HSBC sees up to $1.6 billion in loss on China bank stake reduction
HONG KONG, - HSBC said on Tuesday that its stake in Bank of Communications will drop to about 16% from 19.03%, and it will book a loss of up to $1.6 billion as a result of the Chinese bank's fundraising by private placement of shares.
Four of China's largest state-owned banks, including BOCOM, said in March they plan to raise a combined 520 billion yuan from investors, including the finance ministry, after Beijing pledged to help them support the economy.
The fundraising announcement came after Chinese policymakers pledged to recapitalise major state banks to boost their ability to bolster the real economy. BOCOM at that time said it would sell shares to raise as much as 120 billion yuan.
After the completion of the BOCOM capital raising, HSBC said it expects the bank's stake to reduce by around three percentage points to 16%, resulting in a pre-tax loss in the range of $1.2 billion to $1.6 billion.
The potential loss will be recognised in the Asia-focused lender's income statement, subject to the timing of completion, foreign exchange changes and other factors, HSBC said in its quarterly profit report.
HSBC said that the loss "would not be deductible for tax purposes" as its shareholding in BOCOM is being held for long-term investment purposes, and it will not have a material impact on capital ratios or dividend distribution capacity.
In February last year, HSBC reported a shock $3 billion charge on its stake in BOCOM, the largest yet by an overseas lender, as bad loans mounted in the world's second-largest economy amid a protracted property sector crisis.
On Tuesday, HSBC, which makes the bulk of its revenues and profits in Asia, reported a 25% fall in first-quarter profit and warned of heightened business uncertainty in the face of U.S. President Donald Trump's sweeping global tariffs.
This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
First Published: 29 Apr 2025, 11:08 AM IST
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Trump approves $14.9 billion US steel merger with Japan's Nippon Steel
U.S President Donald Trump formally approved Nippon Steel's 5401.T fraught $14.9 billion bid for U.S. Steel X.N on Friday, capping a tumultuous 18-month effort by the companies, beset by union opposition and two national security signed an executive order saying the tie-up could move forward if the companies signed an agreement with the Treasury Department resolving national security concerns posed by the deal. The companies then announced they had signed the agreement, fulfilling the conditions of Trump's directive and effectively garnering approval for the look forward to putting our commitments into action to make American steelmaking and manufacturing great again," the companies said in the statement, thanking Trump. They added the agreement includes $11 billion in new investments to be made by 2028 as well as governance, production and trade commitments. A golden share would be issued to the U.S. government, the companies added without providing further previously reported that Nippon would invest an additional $3 billion for a new mill after takeover will set up the ailing American steel icon to receive the critical investment, and allow Nippon Steel to capitalize on a host of American infrastructure projects, as its foreign competitors face steel tariffs of 50%. It also absolves the Japanese firm of paying $565 million in breakup fees if the companies failed to secure GREAT PARTNERWhile many investors saw approval as likely after Trump headlined a rally on May 30 giving his vague blessing to an "investment" by Nippon Steel, which he described as a "great partner", Friday's announcement was hardly of U.S. Steel had dipped earlier on Friday after a Nippon Steel executive told the Japanese Nikkei newspaper that its planned takeover of U.S. Steel required "a degree of management freedom" to go ahead after Trump earlier had said the U.S. would be in control with a golden bid, first announced by Nippon Steel in December 2023, has faced opposition from the start. Both Democratic former President Joe Biden and Trump, a Republican, asserted last year that U.S. Steel should remain U.S.-owned, as they sought to woo voters ahead of the presidential election in Pennsylvania, where the company is in January, shortly before leaving office, blocked the deal on national security grounds, prompting lawsuits by the companies, which argued the national security review they received was biased. The Biden White House disputed the steel companies saw a new opportunity in the Trump administration, which began on January 20 and opened a fresh 45-day national security review into the proposed merger in Trump's public comments, ranging from welcoming a simple "investment" in U.S. Steel by the Japanese firm to floating a minority stake for Nippon Steel, spurred InMust Watch
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
As the NATO summit approaches, more than cash is at stake
What makes a good NATO ally? Debates over burden-sharing have 'moved and shaken" the alliance ever since its foundation in 1949, says Rafael Loss of the European Council on Foreign Relations, a think-tank. Most recently, Donald Trump, in both his first and his present term, has justifiably railed against Europeans for not paying their fair whack while America keeps them all safe. He has struck a chord, even with the laggards. Belgium's defence minister has vowed to end a 'period of national shame" whereby the country 'was not loyal to its status as a founding member of NATO, but acted as the most notorious free rider of the entire alliance". Even Iceland, which has no armed forces, is looking into ways of being 'a good ally". To get a sense of how things stand, look to the 'three Cs": cash (how much is spent), capabilities (what it is spent on) and commitment (deployment on missions). Begin, as politicians generally do, with cash. At first glance there is much to commend. All but ten of NATO's 32 members meet the current spending target of 2% of GDP, compared with 25 delinquents a decade ago. Italy and Spain, two of the alliance's lowest spenders, have pledged to hit it this year, too. But the positives mostly stop there. For one thing, the 2% goal is obsolete; at the summit that will open on June 24th in The Hague, the alliance is expected to agree to a new target of 3.5% of GDP, plus a further 1.5% for complementary infrastructure. Moreover, the narrow focus on percentages is a poor way of measuring fighting readiness. Members have long padded their figures by cramming barely related budget items under the umbrella of defence. A better gauge of who is pulling their weight is to look at what the cash is spent on. NATO asks that members spend at least 20% of their military budgets on equipment. Virtually all meet that mark (see chart), though it is likely to be raised to one-third at the summit. But again, a focus on numbers can obscure whether the kit serves the purpose of collective defence. Take Greece. Last year it lavished 36% of its military budget on equipment, one of the highest rates. Yet much of that is focused on countering Turkey, another NATO ally, not Russia. The alliance has long sought to influence the kit bought by members through the NATO Defence Planning Process. Under this, allies agree to buy equipment based on the alliance's operational needs. But two decades of fighting jihadists bent that process out of shape. Many members invested in a hotch-potch of systems without much co-ordination. The Russia threat has helped focus minds. 'Instead of building forces for a range of potential scenarios across multiple theatres," write Angus Lapsley and Admiral Pierre Vandier, two NATO officials in charge of the new planning cycle, allies will be asked to 'focus primarily" on deterring Russia. What the division of labour will look like is not yet clear. NATO is expected to sign off on new 'capability targets" in June, which will determine the equipment each member will be asked to provide. They will probably prioritise areas where America has traditionally dominated but may now pull back, such as intelligence collection, deep strike or strategic lift. Just over three-quarters of members have agreed to the new plans, including 'those who [don't] usually accept", noted Mr Vandier. NATO is mulling greater specialisation. The head of its Military Committee, Admiral Giuseppe Cavo Dragone, has called for a 'multi-speed approach" whereby bigger armed forces would take on the brunt of projecting power against Russia, while smaller states focus on more humdrum but achievable tasks like logistics or cyber-security. That is already the case to some extent. Luxembourg, with just 900 soldiers, is a critical node in providing space-based satellite communications and contributes to NATO's spyplane programme. Iceland operates an air-defence and surveillance system. But cajoling recalcitrants like Spain and Italy might be trickier. Planners could play to their strengths by asking them to invest more in maritime assets. NATO should take heart when it comes to actual operational commitments, the third C. Even the stingiest allies have skin in the game. On the eastern flank, Spain is in charge of a brigade-sized multinational force in Slovakia, and Italy oversees one in Bulgaria. Portuguese fighter aircraft help patrol the skies over the Baltics. Nearly every small member—from Croatia and Albania to Slovenia—contributes troops to NATO's eastern flank. The more pressing question is whether these limited commitments will be beefed up. In the case of a major war in the east, NATO wants to be able to muster around 100,000 troops within ten days, a sharp jump from the 40,000 it budgets for today. It wants to raise a further 200,000 troops within 30 days. Without American boots, Europeans will struggle to be ready to reach those targets, unless they spend considerably more on recruitment. Cash might still be king after all. © 2025, The Economist Newspaper Limited. All rights reserved. From The Economist, published under licence. The original content can be found on
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Trump's earnings: $57 million in crypto, $217 million from Florida golf clubs
U.S. President Donald Trump filed his first public financial disclosure report of the term on Friday, revealing new details about his assets—including earnings from his family's involvement in cryptocurrencies, reported Reuters. According to the filing, Trump reported $57.35 million in income from token sales at World Liberty Financial , a crypto firm. He also disclosed ownership of 15.75 billion governance tokens linked to the venture. The disclosure, signed on June 13, did not specify the time period it covered. However, based on the cryptocurrency details and other information in the report, it appears to cover activity through the end of December 2024—excluding much of the revenue generated later by the family's crypto ventures. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Farmer Finds Diamond Ring. When He Shows It To His Wife, She Says, 'I Want A Divorce'. Plays Star Undo The Republican businessman-turned-president listed a wide range of holdings, spanning real estate and digital assets. A significant portion of his paper wealth remains invested in Trump Media & Technology Group, the company behind his social media platform, Truth Social . Income from Trump's Florida properties featured prominently in the disclosure. His three golf-centric resorts in the state—Jupiter, Doral, and West Palm Beach—along with his private club at Mar-a-Lago, collectively brought in at least $217.7 million, the filing showed. Live Events The report also listed $5 million in license fees from a development project in Vietnam. With inputs from Reuters
