Not Only Jakarta, Kolkata, Chennai And Mumbai Are Also Sinking – Here's Why It Should Terrify You
New Delhi: In the bustling northern outskirts of Jakarta, homes that once stood tall are now almost knee-deep in the earth. Over the past two decades, buildings have gradually sunk, streets have become flood-prone and landmarks have disappeared beneath rising waters. Residents remember mosques and ports that no longer exist – swallowed by the sea as land gives way.
This disturbing reality is not only Jakarta's story. It is emerging as a silent catastrophe across many of the world's rapidly growing cities – including several in India.
A recent international study conducted by Nanyang Technological University (NTU) in Singapore highlights an alarming trend: 48 major coastal cities around the world, including Kolkata, Chennai, Ahmedabad, Mumbai and Surat, are gradually sinking. The primary driver is not only rising sea levels due to climate change, but something more local and human-made – the overextraction of groundwater.
India's Sinking Cities
Kolkata is experiencing land subsidence at rates ranging from 0.01 cm to 2.8 cm per year. Nearly 9 million people live in the affected areas. In places like Bhatpara, the land is sinking as much as 2.6 cm annually. Experts attribute this to the rampant withdrawal of groundwater – a common practice in overpopulated urban zones with limited water infrastructure.
The threat is not limited to erosion or flooding. Subsiding land also increases the city's vulnerability to earthquakes and severe weather events, making disaster management a growing concern.
In Chennai, the situation is similar, with some parts of the city, particularly areas like Tharamani, sinking up to 3.7 cm annually. Here, around 1.4 million people live in regions facing gradual land loss. The cause, again, is excessive groundwater use, particularly for agriculture and industry, compounded by poor water management.
The most concerning figures come from Ahmedabad, where land in some neighborhoods like Piplaj is sinking at a rate of 4.2 cm per year, with some areas reporting up to 5.1 cm annually. Over 5 million residents are affected. The local government has initiated a Climate Resilient City Action Plan to mitigate the impact, focusing on solutions such as rainwater harvesting and artificial recharge of groundwater.
A Widening Global Crisis
The NTU study, supported by United Nations data, reveals that 160 million people across the globe are living in areas that are gradually subsiding – many of them in Asian cities built on river deltas or soft sediment.
These locations are especially vulnerable due to high population density and intense urban development.
Jakarta is now so low-lying that nearly half the city is below sea level. Thirteen rivers run through it, and worsening rainfall patterns are causing increasingly frequent floods.
Land in some parts of the city has sunk by up to four meters since the 1970s. The situation is so critical that Indonesia is now developing a new capital, Nusantara, to escape the environmental collapse.
Solutions and Warnings
Some cities have responded with visible defences – building sea walls, dikes and flood barriers. But these measures, while helpful, can sometimes backfire. When natural drainage is blocked, rainwater and river flows get trapped behind man-made structures – creating what experts call a "bowl effect", worsening floods instead of preventing them.
Cities like Ho Chi Minh City, Alexandria and Jakarta have already built such barriers. However, the real long-term solution lies deeper – in managing groundwater responsibly.
Japan's capital, Tokyo, faced a similar crisis in the 20th century. But by the 1970s, the city imposed strict regulations on groundwater extraction and implemented a robust water supply system.
This drastically slowed land subsidence, turning Tokyo into a global model for how science-based policy can reverse environmental damage.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Wire
7 hours ago
- The Wire
Sustainable Development Cannot Be Achieved Without Gender Equality
Menu हिंदी తెలుగు اردو Home Politics Economy World Security Law Science Society Culture Editor's Pick Opinion Support independent journalism. Donate Now Live Wire Sustainable Development Cannot Be Achieved Without Gender Equality Reana Sachdeva 28 minutes ago Respecting women and ensuring their rights is not merely a moral imperative; it strategically advances efforts towards sustainable development Illustration: Pariplab Chakraborty Real journalism holds power accountable Since 2015, The Wire has done just that. But we can continue only with your support. Contribute now The interconnection between gender equality and sustainable development objectives (SDGs) is increasingly recognised as a fundamental prerequisite for achieving global development progress worldwide. As per United Nations data, women earn 23% less than men globally, on average. They also spend three times the number of hours performing domestic and care work in comparison to their male counterparts. Gender equality transcends mere humanitarian considerations and is a fundamental catalyst for economic growth and environmental sustainability. As per data published by the United Nations in 2023, 54% of countries still do not have laws to address key areas of gender equality, including equal marriage and divorce rights. As the United Nations approaches the 2030 Agenda, promoting women's rights emerges as a cross-cutting issue that can enhance both environmental and economic outcomes worldwide. Gender equality is explicitly articulated in the objective of Sustainable Development Goal 5 (SDG 5), which aims to eliminate discrimination against women and girls and ensure their full participation in political, economic, and public life. The advancement of women's rights is intrinsically linked to improved health outcomes, enhanced economic services, and effective environmental management. Consequently, it fosters the realisation of sustainable development across all sectors. Investing in women's capabilities can catalyse substantial economic growth. The realisation of women's rights catalyses pivotal social transformations, including enhanced educational outcomes, diminished poverty rates, and improved family health. Recognising women's reproductive rights and allowing access to health care, in particular maternal and reproductive health, is crucial to promote gender equality. Recent data records reveal that only 56% of women between the ages of 15-49 have autonomy over decisions about their sexual and reproductive choices. Furthermore, when women have power, they are more likely to participate in the workforce, thus contributing to economic productivity. As per data published by the United Nations in 2023, 61.4% of women of prime working age are in the workforce, the number being 90.6% for men. The intersection of gender equality and environmental sustainability is evident in the roles of women in the management of natural resources. Their involvement in these roles can lead to improved environmental outcomes. Women frequently assume the primary responsibility for managing natural resources, possessing invaluable knowledge and expertise in sustainable practices. Research suggests that promoting gender equality in agriculture can enhance the resilience of agricultural systems to climate change, illustrating how the advancement of women's rights can establish positive feedback loops between gender equity, sustainability, and economic stability. Conversely, the adverse impact of climate change will be disproportionate for women and girls, as globally 158 million (16 million more than the number of men and boys) of them may be pushed into poverty and also be impacted by food insecurity resulting from climate change. Food insecurity is projected to increase by a staggering 236 million more women and girls, compared to 131 million more men and boys. The effective implementation of the 2030 Agenda necessitates a critical examination of the socio-political power dynamics. Addressing systemic inequalities in the allocation of resources through policy making that is rooted in the politics of redistribution can catalyse transformative change within communities and facilitate increased participation of women in decision-making processes. Legislation and governance models that prioritise inclusive, intersectional, gender-sensitive approaches can empower women to assume active roles in environmental management and economic development. In numerous regions, particularly those experiencing economic instability or environmental vulnerability, women's rights are frequently safeguarded inadequately. Consequently, women, particularly those from marginalised communities, bear the disproportionate burden of any conflict or destabilising event. By adopting an approach attuned to emphasising gender equity within the framework of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), nations can harness the potential of women to address climate change and foster economic innovation. In conclusion, the interconnection between gender equality and the Sustainable Development objectives has become increasingly complex and multifaceted. Respecting women and ensuring their rights is not merely a moral imperative; it strategically advances efforts towards sustainable development. By fostering an inclusive environment that enhances women's voice, power and agency to enable their contribution to political and economic life, countries can simultaneously drive economic growth and cultivate environmental resilience, ultimately creating a sustainable future for all. To achieve this vision, global political initiatives are necessary, underscoring the pivotal role of women as key agents in pursuing global sustainability. Through these measures, the framework established by the 2030 Agenda can transform global perspectives, demonstrating that the advancement of women's rights is, in fact, a catalyst for transformative change. Reana Sachdeva is a student at The British School, Delhi, and has a keen interest in the area of research around political science and international relations. Her website is The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments. Make a contribution to Independent Journalism Related News Ali Khan Mahmudabad's Arrest Reveals the Political Capture of Women's Rights in India NWMI Protests Against Inclusion of M.J. Akbar in Operation Sindoor All-Party Delegation Women's Role in War Must Extend to Peace Watch | India Overtakes Japan as the Fourth-Largest Economy: Is the Excitement Justified? Letter Calls on Haryana Women's Commission to Retract Summons, Apologise to Political Scientist 'Heart Lamp' Burns Bright: How Banu Mushtaq Illuminates Muslim Women's Hidden World You Look Pretty, But…: The Tyranny of Beauty Standards Why We Need Social Audits in the MGNREGS They Were Jailed or Acquitted Years Ago, Yet Police Keeps Visiting Their Families View in Desktop Mode About Us Contact Us Support Us © Copyright. All Rights Reserved.
India.com
15 hours ago
- India.com
Not Only Jakarta, Kolkata, Chennai And Mumbai Are Also Sinking – Here's Why It Should Terrify You
New Delhi: In the bustling northern outskirts of Jakarta, homes that once stood tall are now almost knee-deep in the earth. Over the past two decades, buildings have gradually sunk, streets have become flood-prone and landmarks have disappeared beneath rising waters. Residents remember mosques and ports that no longer exist – swallowed by the sea as land gives way. This disturbing reality is not only Jakarta's story. It is emerging as a silent catastrophe across many of the world's rapidly growing cities – including several in India. A recent international study conducted by Nanyang Technological University (NTU) in Singapore highlights an alarming trend: 48 major coastal cities around the world, including Kolkata, Chennai, Ahmedabad, Mumbai and Surat, are gradually sinking. The primary driver is not only rising sea levels due to climate change, but something more local and human-made – the overextraction of groundwater. India's Sinking Cities Kolkata is experiencing land subsidence at rates ranging from 0.01 cm to 2.8 cm per year. Nearly 9 million people live in the affected areas. In places like Bhatpara, the land is sinking as much as 2.6 cm annually. Experts attribute this to the rampant withdrawal of groundwater – a common practice in overpopulated urban zones with limited water infrastructure. The threat is not limited to erosion or flooding. Subsiding land also increases the city's vulnerability to earthquakes and severe weather events, making disaster management a growing concern. In Chennai, the situation is similar, with some parts of the city, particularly areas like Tharamani, sinking up to 3.7 cm annually. Here, around 1.4 million people live in regions facing gradual land loss. The cause, again, is excessive groundwater use, particularly for agriculture and industry, compounded by poor water management. The most concerning figures come from Ahmedabad, where land in some neighborhoods like Piplaj is sinking at a rate of 4.2 cm per year, with some areas reporting up to 5.1 cm annually. Over 5 million residents are affected. The local government has initiated a Climate Resilient City Action Plan to mitigate the impact, focusing on solutions such as rainwater harvesting and artificial recharge of groundwater. A Widening Global Crisis The NTU study, supported by United Nations data, reveals that 160 million people across the globe are living in areas that are gradually subsiding – many of them in Asian cities built on river deltas or soft sediment. These locations are especially vulnerable due to high population density and intense urban development. Jakarta is now so low-lying that nearly half the city is below sea level. Thirteen rivers run through it, and worsening rainfall patterns are causing increasingly frequent floods. Land in some parts of the city has sunk by up to four meters since the 1970s. The situation is so critical that Indonesia is now developing a new capital, Nusantara, to escape the environmental collapse. Solutions and Warnings Some cities have responded with visible defences – building sea walls, dikes and flood barriers. But these measures, while helpful, can sometimes backfire. When natural drainage is blocked, rainwater and river flows get trapped behind man-made structures – creating what experts call a "bowl effect", worsening floods instead of preventing them. Cities like Ho Chi Minh City, Alexandria and Jakarta have already built such barriers. However, the real long-term solution lies deeper – in managing groundwater responsibly. Japan's capital, Tokyo, faced a similar crisis in the 20th century. But by the 1970s, the city imposed strict regulations on groundwater extraction and implemented a robust water supply system. This drastically slowed land subsidence, turning Tokyo into a global model for how science-based policy can reverse environmental damage.
Mint
2 days ago
- Mint
The stunning decline of the preference for having boys
Without fanfare, something remarkable has happened. The noxious practice of aborting girls simply for being girls has become dramatically less common. It first became widespread in the late 1980s, as cheap ultrasound machines made it easy to determine the sex of a fetus. Parents who were desperate for a boy but did not want a large family—or, in China, were not allowed one—started routinely terminating females. Globally, among babies born in 2000, a staggering 1.6m girls were missing from the number you would expect, given the natural sex ratio at birth. This year that number is likely to be 200,000—and it is still falling. The fading of boy preference in regions where it was strongest has been astonishingly rapid. The natural ratio is about 105 boy babies for every 100 girls; because boys are slightly more likely to die young, this leads to rough parity at reproductive age. The sex ratio at birth, once wildly skewed across Asia, has become more even. In China it fell from a peak of 117.8 boys per 100 girls in 2006 to 109.8 last year, and in India from 109.6 in 2010 to 106.8. In South Korea it is now completely back to normal, having been a shocking 115.7 in 1990. In 2010 an Economist cover called the mass abortion of girls 'gendercide". The global decline of this scourge is a blessing. First, it implies an ebbing of the traditions that underpinned it: the stark belief that men matter more and the expectation in some cultures that a daughter will grow up to serve her husband's family, so parents need a son to look after them in old age. Such sexist ideas have not vanished, but evidence that they are fading is welcome. Second, it heralds an easing of the harms caused by surplus men. Sex-selective abortion doomed millions of males to lifelong bachelorhood. Many of these 'bare branches", as they are known in China, resented it intensely. And their fury was socially destabilising, since young, frustrated bachelors are more prone to violence. One study of six Asian countries found that warped sex ratios led to an increase of rape in all of them. Others linked the imbalance to a rise in violent crime in China, along with authoritarian policing to quell it, and to a heightened risk of civil strife or even war in other countries. The fading of boy preference will make much of the world safer. In some regions, meanwhile, a new preference is emerging: for girls. It is far milder. Parents are not aborting boys for being boys. No big country yet has a noticeable surplus of girls. Rather, girl preference can be seen in other measures, such as polls and fertility patterns. Among Japanese couples who want only one child, girls are strongly preferred. Across the world, parents typically want a mix. But in America and Scandinavia couples are likelier to have more children if their early ones are male, suggesting that more keep trying for a girl than do so for a boy. When seeking to adopt, couples pay extra for a girl. When undergoing in vitro fertilisation (IVF) and other sex-selection methods in countries where it is legal to choose the sex of the embryo, women increasingly opt for daughters. People prefer girls for all sorts of reasons. Some think they will be easier to bring up, or cherish what they see as feminine traits. In some countries they may assume that looking after elderly parents is a daughter's job. However, the new girl preference also reflects increasing worries about boys' prospects. Boys have always been more likely to get into trouble: globally, 93% of jailbirds are male. In much of the world they have also fallen behind girls academically. In rich countries 54% of young women have a tertiary degree, compared with 41% of young men. Men are still over-represented at the top, in boardrooms, but also at the bottom, angrily shutting themselves in their bedrooms. Governments are rightly concerned about boys' problems. Because boys mature later than girls, there is a case for holding them back a year at school. More male teachers, especially at primary school, where there are hardly any, might give them role models. Better vocational training might nudge them into jobs that men have long avoided, such as nursing. Tailoring policies to help struggling boys need not mean disadvantaging girls, any more than prescribing glasses for someone with bad eyesight hurts those with 20/20 vision. In the future, technology will offer parents more options. Some will be relatively uncontroversial: when it is possible to tweak genes to avoid horrific hereditary diseases, those who can will not hesitate to do so. But what if new technologies for sex selection become widespread? Couples undergoing fertility treatment can already choose sperm with X chromosomes or determine an embryo's sex via genetic testing. Such techniques are expensive and rare, but will surely get cheaper. Also, and more important, more parents who conceive children the old-fashioned way are likely to use cheap, blood-based screening in the first weeks of pregnancy to find out about genetic traits. These tests can already reveal the sex of the embryo. Some people trying for a girl may then use pill-based abortifacients to avoid having a boy. As a liberal newspaper, The Economist would prefer not to tell people what kind of family they should have. Nonetheless, it is worth pondering what the consequences might be if a new imbalance were to arise: a future generation with substantially more women than men. The power of numbers It would not be as bad as too many men. A surplus of single women is unlikely to become physically abusive. Indeed, you might speculate that a mostly female world would be more peaceful and better run. But if women were ever to make up a large majority, some men might exploit their stronger bargaining position in the mating market by becoming more promiscuous or reluctant to commit themselves to a relationship. For many heterosexual women, this would make dating harder. Some wanting to couple up would be unable to do so. Celebrate the cooling of the war on baby girls, therefore, and urge on the day when it ends entirely. But do not assume that what comes next will be simple or trouble-free.
