logo
2 Top Stocks to Buy Right Now

2 Top Stocks to Buy Right Now

Globe and Mail2 days ago

Some investors are staying away from the market right now due to the volatility stocks have experienced this year and the uncertain near-term economic outlook. Even with these issues, though, stocks are likely to produce superior returns to most other assets over the next decade, as they have consistently done in the past.
Moreover, when things are erratic, it can be a wise strategy to invest in companies that are positioned to perform well over the long term. Two great examples are Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE: BRK.A)(NYSE: BRK.B) and Vertex Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ: VRTX).
1. Berkshire Hathaway
Warren Buffett's recent announcement that he would step down from his longtime role as the CEO of Berkshire Hathaway by the end of this year will almost certainly come down as one of the most talked-about pieces of news on Wall Street this year. In the wake of that leadership change, some investors may decide to steer clear of the stock. After all, it was Buffett who led the conglomerate to market-crushing returns over the decades, not Greg Abel, his chosen successor.
Further, Buffett is leaving at an unsteady time economically. Corporations are facing a rapidly shifting global trade environment. Macroeconomic troubles appear likely to take a toll on many companies, even those as strong as Berkshire Hathaway. Can Abel successfully take the reins of the conglomerate, especially at a time like this?
In my view, the answer is yes. Buffett might be irreplaceable, but he leaves behind an incredibly robust and diversified business. Between Berkshire Hathaway's several dozen subsidiaries across an array of sectors and industries, its impressive stock portfolio, and its massive cash stockpile, it's positioned to handle severe economic shocks better than most companies.
Not all of the company's businesses will be affected equally by macro turbulence. Some might thrive as others suffer -- it will average out, at least somewhat. Berkshire Hathaway might not come out of a recession (if one is on the way) completely unscathed, but it will come out on solid footing. And regarding the pending change in management, Buffett did not pick Abel out of a hat. As a top executive of the conglomerate, Abel has soaked up Buffett's investment philosophy, and he has been capably overseeing a large portion of the company for years.
Nor will Abel be doing the job alone, any more than Buffett did it by himself. Many of Berkshire Hathaway's executives have been with the company for a long time and have contributed significantly to it achieving its current status as one of the few corporations with a trillion-dollar-plus market cap. The stock should continue to deliver superior returns in the long run under new management. That's why it's still worth investing in today.
2. Vertex Pharmaceuticals
Vertex Pharmaceuticals' shares recently plunged after it announced its fiscal second-quarter results. Those were unimpressive, partly due to a non-cash impairment charge it took relating to an investigational medicine it is no longer pursuing, and partly due to the illegal sales of knock-off versions of its patented drugs in Russia, which took a slice out of its total revenues. However, these are relatively minor issues, at least when viewed in the broader context.
Vertex remains the undisputed leader in cystic fibrosis therapies. This rare lung disease only affects about 94,000 patients in Vertex's core markets of North America, Europe, and Australia. But since it sells the only medicines that target the underlying causes of the condition, Vertex has substantial pricing power. That's why revenue and earnings have consistently increased at a good clip over the past decade, and there's reason to expect more growth to come.
Cystic fibrosis patients now live longer than they once did, partly thanks to Vertex's breakthroughs. Unfortunately, they still need constant care. Therefore, its products continue to be in demand among these populations. Furthermore, Vertex is seeking to expand into new territories and develop more effective medicines, particularly for patients who would not benefit from its current treatments.
Vertex's core franchise can still experience significant growth. Even if another company succeeds in developing competing cystic fibrosis therapies, the biotech's first-mover advantage and its relationship with patients, physicians, and third-party payers give it a leg up. Vertex has also expanded its portfolio with the approval of products such as Journavx for acute pain and Casgevy for beta-thalassemia and sickle cell disease.
Its pipeline should yield more clinical and regulatory wins within the next two years. Vertex is an innovative biotech company with an incredibly strong underlying business. Beyond the company's dominance in cystic fibrosis, that's the core reason to buy the stock. It should deliver excellent results over the long term.
Should you invest $1,000 in Berkshire Hathaway right now?
Before you buy stock in Berkshire Hathaway, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Berkshire Hathaway wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $651,049!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $828,224!*
Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is979% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to171%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor.
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of May 19, 2025

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Better Artificial Intelligence Stock: Nvidia vs. AMD
Better Artificial Intelligence Stock: Nvidia vs. AMD

Globe and Mail

time19 minutes ago

  • Globe and Mail

Better Artificial Intelligence Stock: Nvidia vs. AMD

Even with new export controls cutting off a vital market in China, demand for advanced chips used to power artificial intelligence (AI) infrastructure remains high. While there is a growing market for custom AI chips, the most commonly used chips for running AI workloads are graphics processing units (GPUs). This name stems from the fact that these chips were originally designed to speed up graphics rendering in video games. Due to their powerful processing speeds, GPUs are now used for a variety of high-power computing tasks, such as training large language models (LLMs) and running AI inference. The GPU market is basically a duopoly at this point, headed by Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA) and Advanced Micro Devices (NASDAQ: AMD). The question many investors ask, though, is: Which stock is the better buy? Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Learn More » The leader versus the challenger The unquestioned leader in the GPU space is Nvidia, which commands an over 80% market share. Not only is Nvidia larger than AMD, but it's also been growing its data center revenue more quickly. Last quarter, Nvidia grew its data center revenue by 73% to $39.1 billion, while AMD's data center revenue jumped 57% to $3.7 billion. Nvidia's advantage comes from its software platform, CUDA. It launched the free software platform all the way back in 2006 as a way to let developers program its GPUs for different tasks in an effort to expand beyond the video game market. The company pushed the use of the software to universities and research labs, which made it the software program upon which developers were taught to program GPUs. While AMD made some half-hearted efforts with software, it didn't launch a true CUDA competitor until around 10 years later with ROCm. By that time, CUDA had already become the default software used to program GPUs, and ROCm was still behind with less hardware support, limited documentation, and more difficulty to install and use. Meanwhile, Nvidia has since expanded upon its software lead through a collection of AI-specific libraries and tools built on top of CUDA, called CUDA X, which helps bolster the performance of its chips for AI tasks. Ultimately, CUDA has given Nvidia a big network effect advantage. The more CUDA is used, the more tools and libraries are built for it, making Nvidia GPUs all the stickier. While ROCm continues to improve, it still trails CUDA, especially for use in LLM training. However, where AMD has been able to gain more traction is in AI inference. Training AI models is a much more difficult task, which is why Nvidia has dominated this market and where its CUDA advantage really shines through. Inference, on the other hand, is easier, and there is more of a focus on things such as latency, power consumption, and cost. Due to its competitive positioning, AMD's GPUs tend to be less expensive than those from Nvidia, and while its ROCm software trails CUDA, it is generally considered good enough for running most AI inference workloads. The good thing for AMD is that the inference market is eventually expected to become the much larger of the two markets. In fact, some pundits, including venture capitalist and former Facebook executive Chamath Palihapitiya, have said the inference market could be up to 100 times larger than the market for training AI models. But whether the inference market becomes 2 times bigger or 100 times than the training market, AMD could have an opportunity to gain some market share. Which stock is the better buy? When it comes to valuation, both stocks trade in a similar range. Nvidia has a forward price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of just over 32 times this year's analyst estimates, while AMD is at 28 times. Nvidia, meanwhile, is growing its revenue more quickly. With their valuations similar, the key factor to which stock will outperform in the coming years will largely come down to growth. Nvidia is the clear leader in the GPU space and should continue to see strong growth as the AI infrastructure buildout continues. However, its AI data center revenue is now 10 times that of AMD. so the law of large numbers can come into play. As AI infrastructure begins to shift more toward inference, AMD should have a nice opportunity to take some market share. Nvidia still has the lead in inference, but the gap is narrower compared to training. AMD also doesn't need to take a lot a of share in what could be a rapidly growing market to really make a big difference off its much smaller AI data center revenue base. As such, there is a good possibility it could begin to grow more quickly than the much bigger Nvidia. If that happens, I think its stock will outperform. Ultimately, investors can own both stocks, which is probably a good idea. With AI infrastructure spending still appearing to be in its early days, both should be winners, although I do think AMD has more potential upside. The biggest risk, meanwhile, would be if AI spending unexpectedly starts to slow. Should you invest $1,000 in Nvidia right now? Before you buy stock in Nvidia, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Nvidia wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $651,049!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $828,224!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is979% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to171%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025 Geoffrey Seiler has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Advanced Micro Devices and Nvidia. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

To prevent blackouts, Trump administration keeps another aging power plant online through summer
To prevent blackouts, Trump administration keeps another aging power plant online through summer

Globe and Mail

time19 minutes ago

  • Globe and Mail

To prevent blackouts, Trump administration keeps another aging power plant online through summer

HARRISBURG, Pa. (AP) — The U.S. Department of Energy has ordered another power plant, this time an oil and gas plant in Pennsylvania, to keep its turbines running through the hottest summer months as a precaution against electricity shortfalls in the 13-state mid-Atlantic grid. The department's order to the grid operator, PJM Interconnection, regarding the Eddystone power plant just south of Philadelphia on the Delaware River, is the department's second use of federal power under President Donald Trump to require a power plant to keep operating on the mainland United States. Constellation Energy had planned to shut down Eddystone's units 3 and 4 on Saturday, but Trump's Department of Energy ordered the company to continue operating the units until at least Aug. 28. The units can produce a combined 760 megawatts. The department, in its order, cited PJM's growing concerns about power shortfalls amid the shutdown of aging power plants and rising electricity demand. PJM has projected significant growth in electricity use to power America's fast-rising demand for artificial intelligence and cloud computing platforms. Demand for electricity has spiked for the first time in decades. In addition to artificial intelligence, crypto mining, the broader electrification of society and bipartisan political pressure to bring manufacturing back to the U.S. are fueling new electricity demand. PJM last year approved Constellation's request to shut down the units, but it welcomed the department's order to keep them operating, saying it's a 'prudent, term-limited step' that allows PJM, the department and Constellation to study the longer-term need and viability of Eddystone's units. In a statement Monday, Constellation said it is 'pleased' to work with the department and PJM and is taking emergency measures to meet the need for power 'at this critical time when America must win the AI race.' It also said it is trying to accelerate its restart of Three Mile Island 's Unit 1 to bring it online in 2027, instead of in 2028, as part of a deal to supply data centers run by tech giant Microsoft with carbon-free energy. PJM, based in Pennsylvania, earlier this year won federal approval to fast-track the construction of new power plants that critics said would favor natural gas plants over clean energy projects that don't emit planet-warming greenhouse gases. PJM has said a power shortage could affect the grid as early as 2026 as demand grows for electricity at the same time that aging coal-fired plants and nuclear plants are retiring. Clean energy advocates blame PJM for creating the existing reliability problem by taking an unduly long time to study proposed wind and solar energy projects in its project queue. Proposals awaiting PJM's approval are more than 97% solar, wind or battery storage, according to federal figures. Less than 3% are natural gas. The department took a similar step last week, ordering Consumers Energy to keep the J.H. Campbell coal-fired power plant open in Michigan past its Saturday retirement. The grid operator there, the Midcontinent Independent System Operator, said the order was unnecessary, that there was no energy emergency there and that there should be enough energy in the region through the summer. An environmental advocacy group, the Delaware Riverkeeper Network, criticized the move to keep Eddystone operating as an "environmental injustice." Shutting down the units would reduce hazardous pollution and carbon emissions from the decades-old facility and help the region meet federal clean air standards for smog, it said. ___

Iranian official says U.S. nuclear proposal is ‘incoherent and disjointed,' as sources warn talks momentum is collapsing
Iranian official says U.S. nuclear proposal is ‘incoherent and disjointed,' as sources warn talks momentum is collapsing

CTV News

time20 minutes ago

  • CTV News

Iranian official says U.S. nuclear proposal is ‘incoherent and disjointed,' as sources warn talks momentum is collapsing

A senior Iranian official told CNN the new nuclear deal proposal presented to Tehran in recent days is 'incoherent and disjointed,' as sources familiar with the progress of the talks said the momentum behind negotiations to secure a new deal appears to be collapsing. The private pessimism contrasts with U.S. President Donald Trump's public optimism last week that the administration was 'very close to a solution.' CNN has also learned that the US has shifted position on the issue of uranium enrichment in the new proposal, in comparison to what officials had said publicly. It suggests the US could invest in Iran's civilian nuclear power program and join a consortium that would oversee the enrichment of low-level uranium inside of Iran for an unspecified amount of time. That consortium is expected to include Middle Eastern nations and the UN's nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency. Previously, senior US officials have said no enrichment inside Iran could take place under a new deal, and top US officials demanded that Iran stop enrichment and only import the material – a suggestion Tehran firmly rejected. The prospect of allowing continued low-level enrichment in the country would likely enrage Iran hawks in the US and Israel and hearkens back to the 2015 nuclear deal, from which Trump withdrew. However later Monday, Trump said that the Iran deal will not allow uranium enrichment. 'Under our potential Agreement — WE WILL NOT ALLOW ANY ENRICHMENT OF URANIUM,' the president wrote in a post on his Truth Social platform. Iranian officials have repeatedly said that they are open to the idea of an enrichment consortium but have insisted Iran must be able to keep control of its own enrichment capabilities. The senior Iranian official on Monday denounced the new proposal, saying that at 'at first glance, is assessed as incoherent and disjointed, very unrealistic, and with excessive demands.' They argued that the primary barrier to progress was the US' inconsistency. 'The fact that the Americans constantly change their positions has so far been the main obstacle to the success of the talks and now makes the work more difficult than ever,' the official added. The official also alleged the latest text directly contradicts prior understandings. 'The text is clearly in conflict with the latest agreement reached during the fifth round of negotiations,' the official stated. They reaffirmed Tehran's uncompromising stance on a critical issue, saying, 'Iran's position on enrichment is firm and steadfast.' Iran and the United States concluded a fifth round of high-stakes nuclear talks in Rome on May 23 amid growing skepticism in Tehran about the chances of a deal. After that round of talks, the two sides 'agreed to meet again in the near future,' a US senior administration official said at the time. Now, however, the next round of talks is very uncertain and may not happen at all, the sources familiar said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store