Gary students using chemistry to solve 'crime'
'Today, we will look at how we're going to solve a crime using fingerprints,' said faculty adviser Linda Wozniewski, IU Northwest lecturer of Chemistry and Physics.
On Tuesday, the students learned the three basic types of fingerprints and 'everyone out of billions of people have different fingerprints,' Wozniewski told them. They learned to 'lift' their own fingerprints using tape.
The students also learned how to analyze liquids by conducting pH tests.
The students in grades K-5 sat around round tables arrayed with vials of liquids including lemon juice, vinegar, ammonia, rubbing alcohol and hydrogen peroxide.
About 25 students are part of Williams' after-school STEM Club, short for science, technology, engineering and math.
The once-a-month workshop with IUN began in August. The students spend half the year in the chemistry club's program and the other half in a robotics program taught by local electricians.
Tomeka Pope, who teaches Project Lead the Way STEM classes at Williams, organized the club and said the school is on the cusp of attaining its accreditation as a STEM school.
Aubrianna Coulter, 8, said she enjoys science and all the projects they've completed, especially the tasty ones. 'The last time we had cupcakes.'
A few minutes later she dipped a test stick into an ammonia vial and watched in wonder as it turned green.
IUN Chemistry Club member Rami Alnahass, a sophomore biochemistry major, told them the composition was the opposite of acidic. 'Its pH is 8,' he told them.
The students learned that pH is the quantitative measure of acidity or basicity in liquid solutions.
Next, they dropped text sticks into a vial of vinegar and the sticks turned reddish brown, indicating more acidity or pH 4.
Hamza Nasar, IUN Chemistry Club president and a neuroscience major from Chesterton, said each lesson builds upon the next one until the students gain the skills they need to solve a crime at the end of the workshop.
He said the idea for the after-school workshop began last summer when Chemistry Club members did a demonstration at Williams' STEM open house.
'The kids loved it and Professor 'Woz' (Wozniewski) was crucial to me for the curriculum, she teaches forensics,' he said.
'It's honestly really rewarding,' he said. 'I didn't think they'd be interested in the experiments. I was surprised,' said Nasar. 'I'm glad to be able to serve the community.'
Fifth grader Steven Williams, 10, said he's already contemplating a career in science.
'I like doing science and STEM,' he said. 'I like technology and the fingerprints.'
He said he watches a few crime shows, but not many.
'Science is my favorite subject,' he said.
Nasar said he hopes the workshop provides students with experiences he didn't have when he was growing up.
'I hope they take away that science isn't intimidating. It's a fun career path.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
‘It's super disrespectful': WNBA players exasperated after sex toy thrown onto court for second time in a week
WNBA players have spoken out after a second game this week was delayed due to a sex toy being thrown onto the court. In the third quarter of the Golden State Valkyries' 73-66 win over the Chicago Sky on Friday night, the bright green toy was thrown from the stands at Wintrust Arena in Chicago and landed just out of bounds underneath one of the baskets. With the Sky on the attack, the game was halted and an official kicked the object to the side, where it was picked up with a towel and removed. 'It's super disrespectful,' Sky center Elizabeth Williams told reporters afterward. 'I don't really get the point of it. It's really immature. Whoever's doing it just needs to grow up.' The incident came just three days after another sex toy was thrown onto the court during the Valkyries' 77-75 victory over the Atlanta Dream at Gateway Center Arena in College Park, Georgia. Following Friday's reoccurrence, a number of players from around the WNBA took to social media to comment on the incidents. 'ARENA SECURITY?! Hello??!' wrote New York Liberty forward Isabelle Harrison wrote on X. 'Please do better. It's not funny. never was funny. Throwing ANYTHING on the court is so dangerous.' Indiana Fever guard Sophie Cunningham echoed Harrison's anger, writing: 'Stop throwing dildos on the court… you're going to hurt one of us.' The WNBA says any fan caught engaging in such behavior will face prosecution as well as a ban from the league. 'The safety and well-being of everyone in our arenas is a top priority for our league,' a WNBA spokesperson told CNN. 'Objects of any kind thrown onto the court or in the seating area can pose a safety risk for players, game officials, and fans. 'In line with WNBA Arena Security Standards, any fan who intentionally throws an object onto the court will be immediately ejected and face a minimum one-year ban in addition to being subject to arrest and prosecution by local authorities.' The individual involved in the incident in Atlanta was identified and arrested, according to the WNBA.
The Hill
3 days ago
- The Hill
Judge temporarily suspends ‘Alligator Alcatraz' construction
A federal judge on Thursday suspended construction at the 'Alligator Alcatraz' immigration detention center in Florida for two weeks as groups pursue claims it doesn't comply with a bedrock federal environmental law. U.S. District Judge Kathleen Williams issued the temporary order after a two-day hearing in her Miami courtroom, the plaintiffs said. It prevents filling, paving, lighting and installation of additional infrastructure. Immigration authorities can still detain migrants at the facility. The temporary measure comes as the judge weighs whether to grant an indefinite pause. Williams is an appointee of former President Obama. Surrounded by the Florida Everglades, Alligator Alcatraz opened in early July and has the capacity to house thousands of migrants. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem has cast it as a model for state-run immigrant detention facilities elsewhere in the country. The Center for Biological Diversity and Friends of the Everglades sued in late June to stop the construction, claiming the project runs afoul of the National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA). The statute requires the federal government to consider environmental consequences before approving major infrastructure projects. 'We're pleased that the judge saw the urgent need to put a pause on additional construction, and we look forward to advancing our ultimate goal of protecting the unique and imperiled Everglades ecosystem from further damage caused by this mass detention facility,' Eve Samples, executive director at Friends of the Everglades, said in a statement. The federal government has cast Alligator Alcatraz as a state operation where NEPA doesn't apply. The Justice Department also asserts that Williams' court is the wrong venue, because Alligator Alcatraz is located elsewhere in Florida. Immigration organizations and a group of detainees are meanwhile suing over allegations that the administration is not providing migrants with attorney access at the facility. That case is set to head to a hearing on Aug. 18 before a different federal judge.
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Federal judge orders two-week construction pause at ‘Alligator Alcatraz'
MIAMI — A federal judge Thursday ruled construction must temporarily stop at 'Alligator Alcatraz' as hearings challenging the Everglades-based detention center's environmental impact continue. District Judge Kathleen Williams ordered the state to, at the very least, stop installing additional lighting, infrastructure, pavement, filling or fencing and to halt excavation for 14 days. She called the request for the temporary restraining order from the plaintiffs, which represent environmental groups, 'pretty reasonable' to prevent further interruption to the ecosystem. The judge, an Obama-era appointee, said the plaintiffs had introduced evidence of 'ongoing environmental harms.' 'I think that evidence is sufficient to support the plaintiffs' claims,' she said, pointing to how many elected officials, including presidents, had lauded the Everglades over the years and wanted it to remain 'pristine.' The decision came after Williams heard arguments from expert witnesses theorizing that newly created pavement in the area would have consequences on America's largest wetlands. The airstrip housing the detention center is surrounded by the federally protected Big Cypress National Preserve, a fragile ecosystem home to endangered species like the Florida bonneted bat and the Florida panther. Thursday marked the second day in a row that Williams heard arguments regarding environmental harms that might come from the detention center. Questioning is scheduled to continue Tuesday, and the defense hasn't yet brought up its witnesses. The judge offered to continue the hearing into Thursday afternoon to avoid the temporary restraining order, but the defense team representing the state had already released its witnesses to return to Tallahassee. During Wednesday's hearing, each side had agreed to end Thursday's proceedings by noon and meet again Tuesday, given conflicting schedules. The plaintiffs then raised the need for a temporary restraining order Thursday, and Williams reprimanded both sides for failing to predict that the hearing would need to take place over multiple days. The state pushed back on the temporary restraining order, noting that a detention center requires a good amount of activity to care for detainees. 'Can I stand here and say not one feature of this site will change in any iota? How could I even say that?' asked Jesse Panuccio, the lawyer representing Florida Emergency Management Director Kevin Guthrie. The Emergency Management Division is leading the construction and management of the facility for the state. Williams shot back that "construction" was the key word for the state to consider and said it was meant to apply to 'erecting, building, amplifying the facility footprint.' She allowed the various sides to take a lunch break and make their arguments when they returned, issuing her decision within minutes after they finished. The hearing involves just one of several lawsuits that have been filed against 'Alligator Alcatraz.' Friends of the Everglades, the Center for Biological Diversity and the Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida argue that the state and federal government failed to follow federal environmental law when it quickly built a tented detention facility at the Dade-Collier Training and Transition Airport. They specifically allege that officials should have asked the public to weigh in, looked for alternative sites and sought ways to minimize effects to the wetlands. Paul Joseph Schwiep, who is representing the plaintiffs, described the law as a 'look before you leap' requirement. On Thursday morning, two experts testified using aerial photos and videos that the newly paved area would cause harm to the environment through runoff. They also said temporary silt fencing in the area wouldn't help reduce stormwater runoff. Christopher McVoy, a wetlands ecologist, testified that he received a tour of the area June 28 from the incident commander and said it was clear new pavement had been put down. Because the wetlands are flat, he explained, runoff or other contamination from the pavement can easily travel like a sheet through other parts of the Everglades during rain or storms and disturb the sensitive ecosystem. The water can rise up to 2 feet, depending on the season, then drag debris from the road into the wetlands, he explained. McVoy said he 'definitely' would have expected the detention facility to have agencies study the area before adding the pavement, which he described as not being porous. 'It's like pouring water on glass,' McVoy said of water landing on the new pavement. 'It doesn't go in; it runs off. And wherever it runs into is potentially a concern. That's why urban areas [near the Everglades] have strict requirements about how to have a plan to treat water.' Geologist Dillon Reio testified that he estimated 20 or more acres of new pavement had been added to the site. He said pollution chemicals would form as a result, damaging aquatic and terrestrial life. One of the defense's main arguments is that the environmental law in question, the National Environmental Policy Act, doesn't apply given that the facility was 'planned, executed, managed and funded' by the state and not the federal government, as Panuccio described it to the judge. Schwiep countered that all the plaintiffs had to show was that a 'federal actor is involved,' and Williams concluded it was a 'joint partnership.' Panuccio had asked the judge to consider factoring in that illegal immigration posed a harm to society and noted that detention centers had been overcrowded, necessitating temporary detainment facilities. Much of the state's pushback additionally rests on an argument that the airstrip was being used more frequently than the plaintiffs realize before the detention center was built. They leaned into assertions that the plaintiffs failed to show any new significant impact to the environment from the way the airstrip operated previously. They pointed to data showing an estimated 150 flights used the airstrip every day for flight training, as well as training for military aircraft, and argued through questioning that Reio's testimony wasn't specific enough because he used engineering drawings rather than accessing the site directly to study it. They also said he failed to use the initial flight data as a baseline for comparing the impact to the area and didn't personally assess the drainage setup. The state hasn't specified what types of aircraft were using the airstrip before, but one aerial photo showed what appeared to be a large commercial-style plane. The state's Emergency Management Division didn't respond to questions about how many flights are coming in and out of the airstrip now and whether the area is still being used as a training facility. Solve the daily Crossword
