logo
How a reading group helped young German students defy the Nazis and find their faith

How a reading group helped young German students defy the Nazis and find their faith

Yahoo30-04-2025

For three weeks in April 2025, my 'Theology of Christian Martyrdom' class studied how a group of German students and professors from Munich and Hamburg formed a resistance movement from 1942 to 1943 known as the 'White Rose.' These individuals defied Nazi tyranny, they were imprisoned, and many were executed.
At the movement's center were Hans Scholl, Sophie Scholl, Alexander Schmorell, Christoph Probst and Willi Graf, who were all in their 20s, and Professor Kurt Huber. The Scholl siblings, their friends and their professor were beheaded for urging students at the University of Munich to oppose the Nazi regime.
On the surface, the White Rose's 'crime' was the writings, printings and distribution of six anti-Nazi pamphlets urging Germans to resist Adolf Hitler and work to end World War II. However, a closer examination of their pamphlets, along with excerpts from their diaries and letters, reveals that their resistance was rooted in something deeper – a faith anchored in friendship and a humanistic learning. Their time together reading and discussing theological texts deepened their Christian faith.
Teaching this class taught me that teachers can inspire students to improve their country's social and political landscape through the study of literature, history and theology. Teachers can help students form their consciences and empower them to act against falsehood and injustice.
These young people came from a variety of Christian backgrounds, including Catholic, Lutheran and Orthodox traditions. Some had been members of the Hitler Youth as teenagers, while others had served as medical assistants in the German army. They formed strong bonds and underwent personal transformations as students at the University of Munich, where they were mentored by a couple of philosophers, especially Kurt Huber, who was a devout Catholic.
The students met regularly and secretly with their professors to study literature, philosophy and theology from the Catholic intellectual tradition, banned by the Nazi regime as part of Hitler's strategy to first stifle and then strangle the Catholic Church in Germany. Based on the students' correspondence and diaries, their covert engagement with Catholic thought became a cornerstone of the White Rose's rejection of Nazi tyranny.
In the works of the fifth-century North African theologian Augustine, the 20th-century novelist and playwright Georges Bernanos, and the 20th-century philosopher Jacques Maritain, these students encountered a Catholic intellectual tradition that was responsive to the urgent questions of their time.
From Augustine they learned the importance of cultivating an interior life grounded in prayer. Bernanos stressed the importance of embracing one's humanity to confront evil. Maritain emphasized the need to strive for a free democratic society.
The White Rose movement was concerned not only with the present state of humanity but also with its future, and not only with the individual but also with the communal. In their clandestine meetings and correspondence, they wrestled with the relationship between faith and reason, goodness in the face of evil, the meaning of tyranny, the nature of a just state, and the foundations of genuine liberty. Addressing these serious issues not only matured their intellects but also deepened their hearts; it taught them the importance of prayer.
'Better to suffer intolerable pain than to vegetate insensibly. Better to be parched with thirst, better to pray for pain, pain, and more pain, than to feel empty, and to feel so without truly feeling at all. That I mean to resist,' Sophie wrote in her diary in the early summer of 1942.
The personal writings of the White Rose reflect a religious passion, akin to the prayers of saints.
For example, in his imprisonment, Graf stated: 'I know my Redeemer liveth. This faith alone strengthens and sustains me.' The impact of Christianity on the inner lives of these young people is a crucial part of their narrative and resistance.
Their circle of friendship became a haven in a totalitarian state that sought to isolate individuals, instill fear and transform these estranged and fearful people into part of a mass society. 'We negated the many, and built on the few, and believed ourselves strong,' Traute Lafrenz, the last surviving member of the White Rose and a member of the Hamburg circle, later stated.
The most significant intellectual influence on the group may have been John Henry Newman, a 19th-century Catholic convert and theologian who emphasized the primacy of a 'well-formed' conscience. His writings helped them recognize what Catholics like myself see as a moral truth that transcended Nazi propaganda – that each person bears within them the voice of the living God. This voice could not be silenced by state power.
Newman insisted that conscience is not merely intuitive but is shaped through learning – from conversations, books and lived experience. With their professors' guidance, the White Rose students were able to cultivate their conscience.
If Newman were addressing college students today, I like to believe he would emphasize the significance of their conversations with friends on campus, the discussions held with classmates and professors in the classroom, the newspapers they read, the retreats they participated in, the novels they savored during the holidays, their road trips across the country, and their studies abroad. All of these experiences contribute to shaping their conscience.
Newman's defense of broad, active and serious learning offered an appealing counterpoint to Nazi ideology, which sought not only to deprive individuals of their civil rights but also to crush their inner lives and capacity to form meaningful relationships through terror and fear.
The power of a well-formed conscience is perhaps best illustrated by Sophie Scholl, who shared Newman's sermons with her boyfriend, Fritz Hartnagel, a Wehrmacht officer who fought for Germany during World War II.
In the summer of 1942, horrified by the brutality he witnessed, Hartnagel wrote to Scholl that Newman's words were like 'drops of precious wine.' In another letter, he wrote: 'But we know by whom we are created, and that we stand in a relationship of moral obligation to our Creator. Conscience gives us the capacity to distinguish between good and evil.' After the war, Hartnagel became active in the peace movement and supported conscientious objectors. To the members of the White Rose, conscience was a spiritual stronghold – one the state could not breach.
I believe that while my students today face different challenges – a society shaped by what I regard as the nihilistic presence of technological power and populism, rather than full-blown totalitarianism – they also aspire to act with clarity and conviction. Newman's view on the formation of conscience resonated with my students as well.
What my students share with those young dissidents from over 80 years ago is a commitment to cultivating an inner life, fostering a community of friends and engaging in a vibrant intellectual tradition.
They are drawn to the writings that animated Hans Scholl, who, drawing inspiration from the Catholic playwright Paul Claudel, wrote the following just two days before his arrest.
'Chasms yawn and darkest night envelops my questing heart, but I press on regardless. As Claudel so splendidly puts it: Life is one great adventure into the light.'
As a teacher, I believe that young people want to engage with an intellectual tradition that helps them discover their vocation and live with integrity, similar to Scholl.
They seek to act with a clear conscience amid the uncertainties of their own times. This approach serves as a powerful contrast to any hollow, anti-intellectual and culturally bankrupt tyranny.
This article is republished from The Conversation, a nonprofit, independent news organization bringing you facts and trustworthy analysis to help you make sense of our complex world. It was written by: Peter Nguyen, SJ, College of the Holy Cross
Read more:
Spider-Man's lessons for us all on the responsibility to use our power, great or small, to do good
Genocide resisters, long overlooked by history, step into the spotlight
How individual, ordinary Jews fought Nazi persecution − a new view of history
Peter Nguyen, SJ does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

5 takeaways from a major new report on religion around the world
5 takeaways from a major new report on religion around the world

Yahoo

time28 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

5 takeaways from a major new report on religion around the world

This article was first published in the State of Faith newsletter. Sign up to receive the newsletter in your inbox each Monday night. When people hear that researching religion is part of my job, they often ask me very specific questions about faith-related issues that have been in the news. After I disappoint them by not immediately knowing the answers, I turn to Google for help. My job has made me a search engine expert, not a religion expert. The questions that still trip me up even when I've got a strong internet connection are about the religious makeup of faraway countries. It's hard for me to quickly find info about religious life in the Czech Republic or New Zealand and then talk about what that info means for the athlete or politician who's grabbing headlines in the U.S. But now, I've got an exciting new tool in my trivia tool belt. On Monday, Pew Research Center released an interactive website that shows the religious makeup of nearly every country in the world in a single (very large) table. Once you're on the page, it takes only a few seconds to confirm that New Zealand was 40.3% Christian in 2020 or that the Czech Republic is dominated by religious 'nones.' Pew's interactive table was released alongside a new report discussing how the global religious landscape changed from 2010 to 2020. Based on more than 2,700 censuses and surveys, the report provides an in-depth look at 201 countries and territories — and plenty of fodder for conversations with your friends. Here are five key takeaways from Pew's new analysis of the global religious landscape. Christianity is the world's largest faith group, but it's not keeping pace with global population growth. In 2010, 30.6% of the world identified as Christian. By 2020, that figure had fallen to 28.8%. Islam is the fastest growing religious group. 'The number of Muslims increased by 347 million (from 2010 to 2020) — more than all other religions combined,' researchers wrote. Sub-Saharan Africa is now the region of the world where most Christians live. In 2010, Europe held that title. As of 2020, the United States has the second-largest number of religiously unaffiliated residents. China has the most. The growth of Islam from 2010 to 2020 was mostly due to natural population growth, while the decline of Christianity stemmed, in large part, from religious switching. 'Religious 'switching' — especially people shedding their religious identity after having been raised as Christians — explains much of the unaffiliated population's growth between 2010 and 2020," Pew reported. Americans are divided over religious freedom. The Supreme Court? Not as much How 'Jeopardy!' can save us all, according to Ken Jennings The Supreme Court's surprising decision day This top running back says he believes in God, not the so-called 'Madden curse' A religious school is facing pushback for its partnership with U.S. Customs and Border Protection Hidden Christianity is a unique form of Christianity practiced on some of Japan's rural islands. It gets its name from the fact that its earliest practitioners really were hiding their faith to avoid persecution. 'Hidden Christians were forced to hide all visible signs of their religion after the 1614 ban on Christianity and the expulsion of foreign missionaries. Households took turns hiding precious ritual objects and hosting the secret services that celebrated both faith and persistence,' according to The Associated Press. Early practitioners disguised their Christian icons by making them appear to be Buddhist. Even after it was safe to be openly Christian again, many families continued these secretive practices, in part because they wanted to honor loved ones who'd risked their lives and in part because they didn't fit in with mainstream Christians, the AP reported. 'Many Hidden Christians rejected Catholicism after the persecution ended because Catholic priests refused to recognize them as real Christians unless they agreed to be rebaptized and abandon the Buddhist altars that their ancestors used,' the article said. Hidden Christianity may soon be just a memory in Japan, since most current practitioners are quite old and most young people who grew up with the traditions have moved to cities and either don't want to or can't access the gatherings. A controversial research project featuring faith leaders using psychedelic drugs was released last month after a long delay. The report showed that nearly all of the members of the clergy who took part described their experiences with psilocybin as some of the most spiritually significant of their lives, but health and religion experts don't agree on what type of additional research or policy proposals that finding should inspire, according to Religion News Service. Which groups face the most discrimination in the United States? Pew Research Center recently asked Americans to weigh in, and the survey report offers an in-depth look at how people's political views influence their thoughts about discrimination. My Deseret News colleague Krysyan Edler recently wrote about the inspiring life of Caroline Klein, the chief communications officer for Smith Entertainment Group. After being diagnosed with cancer in her thirties, Klein committed to living every day like there might not be a tomorrow. 'Nothing about my situation is sad to me, but I want to make sure that when I'm gone, I've left people with a lot of great memories that bring them joy, too,' she said. After years of daydreaming about getting back into tennis, I finally started a summer tennis class on Saturday. It felt so good! Take this as the nudge you need to do that thing you've been dreaming about.

Members of the MAGA Elite Have a New Favorite Slur for Each Other. It's Tearing Them Apart.
Members of the MAGA Elite Have a New Favorite Slur for Each Other. It's Tearing Them Apart.

Yahoo

time28 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Members of the MAGA Elite Have a New Favorite Slur for Each Other. It's Tearing Them Apart.

Sign up for the Slatest to get the most insightful analysis, criticism, and advice out there, delivered to your inbox daily. Last week, while the Republican Party reeled from a bitter and loud falling-out between the two most powerful men in U.S. politics, a much quieter dispute was playing out among the intellectual leaders of the right. This feud would have been easy to miss, even without the Trump–Musk showdown overshadowing everything else. It involved impenetrable jargon, long-winded blog posts, hard-to-parse political factions, and a set of characters known more for quoting philosophers than for authoring the kinds of punchy, lib-owning posts that typify the right's most popular internet figures. But those inside that world who followed the conversation witnessed something significant: a sign that some of the intellectual leaders of the modern MAGA movement are becoming disturbed by parts of the movement they created. The controversy began on Sunday, when the prominent conservative writer Rod Dreher, a close friend of J.D. Vance's, published an essay in the Free Press, the publication founded by Bari Weiss, titled 'The Woke Right Is Coming for Your Sons.' In the essay, Dreher argued that many on the right were displaying what he believed to be ugly qualities that define the modern left: language policing (see: Trump's renaming the Gulf of Mexico to the 'Gulf of America'); rewriting history (see: a MAGA podcaster's description of Winston Churchill as the 'chief villain' of World War II); and, above all, identity-based politics. Dreher wrote that he saw white Christian men feeling disempowered and advocating for their own racial, gender, and religious interests; he was most disturbed by how often this form of 'identity politics' seemed to manifest as aggressive antisemitism. This essay infuriated some people on the right, who complained that Dreher was slandering normal conservatives by calling them 'woke.' His mistake had been in using a term that some more-centrist conservatives have invoked to describe people such as Christopher Rufo, the man often credited with driving the campaign against 'critical race theory' in schools. Worse, the terminology seemed to imply that there was a power equivalence between the 'woke left' and 'woke right,' when, conservatives argued, the 'woke left' was much more powerful than whatever its right-wing counterpart was. The next day, Dreher published an apology to his readers. In a 4,700-word blog post (Dreher is always prolix), he admitted that he had erred by not being 'online enough.' The term 'woke right' was excised from the piece, and the headline was changed to warn of the dangers of 'the radical right.' The incident was not the first time the term had been the center of controversy in debates around modern conservative politics. But the episode marks a particularly heated moment for the digital elites of the MAGA movement, as Dreher's miscalculation comes at a time when the right, wielding greater political power than it has held in years, has begun to show fractures in its coalition. The term 'woke right' has been circulating for a few years now; one of the first significant uses was in 2022, in a critical essay from a Reformed Presbyterian pastor reviewing a Christian nationalist book. The review, titled 'The Rise of Right-Wing Wokeism,' argued that the Christian nationalist book was 'woke' because it argued that 'oppression is everywhere, extreme measures are necessary, and the regime must be overthrown.' Since then, some conservatives have used the term to describe right-wing victimhood complexes (as when supposed 'woke' right-wingers characterize the Jan. 6 defendants as martyrs) and disruptive, burn-down-the-system ideologies. Tucker Carlson and Matt Walsh are often pointed to as leading figures of this 'woke right.' But the discussion of the term has grown in the past couple of months. In late March, the Quillette podcast hosted a guest to discuss how 'the enemies of wokeness have created their own cultish ideology, complete with right-wing purity spirals and mobbings.' On May 12, the Christian Post published an op-ed arguing that 'woke right' social media users were complaining that 'straight white men are oppressed'; 'society is ruled by women'; ' 'normies' are blind to this reality'; and 'the only solution is a Protestant Franco or a Christian prince.' The term has yet to develop a consensus definition. The psychologist Jordan Peterson, who was one of the main figures popularizing the term, told Joe Rogan in April that the 'woke right' was really a matter of 'psychopaths' on social media who care mostly about being inflammatory and publicly antisemitic and only pretend to care about the conservative movement. Peterson and those like him see this phenomenon as the bile of the internet, rather than a matter for real political analysis. That differs from the views of James Lindsay, the term's biggest enthusiast. Lindsay is a provocateur known for a 2018 stunt in which he successfully published a number of ridiculous papers in 'grievance studies' in peer-reviewed academic journals. For people who knew Lindsay only for that episode, his current actions would seem surprising: He is now on a crusade against certain elements of the modern GOP, including techno-fascists, Christian nationalists, and national conservatives. Last year, in a sign of that pivot, he tricked a conservative Christian publication into running portions of The Communist Manifesto. It's his use that has made the term most controversial. Lindsay's version of the 'woke right' is defined by identity-based politics in which everything can be viewed through the lens of power dynamics. The 'woke right' seeks to destroy the left to order society by its cultural values—through any necessary means. In other words, while Dreher and Peterson used the word woke to describe, essentially, expressions of aggressive racism, antisemitism, and misogyny, Lindsay uses it to describe a larger political faction with fascist-leaning politics that he believes is taking over the elites of the MAGA movement. He is using the term against the New Right. He has even used it against Vance. It's easy to feel lost when trying to wade through this discussion, in large part because members of the right-wing online commentariat speak their own insular language. (The term longhouse, for example, often surfaces in this debate. That one term, which, to boil it down, refers to 'female' styles of governance, warrants its own separate explainer.) But it's not necessary to understand the nuanced differences between the uses of the 'woke right' to see the underlying friction. It's clear, from all this, that some on the right are becoming so uneasy about the more militant elements of their new coalition that they are feeling the need to speak up, knowing they will give ammunition to their enemies on the left. 'I am now witnessing the deep inroads, in such a short period, that right-wing totalitarianism, expressed most often as antisemitism, has made, especially among a growing segment of right-wing males,' Dreher wrote in his essay. Dreher is no moderate centrist. He opposes gay marriage, has been vocally critical of Islam, and has described immigration from nonwhite countries as undermining Western civilization. He is so enthusiastic about the authoritarian president of Hungary that he moved to the country to enjoy what he believes to be its postwoke society. So it's notable that, in his essay, he describes being disturbed by the amount of white nationalism, Holocaust denial, and conspiracy theories, as well as other forms of extremism he has observed among young white conservative men. And it's even more notable that he rejects the notion that it was only fringe. 'When popular online figures offering crackpot takes … find their way onto mainstream podcasts like Joe Rogan's and Tucker Carlson's, you know something massive is happening,' he wrote. Dreher did not go so far as to equate the left and the right. He was insistent that the 'woke right' had only a fraction of the power the 'woke left' wielded. (He broke hard from Lindsay here, accusing him in his apology blog post of 'vile slander' and speculating that Lindsay was autistic.) He also expressed some empathy for the budding fascists. 'So many young men like him—white, heterosexual, and Christian—have grown up in a culture that has told them they are the source of most of the world's evils, simply by virtue of their unchosen identity,' he wrote in the original essay. 'Right-wing radicalism, including antisemitism, because some of their perceived persecutors are Jewish intellectual and cultural figures, speaks to their anger and trauma, and validates their rage.' Still, as cautious as the critique may seem, it pointed to some fundamental tensions in the right's coalition. He wasn't alone in expressing his anxiety about extremism either. The writer Robby Soave disagreed with Dreher's use of the term but wrote on X that the 'underlying phenomenon (increased anti-Semitism, tribalism, Tate-ism etc. in some corners of the young, male online right) is real.' Rufo, similarly, wrote that 'what you're describing is a real phenomenon that needs to be dealt with,' offering that he substitute 'antisemitism, right-wing racialism, etc.,' for the word woke. The term 'woke right' may or may not survive as a political insult past this moment. It's possible that some will continue to use it to label the group that many have, at other times, called the 'dissident right' or 'alt-right' or any number of terms to describe ugly, racist, and provocative nationalist conservatism. It's also possible it will fade away. But this small conflict, played out mostly among a tiny group of right-wing elites, reveals the natural inward turn that comes from cultural and political dominance. The right has routed the left; its individual factions do not, at this moment, need their allies as they once did. The time is right instead for them to advocate for their own political projects. The Musk–Trump feud made it clear that the tech right doesn't always fit well within the populist MAGA movement. Nor can the libertarians, the Christian nationalists, the bigoted edgelords, the Israel hawks, the MAHA antivaxxers, and the doomsday conspiracists all be expected to get along. But with the 'woke right' fight, we saw a different kind of splintering, even among those who share political end goals: one between those who are concerned about the radicalization of young white men, and those who see it as an asset. 'Imagine you're stuck in LA today, facing certain death from the Hamas Marxist army,' one major right-wing account wrote on X on Saturday. 'Who do you want fighting next to you, the people crying about 'woke right' or the people who have been called 'woke right.' Everyone knows the answer.' The answer, of course, was the group known for its anger and resentment. Thanks to the changes Musk has made to X, it's easier than ever to observe the swamp of far-right hatred on social media. Dreher and the others saw it themselves: Any of the posts discussing the problem of 'wokeism' in MAGA will be flooded with comments about Jews. Now that the right has room to breathe, MAGA leaders can finally turn to the issues in their own movement. And some of them are starting to become disturbed by what they've created.

Lawmakers expelled from Greece's parliament over ties to jailed far-right politician
Lawmakers expelled from Greece's parliament over ties to jailed far-right politician

Yahoo

time28 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Lawmakers expelled from Greece's parliament over ties to jailed far-right politician

ATHENS, Greece (AP) — Three far-right lawmakers in Greece were expelled Tuesday from parliament due to ties with a jailed politician convicted of leading a criminal organization. A court found that Vasilis Stigas, the leader of the far-right Spartans party, and two other party lawmakers had misled voters in the 2023 parliamentary election. The decision comes as concerns grow among traditionally dominant political parties over the rise of far-right parties across Europe and their willingness to disrespect democratic rules. The court determined the three had effectively served as proxies for a former member of Golden Dawn, a neo-Nazi inspired party, who was sentenced in 2020 to 13 years in prison for orchestrating violent attacks against migrants and political opponents. The decision, welcomed by Greece's conservative government, will reduce the number of seats in parliament from 300 to 297 for the remainder of the legislative term through 2027. It also lowers the threshold required to pass legislation from 151 votes to 149. The Spartans party, which won 4.7% of the popular vote in 2023, has denied any affiliation with Golden Dawn and did not immediately respond to the ruling. Two remaining Spartans lawmakers will continue to serve as independents.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store