Rutgers' Harper headlines a bevy of 1-and-done guards set to go high in the NBA draft
Associated Press
There's a deep set of high-end guard prospects in the upcoming NBA draft.
Rutgers point guard Dylan Harper is positioned to be the first name called after projected No. 1 pick Cooper Flagg, while Baylor's VJ Edgecombe, Texas' Tre Johnson, Oklahoma's Jeremiah Fears and Illinois' Kasparas Jakucionis are possible top-10 picks as one-and-done prospects.
Here's a look at the guards entering Wednesday's first round: Dylan Harper, Rutgers
STRENGTHS: The 6-foot-5, 213-pound son of former NBA guard Ron Harper has size at the point and two-way potential. The lefty thrived as a scorer (19.4 points) with athleticism to finish at the rim, score on stepbacks and hit catch-and-shoot looks. Notably, he went for 36 points in an overtime win against Notre Dame, then 37 more a day later in a loss to then-No. 9 Alabama during the Players Era Festival in November.
Harper is a playmaker with good court vision, averaging 4.0 assists. He also averaged 1.4 steals, including six against Southern California and four more against a ranked Illinois team in February.
CONCERNS: He shot 33.3% on 3-pointers while launching 5.2 per game, though shot selection against contested looks didn't always help. There's also the optics of being the NBA-bound floor leader on a team that finished with a losing record despite featuring a second one-and-done talent in forward Ace Bailey. VJ Edgecombe, Baylor
STRENGTHS: Explosive athleticism stands out at both ends, notably as an above-the-rim finisher who creates highlight-reel moments. The 6-4, 193-pound Edgecombe finished in the combine's top 10 with a 38.5-inch max vertical leap, had seven games with at least three made 3s and 11 games with three-plus steals.
'I think for freshmen, the universal (issue) is just being able to sustain the level of intensity required as long as they're on the court,' Baylor coach Scott Drew said recently. 'The size, length, speed is one thing, but just to be able to compete each and every play, it's a different level. And VJ has that.'
CONCERNS: Edgecombe shot just 34% on 3s, though Drew said Edgecombe could see gains after refining his shot mechanics. He could also improve in shot creation, such making just 25% (13 of 59) in off-dribble jumpers, according to Synergy's analytics rankings. Tre Johnson, Texas
STRENGTHS: The 6-5, 190-pound Johnson averaged 19.9 points to lead all Division I freshmen, as well as being the Southeastern Conference's overall scoring leader. The highlight was Johnson going for 39 points against Arkansas in February to break Kevin Durant's Longhorns freshman single-game record.
He thrived off screens (shot 52.1% in those scenarios to rate in the 91st percentile in Synergy) and shot 39.7% from 3-point range, including 12 games with at least four made 3s. He also shot 87.1% at the foul line.
CONCERNS: The 19-year-old could use some bulk on a slender frame to help him hold up against bigger and stronger opponents at both ends. Jeremiah Fears, Oklahoma
STRENGTHS: The combo guard pressures defenders with his ball-handling and space creation, averaging 17.1 points, 4.1 rebounds and 4.1 assists. He got to the line 6.3 times per game and ranked tied for 11th among all Division I players by making 183 free throws.
Fears also had a knack for clutch plays, including a four-point play to beat a ranked Michigan team along with a tough late scoring drive for the lead in the SEC Tournament loss to Kentucky.
CONCERNS: He needs to get stronger (6-3, 180) and improve his outside shot. He made 28.4% of his 3s, including nine games of going 0 for 3 or worse. Reducing turnovers (3.4) would help, too. Kasparas Jakucionis, Illinois
STRENGTHS: Jakucionis brings size (6-5, 205) and an all-around floor game to the perimeter. He averaged 15 points, 5.7 rebounds and 4.7 assists with four double-digit rebounding games and eight games with at least seven assists.
He was also one of the nation's best freshmen at getting to the foul line (5.1 attempts per game).
CONCERNS: Jakucionis shot just 31.8% on 3s, including 5 of 22 (22.7%) in four bright-spotlight games during the Big Ten and NCAA tournaments. He averaged 3.7 turnovers — sixth-most in Division I, most among freshmen — and had 13 games with at least five turnovers. Others of note:
— EGOR DEMIN: The BYU freshman from Russia is a possible lottery prospect as a playmaker with size (6-8, 199), known for elite passing and vision. He averaged 5.5 assists to rank second among all Division I freshmen.
— JASE RICHARDSON: The Michigan State freshman and son of former NBA guard Jason Richardson is small (6-1, 178), though the first-round prospect is a 41.2% 3-point shooter.
— NOLAN TRAORE: The 6-5, 175-pounder is a scoring playmaker from France. The first-round prospect had previously drawn interest from programs like Duke, Alabama and Gonzaga.
— NIQUE CLIFFORD: The 6-5, 202-pound Clifford spent three years at Colorado then two at Colorado State. The first-round prospect is older (23) but had career-best numbers last year (18.9 points, 9.6 rebounds, 4.4 assists, 37.7% on 3s).
— BEN SARAF: The 6-6, 201-pound lefty from Israel is a scoring playmaker and first-round prospect. He averaged 12.8 points and 4.6 assists last season with Ratiopharm Ulm in Germany.
— CEDRIC COWARD: The 6-5, 213-pound senior started at Division III Willamette, spent two years at Eastern Washington, had an injury-shortened season at Washington State and was set to transfer to Duke. Now he's a first-round prospect after testing well at the combine.
— WALTER CLAYTON JR.: The 6-2, 199-pound combo guard was a first-team Associated Press All-American and Final Four's most outstanding player in Florida's national title run. He's a first-round prospect and gamer who thrived in pressure moments.
— DRAKE POWELL: The North Carolina freshman wing has perimeter size (6-6, 195), athleticism, 3-point range and defensive potential to be a possible first-round pick. He has a 7-foot wingspan and had combine-best marks in standing and max vertical leap.
— KAM JONES: The Marquette senior and potential first-rounder was a finalist for the Cousy Award presented to the nation's top point guard after averaging 19.2 points and 5.9 assists. He missed two games in his career.
___
AP Sports Writer Stephen Hawkins in Texas contributed to this report.
___
AP NBA: https://apnews.com/nba
recommended
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NBC Sports
35 minutes ago
- NBC Sports
Is $10 billion sale price good or bad for Lakers? Yes. Mostly it highlights changing NBA.
The NBA without the Buss family owning the Lakers sounds… weird. Dr. Jerry Buss purchased the Lakers when Ronald Reagan was entering the White House and he proceeded to transform both the team and the league. There is the on-court success, where the Lakers have won 11 championships since Buss bought the franchise, while boasting a parade of 'face of the game' level players: Magic Johnson, Shaquille O'Neal, Kobe Bryant, and now LeBron James, with Luka Doncic. Laker fans should be estatic. A few things I can tell you about Mark - he is driven by winning, excellence, and doing everything the right way. AND he will put in the resources needed to win! I can understand why Jeanie sold the team to Mark Walter because they are just alike -… Beyond that, Dr. Buss changed how the sport was packaged as a product — this was entertainment. This was an event. It was the Laker girls and music pumped in the arena (not just an organist), it was Dancing Barry and celebrities sitting courtside. The modern fan sporting experience started with Buss' vision. Now, Lakers ownership is changing. Once approved this summer by the Board of Governors, it will be Mark Walter, the CEO of global investment firm Guggenheim Partners, who will have bought the franchise at a $10 billion valuation. Jeanie Buss reported will stay on as the team's governor (she and the Buss family will retain 18% ownership, according to reports). Sale about change Is the sale of the Lakers good or bad for the franchise? Is it good or bad for the NBA? Yes. The answers are nuanced. It's also not the right question, Is this the end of family ownership in the NBA? Yes This is the real takeaway from the sale. The days of an NBA team as a family-run operation — especially where the team is the primary source of income, as it was for the Buss children — are gone. Big-time professional sports are now an investment for the ultra-wealthy. Fans look at the Lakers' brand, the superstar players, how often they are on national television, the purple-and-gold jerseys in the crowd at road games, and with all that comes a perception that the Lakers were a free-spending, do-whatever-it-takes-to-win organization. They were not even close. Behind the scenes, this was a relative mom-and-pop operation because it had to be — and if it wasn't for a very generous local television contract it would have been much more noticeable (but betting on cable television to keep funding the team is a losing proposition long term). The Lakers did not spend top dollar on coaches (remember Ty Lue going across town?). They did not spend to beef up basketball operations and staff — Oklahoma City has a larger scouting and basketball operations team. That's what Walter's ownership changes and why Lakers fans should feel positive. Under Walter's ownership, the Dodgers have unashamedly acted like the richest kids on the block, and have been rewarded for it on the field. For a Lakers team going into summer negotiations with Doncic and LeBron, having a deep-pocketed owner willing to spend matters, even if the NBA's tax structure limits that spending. The Lakers are an amazing organization. I'm looking forward to meeting Mark and excited about the future. I am also grateful to Jeanie and the Buss family for welcoming me to LA, and I'm happy that Jeanie will continue to be involved. I look forward to working with both of them… What Walter did with the Dodgers was spend — not just on players, he also upgraded Dodger Stadium, he beefed up the team's front office (stealing the GM from another team), its analytics department, and he spent big on player development. He turned the Dodgers into Goliath and has a couple of World Series wins to show for it. Walter can't just spend to buy players under the NBA's punitive salary cap/luxury tax system, but his Lakers will start acting like a rich team off the court. Expect the Lakers' front office and scouting teams to grow. Expect a focus on player development. Expect facility upgrades (not at which is owned by AEG, but other team facilities). The Lakers didn't act like the richest kids on the block — that other team in Los Angeles did — and around the Lakers there are a lot of little stories that highlight things. As noted at ESPN: 'An assistant coach was not approved to stay at the same hotel as the player he was traveling to work out with in the offseason because the room was too expensive.' All that is about to change. Something lost With that, a connection between the fans and the owner is lost. Jeanie Buss will remain the team governor and in some ways face of ownership, but Walter and his investment team will have the final say. A much more corporate entity runs the Lakers now, whatever face they put on it. The same was true in Dallas, where part of the loss in Mark Cuban selling the Mavericks was not having him as the recognizable owner fans to relate to (and talk to). The same is true in Boston, where Wyc Grousbeck was always a rich, corporate owner, but one fan saw, who a year ago was carrying the Larry O'Brien Trophy around the streets of Boston during a parade, high-fiving fans. The trend toward corporatization and private equity/investment banking touching everything is not just a sports thing, it's a societal thing. It's the way of the world. It's just going to feel a little different for the NBA. At least Jeanie Buss will still be around and have a voice in the Lakers, but it's not going to be the same. Not that it will matter to Lakers fans if they start winning like the Dodgers.
NBC Sports
an hour ago
- NBC Sports
Teague takes Pacers in Game 7 of NBA Finals
Jeff Teague, former 2015 NBA All-Star/ current host of 'Club 520,' sits down with Dan Patrick, discussing expectations for upcoming NBA Finals, and reminisce Teague's time in the league.
Indianapolis Star
an hour ago
- Indianapolis Star
Pacers open 8.5-point underdogs in Game 7 of NBA Finals: 'I think it's disrespectful'
The Indiana Pacers have been an underdog in every game of these NBA Finals. And that won't change heading into Sunday's Game 7 in Oklahoma City. The Pacers opened as 8.5-point underdogs, a staggering number for a Game 7. "Everybody has counted out the Pacers," ESPN's Jay Williams said on Friday's 'First Take.' "They're one of the biggest underdogs in Finals history." "I don't think they're counting them out now," responded Stephen A. Smith, who actually predicted the Pacers would win Game 6 to force a decisive game in OKC. Indiana's superpower: Pacers do something that's never been done in NBA playoffs Game 6 reaction: 'This is Hali spitting in the face of narratives.' "Not now, but 8-and-a-half! It's 8-and-a-half! That's eight and a hook in the NBA Finals after you just smacked the team by 17, you're up close to damn near 30," Williams said. 'First Take' host Molly Qerim then asked: "Do you think that's disrespectful?" "Yeah, I think it's disrespectful," Williams answered. "It's reality," former NBA All-Star Gilbert Arenas interjected. "Well, reality can be disrespectful too," Williams said. "... I agree with you. On paper, they should be smacking Indiana. I believe that. But they're not. Now, we're in a 3-3 Game 7 scenario. Pressure for the MVP, going back home, in your own hometown territory, with guys like J-Will, guys like SGA, we're comparing to Michael Jordan and Scottie Pippen. I mean that's a lot of pressure on a young basketball team." "I think Game 7 is going to be a thriller," Smith said Friday. "I don't think it's going to be a blowout. I think it's going to be tight. I think that, here's what I'm thinking: When I watched OKC in Game 1 have a 15-point lead and ultimately blow that, I watched them throughout the playoffs, and there are two times where they just lag offensively. They can't seem to get anything going, but they know how to neutralize you defensively. Indiana, to me, with Rick Carlisle I have faith that he'll figure out a way to produce enough offense where it gets tight when the fourth quarter is here. "I think this is one of those situations, ladies and gentlemen, where it's going to come down to the ball in SGA's hands and the Haliburtons of the world and whoever you want to pick, the point is I think it's going to be close in the fourth quarter. I'm not saying that OKC is not going to pull away because I still believe in them. But I think come fourth quarter time, midway through the fourth quarter, we going to be within five points of one another. It's going to come down to the wire, and cats are going to get tested. And when you take into account that you're relatively young and it's a Game 7, y'all know this better than me, palms get sweaty, stuff gets tight, and you don't know how somebody is going to react to a Game 7 of an NBA Finals. The championship is on the line. The slightest mistake can cost you everything. If you've played awful at moments in other games, why the hell should I assume that you might not play awful in those moments. I think it's going to come down to the wire." "Do you think OKC has the potential to fold? I don't believe it will happen, but they do have that potential, and if I'm Indiana, I want to keep it tight. Why? Because I'm saying to myself, 'We can get 'em. We can get 'em. We don't give them that cushion, if it's tight and they're like damn this is Game 7 on our home turf, we just got blown out in Game 6, these cats still here, it's a three-point game, there's four minutes left, three minutes left, ahhh damn.' Listen, if I'm Indiana, that's what I want. That's the kind of moment I want. And we'll find out. I still would go with OKC, me personally, but if I'm Indiana, I want that."
