How can Vivekananda Ashram be zoned as 'main commercial'?
LETTER | I write in support of the article 'Preserve Vivekananda Ashram, the soul of Brickfields' (June 8, 2025).
My concern regarding the decision by Kuala Lumpur City Hall (DBKL) to rezone the Vivekananda Ashram as 'main commercial' stems not only from what I have read or researched, but also from personal experience - experiences that reveal how far the ashram's trustees have strayed from its founding principles.
This is most evident in their proposal to construct a 23-storey tower over the ashram and their opposition to the building's gazettement as a heritage site.
I offer two more moments that stand out vividly in my memory.
First, during a 2015 protest organised by concerned citizens under the banner Save Vivekananda Ashram Brickfields, I was explicitly told by an unknown person who claimed to be a member of the ashram that the issue 'had nothing to do with me' - simply because of my racial background.
That comment was not only hurtful but deeply ironic. Swami Vivekananda stood for universality, spiritual unity, and inclusion beyond race or identity. To invoke his name while practising exclusion is a betrayal of the very values the ashram is meant to represent.
Second, the installation of a boom gate at the ashram's main entrance feels like an act of quiet hostility. Even if intended for traffic control, it signals a shift in posture - from open to closed, from welcoming to wary.
As a gazetted heritage site, was this alteration approved by the National Heritage Department? If not, it raises troubling questions about whether the trustees see themselves as stewards or simply as owners.
Loud and clear
At the core of this issue, I strongly urge DBKL to make a wise and principled decision: rezone the Vivekananda Ashram land as 'public facility', not 'main commercial'.
The public has spoken loudly and clearly - 876 formal objections from across communities, near and far. Classifying a spiritual and cultural landmark as commercial is illogical - unless, of course, there are commercial intentions at play.
Such a move benefits neither the public interest nor the values the ashram purports to uphold. Worse still, it sets a dangerous precedent where commercial gain overrules principle, even on sacred ground.
If DBKL is truly committed to building a 'City for All,' this is the moment to prove it. Why is it so difficult for the authorities to hear the people's plea? Must we wait until all of Kuala Lumpur's cultural heritage is lost, only to mourn over spilt milk?
What, then, is the meaning of the 'Warisan KL' initiative that the government so proudly takes ownership of, if it cannot fully guarantee the protection of a living heritage?
The success of 'Warisan KL' depends not only on preserving iconic buildings but also on safeguarding living cultural sites like the Vivekananda Ashram - places where heritage is not just displayed but lived.
The views expressed here are those of the author/contributor and do not necessarily represent the views of Malaysiakini.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malaysian Reserve
21 hours ago
- Malaysian Reserve
DBKL gazettes KL Local Plan 2040 to improve transparency, urban renewal
by Nurul Najmin Abu Bakar THE Kuala Lumpur City Hall (DBKL) has officially gazetted the KL Local Plan 2040, effective on June 11, to enhance transparency and guide sustainable urban development. Mayor Datuk Seri Maimunah Mohd Sharif said the plan reflects a collective social contract to shape the city's future through balanced growth, inclusivity and sustainability. 'The Local Plan is not just a planning document, it is your plan, my plan and our plan,' she said during her keynote address at the Real Estate and Housing Developers' Association (REHDA) Institute forum titled 'Resilient Cities, Sustainable Futures: Transforming Urban Landscapes through Sustainable Renewal' on June 10. She said the plan incorporated 4,000 public feedback submissions out of a total of 28,000 received. Maimunah credited Prime Minister (PM) Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim for urging that the plan be gazetted earlier, describing it as a rare intervention by the federal leadership in local urban planning. Anwar is scheduled to officially launch the plan on June 24. The plan identifies 139 sites across KL targeted for urban renewal. 'Urban renewal is like a medical check-up for a city every 15 to 30 years. It is not just about replacing old buildings, but about improving livability and infrastructure,' she said. She acknowledged that implementation will face challenges, particularly regarding strata management and the city's current maintenance practices. 'Our maintenance culture is still lacking, but we need scheduled and consistent upkeep of city assets,' she added. DBKL is also planning to make the Local Plan more accessible to the public, drawing inspiration from Singapore's Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) model. Maimunah stressed the critical role of cities in addressing both economic and climate challenges. 'Cities occupy only 2% of the Earth's surface, but generate 70% of waste and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and contribute 80% of global GDP,' she said. She said urbanisation should no longer be seen solely as a challenge, but also as an opportunity to drive innovation, economic growth and resilience. 'Our job is not only to make KL functional and efficient, but also to build a city that people are proud to call home,' she added.
Free Malaysia Today
2 days ago
- Free Malaysia Today
DBKL to form task force ahead of Urban Renewal Act
Kuala Lumpur mayor Maimunah Sharif said DBKL will work with professionals to assist owners and developers who are interested in taking up redevelopment work under the Urban Renewal Act. PETALING JAYA : Kuala Lumpur City Hall (DBKL) will set up a task force to guide stakeholders on urban redevelopment once the proposed Urban Renewal Act (URA) comes into effect, says Kuala Lumpur mayor Maimunah Sharif. She said the task force would study the proposed law and help DBKL support property owners involved in redevelopment projects, The Edge reported. 'This is to ensure DBKL is well prepared to assist property owners with matters regarding urban redevelopment,' she said during a forum organised by the Real Estate and Housing Developers' Association (Rehda) Institute. 'We are here to facilitate … DBKL will also work with professionals to assist owners and developers who are interested in taking up the redevelopment work.' Maimunah stressed that while DBKL would play a supporting role, the initiative for redevelopment must come from property owners themselves. 'Urban development should be an owner-led initiative. Developers should be the last to step in,' she said. The proposed URA, spearheaded by the housing and local government ministry, aims to replace outdated legislation governing the redevelopment of ageing and dilapidated areas. However, the URA has sparked concern among civil society groups and opposition parties who argue that it could displace lower-income residents unable to afford redeveloped housing. Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim has said the Act will not force property owners to give up their homes or change the ethnic makeup of neighbourhoods.
Malaysiakini
2 days ago
- Malaysiakini
How can Vivekananda Ashram be zoned as 'main commercial'?
LETTER | I write in support of the article 'Preserve Vivekananda Ashram, the soul of Brickfields' (June 8, 2025). My concern regarding the decision by Kuala Lumpur City Hall (DBKL) to rezone the Vivekananda Ashram as 'main commercial' stems not only from what I have read or researched, but also from personal experience - experiences that reveal how far the ashram's trustees have strayed from its founding principles. This is most evident in their proposal to construct a 23-storey tower over the ashram and their opposition to the building's gazettement as a heritage site. I offer two more moments that stand out vividly in my memory. First, during a 2015 protest organised by concerned citizens under the banner Save Vivekananda Ashram Brickfields, I was explicitly told by an unknown person who claimed to be a member of the ashram that the issue 'had nothing to do with me' - simply because of my racial background. That comment was not only hurtful but deeply ironic. Swami Vivekananda stood for universality, spiritual unity, and inclusion beyond race or identity. To invoke his name while practising exclusion is a betrayal of the very values the ashram is meant to represent. Second, the installation of a boom gate at the ashram's main entrance feels like an act of quiet hostility. Even if intended for traffic control, it signals a shift in posture - from open to closed, from welcoming to wary. As a gazetted heritage site, was this alteration approved by the National Heritage Department? If not, it raises troubling questions about whether the trustees see themselves as stewards or simply as owners. Loud and clear At the core of this issue, I strongly urge DBKL to make a wise and principled decision: rezone the Vivekananda Ashram land as 'public facility', not 'main commercial'. The public has spoken loudly and clearly - 876 formal objections from across communities, near and far. Classifying a spiritual and cultural landmark as commercial is illogical - unless, of course, there are commercial intentions at play. Such a move benefits neither the public interest nor the values the ashram purports to uphold. Worse still, it sets a dangerous precedent where commercial gain overrules principle, even on sacred ground. If DBKL is truly committed to building a 'City for All,' this is the moment to prove it. Why is it so difficult for the authorities to hear the people's plea? Must we wait until all of Kuala Lumpur's cultural heritage is lost, only to mourn over spilt milk? What, then, is the meaning of the 'Warisan KL' initiative that the government so proudly takes ownership of, if it cannot fully guarantee the protection of a living heritage? The success of 'Warisan KL' depends not only on preserving iconic buildings but also on safeguarding living cultural sites like the Vivekananda Ashram - places where heritage is not just displayed but lived. The views expressed here are those of the author/contributor and do not necessarily represent the views of Malaysiakini.
