Rogue landlord Christian Carter hit with €5k legal bill after backing off from ‘silencing' media
Dubliner Carter had secured interim restraining orders on April 9, temporarily stopping two reporters from publishing stories about him
Landlord turned screenwriter Christian Carter has backed off from using anti-stalking laws to stop an RTE reporter writing stories about him but has been hit with a €5,000 legal bill.
Dubliner Carter had secured interim restraining orders on April 9, temporarily stopping Amy Molloy, the Irish Independent's Social Affairs Correspondent, and Maura Fay, a Today with Claire Byrne reporter on RTÉ Radio 1, from publishing stories about him.
Both of the journalists resisted his attempts to extend the interim order for five-years.
However, last month at Dublin District Court, Judge Anthony Halpin threw out Carter's bid to "silence" Amy Molloy before lifting reporting restrictions and landing him with an order to pay €10,000 to cover expenses incurred by Mediahuis, the publishers of the Irish Independent, in fighting the case.
Yesterday, Carter's case against Ms Fay was listed again for hearing. However, during the call-over of the day's cases, his barrister, Stephen Wilson, instructed by solicitor Alex Rafter, said he was instructed to withdraw the matter.
Judge Halpin noted two similar previous attempts against Ms Fay had failed. Following an application by Rebecca Tierney BL for Ms Fay, he ordered Carter to pay her legal costs of €5,000.
Furthermore, he again lifted the in-camera rule, allowing the parties to be named.
The businessman's U-turn follows a resounding courtroom defeat on April 16 in his action against the Irish Independent journalist.
In that case, Judge Halpin criticised Carter's use of the process, saying it was not the purpose of the civil restraining orders introduced last year.
Christian Carter
The News in 90 Seconds - Wednesday, 7th of May
The judge had heard that Amy Molloy had broken stories and covered court cases about Carter's days as a landlord and his tax affairs.
"I was just doing my job," the journalist emphasised when she testified at the hearing.
Judge Halpin dismissed that case: "I never envisaged that this forum would be used to dilute journalistic freedom or restrict publication of certain matters."
He held that Carter endeavoured to use this legal remedy to "suppress" the legitimate publication of facts he did not want in the public domain.
Ronan Lupton SC for the newspaper described that civil restraining order application as a collateral attack that tramples on the right of freedom of expression.
In evidence, the journalist rejected suggestions from the applicant's solicitor that she had stepped over the line, telling Judge Halpin she was simply seeking a comment, offering Carter the right to reply, which was a fundamental part of journalism, and "I was just doing my job".
Carter claimed that she had written 50 articles and had rehashed stories about him since 2017.
In response to his claims, Ms Molloy said since 2017, she had written 17 or 18 articles concerning properties Carter rented out and when he appeared on the tax defaulters list last year.
One of the properties featured in her work was a Cabinteely property, which she alleged had 70 tenants, while Carter claimed it was a 6,000 sq ft 25-roomed mansion with 40 tenants. The Circuit Court had ordered him to pay €20,000 to some of his tenants.
The court heard he was also featured in a 2017 RTE Investigates broadcast called Nightmare to Let.
Ms Molloy explained she had written about his issues with the Residential Tenancies Board, a council and the Revenue Commissioners.
The journalist said that a source informed her that Carter had recently travelled to various destinations, including South America, Canada, and Hawaii.
Ms Molloy asserted that in light of that, she attempted to reach out to him for a comment on whether he had paid up following his settlement of nearly one million euro with the Revenue Commissioners after under-declaring income tax.
She stated, "If Mr Carter had paid his taxes and had not dangerously overcrowded houses, I would never have had to write about him".
Breaching a civil restraining order can result in a €4,000 fine, a criminal conviction and a 12-month prison sentence.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Dublin Live
2 hours ago
- Dublin Live
Undercover RTE documentary highlights horrific conditions in Irish nursing homes
Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info A shocking RTÉ documentary that goes undercover in two nursing homes shows residents crying out for help, left in soiled clothes and being incorrectly handled. Over the past eight weeks, the public broadcaster has been investigating care at two nursing homes run by Emeis Ireland, formerly Orpea. The largest private nursing home provider in the country, it has 27 homes across the country with capacity for 2,400 residents. Following concerns raised by several whistleblowers, RTÉ had two undercover researchers and healthcare workers apply for and secure jobs at separate Emeis nursing homes. The researchers got extensive footage from The Residence Portlaoise, Co Laois, and Beneavin Manor in Glasnevin, Dublin. In Portlaoise, a woman was left stranded on a toilet by a new carer who had gone on her break. Harrowing footage shows the woman saying "Don't leave me now, oh my God," as she has a broken call bell. A nurse then comes to her help, as the terrified resident tells her she was "ringing and ringing and ringing". Later, speaking about the carer, she says: "She never came back. I'm here on me own. It was terrible. It is a fright when the other yoke won't work." The nurse then told her "don't worry" but proceeded to clean the woman's hands with her own skirt. In another incident, a man was left waiting for 25 minutes to use the bathroom, as he said he was "in terrible pain" and "very full". Consultant Geriatrician Prof Rónán Collins, who took part in the documentary, said: "I don't want to be melodramatic and say that it amounts to institutional abuse of people but clearly if people are suffering because they want to go to the toilet and they're faced with the choice of being incontinent in the chair not being taken to the toilet due to staffing levels, that is very, very poor care of people." Prof David Robinson added: "What we're looking at I suppose is largely institutional abuse and this is neglect at, we're seeing a lot of it, in a setting which is supposed to be caring." Footage in Portlaoise showed a serious staffing issue, as the undercover healthcare worker was just one of three staff looking after 30 residents on Easter Saturday. (Image: RTE Investigates) Much of the inadequate care appears to be down to staffing issues, however, the documentary also exposes a lack of proper equipment. At a staff meeting in Portlaoise, the home ran out of incontinence pads, with a nurse saying that the next supply wouldn't arrive for 10 days. A senior nurse then tells staff that management might restrict their access to pads. She said: "'You were told this at the meeting, if ye run out of pads this month, you're going have to use what's there. You'll have to go and use sticky pads and use underwear and sticky pads for the next 10 days'." A nurse then said that some residents were found "double padded" and "that is a form of abuse". Commenting on this, Prof Robinson said: "Rationing incontinence wear when you're trying to make sure that people are clean and dry and also promote toileting. It's almost like a restriction." The Emeis policy on correct manual handling techniques states its nursing homes should operate a "minimal manual handling approach". However, during her time at The Residence in Portlaoise, the undercover assistant frequently saw staff flout basic manual handling skills. A shocking scene shows a frail older woman being lifted under her arms by one male carer, despite her care plan outlining she needs two workers and a full body hoist. The resident distressingly shouts "no" as the staff member tells her "no you're fine, you're fine". At Beneavin Manor in Glasnevin, footage also showed staff improperly handling residents and leaving them to soil themselves. While going down a corridor, a man using a walking frame was shown being guided by two staff in a very quick manner. One assistant was hoisting him by the back of his waist, and he became visibly uncomfortable and upset. Despite protesting, they forced him into his room and very abruptly pulled his trousers down and yanked his pad off before being pushed into a chair. The elderly man could be heard saying: "Stop that! Stop that, get out of my room." Prof Collins said: "That's unacceptable. You can clearly see that he's being roughly handled, inappropriately handled, that he's not understanding what's going on and being slightly frightened by as well as being grabbed by the back of his pants and pushed forward, pushed back into the chair. That's very inappropriate handling." At the nursing home, the undercover reporter was also shown by a more senior assistant how to transfer a patient to bed "quickly". (Image: RTE) Despite protocol being to use a hoist, she showed her how to lift the patient under her arms. She then informed her: "We aren't allowed to do this, it's speedy Gonzales". At nighttime in Beanevin, footage showed a resident being refused the toilet, and told to go on his incontinence pad. A nurse then gets agitated and tells him not to go on his sheets as they don't have any more. The man was then heard calling for help multiple times but no one responded. On another occasion, the same elderly man was found by the undercover reporter lying on a soaking wet bare mattress without any bedsheets. (Image: RTE) Speaking at the end of the documentary, Professor Robinson said the footage shows "systemic and institutional lack of consideration for the older person. "This is going to shorten people's lives and their lives will be more miserable." RTÉ Investigates said findings have been reported by RTÉ researchers to HIQA, and the local nursing home management where applicable. It also said the findings of the investigation have been shared with the private nursing home group and RTÉ has offered them due right of reply. In a statement, Emeis Ireland said: "It is not, nor will it ever be our policy to understaff any of our nursing homes. (Image: RTE) "Staff should only be released for in service training when sufficient staff remains in place to meet resident needs. "The allocation and utilisation of staff resources across both nursing homes is also the subject of this review. "It is not acceptable for residents to wait for care or to be dismissed when requesting assistance. We take these matters very seriously and we do not tolerate such practices... "We acknowledge and sincerely apologise to residents and their families for the distress caused by the failings identified. This is not the standard we expect and not the standards that residents or their families deserve."
RTÉ News
3 hours ago
- RTÉ News
All you need to know about voice spoofing and audio deepfakes
Analysis: Biometric fraud like voice spoofing and audio deepfakes are part of broader social engineering attacks by scammers and criminals Voice spoofing involves using digital technology such as artificial intelligence to mimic someone's voice so accurately that it can deceive both humans and automated speaker verification systems. With recent rapid advancements in AI, creating these fake voices—often called "audio deepfakes"—has become alarmingly easy. Today, with just a few seconds of recorded speech from platforms like podcasts, YouTube or TikTok, machine learning models can generate highly realistic synthetic voices that mimic real individuals. It is a type of biometric fraud and often part of broader social engineering attacks. How does voice spoofing work? AI-powered tools analyses the unique patterns of a person's speech—such as tone, pitch, and rhythm—and use this data to produce synthetic speech that closely resembles the original voice. The technology have become so advanced that distinguishing between a real voice and a fake one is increasingly challenging. From RTÉ Radio 1's The Business, BBC's File on 4. reporter Paul Connolly on how criminals are now using AI-generated voices to scam people out of their money Typically, the process usually begins with an attacker collecting voice clips from online sources like social media or videos. Specialized AI models, like VGGish or YAMNet analyze these voice samples to extract important acoustic patterns from the voice, turning them into digital fingerprints called embeddings. These embeddings are then fed into voice generation systems such as Tacotron, WaveNet, or FastSpeech that produce new speech mimicking the original voice. The resulting fake voice can be used in phone calls or apps to impersonate someone in real time. How is this going to impact us in the real world? Financial scams are a growing problem and we've all had a (fairly ridiculous) phone call where a robot voice purporting to be from a company tries to get information or money, but more sophisticated versions have worked. In the UK, fraudsters used AI-generated voices to impersonate financial advisors, leading to a multi-million euro scam targeting crypto investors. In the US, the FBI has warned about scammers using AI to mimic senior US officials' voices, deceiving individuals into sharing confidential information. There have also even been cases where scammers cloned the voices of loved ones, calling individuals and pretending to be in distress to extract money. These incidents highlight the disturbing reality that even the sound of someone's voice can no longer be trusted. From CNN, can Donie O'Sullivan's parents tell the difference between RealDonie's voice and AI-Donie's voice? Celebrities, politicians, and influencers are particularly at risk because their voices are widely available online. The more audio content (voice data) available publicly, the easier it is for AI tools to replicate their voice. This is a basic principle of AI: more data = better performance. However, it's not just public figures who are at risk. If you've ever posted a video or audio clip on platforms like Facebook, Instagram, or YouTube, your voice could potentially be cloned. What are the difficulties in detecting voice spoofing? Detecting synthetic voices is a complex task. Most traditional security systems and speaker verification systems often rely on voice recognition for authentication, but AI-generated voices have become sophisticated enough to deceive these systems. Some of the core technical challenges include: Spectro-temporal similarity Fake voices closely mimic both pitch and timing patterns of natural speech. Data imbalance: Real-world datasets typically contain fewer examples of spoofed voices, making it harder for AI to recognize these cases. Generalisation: Many detection models struggle when faced with spoofing methods they weren't specifically trained on. How to protect yourself While the threat is real, there are steps you can take to safeguard against voice spoofing: Be sceptical: If you receive an unexpected call requesting sensitive information or money, verify the caller's identity through another channel. Use safe words: Establish a unique code word with family and close contacts that can be used to confirm identities during emergencies. Limit voice sharing: Be cautious about sharing voice recordings online, especially on public platforms. Stay informed: Keep abreast of the latest scams and educate yourself on how to recognize potential threats. Voice spoofing poses a growing threat as AI continues to advance, making it easier than ever to mimic someone's voice convincingly. Whether you're a public figure or an everyday social media user, the potential to become a victim of voice cloning exists. From RTÉ Radio 1's Ray D'Arcy Show, AI expert Henry Ajder talks on how deepfakes are damaging online trust and what some platforms are doing to rebuild it How our research work is helping Our recent research proposes an innovative and effective approach for detecting voice spoofing by using a hybrid deep learning (DL) architecture called VGGish-LSTM. We used VGGish, a pre-trained model developed by Google, to extract robust acoustic embeddings from audio data. These embeddings capture detailed features that are often not noticeable by human listeners but are critical in distinguishing synthetic voices. Once extracted, these acoustic features are then analysed by a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network, a type of artificial neural network designed specifically to detect long-term patterns and dependencies in sequential data. These networks excel at identifying variations in speech rhythm, tone, and pitch that could indicate synthetic or manipulated speech. The advice for users is to stay vigilant, limit how much voice data you share online and adopt simple safety practices Evaluated on the widely used ASV Spoof 2019 dataset, our model achieved an outstanding accuracy of over 90%. This performance demonstrates our model's ability to detect spoofing effectively and can be used in real-world scenarios such as banking authentication, call centre security, or smart home voice verification systems. With ongoing research into detection technologies, such as the VGGish-LSTM model described here, we can continue developing robust defences to cope with voice spoofing scams. But for users, the advice is to stay vigilant, limit how much voice data you share online and adopt simple safety practices.
Irish Independent
12 hours ago
- Irish Independent
The Indo Daily: Gerry Adams – what €100K defamation win against the BBC means for his legacy, Sinn Féin and Irish media
A High Court jury delivered the verdict following a four-week trial in which Mr Adams claimed he was defamed by a BBC 'Spotlight' programme in which it was alleged he sanctioned the murder of an informer. Afterwards, Mr Adams said he took the case to put 'manners' on the BBC. The jury found that the BBC had defamed Mr Adams by suggesting he had sanctioned and approved the killing of Denis Donaldson, a Sinn Féin official who spied for Britain's MI5. It also rejected defences put forward by the BBC that the allegation was published in good faith and that it was fair and reasonable to do so. Mr Adams' legacy and how he will be viewed in the history books was very much at stake in the trial. Has this landmark case set a precedent for how media organisations can cover the Troubles in the future? Today on The Indo Daily, Fionnán Sheahan is joined by Shane Phelan, Legal Affairs Editor with the Irish Independent, and by John Downing, Political Correspondent with the Irish Independent to go through the key proceedings of the trial and examine what the verdict means for Mr Adams, Sinn Féin, the BBC and the media at large.
