RaiseFashion Spotlights Production Gap
'I just have to say something,' Prabal Gurung said. 'Who knew Long Island City was so fashionable?'
The American designer and memoirist was joking, of course, but the sentiment was sincere.
More from Sourcing Journal
Sustainability Takes Pressure, Policies Says Kering Exec
Depop Brings the Second British Invasion to NYC
Sorry, Charli: Future Snoops and the Great Retail Recovery Reframe
Just above a local factory's cutting room floor was a group of industry insiders and emerging designers, gathered in support of RaiseFashion, a nonprofit dedicated to offering pro-bono advisory services, grant resources, and network access to Black, Indigenous, and people of color-owned brands.
'We're here tonight not just to network and fund-raise, but to name the production gap for what it is,' said Felita Harris, RaiseFashion's executive director and co-founder. Considering most manufacturers require high minimums, she explained, designers need thousands upfront just to get started. Payment delays of 60 to 90 days only deepen the strain.
'Eight out of 10 designers we've worked with cite production financing as their biggest barrier. In 2024, just 0.4 percent of venture capital went to BIPOC founders,' Harris said. 'These statistics aren't just numbers. They represent collections that never leave the sketchpad, opportunities that vanish before they're realized, and creative businesses that stall—not for lack of vision, but for lack of access.'
The organization's annual Raise the Future fundraiser was held June 12 at the family-owned Ferrara Manufacturing headquarters in Long Island City in support of the Designer Production Fund. This grant initiative was created to front production costs, broker relationships and fulfill orders at scale to, ultimately, build sustainable businesses without compromising integrity.
'Your support helps turn a sketch into a sample, a sample into a collection and a collection into legacy,' Harris said. 'And who doesn't want to be a part of that?'
Looking behind the curtain to 'go deeper into realities behind the runway,' per Harris, the evening's panel explored 'the trust cost of production' to take an honest look at what it takes to build a lasting business, highlighting production realities and power in local manufacturing.
'I love running a family business. It's been great, it's been an honor,' Joseph Ferrara, co-founder of Ferrara Manufacturing, said. 'What I love about the industry most is the creative force that drives it. It's the designers, it's the creators, and they are so prolific. They are so unbelievably talented.'
To that end, Joseph Ferrara sees his role as something of a conduit.
'I like to capture that energy in a bottle, translate it into a factory activity, and produce clothes that are a representation of that vision, of that joy, of that unbelievable creative talent,' he said. 'That's what turns me on.'
That same creative force, he said, is what makes the business possible in the first place.
'Our reason for existing is because design exists,' Ferrara said. 'Without design, without creativity, there's nothing for us to do.'
Supporting the future of the industry, he emphasized, isn't optional—it's imperative. That means backing all emerging creators.
'Our job is to execute. It's to interpret, it's to monetize, it's to operationalize, it's to make sustainable,' Joseph Ferrara said. 'Design is a function, and if they're not making money, we're not making money.'
The long-term viability of the business, Joseph Ferrara argued, hinges on investing in new talent now.
'We're going to need enough [designers] 10 years from now,' he said. 'It's all about replenishment. When we think about what sustains forests, you're seeding new plants. And if you're not part of that ecosystem—if you're not part of the future—you shouldn't be part of the present.'
This mindset persists throughout the local manufacturer. Gabrielle Ferrara, president and COO of Ferrara Manufacturing (and Joseph Ferrara's daughter) highlighted a pervasive myth within the industry.
'Sustainability is a hot topic,' said Gabrielle Ferrara. 'Everyone wants to buy sustainable clothing, and everyone wants to make it—but it's pretty complicated to do that.'
She pointed out that the word 'sustainability' often gets flattened in conversations despite being quite multifaceted in practice.
'There's material sustainability: Buying something certified by one of many organizations,' she explained. 'But there's also production sustainability: Are you paying fair wages? Are the people making your clothes being treated how they should?'
Certifications tend to dominate the conversation, especially among big brands, Gabrielle Ferrara said. But they don't tell the whole story.
'There are more holistic ways to approach it,' she added. 'One of my favorite projects was with Jacob James' American Woolen mill in Connecticut. We made a fully sustainable garment, using certified sustainable wool—but it wasn't just about the fiber. It was about labor, materials, the full production cycle.'
The biggest myth, she said, is assuming that sustainability begins and ends with the fabric.
'It's not just about the material,' Gabrielle Ferrara said. 'It's about the entire process.'
Aisling Camps, designer and CFDA member, as well as RaiseFashion masterclass alumna and Designer Production Fund recipient, knows this all too well.
'My background is in engineering, with a focus on sustainability,' she said. 'From the start, I was committed to making products that were ethically and responsibly produced. But that comes at a cost.'
That cost? Thinner margins. And harder decisions. Even with 'great partners and growing resilience,' per Camps, the production process has been a constant challenge. And that's where RaiseFashion comes in.
'Raise has gotten me into rooms I never thought I'd be in—connected me to C-suite leaders, opened doors, and, more importantly, helped cover production when I didn't know how I'd pay my factory,' Camps said. 'The grants go straight to invoices. It's that real.'
The system, she argued, is structurally broken for smaller, emerging designers.
'It's a cash flow game,' she said. 'You get paid in six months, but you have to pay your entire business now—your production, your staff, your show. The barrier to entry is astronomical. These production grants don't just help—they keep us alive.'
For founders like Camps, the challenge is less about vision and more about viability. Even the most responsible brands can't survive on ethics alone without financial support.
That's where people like Bradley Taylor, founder and investor of the Carrom Company, come in. For Taylor, a RaiseFashion board member, the evening was about more than fashion. It's about showing up.
'You can run a sheet metal business or a fashion label—it doesn't matter,' he said. 'If you believe in people, in nonprofits, in community, you have to actually show up. Everything is under attack right now. You can't sit it out.'
For context, Taylor launched his own company in 2004 and sold it to Vista Equity Partners—led by Robert Smith, in 2017.
That acquisition prompted Taylor and his family to set up a donor-advised fund at the Grand Rapids Community Foundation. 'George Floyd's murder in 2020 made everything we were doing feel more urgent,' he said.
Though Grand Rapids regularly ranks among the best places to live in America, Taylor pointed out the stark divide.
'If you're white, it's great,' he said. 'If you're a person of color, it's one of the worst cities in the country for economic opportunity.'
Since then, he's focused on 'anything that has to do with generational wealth for people of color.'
'Everybody deserves a shot, but not everybody has the same access,' Taylor said. 'That's what we have to fix.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Business Insider
an hour ago
- Business Insider
I'm 87 and work full time. I was rejected from hundreds of companies in my 80s and have a low-paying job, but I love the work.
This as-told-to essay is based on a conversation with Charles Smith, 87, who lives in Pennsylvania. After hundreds of unsuccessful applications in his mid-80s, he found work at the Lancaster County Office of Aging and makes about $30,000 a year. He and his wife live a frugal and somewhat comfortable life, though Smith said if he didn't work, they would be much more stressed financially. This interview has been edited for length and clarity. The job I have now is not the best-paying job I've ever had, as I only make a little more than $30,000 a year, but it's the best job I've ever had. I go to work every day and know I'm helping people who are very much in need of the services we provide. Still, if I weren't working, we wouldn't be quite so comfortable. It's been a long journey. My first job out of high school was when I was 18. It was with a large chemical company headquartered in Philadelphia, and I worked as a lab technician on a rotating shift. Are you an older American comfortable sharing your retirement outlook with a reporter? Please fill out this quick form. We are especially looking to hear from people 80 and older. By the time I was 19, I was making more money than my father, but I was doing shift work. I got married shortly after that and started to realize that if I was going to do anything more, I needed to get back to school. Back then, if you were 19, you were eligible for the draft. No one would hire me until I met that draft obligation. So I went into the military. That went a little off the rails. I went downtown to sign up for the Air Force as a mechanic. I wanted to learn all about jet engines. But the Air Force office was closed. The Army office was open, and I wound up spending the next three years in the Army. Two years of that time period were spent listening to Morse code. We were intelligence intercept operators. We listened to the Berlin Wall being built. I got out in 1962. I got a great job with another chemical company in Philadelphia, and I worked for them for almost six years. At the end, that company was going public, and the new management that came in found that I was trading shifts for the other operators so that I could go to school at night. Because they didn't want us to trade, I decided to continue going to school instead. I learned how to start a business, and I opened a successful water treatment business. I eventually sold it and ventured into the chemical side of water treatment. I found a job with a company in New Jersey. They hired me as a district manager, and for the next three years, I built their business considerably. They wanted me to move to Rochester and duplicate what I did here. I told them I've got a family with kids in school here, and I'm not going. Jumping around companies and facing layoffs I went back on an entrepreneurial journey. In 1985, I started my own chemical water treatment business. I operated it until 2005. My business philosophy was that you need to develop the business to make it self-sustaining, not driven by chasing the dollar. I started having heart problems and had a heart attack. It was time to wrap up that business, and I sold it to the young man with whom I had a joint venture for a while. I lost money after that deal. My plans for retirement were disrupted by the poor choices I made in my personal and business relationships. I decided that going back to work as a private individual wasn't going to work. I didn't fully anticipate I would start running into age discrimination, but there wasn't anything I could do about it. I went to work for a friend who was in a similar line of business for another three years before he sold his company to a national company. This new national company decided that they needed younger people in their sales force, and by this time, I was in my late 60s, so I was out of work. I bounced around with another couple of companies that would hire me. It was a pattern of them trying to learn as much as they could from me, then terminating my employment and eliminating my position. This went on in my 70s. By my early 80s, it got to the point where no one was going to hire me. I had four different businesses that were all successful, but my age got in the way of landing jobs. I spent a lot of time on unemployment, filling out hundreds of applications with no response. No matter what I did, it just didn't seem to work. Three years ago, I had a serious accident. I fell on my face when I was gardening and wound up paralyzed. I injured my spinal cord. I spent a couple of months in a rehab hospital and eventually got myself back to being functional. The fortunate thing is that my wife and I had bought a very nice house in a really good community. After the accident, we were able to sell that house, and the profit we realized from that was enough to buy another house with no mortgage. Each of us is collecting Social Security, and this small income from my current job with the county keeps us comfortable. The best job I've had I decided it was time to change careers. I saw an ad in the local paper in December 2022. It was not a well-paid job, but it was with the Lancaster County Office of Aging. I figured with them, I wouldn't have to worry about age discrimination. In February 2023, I went to work with them on initiatives that include Meals on Wheels, home assistance, physical therapy, and adult daycare. Many of those we help are old and don't have material finances or assets. Some are disabled. Whenever I think I've got problems, I just take a look at some of the people whom we provide services to, and then I realize my problems fade into the background. It's really rewarding to know that what you do makes a difference in someone's life, who would be pretty miserable without the programs we administer. I work five days a week for seven and a half hours a day, which doesn't leave a lot of time between my work schedule and recovering from the injury. I do try to reserve some personal time. We do get out of the house with other people. We have friends who live nearby, and I try to achieve a pretty good work-personal time balance. I recently went down to Delaware and took a walking tour using a type of walker with a seat on it. One of my friends and I share an interest in photography, and we each have some high-end photographic equipment. I spend a lot of my free time processing photos, and I'm pretty proficient in Photoshop. We get almost $40,000 in Social Security income between the two of us, so with this income, we've got about $70,000 coming in a year. We're trying to save that for our actual old age.


Business of Fashion
2 hours ago
- Business of Fashion
Five Years After George Floyd: Can Fashion Still Stand for Something?
In June, a new nonprofit, The Jewelry Edit Foundation, convened a group of industry leaders — including executives from Coach, Tiffany & Co. and Hermès — for a 'Lunch With Purpose.' The agenda: support underrepresented designers through year-round programming with a heavy focus on diversity, equity and inclusion, as well as sustainability. The Jewelry Edit Foundation has its roots in a retail platform of the same name (with a similar values-driven emphasis) founded by the designer Rosena Sammi in 2020, when fashion's promise to stand for something was at its loudest and most urgent. But in the second Trump administration, organisations that put DEI front and centre are increasingly rare, and groups with public backing from major corporations are even rarer. Sammi says the need to plow ahead now is more critical than it has ever been. ADVERTISEMENT 'I want to be surrounded by people brave enough to take action — not stand by on the sidelines,' she said. The Jewelry Edit founder Rosena Sammi hosts a "Lunch With Purpose," attended by high-profile leaders in the fashion and jewellery industry. (Courtesy/Courtesy) Many companies that founded DEI departments and backed organisations that support minority designers and entrepreneurs have quietly – and not so quietly – dismantled those efforts in the face of a conservative backlash. Dozens of Black-owned fashion and beauty brands that benefitted from increased attention after 2020 have shuttered, starved of capital and lacking the resources to weather economic headwinds. The pressure to keep silent was on display last week, as protests erupted in California after immigration enforcement agents arrested dozens of day labourers, including garment workers. While a handful of celebrities, including singer and rapper Doechii and Kim Kardashian spoke out, few large brands did. There was certainly nothing resembling the black square campaign of 2020 — a highly visible, if much-criticised, show of solidarity that saw brands from Chanel and Gucci to Levi's and Gap participate. Still, some of the energy sparked in 2020 hasn't disappeared. In a few cases, it's intensified. Felita Harris, a former Donna Karan executive who co-founded RAISEFashion in 2020 to support independent BIPOC designers, says there's upside in staying the course. The nonprofit in May hosted its latest 'master class' for emerging Black designers, this time on profitable growth, and partnered with Ferrara Manufacturing on a June 12 fundraiser to help underrepresented founders scale. Its latest grants are helping several Black-owned labels stay afloat, and alumni have landed roles at Louis Vuitton, Bloomingdale's and other major companies. 'I see the potential every day in [our master] classes — being able to make introductions, to stop the gatekeeping,' Harris said. Felita Harris, a former Donna Karan executive, co-founded RAISEFashion in 2020 and is doubling down on its mission to support BIPOC designers. (Courtesy/Courtesy) A few companies have kept up their pre-2024 approach to politics. Outdoor retailer REI and beauty brand Lush Cosmetics have recently doubled down on their DEI commitments — with Lush even using the acronym in product names and marketing. Designer Willy Chavarria in April partnered with the American Civil Liberties Union to launch Creatives for Freedom, which takes on issues like immigrant rights. So why have some brands and creatives continued to press forward when so many others have pulled back? ADVERTISEMENT The motivation is a combination of mission and margin — rooted in the belief that fashion can be a cultural force on issues like race, gender, and immigration, and that marginalised creatives drive the innovation and relevance the industry needs to grow with a new generation of consumers. 'Our business has always been rooted in mission and values. To stray from that now — or ever — would be antithetical to who we are,' said Nicole Lacasse, senior manager of brand and customer REDI (or racial equity, diversity and inclusion) at REI. 'We have seen firsthand the business results. This is right for our business.' For companies caught in the middle — eager to engage but wary of political blowback from a divided customer base — the path forward can feel murky. But it's not impossible. And some brands say the rewards for staying the course are becoming apparent. Backlash to the Backlash The surge in anti-DEI sentiment — from Trump's vow to 'end the tyranny' of DEI to a wave of executive orders earlier this year — has introduced real, or at least perceived, risks for fashion and beauty brands. Earlier this year, many brands determined that staying quiet was the most prudent course of action. But the anti-DEI backlash is generating its own backlash. Target — once praised for its swift response in the wake of Floyd's murder in its home city of Minneapolis — backed off its diversity commitments within hours of Donald Trump's inauguration. The URL that once led to a 2020 statement by chief executive Brian Cornell about 'a community in pain' now returns a 404 error. Foot traffic has declined in each of the four months since Target changed its policies, according to In May, Cornell told investors that year-over-year sales were down partly due to the fallout. Meanwhile, plenty of retailers have plowed ahead with their existing DEI policies, sometimes under new names, without facing a backlash from Trump or consumers. The key is to move past the 2020-era reflex to turn everything into a marketing play, experts say. ADVERTISEMENT Lush keeps its internal DEI work mostly under the radar, even as it renamed three of its bestselling bath bombs 'diversity,' 'equity' and 'inclusion' in January. That's because, while the brand is known for its activist campaigns, when it comes to its culture and workforce, 'you should take care of your own house before talking about it externally,' said Amanda Lee Sipenock Fisher, the company's head of DEI and belonging. Lush's cheekily named soaps are a natural way 'to enter the conversation with our products,' Sipenock Fisher said. But it works best when paired with substantive work behind the scenes. 'When you have a DEI programme that first and foremost serves your people, you are tuning in directly to employee engagement,' Sipenock Fisher. 'And we know that employee engagement is an incredible KPI. It is a driver of successful businesses.' Lush's "diversity" bath bomb. (Courtesy/Courtesy) That dual track approach is getting more challenging as the Trump administration puts corporate DEI initiatives under the microscope. 'I've never seen this much external interest in our work,' she said. 'Seeing [DEI] being threatened, rolled back, quieted — that was a moment for employees, consumers and companies to say, 'Wait, there is backlash to the silence.'' Retailers with the most successful DEI programmes today tend to be the ones that were thinking about the topic before 2020. REI formally embedded inclusion into its business strategy nearly two decades ago, Lacasse said. Its partnerships with groups like Outdoor Afro, Black Girls RUN!, and Latino Outdoors are part of a broader strategy that includes investing in inclusive sizing, colour palettes and gender-neutral designs — products that have become some of the company's top performers, Lacasse said. 'This is really about continuity of our brand commitment, our purpose and trust building,' she said. 'We do really believe that when we show up consistently over time, when we centre the voices of our communities and we make equity a shared responsibility, we can really strengthen our position as a brand.' Fashion as a Cultural Force Even as brands face pressure to retreat, fashion's most public-facing moments — red carpets, runways, and campaigns — remain powerful, if inconsistent, signals of inclusion. But 'visibility doesn't equal viability,' Harris pointed out. In other words, fashion has become known for splashy displays of support — like buzzy shows or red-carpet moments featuring BIPOC designers — that often fail to translate into lasting commercial success, like shelf space, wholesale deals or infrastructure investment, Harris said. The Met Gala in May offered mainstream exposure to Black creatives, with LaQuan Smith, Grace Wales Bonner, Ozwald Boateng and Sergio Hudson delivering standout red carpet moments. The spotlight on the Black dandy — a fluid term celebrating expressive, often ostentatious style — landed like a quiet protest in a politically fraught climate. Teyana Taylor, Colman Domingo and Lewis Hamilton at the 2025 Met Gala. (Getty Images) 'The Met Gala shows fashion's power to inspire the masses,' Chavarria said in an email. 'However, that must live beyond the one event and we should use that momentum to elevate voices.' The industry has repeatedly failed to turn these cultural flashes into lasting structural change — whether through sustained investment, leadership opportunities, or shelf space. With a few high-profile exceptions, including Pharrell Williams at Louis Vuitton and Olivier Rousteing at Balmain, designers of colour remain rare in top creative roles. These designers not only continue to be locked out of these top roles — they're also expected to lead the charge for change, often while navigating the very systemic barriers that hinder their progress. Designer Willy Chavarria walks the runway during his Ready to Wear Spring/Summer 2025 fashion show. (Getty Images) 'I don't want Willie [Chavarria] to be the only one who's doing this work, and I also don't want it to always be the person who is in the marginalised community who feels that they have to be the one doing this work,' said Jessica Weitz, national director of artist and entertainment engagement at ACLU. 'There's no question that this industry could not exist without a diverse workplace ... and a diverse group of people who are in the business of buying fashion.' Fashion's influence — its soft power to shape culture and drive progress — has dulled, insiders say, not for lack of rhetoric, but for lack of follow-through. 'Maybe the world is looking at fashion in the same way we [experience it], which is, can fashion be trusted?' said Harris. 'Can it really deliver what it promises? Because how can fashion call for democracy when designers are going out of business? When there's such a lack of Black leadership at the top?' Still, designers like Chavarria say there's power in holding the industry accountable to the ideals it promotes. 'Fashion has always been political, and now it's becoming urgent,' Chavarria said. 'It is a way to resist. Now more than ever, fashion must stand with the communities that have always used it to speak out and be heard.'
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Liverpool have no Florian Wirtz alternative as truth about transfer spend emerges
Even before an agreement with Bayer Leverkusen had been reached over £116m Florian Wirtz, Liverpool were being subjected to the sniping of rivals. 'That's the last of the Phillippe Coutinho money' went the prod in the direction of the Premier League champions, with tongues firmly pressed into cheeks. The inference being, of course, that the Reds have somehow pretended to stretch the £142m fee received from Barcelona over seven years ago in an effort to present a false reality of a club who don't spend heavily in the transfer market. Advertisement For the avoidance of doubt, the sale of Coutinho in January 2018 did facilitate the arrivals of £75m Virgil van Dijk and £65m Alisson Becker, which, quite neatly rounded up to a nice, even £140m and almost directly led to Jurgen Klopp's Liverpool going from pretenders to contenders and then serial winners of every major trophy between the years 2019 and 2022. READ MORE: Liverpool could have another mega transfer to come with dream signing and Arsenal hijack considered In short, the departure of the Brazil playmaker was one of the greatest deals in modern football. But, of course, Liverpool have not made a habit of such an extraordinary outlay that is being paid for Germany international Wirtz. In fact, only two senior players have officially been signed for the Reds since the transfer window closed in August 2023. Jeremie Frimpong's £29m release clause was triggered last month to add to the £12m addition of Federico Chiesa last year. Advertisement That means that the Reds have spent, inclusive of add-ons, £41m in two years. That is around £10m more than Brighton & Hove Albion have just paid to land Charalampos Kostoulas from Olympiakos. The imminent arrival of goalkeeper Giorgi Mamardashvili, at £29m, takes the Reds to £70m on sporting director Richard Hughes's watch. Throw in the addition of Wirtz at £116m, which is, again, inclusive of all add-ons, and it takes Liverpool's spending in the Arne Slot era to £186m, which, while not an insignificant amount, pales in comparison to the likes of Chelsea, whose spendthrift model has seen them lay out the thick end of £350m during that same timeframe. Such has been the Londoners' disorienting level of recruitment, in fact, that they have named a 28-man squad for this month's Club World Cup and have still been able to omit £47.5m Raheem Sterling, £38.5m Axel Disasi, £45m Ben Chilwell and £45m Joao Felix. Manchester City, meanwhile, are careering towards a total of £320m themselves since the start of last season, while Manchester United continue to spend good money after bad on a string of players unsuited or ill equipped to perform at Old Trafford. Just the £209m spent last summer, for those keeping score. Advertisement Since the start of the decade, Liverpool sit outside the top 10 for money spent in the Premier League and the eye-watering and potential British-record addition of Germany international Wirtz only moves them into eighth, around £30m short of West Ham United. So no, the Coutinho is long gone at Anfield, spent wisely on two of the greatest players the club have ever had in Alisson and Van Dijk and that, ironically, is the level Wirtz is being viewed at internally at Anfield. That means the pressure is on immediately and at that sort of price, the pitch forks will be out from those hoping it falls on its face as hopelessly as many of those aforementioned Chelsea deals. But if a risk-averse and often parsimonious strategy to signings has taught anything over the last few years at Anfield, it's that Liverpool often get it right when it's time to spend big. For them, unlike some of their rivals, there is no alternative.