Amazon Goes Before EU Court in Attempt to Shed Very Large Online Provider Designation
Amazon wants the EU to stop the VLOP.
That is to say, the e-commerce giant went before a European court to ask that its status as a very large online provider (VLOP) under the Digital Services Act (DSA) be rescinded.
More from Sourcing Journal
Rebag Expands Access to Pre-loved Luxury Goods With New Amazon Collaboration
Amazon Reportedly Tests Humanoid Robots for Parcel Delivery
Are Amazon's Warehouses Facing an 'Injury Crisis'?
The DSA went into general effect in 2024, and it's aimed at creating better transparency, tamping illegal digital activity and creating a safer internet for citizens of the European Union. Under the law, platforms and service engines can be designated as VLOPs, subjecting them to more stringent provisions of the DSA. For that reason, DSA regulations began in 2023 for companies designated that way.
EU regulators designated Amazon as a VLOP in April 2023; the DSA states that platforms that accrue at least 45 million monthly users are eligible to be designated as such. Other VLOPs include Google, Meta, Shein, Temu and Zalando.
These companies, among more than a dozen others, are required to 'have user-friendly terms and conditions,' 'be transparent as regards advertising, recommender systems or content moderation decisions' and more. They also must look deeper into their business models to identify risks surrounding illegal content, minors' protection and the mental and physical wellbeing of consumers.
Not long after its designation, Amazon made it clear that it would appeal its status as a VLOP, primarily with the argument that retail platforms should be exempt from such a categorization because they don't pose the same risk as, for instance, social media platforms. Zalando has made a similar argument.
According to Reuters, Amazon's lawyer Robert Spano appeared in Luxembourg-based General Court to continue arguing with that same principle on Thursday.
'Online marketplaces like the Amazon Store do not pose systemic risks. Second, the VLOP rules do not and cannot rationally assist in preventing the dissemination of illegal or counterfeit goods,' Spano reportedly said. 'The VLOP rules therefore make no sense when applied to online marketplaces.'
An Amazon spokesperson told Sourcing Journal via email that it believes the VLOP designation is meant for companies 'with advertising as their primary revenue and that distribute speech and information.'
With that framework, the spokesperson said, Amazon 'doesn't fit the description of…a VLOP under the DSA and should not have been designated as such.'
'The Amazon Store, as an online marketplace, does not pose any such systemic risks; it only sells goods, and it doesn't disseminate or amplify information, views or opinions,' the spokesperson said via email.
According to Reuters, Spano argued in Luxembourg that risk is not pervasive but rather isolated to individual customers and noted that the company already complies with existing product safety regulations.
He went on to say that regulators should not cast further scrutiny on companies like Amazon solely because of the number of users or consumers they have managed to amass. Zalando has made a similar argument, noting that each company calculates the number of users it has differently.
'When it comes to marketplaces like the Amazon Store, size does not multiply risk. It is an arbitrary, disproportionate and discriminatory metric,' Spano said, according to Reuters.
The Amazon spokesperson said it believes its designation as a VLOP doesn't provide any tangible upside for its consumers.
'The VLOP designation also forces Amazon to meet onerous administrative obligations that don't provide any benefit for EU consumers,' they said in the email.
The court that heard Amazon's arguments is expected to rule about the company's VLOP status in the coming months.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Exclusive: Trump's tariff deal ‘quietly' added 10% raise which nobody is complaining about anymore, says his former commerce secretary
Wilbur Ross, former Commerce Secretary and a key architect of Trump's first-term trade policy, describes Trump's current tariff strategy as a deliberate evolution: moving faster, hitting harder, and using broader executive powers to impose tariffs for both economic and diplomatic leverage. The Trump administration's use of tariffs has sparked debate over the ultimate goals of its economic strategy. However, a former Cabinet member and key trade advisor to the President has suggested there is an underlying logic to the approach. Since winning the Oval Office, President Trump has announced an evolving range of policies. with economic sanctions spinning higher on some trade partners while others have been granted pauses. Many of the announcements have not come through official White House channels; for example, Trump threatened a 50% tariff on the EU in April in a bid to get European negotiators to the table—by posting on his social media site, Truth Social. Indeed, Trump has come under scrutiny from Beijing, arguably the most critical region for the U.S. to make a deal, who claim America's tariff tactics have been 'coercion and blackmail' when instead it should 'convey information to the Chinese side…through relevant parties.' But Wilbur Ross, Trump's Commerce Secretary in his first administration, says there's a clear tactic at play beneath Trump's bluster. The 87-year-old banker turned D.C. power player said there is an 'art' to Trump's dealmaking, as White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt has suggested; Ross told Fortune in an exclusive interview: 'Well, everybody's reaction to [tariffs] was first shock and amazement, but the actual retaliatory measures that they put in were fairly modest—even China didn't match in dollar for dollar. 'There's a real reason for that, I think the other countries, as they've thought about it, have recognized that while they have to talk very bravely for their domestic political constituencies… They also recognize that at the end of the day, they can't afford a tit-for-tat escalating trade war with us.' And this was a fact Trump was relying on, continued Ross: 'One of the earliest things he put in was that 10% tariff on everything from everywhere. 'Nobody is even complaining about that anymore. When you think about it, in the normal course, getting quietly to do a 10% tariff on everything from everywhere was a huge achievement, even if he didn't get anything else. But because he followed it with these much more extreme things, it makes the 10% look like it's not such a big bother. 'But it's a huge number, and he's been collecting it every day.' Indeed, imported goods alone into the U.S. in 2024 stood at $3.36 trillion—even before tax, duties, and levies were collected (worth $82 billion) and before imported services are added to those figures. Even 10% of near-$3.4 trillion is an eye-watering sum to add to federal budgets, though some items like autos and steel are even higher. Indeed nations like China, Canada, and Mexico are all already subject to more than the baseline 10% universal tariff. When Ross spoke to Fortune in a previous exclusive interview earlier this year, he said President Trump would be all the more confident in his second term because he now better understands the inner workings of Washington, D.C., and has a stronger mandate courtesy of a solid election sweep. And President Trump's tactics, which have included everything from threatening a 25% hike on Apple's iPhones specifically to raising sanctions to more than 150% on China at some points, reflect the path Ross expected. After all, as Secretary, Ross was one of the key allies in Trump's team when renegotiating America's position on the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). At the time, Trump was a fierce critic of the deal with Mexico and Canada and wanted to withdraw from the agreement and begin negotiating from there. Ross felt the better tactic was to threaten such action and keep an exit as a last resort, an opinion that Trump eventually came around to agreeing with. Likewise, having been appointed in 2017 Ross oversaw the tariff action in the first Trump administration which included sanctions on Chinese goods as well as aluminum and steel more widely. 'He has started out on a much more adventurous path than last time,' Ross told Fortune this week. 'Broader in scope and more extreme in terms of the numbers themselves.' Trump has three objectives, he adds: shrinking trade deficits, producing revenue to offset his 'One Big, Beautiful Bill' and achieving other diplomatic purposes such as the flow of fentanyl into the U.S. and global defense spending. 'He has a much more fulsome, much more complicated agenda than before,' Ross explains. 'It's also different in…that last time I was very careful to set the groundwork to do public hearings, stakeholder meetings, to do written reports, to set a whole record so that under the Administrative Procedures Act we would be relatively safe from people trying to knock it out in court. 'This time, they did a very different thing. They went in mostly just by his say so using the IFA, the Emergency Powers Act, and they ran into a snag at the Court for International Trade.' This snag may alter the course of tariff reaction on the account of businesses, he added, because their investment timelines may shift based on when the tariffs are legally approved. But Ross added: 'Most people are operating under the assumption that sooner or later, he'll get something like what he was looking for…and therefore, while it's slowed down a bit, [I] don't think it will derail [trade talks] because [foreign governments] also know there are other ways he could punish them rather than just the tariffs. 'So it's a bump in the road, but I don't think it's a huge pothole that would wreck the car.' This story was originally featured on
Motor Trend
17 minutes ago
- Motor Trend
Genesis Magma Racing Unveils 2026 Le Mans Hypercar and European Expansion Plans
Last year, Genesis, the luxury brand from Hyundai, announced its motorsport arrival with Genesis Magma Racing. Ahead of the 2025 24 Hours of Le Mans this weekend, GMR revealed its roadmap for its 2026 Le Mans debut in the legendary racing series top hypercar division. Highlighting its ambitious plans, Genesis twin announcements provided updates on its LeMans team and the brand's expansion across key European markets. GMR team principal Cyril Abiteboul announced key milestones in the development of the GMR-001 Hypercar, namely that it will be powered by a newly developed V-8 engine derived from Hyundai's WRC technology. Essentially two of the 1.6-liter inline-four cylinder engines from the Hyundai N world rally team will be fused together to create the GMR-001's V-8. New Race Base in France Along with the engine update, the team also confirmed a new strategic operations base in Le Castellet, France, near racing partner Oreca, for seamless collaboration and vehicle development. 'The team is being created from very strong parts. A strong chassis from Oreca; an ideal Race Base location in Le Castellet; an international, experienced team of people from around motorsport; and, of course, the best of the influences from Korean culture to drive us all forward at Hyperspeed,' said Abiteboul. The team also announced key additions to GMR leadership; Anouck Abadie as team manager, Justin Taylor as chief engineer, and Gabriele Tarquini as sporting director. These seasoned leaders aim to steer the team through the rigorous World Endurance Championship (WEC) by 2026 and the IMSA SportsCar Championship by 2027. Genesis Expands to Four New European Markets Genesis emphasized its European expansion with plans to enter markets in France, Spain, Italy, and the Netherlands by 2027. Chief Creative Officer Luc Donckerwolke positioned Genesis Magma Racing as more than a motorsport initiative, describing it as an extension of Genesis's design philosophy and cultural identity. 'Our entry into these important markets is a pivotal moment for Genesis. We are moving now to deepen our long-term presence and commitment across Europe. This is the most significant market expansion since we launched in Europe in 2021 and is the start of our next phase of measured, strategic growth, and sporting brand direction' said Xavier Martinet, managing director of Genesis Motor Europe. 'Our distinctive electric models have strong European appeal and the demand is growing. With these new markets, and our audacious approach to motorsport, we look forward to introducing new customers to our design-driven performance brand.' While Genesis did not share all the models it intends to sell in these new markets, it confirmed the all-electric GV60 compact SUV, and electric GV70 SUV and G80 luxury sedan will be available in the four countries, starting in early 2026. And now it's time to go racing... While Genesis' factory effort in the top class of endurance racing will debut next year, GMR will be represented this year by endurance racing veteran and three-time winner of the 24 Hours of Le Mans, André Lotterer, who joins rising stars Jamie Chadwick and Mathys Jaubert in the #18 IDEC LMP2 racecar, which qualified in fourteenth position.
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
RaiseFashion Spotlights Production Gap
'I just have to say something,' Prabal Gurung said. 'Who knew Long Island City was so fashionable?' The American designer and memoirist was joking, of course, but the sentiment was sincere. More from Sourcing Journal Sustainability Takes Pressure, Policies Says Kering Exec Depop Brings the Second British Invasion to NYC Sorry, Charli: Future Snoops and the Great Retail Recovery Reframe Just above a local factory's cutting room floor was a group of industry insiders and emerging designers, gathered in support of RaiseFashion, a nonprofit dedicated to offering pro-bono advisory services, grant resources, and network access to Black, Indigenous, and people of color-owned brands. 'We're here tonight not just to network and fund-raise, but to name the production gap for what it is,' said Felita Harris, RaiseFashion's executive director and co-founder. Considering most manufacturers require high minimums, she explained, designers need thousands upfront just to get started. Payment delays of 60 to 90 days only deepen the strain. 'Eight out of 10 designers we've worked with cite production financing as their biggest barrier. In 2024, just 0.4 percent of venture capital went to BIPOC founders,' Harris said. 'These statistics aren't just numbers. They represent collections that never leave the sketchpad, opportunities that vanish before they're realized, and creative businesses that stall—not for lack of vision, but for lack of access.' The organization's annual Raise the Future fundraiser was held June 12 at the family-owned Ferrara Manufacturing headquarters in Long Island City in support of the Designer Production Fund. This grant initiative was created to front production costs, broker relationships and fulfill orders at scale to, ultimately, build sustainable businesses without compromising integrity. 'Your support helps turn a sketch into a sample, a sample into a collection and a collection into legacy,' Harris said. 'And who doesn't want to be a part of that?' Looking behind the curtain to 'go deeper into realities behind the runway,' per Harris, the evening's panel explored 'the trust cost of production' to take an honest look at what it takes to build a lasting business, highlighting production realities and power in local manufacturing. 'I love running a family business. It's been great, it's been an honor,' Joseph Ferrara, co-founder of Ferrara Manufacturing, said. 'What I love about the industry most is the creative force that drives it. It's the designers, it's the creators, and they are so prolific. They are so unbelievably talented.' To that end, Joseph Ferrara sees his role as something of a conduit. 'I like to capture that energy in a bottle, translate it into a factory activity, and produce clothes that are a representation of that vision, of that joy, of that unbelievable creative talent,' he said. 'That's what turns me on.' That same creative force, he said, is what makes the business possible in the first place. 'Our reason for existing is because design exists,' Ferrara said. 'Without design, without creativity, there's nothing for us to do.' Supporting the future of the industry, he emphasized, isn't optional—it's imperative. That means backing all emerging creators. 'Our job is to execute. It's to interpret, it's to monetize, it's to operationalize, it's to make sustainable,' Joseph Ferrara said. 'Design is a function, and if they're not making money, we're not making money.' The long-term viability of the business, Joseph Ferrara argued, hinges on investing in new talent now. 'We're going to need enough [designers] 10 years from now,' he said. 'It's all about replenishment. When we think about what sustains forests, you're seeding new plants. And if you're not part of that ecosystem—if you're not part of the future—you shouldn't be part of the present.' This mindset persists throughout the local manufacturer. Gabrielle Ferrara, president and COO of Ferrara Manufacturing (and Joseph Ferrara's daughter) highlighted a pervasive myth within the industry. 'Sustainability is a hot topic,' said Gabrielle Ferrara. 'Everyone wants to buy sustainable clothing, and everyone wants to make it—but it's pretty complicated to do that.' She pointed out that the word 'sustainability' often gets flattened in conversations despite being quite multifaceted in practice. 'There's material sustainability: Buying something certified by one of many organizations,' she explained. 'But there's also production sustainability: Are you paying fair wages? Are the people making your clothes being treated how they should?' Certifications tend to dominate the conversation, especially among big brands, Gabrielle Ferrara said. But they don't tell the whole story. 'There are more holistic ways to approach it,' she added. 'One of my favorite projects was with Jacob James' American Woolen mill in Connecticut. We made a fully sustainable garment, using certified sustainable wool—but it wasn't just about the fiber. It was about labor, materials, the full production cycle.' The biggest myth, she said, is assuming that sustainability begins and ends with the fabric. 'It's not just about the material,' Gabrielle Ferrara said. 'It's about the entire process.' Aisling Camps, designer and CFDA member, as well as RaiseFashion masterclass alumna and Designer Production Fund recipient, knows this all too well. 'My background is in engineering, with a focus on sustainability,' she said. 'From the start, I was committed to making products that were ethically and responsibly produced. But that comes at a cost.' That cost? Thinner margins. And harder decisions. Even with 'great partners and growing resilience,' per Camps, the production process has been a constant challenge. And that's where RaiseFashion comes in. 'Raise has gotten me into rooms I never thought I'd be in—connected me to C-suite leaders, opened doors, and, more importantly, helped cover production when I didn't know how I'd pay my factory,' Camps said. 'The grants go straight to invoices. It's that real.' The system, she argued, is structurally broken for smaller, emerging designers. 'It's a cash flow game,' she said. 'You get paid in six months, but you have to pay your entire business now—your production, your staff, your show. The barrier to entry is astronomical. These production grants don't just help—they keep us alive.' For founders like Camps, the challenge is less about vision and more about viability. Even the most responsible brands can't survive on ethics alone without financial support. That's where people like Bradley Taylor, founder and investor of the Carrom Company, come in. For Taylor, a RaiseFashion board member, the evening was about more than fashion. It's about showing up. 'You can run a sheet metal business or a fashion label—it doesn't matter,' he said. 'If you believe in people, in nonprofits, in community, you have to actually show up. Everything is under attack right now. You can't sit it out.' For context, Taylor launched his own company in 2004 and sold it to Vista Equity Partners—led by Robert Smith, in 2017. That acquisition prompted Taylor and his family to set up a donor-advised fund at the Grand Rapids Community Foundation. 'George Floyd's murder in 2020 made everything we were doing feel more urgent,' he said. Though Grand Rapids regularly ranks among the best places to live in America, Taylor pointed out the stark divide. 'If you're white, it's great,' he said. 'If you're a person of color, it's one of the worst cities in the country for economic opportunity.' Since then, he's focused on 'anything that has to do with generational wealth for people of color.' 'Everybody deserves a shot, but not everybody has the same access,' Taylor said. 'That's what we have to fix.'
