Ukrainian missile strike kills high-ranking Russian Naval Officer
Gudkov was killed early yesterday in a pinpoint Ukrainian missile strike on Korenevo in Russia's Kursk region, making him one of the highest ranking military officials to be killed by Ukraine, Russis's defence ministry confirmed. Primorye Region Governor Oleg Kozhemyako wrote of the news of Gudkov's death in a Telegram post: 'I express my deepest condolences to the family, friends, and fellow servicemen of Mikhail Gudkov, Nariman Shikhaliyev, and all other fighters who were killed in the Kursk Region.' Four out of eight missiles were reportedly downed by Russian air defences, but the others hit their marks.
Some 50,000 Russians troops are massed at the border, in a development Donald Trump said this week he was watching 'very closely'. Obituaries say Gudkov died with his troops 'in combat action'. Flowers were being laid today for Gudkov in Vladivostok, Russia's Pacific capital, in Primorsky region, home of the 155th Marine Brigade which has played a key role in Putin's illegal invasion of Ukraine.
At a meeting in Russian Arctic capital Murmansk in March, Putin promoted Gudkov who had been picked out as a high-flying military talent. Putin told him: 'I have made the decision to transfer you to a new position and increase the level of your responsibility. 'You are being appointed Deputy Commander of the Naval Forces of the Russian Federation.' Gudkov replied: 'Aye, Comrade Supreme Commander-in-Chief.'
In October 2023, then a Colonel, he had received the Gold Star of the Hero of Russia honour and an award pistol for 'courage, heroism and skilful command of subordinate units' for his war service.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
QUENTIN LETTS: What will become of the builder who sends his labourer for two tins of tartan paint?
's monitors of workplace chit-chat have already been dubbed 'banter police' or 'banter tsars', but a different Russian word would be more accurate. After the Bolshevik revolution of 1917, military units had komissars who were enforcers for the regime. Given their power to denounce soldiers to the Soviet authorities, it wasn't long before they were heartily loathed. These komissars kept an eye on the ranks. They noted which men had an independent streak and they made sure any scepticism about the new political order did not spread. Light-hearted banter brightens most places of work. Life would become dull if we could not rib one another, devise nicknames and tease workmates when they goof. But under Ms Rayner's Bill, 'third-party harassment' will be reportable to and by diversity officers. The unifying benefits of banter will be lost to suffocating fear of propriety. Morale will be dented. Work will become more of a drudge. Is this really what Labour MPs want? Quite what constitutes 'harassment' will be for courts to decide. The lawyers are going to be busy, as will Ms Rayner's union allies. This law will also give trade union reps leverage over free-spirited souls who crack jokes at work. If those people pay their union dues, their indiscretions will no doubt be overlooked. But anyone who seems a bit too Right-wing or 'Brexity' will be fed into the procedural mangle. As for bosses, if they refuse to meet unions' pay demands, you can bet the banter komissars will find more incidents to report. My wife often works on a building site. She removes paint from doors and windows. 'Here's our stripper,' say her male workmates. She thinks this is a hoot, but you can see how a grievance-surfing lawyer could turn that into a demand for thousands in compensation. Construction sites are fruity places. She was once on all fours, helping a contractor fit some under-floor piping, and had to tell him, 'give me another inch'. Cue much ribald laughter. Under Ms Rayner's proposals it might not even require a complaint by the alleged victim of banter. Diversity officers could themselves decide to report any incidents, starting a legalistic process that will last months, ruin reputations and create untold stress. More money will be spent on human resources and training. There will be more rules, more anxiety, more suspicion, less freedom. I once worked at a warehouse where a forklift accidentally pronged a pallet of Brut 33 aerosols. What a stink. The forklift driver was the target of plenty of banter. Richly deserved it, too. My son, new to a labouring job, was dangled over a sewage pit by his ankles. A union rep might call that bullying but from that day my son felt part of the team. I know of another young lad who was sent off by his foreman to buy 'two tins of tartan paint, and holes for fence-posts'. He was told 'the holes aren't heavy but there's nothing to hold on to'. It was a while before he realised he was being asked to buy thin air. Likewise, he was told to 'go to the van and bring back a new bubble for the spirit-level'. The weird thing is that Ms Rayner is supposedly the one normal, working-class person in a Cabinet of wonks. In pressing for this mad law she is showing herself to be as out of touch as the rest of them. All because she is ambitious for the top job and wants to suck up to her union paymasters. How pathetic.
The Sun
2 hours ago
- The Sun
Donald Trump ‘moaned he could not access PORN in White House as computers there were blocked'
DONALD Trump grumbled about his lack of access to porn in the White House, his former communications director has said. The US President moaned he could not watch X-rated films as computers there blocked them. 2 Financier Anthony Scaramucci, who worked for Mr Trump in 2017 during his first stint in office, made the revelation while visiting the UK last month. Mr Trump — who reputedly had flings with porn star Stormy Daniels and a Playboy model — has also discussed death with Sir Keir Starmer, it is reported. During a White House lunch in February, the President quizzed the PM about younger brother Nick, who died of cancer aged 60. According to The Spectator mag, he asked: 'Your brother, Keir…he died…was it a good death?' Instead of replying in full, Starmer steered the conversation back to lowering car tariffs. Sir Keir's team said Trump was 'obsessed with death', it was claimed. The revelations came as Trump — a guest at Hugh Hefner's Playboy mansion during his 2016 presidential bid — signed his 'big beautiful Bill' into law. It enacts key parts of his agenda including tax cuts and an immigration purge. US President Donald Trump said Russia just wanted to -keep killing people- and hinted at sanctions after Moscow launched its largest ever drone and missile attack on Ukraine in the three-year-old war- 2
The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
Leaders of Russia and China snub Brics summit in sign group's value may be waning
Russia and China are not sending their leaders to a Brics summit starting in Brazil on Sunday in what may be a sign that the group's recent expansion has reduced its ideological value to the two founding members. China's 72-year-old leader, Xi Jinping, has attended Brics summits for the past 12 years. No official reason has been given for sending the premier, Li Qiang, other than scheduling conflicts. Russia's president, Vladimir Putin, is facing an international criminal court arrest warrant and may have decided not to travel to Rio to avoid embarrassing the summit hosts, who are signatories to the ICC statute. Mongolia has been in an acrimonious legal dispute with the ICC after it did not act on the warrant when Putin visited last year. Putin abandoned his plans to attend the 2023 Brics summit in South Africa after the president, Cyril Ramaphosa, was unable to offer any guarantees regarding Putin's arrest or otherwise under the warrant. Putin is accused by the ICC of being instrumental in abducting and deporting tens of thousands of Ukrainian children. Brics, often described as the developing world's alternative to the G7 group of nations, has undergone a recent rapid expansion, but in the process has diluted its coherence as a body offering an ideological alternative to the western capitalism represented by the G7. Its founding members were Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa, but the group last year expanded to include Indonesia, Iran, Egypt, Ethiopia, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, countries in various stages of economic development and with varying levels of antagonism towards the west. The additions skewed the body towards autocracies, leaving Brazil, South Africa and India uneasy. Brazil has said the Brics grouping is just one sign of an emerging new world order. Speaking recently at the Overseas Development Institute, the former Brazilian foreign minister and current ambassador to London, Antonio Patriota, said Donald Trump's 'America first' foreign policy would move the world order away from the US as a superpower and towards a multipolar world with power spread more evenly. 'The US, through its policies, including on tariffs and sovereignty, is accelerating the transition to multipolarity in different ways,' Patriota said. He added that new alliances were likely to develop that would challenge the current distribution of power. 'It's difficult to argue today that Europe converges with the US policy on trade or on security or on sustaining democracy, for example. So where there used to be one unique western pole, now perhaps there are two.' Brazil, an emerging diplomatic powerhouse in the global south, may benefit from Russia and China's leaders being absent this weekend, since it wants to use the summit to champion a theme of inclusive global governance reform. It would not want the focus to be solely on criticism of western double standards in the Middle East and Ukraine. The hosts have a set of concrete proposals: the green energy transition, cooperation on vaccines and expanding most-favoured nation status to all countries in the World Trade Organization. Patriota denied that new multipolarity – a world in which many different cooperative alliances are formed – was inherently unstable, arguing it was unilateralism that had been the more disruptive force. 'There is strong support for preserving multilateralism, but that does not mean that we need to preserve it as it stands,' he said. 'Brazil is arguing we shouldn't wait for another world war, or for something of that nature, or scale, to start reforming. Unless there is a strong movement towards reform now, we run the risk of reaching a tipping point.' But Dr Christopher Sabatini, a senior fellow for Latin America at Chatham House, has argued Brazil will struggle to impose an agenda on the Brics. 'Brics was an unwieldy group before it opened its membership – even if the stated goals of the emerging-economy alliance were initially laudable and long-overdue,' he wrote recently. 'While UN security council expansion was once a stated goal, China was always likely to block India's accession to the body. Brazil's commitments to reduce carbon emissions were also likely to collide with Saudi Arabia, Russia and the UAE's oil- and gas-based economic interests (though Brazil has doubled down on oil production and exports despite its public rhetoric over climate change).' India is also opposing the idea of a Brics currency as an alternative to the dollar. Nevertheless, Xi's decision to stay away is puzzling, given the US's retreat from its global leadership role has provided a golden opportunity for China to pick up the mantle. Dr Samir Puri, the director of the centre for global governance at Chatham House, questioned whether a transition to a new multilateralism was happening. 'It seems that the ending of one international order does not necessarily beget the sudden arrival of another,' he said. 'The vacuums created by the US's sudden retreat from multilateralism and global governance will not be automatically filled by others.'
