Anti-racism a ‘core municipal responsibility' says Sohi during update on Edmonton's strategy to address hate-based violence
The Sisters Dialogue unveiled a new ad campaign aimed at addressing gender-based Islamophobia in Edmonton. (Evan Klippenstein/CTV News Edmonton)
The City of Edmonton received an update on its anti-racism strategy on Tuesday.
The strategy to address hate-based violence and support the communities it affects was introduced by Mayor Amarjeet Sohi after the 2021 municipal election and was adopted by city council in 2022.
'Anti-racism work is not peripheral. It is a core municipal responsibility,' Sohi said on Tuesday. 'As Edmonton grows, this work ensures our services are becoming more accessible, our communities are inclusive, and our collective potential is fully realized.'
During a Tuesday update, city administration said two out of three initial recommendations in the strategy had been completed.
Those include expanding anti-racism grant funding – which Sohi said has supported about 140 initiatives in the city – and creating an organization within city administration to incorporate anti-racism and reconciliation action into city processes.
That organization will work to meet seven corporate commitments over the next two years aimed at dismantling systemic barriers.
'The team's mandate involves working closely with colleagues across the corporation to celebrate diversity, promote inclusion, and begin to change a system that wasn't originally designed for everybody to be more equitable,' Salima Ebrahim, chief of staff to the city manager, explained.
Sohi said he and members of his office also joined the Bloomberg Harvard City Leadership Initiative to learn more about how other North American cities are tackling racism and how Edmonton can follow suit.
'Are our services accessible for people from diverse backgrounds? Are we delivering the right level of services for those communities' needs, such as support for newcomers or building an efficient, effective public transit system that racialized people, or newcomers and low income people rely on?
'I think those are the things that we need to continue to monitor and press upon to see the positive change that we want to see.'
The third priority, to create an independent anti-racism body has yet to be completed. Sohi said a 15-person panel has been assembled to advise the city on how best to create that body.
More information on Edmonton's anti-racism strategy can be found on the city's website.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
38 minutes ago
- CTV News
Some Newfoundland hydrogen companies behind in bills as industry hype ‘boils off'
Hydrogen storage tanks are visible at the Iberdrola green hydrogen plant in Puertollano, Spain, on March 28, 2023. THE CANADIAN PRESS/AP-Bernat Armangue ST. JOHN'S — Newfoundland and Labrador is owed millions of dollars in fees from green energy companies, underlining growing doubts about whether promises of major projects and multi-billion dollar investments will pan out. Six companies are vying to create new operations in the province that would use wind energy to produce hydrogen for exports overseas. Figures obtained by The Canadian Press reveal some owe a collective total of $13.7 million in fees due in 2024 for the use of Crown land. Russell Williams, an associate political science professor at Memorial University in St. John's, N.L., said he's not surprised the companies have land fees outstanding. 'I think it highlights the extent to which the public should be skeptical about megaprojects, and about governments getting very carried away, very early, with the idea that there are huge benefits from these kinds of natural resource developments,' Williams said in a recent interview. However, the province insists the money will be collected. 'The provincial government has not written off any outstanding Crown land reserve fees and expects to collect all revenue owing for these fees,' said an emailed statement from Steve Crocker, minister of industry, energy and technology. The industry began paying the fees after the provincial government invited companies to bid on Crown land to use for wind energy projects in December 2022. By paying the fees, the companies have the option to lease the land if they choose to move forward with projects. But it's not clear which developments will proceed even though the companies have now reserved roughly 3,944 square kilometres of Crown land. Executives from the six companies told an energy conference in St. John's, N.L., last week that it's been tough to find buyers on the overseas market to make their projects viable. Some companies said they were considering other options in the meantime, including an anticipated call for renewable energy for the local grid in Newfoundland and Labrador. 'In 2021, 2022 the world thought everything was going to be running on hydrogen,' Karlis Povisils, with Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners, told reporters during the conference. 'I think the hype has boiled off, and that's a healthy thing. The players that are left are the ones that are serious and committed.' The companies owed a collective total of about $22.1 million in Crown land reserve fees for 2024, Crocker said. The province collected just $8.4 million, according to figures obtained through access to information legislation. In 2023, the province received $5,491,316 in Crown land reserve fees — exactly the amount it was owed, the department confirmed. Only three of the six companies confirmed to the Canadian Press their fees were up to date: North Atlantic, Pattern Energy, and the Exploits Valley Renewable Energy Corporation, or EVREC. Other companies weren't as clear. A spokesperson for World Energy GH2, which proposed a $16-billion wind-powered hydrogen operation in western Newfoundland, said the company has paid 'millions' in Crown land reserve fees. She did not confirm if it had paid all of its fees for 2024. 'We continue to reserve Crown lands, and incur fees related to our reservation, and will continue to service our obligations,' Laura Barron said in an email. A spokesperson for EverWind, which has proposed wind-to-hydrogen projects in Newfoundland and Nova Scotia, said the company has paid $5.6 million in reserve fees, 'but we cannot comment further as we are in ongoing land reservation discussions with the province.' EverWind Fuels is one of two companies that have asked the province to reduce the amount of land held in reserve for its proposed development. Using the reduced land reserve, the company would have owed more than $8 million in 2024. ABO Energy, which is working with Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners on a project in eastern Newfoundland, has also reduced its Crown land reserve. The company said it is working with the government 'to ensure compliance' with reserve fee conditions. 'And indeed, we are working to create the ecosystem that this nascent industry demands,' said spokesperson Heidi Kirby in an email. Tom Cooper, a business professor at Memorial University, said forgoing the land fees could be a way for the province to fund the developments, 'without handing over hard cash.' Williams added that the fees are quite small compared to the cost of some of the projects. He worries the provincial government undervalued its resources and got swept up in 'pie-in-the-sky' promises of megaprojects that would produce jobs. 'One of the things that always gets lost in those calculations is the public interest,' Williams said. 'The public interest here is what kind of royalties and revenues was the province going to get ... and it looks like, unless something changes, the benefits are tiny and in arrears.' This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 12, 2025. Sarah Smellie, The Canadian Press
CTV News
39 minutes ago
- CTV News
G7 will be a success if Trump ‘doesn't have an eruption,' experts say
PM Mark Carney's G7 invites to the leaders of Saudi Arabia and India is dividing members of the Liberal caucus. Judy Trinh on the the reasons for concern. Mark Carney's ability to balance Canada's economic agenda while promoting its democratic values will be tested at the upcoming G7 summit after he expanded the invitation list to nations implicated in international murders. The prime minister ignored questions from reporters about why he was inviting Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman to Kananaskis, Alta., as he walked into Question Period on Wednesday But earlier in the day, MP Sukh Dhaliwal, who represents the B.C. riding of Surrey-Newton, says he met with Carney and told him that hundreds of people had voiced concerns that Modi was attending the G7, due to being linked to an 'assassination of a Canadian on Canadian soil.' 'We're a country of human rights. A country of law and justice,' Dhaliwal said in an interview on CTV's Power Play, adding that he reminded Carney that during the public inquiry into foreign interference, Justice Marie-Josee Hogue found that China and India were the two biggest nations interfering in Canada's democratic processes. The relationship between Canada and India has been strained since the RCMP revealed that it had credible information that government agents of India were involved in the 2023 murder of a Sikh-Canadian in Surrey, B.C. The victim, Hardeep Singh Nijjar, supported the Khalistan movement, which promotes a Sikh separatist state. Dhaliwal said Carney 'clearly' assured him that he will 'be strong and raise these concerns' with Modi during their bilateral meetings at the G7. So far, Canadian police say they've received little help from Indian authorities in their investigation, but Ottawa Centre MP Yasir Naqvi says high-level engagement could improve relations. According to data from the International Monetary Fund, India is the world's fourth largest economy. 'We want to make sure those investigations are taking place, and they're independent of the government when it comes to matters of law enforcement,' Naqvi said. 'It's also really important that, at this moment in time, when so much is changing around the world, that we do engage in a large economy like India.' 'Very big investor' Carney's invitation to Saudi Arabia is also raising eyebrows. In 2018, the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) concluded that bin Salman had ordered the assassination of Washington Post journalist Jamal Khashoggi a year earlier. Khashoggi, an outspoken critic of the Saudi government, was dismembered after walking into the Saudi embassy in Istanbul, Turkiye, to pick up marriage documents. Roland Paris, director of the Graduate School of Public and International Affairs at the University of Ottawa, told CTV News that Carney understands that he needs to talk to countries that Canada has a difficult relationship with in order to further his economic goals. While bin Salman is an 'unsavoury actor,' Paris says the crown prince has considerable resources that could be invested in Carney's nation-building projects. 'One of the issues that Prime Minister Carney wants to really push at this meeting is catalyzing private investment for infrastructure around the world - and the Saudis, especially through their sovereign wealth fund, is a very big investor,' Paris said. The crown prince also has warm relations with U.S. President Donald Trump. Last month, Saudi Arabia signed a pact to invest US$600 billion in the United States after Trump visited the Gulf state. Paris notes when Italy hosted the G7 last year, it also invited Saudi Arabia, but the crown prince did not attend. So far, the Saudis have not confirmed if they will accept Carney's invitation. Zachary Paikin, a senior fellow with The Institute for Peace and Diplomacy, says that Saudi Arabia is gaining influence as a regional power and mediator. In March, the Saudis brought Ukrainian and Russian delegations to Jeddah to embark on peace talks. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy will also be at the G7 and will be seeking a bilateral meeting with Trump. Carney's invitation to bin Salman could facilitate further peace talks. Carney's G7 objectives Paikin says Canada risks becoming marginalized on the global stage unless it is willing to engage with countries it disagrees with. 'To put it very frankly, the overwhelming majority of the world's governments and peoples do not share the values and worldview of the liberal, capitalist democratic West,' Paikin told CTV News in a zoom interview from Geneva, Switzerland. 'When Canada isolates itself, it puts itself at the mercy of Donald Trump, and we cannot afford that if we want to preserve our status as a sovereign, proud and independent country.' Even though the U.S. has launched a trade war with much of the world, Paris expects the prime minister will strive to find areas of 'commonality and progress' on his key priorities, such as combating transnational crime, strengthening access to critical minerals and energy security, along with improving joint responses to wildfires. A clearer framework outlining Canada's future economic and security relationship with the U.S. could also come into focus in bilateral meetings. Paris says the success of this summit will depend a lot on managing the unpredictability of the American president. 'This will be a successful meeting if Donald Trump doesn't have an eruption that disrupts the entire gathering,' Paris said. 'Anything above and beyond that is gravy.' The last time Canada hosted a G7 was in 2018, during the first Trump administration. Talks fell apart in Charlevoix, Que., and the U.S. president left without signing the final communique.
Globe and Mail
2 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
Letters to the editor, June 12: ‘I fear that without significant constitutional reforms, Canada is in the early stages of inevitable economic demise'
Re 'ArriveCan's main contractor GCStrategies paid without ensuring work was done: A-G' (June 11): The Auditor-General's report makes it clear that at issue was government services not following its own rules in awarding contracts, thus wasting taxpayer dollars. Mark Carney's response was to point out that GCStrategies has been suspended from receiving further contracts. Fine, but what about the individuals and departments found to have broken government rules? Apparently nothing, as Mr. Carney simply pledges to do better going forward. A new government, but seemingly the same values on accountability. David Harper Burlington, Ont. Re 'Canada invites Saudi Crown Prince to G7 summit' (June 11): This deeply disturbs me. Is it possible that the Prime Minister or his advisers are unaware of the 2018 murder of journalist Jamal Khashoggi, a brutal act with the Crown Prince's fingerprints all over it? Are we so desperate for investment and trade to want to engage with such an authoritarian regime? For a country that professes to believe in the rule of law and human rights, this invitation disgusts me. Ken Pattern Vancouver Re 'Mexico and Canada fell apart over migration. Could it bring us back together?' (June 10): I have long been puzzled by what has appeared to be Canadian indifference toward things Mexican beyond tequila, tacos and beach resorts. Mexicans are enormously diverse, a trait that we share, and know exactly who they are as a people and a nation. Nowhere do I see a sugar-coating of their often-violent history. As a NAFTA partner and, yes, often times a competitor, we have missed an opportunity to gain a solid foothold into our own hemisphere with the world's largest Spanish-speaking nation. Bilingual Canadians will likely find learning Spanish quite easy, as I did during the pandemic. I support the Carney government's look across the ocean to Europe. I would be enthusiastic about deepening engagement with Mexico. David Roy Toronto Re 'The Liberals get around to fixing the thing they broke' (Editorial, June 7): The underlying purpose of refugee law is not to protect those fleeing from past persecution. It is to protect those who face future persecution. The length of time a person has spent in Canada should have no bearing on this issue and thus should not be used as a reason for diluting procedural protections for some claimants. Donald Galloway Victoria Re 'ROI' (Letters, June 11): Letter-writers do a good job of explaining the opposing views on building pipelines as nation-building projects, and I find merit in both arguments. It seems to me that a compromise – where Canada builds pipelines yet does so in the most ethical and efficient manner, with proceeds earmarked for environmental objectives – could win the day. 'Building a nation' with such disparate interests necessitates a balanced approach. Jeff Zuk Hamilton Even before new energy infrastructure projects have been announced, the usual suspects of opposition are out in force. The swell of national unity is, it seems, not unbounded, but conditional. It is becoming increasingly clear to me that Canada is ungovernable. This nation, as currently configured, feels set up to fail. Canada may not only be left behind with respect to major infrastructure: We will likely become technology slaves dependent upon the United States. Optimism alone is not a recipe for success. I fear that without significant constitutional reforms, Canada is in the early stages of inevitable economic demise that will increase the likelihood of 'absorption' by the U.S. Martin McMahon Oak Bay, B.C. Re 'Advocates question tax-cut bill's plan to shield federal parties from provincial privacy laws' (June 10): I find it incomprehensible and shocking that federal parties are not subject to any privacy legislation. And I find it disturbing that the Liberals would attempt to quietly entrench this unacceptable state of affairs in an unrelated bill. The lack of privacy protections for Canadians is not an abstract matter. The infamous 'robocall' data breach and electoral crime of 2011 played out across the country. There were no legal or financial consequences for the Conservative Party itself for this egregious data breach. They were not obligated to inform individuals who had their data compromised. We learned through the Cambridge Analytica scandal in the United States that political parties can amass thousands of data points about every elector. It's long past time for federal parties to be subject to meaningful privacy legislation. Canadians should demand it. Susan Watson Guelph, Ont. I guess we shouldn't look to the federal government to address any privacy concerns we might have, since they want to grant themselves immunity from any such legislation. Do as we say…. Paddy Fuller Ottawa Re 'In a challenging market, a few brave developers push forward' (Real Estate, June 6): There is forecasted to be 24,000 unsold condos sitting on the market in Toronto and 3,500 in Vancouver by the end of the year. Maybe we should figure out how to build stuff people want to live in, and can afford to purchase, before we embark on the federal government's 'build, baby, build' strategy for solving the housing crisis. Barbara Yaffe Vancouver Re 'CIBC chief calls for tax changes to help young Canadians struggling to save money' (Report on Business, June 10): I do not disagree with helping young Canadians, but I think the CIBC CEO's recommendation will serve the bank well. Of course the bank wants to negotiate more mortgages. What is CIBC doing to help young people? Are they reducing banking fees, increasing interest earned on money in the bank or lowering interest rates on loans? Jan Vanderwal Toronto Re 'Is AI dulling critical-thinking skills? As tech companies court students, educators weigh the risks' (June 7): With the advent of the pocket calculator came the mantra that tech will make learning easier. With the personal computer it was that tech will make learning fun. With artificial intelligence it will be that tech will make learning unnecessary. I'm not a Luddite. I'm just reflecting on a lifetime of experience in education, the snake oil that senior decision-makers have bought over the decades and the ill effects of their decisions. Learning requires a mix of effort, focus and discipline. It always has. Before we use the tools, we should learn how to use our brains. Dan Brennan Belleville, Ont. .................................................................................................................................. Letters to the Editor should be exclusive to The Globe and Mail. Include your name, address and daytime phone number. Keep letters to 150 words or fewer. Letters may be edited for length and clarity. To submit a letter by e-mail, click here: letters@
