Does TGEC have intellectuals better than Tagore and Ambedkar?
However, many view the Commission as merely reinventing the wheel. Sources indicate that a few TGEC officials congratulated each other for advocating the introduction of English as the sole 'save our soul' policy essential for the survival of the educational system in the state. Critics from state universities and academic circles argue that the seminar did not yield any new or significant insights and believe it was a waste of taxpayers' money.
Speaking to The Hans India, a senior faculty member in Linguistics from the University of English and Foreign Languages (UEFL), while refraining from specific comments on the TGEC's seminar, emphasised that English-medium instruction has been established in the country for the last 200 years. The first significant push for this came from social reformer Raja Rammohan Roy, who wrote a letter to the then British Governor-General Lord Amherst in 1823. In his letter, he opposed the establishment of a Sanskrit College and advocated for founding an English language institution instead. Earlier, he played an active role in establishing the Hindu College in Calcutta in 1817, which later became a centre for English and Western education. Subsequently, Macaulay's 'Minute on Education' in 1835 officially promoted English education in India.
A former Vice-Chancellor of the oldest state university in Telangana highlighted that Nobel laureate Rabindranath Tagore outrightly rejected the idea of using English as the medium of instruction, insisting that it should only be learned as a second language, especially in the early stages of education.
Dr B R Ambedkar also argued that forcing a foreign language too early could hinder learning and alienate students, particularly those from disadvantaged backgrounds. He suggested that English should be introduced at higher education levels to empower students to participate in national and international affairs.
Moreover, experts in English language, literature, and linguistics from Andhra, Sri Venkateswara, and Osmania Universities in the two Telugu states pointed out that numerous seminars are organised both nationally and internationally on the topic of instruction in the mother tongue and foreign languages. Many of these events have focused on South Asia and Africa, featuring experts from various fields, including linguistics, neuro linguistics, natural language processing, philosophy of mind and language, child psychology, mathematics, educational psychology, cognitive sciences, and other fundamental and applied sciences, including medicine. The themes often explore how colonial rulers used English-medium instruction not only for education but also as a weapon to promote neo-colonialism, subjugating their subjects culturally, destroying native knowledge traditions, and furthering 'Western Universalisation.' Besides, to sustain and strengthen the scale of their knowledge and educational economies remains a dominant factor.
Additionally, there are numerous research papers published in peer-reviewed national and international journals over the past 150 years on the issue of the language of instruction. When confronted with the seminar outcomes claimed by the TGEC, faculty members pointed out that no new insights emerged from the seminar.
Most of the views expressed by the speakers had already been articulated, researched, and published extensively by experts over the last 50 years in the contexts of emerging fields, including the intersection of science, technology, language, and linguistics and their diversity.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
27 minutes ago
- Time of India
Odisha bans use of ‘harijan' in official records: Govt tells depts to use ‘scheduled caste' or ‘anusuchita jati' instead; move follows OHRC directive
BHUBANESWAR: The Odisha government has directed all its departments, public and educational institutions, and other organizations to stop using the term 'harijan' in their communications, officials said on Wednesday. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The government suggested the authorities concerned that words like 'scheduled caste' in English and 'anusuchita jati' in Odia or other national languages should be used to "denote persons belonging to scheduled castes as notified under Article 341 of the Constitution", according to a letter issued on August 12 by the commissioner-cum-secretary of the ST and SC Development, Minorities and Backward Class Welfare Department. Officials said the letter was sent to all additional chief secretaries, principal secretaries, and commissioner-cum-secretaries. "They have been instructed to ensure that the word 'harijan' does not appear in any official communications, records, transactions, caste certificates, publications, departmental names, or any other form of use," one of the officials said. Authorities have been directed to educate their staff and update existing documents and records accordingly, an official said. They have also been asked to submit a compliance report detailing the actions taken. The state government's move follows guidelines issued by the Odisha Human Rights Commission (OHRC) prohibiting the use of the term 'harijan'. These guidelines will be strictly enforced across all government offices, the official added. The term 'harijan' has long been discouraged: in 1982, the Centre instructed all states not to use it to refer to Dalits. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Following fresh guidelines from the Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment, a similar order was issued in 2013, directing states to avoid the word in caste certificates and official communications. The Odisha Assembly has also prohibited its use, officials noted. (With inputs from agencies)
News18
39 minutes ago
- News18
Putin Calls Kim Jong Un: Wartime Alliance Brewing? Russia–North Korea Military Ties
In a surprise diplomatic move, Russian President Vladimir Putin has reportedly reached out to North Korean leader Kim Jong Un for potential wartime support as the Ukraine conflict grinds on. With Russian ammunition supplies under strain and Western sanctions biting hard, Pyongyang's military stockpiles — and its willingness to defy the West — could prove critical for Kremlin has not confirmed the full extent of the conversation, but sources suggest discussions may have touched on arms transfers, military technology cooperation, and deeper strategic alignment between the two sanctioned states. The call has sent ripples through Washington, Seoul, and Tokyo, with concerns about a new axis of authoritarian powers reshaping global security dynamics. News18 Mobile App -
News18
39 minutes ago
- News18
India's Tariff Diplomacy: Strategic Autonomy In Fractured Global Order
Last Updated: India's tariff diplomacy under PM Narendra Modi offers blueprint for other nations: strategic autonomy is not about isolation but about building resilience through diversification In an era where tariffs have re-emerged as a weapon of choice in global diplomacy, India stands as a compelling case study of a nation that has not only safeguarded its economic interests but also transformed external pressures into opportunities for growth and strategic autonomy. From Washington to Beijing, tariffs have transcended their traditional role as tools for resolving trade disputes, evolving into calculated instruments of geopolitical influence, economic resilience testing, and concession extraction. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace has summarised this world order effectively, it says : The 'global order' is no longer shaped by alliances alone—it is shaped by the ability of nations to protect their own economic sovereignty. Under Prime Minister Narendra Modi's leadership, India has navigated this volatile landscape with a blend of resolve, pragmatism, positioning itself as a pivotal player in a multipolar world. Tariffs are far from a modern invention. Their use as instruments of economic protection and geopolitical leverage dates back centuries. The United States, for instance, passed its first tariff law — the Tariff Act of 1789 — within months of ratifying its Constitution. This act imposed duties of 5-10% on imports to shield nascent American industries from European competition, particularly British manufactures, while generating revenue for the fledgling republic. Similarly, Britain's Corn Laws, enacted in 1815 and repealed in 1846, protected domestic agriculture from foreign grain imports, reflecting the economic nationalism of the era. The 20th century saw tariffs fall out of favour during the high tide of globalisation in the 1990s. The establishment of the World Trade Organization (WTO) in 1995, coupled with a proliferation of Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) and multilateral pacts, relegated tariffs to the margins of economic policy. However, the 21st century has witnessed a dramatic resurgence of tariffs among the architects of globalisation. The U.S.–China trade conflict, initiated in 2018 with tariffs on Chinese goods, marked a turning point, signalling that economic coercion through trade barriers was back on the global stage. Similarly, disputes such as the U.S.–EU steel and aluminium tariffs (2018–2021) and Japan–South Korea technology export restrictions (2019–2023) illustrate how tariffs have become tools of strategic rivalry, wielded against allies and adversaries alike. On July 30, 2025, U.S. President Donald Trump announced tariffs ranging from 10-20% on Indian goods on the pretext of safeguarding US industries and the need to bolster American manufacturing. Less than a week later, The U.S. expanded the tariffs with India on imports of Russian oil—knowing fully well that the U.S., EU, and China were themselves buying more from Russia. As of mid-2025, China remains the top buyer of Russian crude—accounting for about 47% of its exports in July with the EU importing 18% of Russian Energy in 2024 & U.S. still purchasing key commodities like fertilizers, uranium, and palladium from Russia. In 2022, during the Russia Ukraine conflict, when crude oil prices were threatening to soar past $150 a barrel, the U.S. privately urged India to step up Russian oil purchases; India responded by ramping up Russian crude imports, purchasing millions of barrels at $20–30 below Brent. This strategic move prevented global oil prices from spiralling to $150–200, stabilising them in the $80–90 range. By doing so, India averted a global inflation surge—saving the world economy & shielding 1.4 billion Indians from fuel price shocks while cutting its own import bill by $7-8 billion a year. India today sources crude oil from over 40 countries across five continents, a diversification strategy built to shield the economy from geopolitical shocks, price volatility, and supply disruptions; this expanded basket — ranging from Russia, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE to the U.S., Brazil, Nigeria, and even small producers in Latin America and Africa — means no single nation controls India's energy lifeline, ensuring steady supply for its 1.4 billion citizens while giving New Delhi the leverage to secure the best prices in the global market. On US tariffs, India, as the fourth-largest economy, responded by reaffirming its sovereign right to make independent energy choices, diversifying its trade channels, boosting rupee-based settlements, and protecting its economic security as well as the affordability of fuel for its citizens as was made clear in the detailed MEA statement on August 6. Such aggressive tariff measures might have pressured a nation into reactive concessions or retaliatory escalation. India, however, responded with a measured yet confident strategy, reflecting a sophisticated understanding of its permanent interests—a principle articulated as early as 1848 by British Foreign Secretary Lord Palmerston, who told the House of Commons, 'We have no eternal allies, and we have no perpetual enemies. Our interests are eternal and perpetual, and those interests it is our duty to follow." This maxim resonates deeply in India's approach to 21st-century tariff conflict. Rather than engaging in tit-for-tat tariff hikes, New Delhi pursued a multi-pronged strategy. India had already accelerated efforts to diversify its export markets, concluding trade talks with the European Union (FTA negotiations resumed in 2023, targeting completion by 2026), the United Arab Emirates (CEPA signed in 2022, boosting bilateral trade to $85 billion by 2024), Australia (ECA signed in 2022, with trade projected to reach $45 billion by 2027), and the United Kingdom (FTA talks nearing conclusion in 2025). These agreements reduce India's reliance on any single market. India's response to the 2025 U.S. tariffs encapsulates a broader vision of economic sovereignty through diversification. By expanding trade partnerships, bolstering domestic manufacturing, and maintaining diplomatic flexibility, India under PM Modi has mitigated the risks of over-dependence on any single nation. The Modi government's investments in infrastructure—such as the Rs 44 lakh crore National Infrastructure Pipeline (2019–2025)—have enhanced India's trade logistics, reducing port turnaround times by 40% and boosting export competitiveness. Domestically, through the years, India has doubled down on its Aatmanirbhar Bharat (Self-Reliant India) initiative, launched in 2020, which has driven manufacturing growth through policies like the Production Linked Incentive (PLI) scheme. By 2025, the PLI scheme had attracted Rs 4.78 lakh crore ($60 billion) in investments across 14 sectors, including electronics, pharmaceuticals, and renewable energy, creating over 8 lakh direct and indirect jobs. For instance, India's electronics manufacturing sector, bolstered by PLI incentives, grew from $48 billion in 2019 to $115 billion by 2025, with companies like Apple shifting 14% of iPhone production to India. This domestic capacity building has cushioned India against external trade shocks, ensuring that tariff-induced disruptions do not derail economic momentum. India's exports hit a record USD 824.9 billion in 2024-25 (up 6%), with electronics up 32.5%, pharmaceuticals up 9.4%, agriculture up 7.4%, and services surging 13.6%, putting the country on track to cross USD 1 trillion in FY 26. India's resilience in the face of tariff pressures stems from its unique position as one of the world's largest and most dynamic consumer markets. With a population of 1.45 billion, a middle class projected to drive consumption to $6 trillion by 2030, and a workforce adding 12 million new entrants annually, India wields significant bargaining power. Its domestic market is attractive for global investors and trade partners, making it difficult for any nation to sideline India in the global trade architecture. For example, India's pharmaceutical industry, often called the 'pharmacy of the world", supplies 20% of global generic drugs by volume, including critical medications for the U.S. and EU. This market leverage gives India the confidence to negotiate from a position of strength. Moreover, India's focus on emerging sectors like renewable energy and semiconductors aligns with global trends. The National Green Hydrogen Mission, launched in 2023 with a Rs 19,744 crore outlay, aims to make India a global leader in green hydrogen production by 2030, attracting $8 billion in investments by 2025. Similarly, the India Semiconductor Mission has secured commitments from companies like TSMC and Micron, with $10 billion in planned investments to establish India as a chip manufacturing hub. On August 12, 2025, the Union Cabinet approved four new semiconductor manufacturing projects under the India Semiconductor Mission, with a total investment of approximately Rs 4,594-4,600 crore, spanning across two units in Odisha and one each in Andhra Pradesh and Punjab. India is also set to produce it's first indigenous semiconductor chip soon. top videos View all In a world where economic leverage is increasingly weaponized, India's tariff diplomacy under Prime Minister Narendra Modi offers a blueprint for other nations: strategic autonomy is not about isolation but about building resilience through diversification. Pradeep Bhandari is BJP's National Spokesperson. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect News18's views. tags : Narendra Modi view comments Location : New Delhi, India, India First Published: August 13, 2025, 12:56 IST News opinion Opinion | India's Tariff Diplomacy: Strategic Autonomy In Fractured Global Order Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
