ahead with the land transfer, prompting Apache Stronghold's emergency appeal.
Apache Stronghold sued the U.S. government in 2021 under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act to protect the place tribal members call Chi'chil Bildagoteel, an area dotted with ancient oak groves and traditional plants the Apaches consider essential to their religion.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Indiana woman arrested amid threatening to kidnap & assassinate Trump
Indiana woman arrested amid threatening to kidnap & assassinate Trump

Daily Mail​

time15 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Indiana woman arrested amid threatening to kidnap & assassinate Trump

A woman has been arrested after she traveled from New York to Washington D.C. while making death threats against President Donald Trump. Nathalie Rose Jones (pictured), a 50-year-old woman from Indiana, was arrested in Washington on Saturday after participating in a protest outside the White House and charged with two felonies related to her threats. US Attorney Jeanine Pirro (pictured), a Trump ally and former Fox News anchor, announced the woman's arrest on Monday and vowed 'she will be prosecuted to the full extent of the law.' 'Threatening the life of the President is one of the most serious crimes and one that will be met with swift and unwavering prosecution. Make no mistake - justice will be served,' Pirro said. The posts on her Facebook account became increasingly unhinged and frequent. On August 14, she wrote directly to Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth pleading with him to 'arrange the arrest and removal ceremony of POTUS Trump as a terrorist on the American People from 10-2pm at the White House on Saturday, August 16th, 2025.' On August 15, the Secret Service conducted a 'voluntary interview' with Jones, during which she insisted Trump was a 'terrorist' and a 'Nazi.' In that interview, she allegedly said that if given the opportunity, she would kill Trump at 'the compound', adding that she had 'a bladed object' which could 'carry out her mission of killing.' Jones allegedly said she wanted to 'avenge all the lives lost during the Covid-19 pandemic,' and said she blamed the Trump administration's position on vaccines for the deaths of so many. On the day of her arrest, Jones had shared several photos from the front lines of a protest at the White House, demanding Trump's immunity from prosecution be 'stripped' and doubling down on her demands for him to be removed from power. During a second interview with Secret Service on the day of her arrest, Jones allegedly denied she had any present desire to harm the president. Jones was charged with threatening to take the life of, kidnap, or inflict bodily harm upon the President of the United States, and transmitting in interstate commerce communications containing threats to kidnap any person or any threat to injure the person of another. 'Special Agents from New York and Washington, DC, working in close coordination with prosecutors from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia, acted swiftly and decisively to neutralize this alleged threat before it could escalate. We are deeply grateful to the dedicated professionals who worked tirelessly to advance this investigation and safeguard our nation's leadership.'

‘We're all going backwards': dismay as Trump undoes Biden student-debt plan
‘We're all going backwards': dismay as Trump undoes Biden student-debt plan

The Guardian

time18 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

‘We're all going backwards': dismay as Trump undoes Biden student-debt plan

When Faith, a 33-year-old in Burlington, North Carolina, went back to get her master's degree in higher education administration in 2020-21, she hoped it would accelerate her career growth and maybe even help her get on the housing ladder. Now, Faith has federal student loan debts of $38,113, and a repayment schedule that is much more demanding than she realized so she feels like the program stalled her progress. 'I wasn't aware of the detriment it would have on my future,' she said. 'You really don't know the full scope of what you're getting into [when taking out student loan debt] … I got my master's specifically to progress in my career, but what I make now versus what I owe on the degree, it's almost like it doesn't make sense.' She added: 'I always regret that decision.' Faith's situation has been made worse by the Trump administration's moveto resume charging loan interest for borrowers under the Saving on a Valuable Education (Save) plan as of 1 August. Under the Biden administration, about 8 million people enrolled in the Save plan – a 2023 income-driven repayment plan for student debt – many of whose loans have been in forbearance since last year. Under Donald Trump, the Department of Education has effectively killed the Save plan, recommending people switch to another repayment plan for their federal student loans. Borrowers can still choose to forgo payments, but will see interest accruing on their loans and won't make any progress toward student loan forgiveness. 'To me that just looks like you're digging me deeper into debt, so I felt like I had no other choice but to go ahead and change from the Save plan and start making those payments,' Faith said. Faith is one of scores of people who got in touch with the Guardian to share how they'll be affected by changes to the Save plan. Her new repayment plan means she must find an extra $300 a month, on top of her rent of $1,200 (before bills and living costs), a financial challenge that feels 'very overwhelming' and has put everything else on hold. 'Luckily I don't have any dependents … but all the people in their 30s around me, it feels like we're all going backwards,' Faith said. 'I'm scared for what the future looks like, especially as we get older. Does that mean, unlike our grandparents whose homes were paid off and who were free of debt, that we're just going to be in debt?' Public school teacher Jennifer, a 34-year-old based in Portland, Oregon, with $63,419 in federal student loan debt, is also leaving the Save plan, but said her monthly payments almost doubled in her new repayment scheme from about $250 to $480. 'I don't understand why it's so high,' she said – but she has to leave the Save plan in order to make progress towards loan forgiveness for public school teachers. Jennifer wants to have children in the next couple of years, but said she's 'scared for my family plans' under such difficult financial pressures. Alongside teaching in public school, she babysits and runs a weekly bar trivia night in order to earn extra cash to make a living. 'The [Trump] administration claims to be pro-family, but is screwing a lot of people over – including ones with families, including ones who want to build a family,' she said. After changes to Save plan were announced, Jennifer was forced to ask her parents for financial support to help pay off her car loan, which felt difficult as a 34-year-old woman, the age her mother already had two children. 'I'm really lucky to be in the position' to ask for help, she said, but added that 'there's so many Americans who don't have access to generational wealth in that way, and so many teachers who don't – and we wonder why the teaching field is so white, so unrepresentative. It's so expensive to be a teacher.' Sedona, a 30-year-old lawyer in Seattle, Washington, who has federal student loans worth $170,848, will be staying in the Save plan, despite the loan interest resuming. She is 'much more afraid of defaulting on private debt', which is currently $22,413 in loans co-signed with her mother, she said. Despite Sedona earning a good wage as an associate lawyer, she and her partner still 'live paycheck to paycheck' and already keep a hawkish eye on their finances. As a household they have cancelled most of their subscriptions, very rarely go on trips like to the movies or for nights out, and Sedona picks up sporadic gig work such as copy editing to supplement their income. 'In my therapy sessions, we talk a lot about how so much of my anxiety and issues are tied to financial concerns,' she said. 'It's kind of like always sitting there, as this heavy weight.' Sedona feels that the Trump administration's decision to effectively kill the Save plan aggressively punishes those already in often severe levels of debt, while it simultaneously gives lavish tax giveaways to wealthy individuals and corporations. One day Sedona and her partner would like to adopt or foster children but they currently cannot see a future in which it would be financially responsible to do so. 'It feels like, when do I get to start living my life?' she said. 'We're a generation of people who feel jilted.' In Aurora, Colorado, 46-year-old Chris is also remaining in the Save plan. He said he has about $50,000 in outstanding student loan debts – down from $65,000 – that he accrued while studying a bachelor's degree in hospitality management. He's keeping his federal student loans in forbearance and paying the interest for as long he can, in order to prioritize paying other debts. 'It's not that I don't intend to pay my students debts, I understood it was a loan like any other to be repaid,' he said, but the 'repayment costs need to be able to fit in a budget that allows for personal and professional growth'. It feels to Chris as if the Trump administration wants to 'keep those with [student] debt in it for as long as possible'. 'My hope is that midterm elections will bring about government leaders that will undo this mess, that is where my vote will go,' he said.

Democrat warns US progressives against moving toward the center: ‘It lost me the election'
Democrat warns US progressives against moving toward the center: ‘It lost me the election'

The Guardian

time18 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Democrat warns US progressives against moving toward the center: ‘It lost me the election'

India Walton has a warning message for progressive Democrats during Donald Trump's second presidency: don't water down your politics to win over the establishment. The Democratic socialist who stunned the Democratic establishment by defeating a four-term incumbent mayor in Buffalo, New York's 2021 primary believes moderating her leftwing message cost her the general election. It's a lesson that carries new weight now that Zohran Mamdani secured his own victory in New York City's Democratic mayoral primary earlier in the summer and inspired thousands of other progressive candidates to also run for office. After disrupting the political base in the US by beating incumbent mayor Byron Brown in Buffalo's Democratic primary, she says she pivoted toward the center – and lost. 'Moderating is what got us here,' said Walton, now a senior strategist at RootsAction, referring to Donald Trump's return to the White House. 'I believe that moderating is what lost me ultimately the election in 2021.' 'I pivoted fairly quickly … to try and integrate myself into the party, because I thought that was the way to build a broad based coalition,' she reflected. 'It sort of ate away from our message from the inside out.' After initially opposing charter schools in the primary to win the Buffalo Teachers Federation endorsement, Walton later told business leaders she supported 'school choice' – and lost the union's backing for the general election as a result. She also distanced herself from the 'defund the police' movement. Shortly after Walton won the primary that year, the establishment and investor-aligned Brown mounted an unorthodox write-in campaign and won, even though his race was marked by possible campaign finance violations including receiving contributions from real estate corporations in defiance of election law.. Brown, an ally of New York governor Andrew Cuomo and a former New York Democratic party chair, would step down in 2024 to serve as president and CEO of a western New York off-track betting company. But in 2021, there was widespread fear over Walton's socialist tendencies, with the city even researching whether or not it should entirely abandon its mayoral system over her primary win. These days, Walton argues Democrats lost working-class voters by abandoning populist economics. 'I think a part of the reason how we got a second Donald Trump presidency is that the Democrats have not had a message that appeals to working-class and poor people.' The establishment resists such policies because they're 'beholden to corporations and billionaires', she added. 'It's not the message they want to hear, but it is the message that is resonant with the voters.' Walton's analysis runs counter to some Democratic strategists who argue the party moved too far left after 2024's losses. One post-mortem survey by the Progressive Policy Institute showed 68% of working-class voters believed the Democratic party had embraced overly progressive positions. Soon after Trump's election win and swing state sweep, New York Times columnist Ezra Klein argued that the Biden-era Democratic Party reflected 'a culture in which nobody is saying no to the groups at any level of American Democratic politics'. Yet last year, progressive ballot measures thrived even as Democratic candidates struggled. Voters across the country approved minimum wage increases, paid leave expansions, and other progressive economic policies, with red states embracing progressive measures even while supporting Trump, like Missouri where voters passed a $15 minimum wage and paid sick leave, or Nebraska where voters approved guaranteed paid time off. A July 2025 poll by Democratic pollster Celinda Lake for progressive network Way to Win found that Democratic voters who skipped 2024 want candidates more like independent Vermont senator Bernie Sanders and New York member of congress Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, suggesting the party's problem may be insufficient progressivism rather than too much. One example Walton pointed to was the debate on 'defund the police' that did damage to many progressive and centrist campaigns. The real message, which Walton said had been distorted, was about shifting police funding toward social services and mental health care. The slogan ultimately became a political liability. In 2020, centrist Democrats warned it had cost them over a dozen swing district House seats after Joe Biden's presidential win and in Minneapolis, voters rejected a measure to overhaul policing even after George Floyd's murder. In a pre-Mamdani New York City, Eric Adams ran explicitly against 'defund the police' and won. Now Mamdani – a democratic socialist assemblyman who defeated former governor Andrew Cuomo with 56% in the final ranked-choice count – has given progressives fresh momentum all over again. His victory generated immediate enthusiasm, with Run for Something, a progressive group that urges young candidates to seek public office, noting that 10,000 people nationwide signed up to pursue public office within two weeks of his win. Walton sees opportunity in younger voters who don't follow traditional political voting patterns. 'Millennials are the first generation who are not becoming more conservative as they age.' Her advice to progressive candidates is simple: resist the pressure to compromise. 'People hear hope in 'we're going to prioritize working-class people',' she said. 'People hear hope in 'I'm not going to capitulate to the establishment and negotiate all of our power that we've built'. This is the right time.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store