logo
Judge urges jury ‘to exercise patience' in McGill Ghetto murder trial

Judge urges jury ‘to exercise patience' in McGill Ghetto murder trial

Montreal Crime
By
One of the jurors in the murder trial of the man accused of stabbing 24-year-old Romane Bonnier in the McGill Ghetto more than three years ago expressed their impatience over how François Pelletier has been testifying in the case.
The frustration was expressed in a note sent from the 12-member jury to Superior Court Justice François Dadour on Tuesday afternoon while Pelletier, 39, was in his fifth day of testifying in his own defence. He is acting as his own lawyer, and this has created the unique situation where Pelletier is not answering questions.
His testimony is in the form of a long monologue full of confusing asides, references to songs and other cultural references. Pelletier has often taken more time to explain his asides than he has referred to actual evidence. For example, he has mentioned a television show called Black Mirror at least a few times and, earlier on Tuesday, the juror asked the judge if they can watch one hour-long episode.
The Crown's theory in the case is that Pelletier met Bonnier through an ad she placed seeking a roommate to share an apartment she was already renting. Pelletier moved in and they started what turned out to be a brief relationship. Pelletier moved out on Sept. 1, 2021 and sent Bonnier many text messages for weeks asking why she ended it. On Oct. 19, 2021, he staked out Bonnier's workplace, a store owned by her parents, and followed her as she walked home before he killed her.
Following a morning of hearing similar testimony, the jury member sent Dadour a note 'concerning the evidence of Mr. Pelletier.'
The juror wrote that the 'mental health of the jury is important' to the trial. The person wanted to address 'the elephant in the room' and called Pelletier's testimony repetitive and lacking relevance.
When Pelletier testified Tuesday morning about a relationship he had with a different woman in 2010, one of the male jurors could be seen leaning back in his chair with his head staring at the ceiling. He appeared to have tuned out Pelletier.
'It is common to have a witness testify for days, if not weeks,' Dadour told the jury in his reply to the note. 'His examination takes the form of a monologue because he is not being asked questions.'
He said that 'all judges must be patient,' reminded them that Pelletier is close to finishing his testimony and noted that the accused will soon be cross-examined by one of the two prosecutors in the case.
'I invite you to exercise patience,' the judge said. 'We have started this trial and now we must finish it.'
While testifying, Pelletier has admitted several times that he stabbed Bonnier 26 times on Aylmer St. in front of several stunned witnesses.
In her opening statement to the jury, prosecutor Marianna Ferraro told the jury the case is not a whodunit. This is because the horrific slaying was recorded by a surveillance camera and the jury has now seen the video. The questions for the jury to consider will involve what was Pelletier's state of mind when he killed Bonnier.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Montreal man on trial for murder in ex-girlfriend's death finishes testimony
Montreal man on trial for murder in ex-girlfriend's death finishes testimony

CTV News

timean hour ago

  • CTV News

Montreal man on trial for murder in ex-girlfriend's death finishes testimony

The man accused of first-degree murder in the death of his former girlfriend near McGill University finished his testimony Friday afternoon. François Pelletier is defending himself in his trial in the killing of 24-year-old Romane Bonnier, who was stabbed to death in 2021. The prosecution wrapped up its cross-examination in the trial and Pelletier is acting as his own lawyer in the case. On at least three occasions, he seemed to admit to killing her. He testified that he considered himself a soldier of God, and that he had to kill Bonnier to protect her from the apocalypse. His testimony got so confused that at one point the jury asked why they had to listen to it. The cross-examination by the prosecution was considerably more direct. Pelletier was asked about the three options he considered when he made the decision to kill Bonnier. On the stand, Pelletier admitted his first option was murder by strangulation, but couldn't figure out how to do it. His second option was to shoot his victim but Pelletier said he couldn't afford a gun. He went for the third option, which was to stab his victim. Security cameras showed the entire sequence where a man can be seen repeatedly stabbing Bonnier. Pelletier has also alluded to some mental health issues, but so far, provided no expert testimony. Pelletier said the jury had to see a particular episode of the hit Netflix series, Black Mirror, because he says they'll better understand his state of mind. There's been a lot of objection by the prosecution and questions from the judge regarding the relevancy of showing this to the jury, but so far, the court has provided the accused with a considerable amount of leeway.

High court overturns B.C. sex assault conviction, clarifies ‘confusion' over evidence
High court overturns B.C. sex assault conviction, clarifies ‘confusion' over evidence

CTV News

time3 hours ago

  • CTV News

High court overturns B.C. sex assault conviction, clarifies ‘confusion' over evidence

The Supreme Court of Canada is pictured in Ottawa, Monday, June 3, 2024. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Sean Kilpatrick The Supreme Court of Canada says a British Columbia man convicted of sexual assault in 2022 should get a new trial because social media messages used as evidence against him were admitted to court without a proper hearing. The court says the ruling confirms that it's not just evidence about a sexual assault complainant's history of sexual activity that's inadmissible at trial without a hearing — but also their history of sexual inactivity. The ruling released Friday says Dustin Kinamore was 22 when he met the 16-year-old complainant in May 2020, and they exchanged sexualized social media messages that became key pieces of evidence at trial. The ruling says the messages were introduced by the Crown to show the complainant wasn't interested in a sexual relationship with Kinamore — but the trial judge didn't hold an admissibility hearing, highlighting 'uncertainty' around rules governing evidence about a complainant's sexual history. The decision says the messages were evidence of sexual inactivity, and confusion about their use in the trial arose because they were introduced by the prosecution rather than the defence. The court ruled that evidence about a complainant's past sexual inactivity is presumed inadmissible, quashed Kinamore's conviction and ordered a new trial because the messages were used without a hearing to precisely determine relevance. The ruling says so-called 'sexual history evidence' is presumed inadmissible because it can perpetuate 'myths and stereotypes' about complainants. 'The increasing complexity of sexual offence trials in Canada poses a challenge to our overburdened criminal justice system. One source of complexity lies in the application of the rules that govern evidence of a complainant's sexual history,' Chief Justice Wagner wrote, with the other judges agreeing. 'Although these evidentiary rules are essential to eliminate discriminatory myths and stereotypes from the fact-finding process and safeguard the dignity, privacy, and equality interests of complainants, uncertainty about their scope and procedural requirements has caused unnecessary confusion and disruption.' This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 13, 2025.

Jury in McGill Ghetto murder trial views episode of sci-fi series Black Mirror
Jury in McGill Ghetto murder trial views episode of sci-fi series Black Mirror

Montreal Gazette

time3 hours ago

  • Montreal Gazette

Jury in McGill Ghetto murder trial views episode of sci-fi series Black Mirror

By The jury hearing the murder trial of François Pelletier ended what must have been a very confusing week for them by watching an episode of a television show. Superior Court Justice François Dadour asked the 12-member jury to watch an episode from season one of Black Mirror, a sci-fi drama that was streamed on Netflix, following Pelletier's weeklong testimony in his defence. He is charged with the first-degree murder of Romane Bonnier, a 24-year-old woman who was stabbed to death on Oct. 19, 2021 on Aylmer St. in the McGill Ghetto. During his sometimes confusing and rambling testimony, Pelletier, 39, has made several asides, for example to songs he was listening to while he and Bonnier were in a brief relationship. He has also mentioned the Black Mirror show often. Earlier this week, a member of the jury sent Dadour a note asking whether they could watch a specific episode of Black Mirror and, on Friday, Dadour allowed it. He asked the jury to watch the hour-long episode inside their deliberation room because, Dadour said, there might be 'issues' with playing the episode in open court. When Pelletier was sworn in on Friday with the intended goal of completing his testimony, he was asked to state his occupation. He said: 'Chief antagonist of the Black Mirror Society.' On previous days, Pelletier stated his occupation as 'prisoner,' but he also said 'Soldier of God' at the start of one day this week. On Friday, Pelletier testified about the days after he was arrested by the Montreal police and detained as a suspect in Bonnier's death. 'It eventually hit me, like the repercussions and the collateral damage (of Bonnier's death) and all the reality of like how now she's not gonna be there anymore. It was like a funeral,' Pelletier said, adding he had difficulty being detained in isolation. 'I started thinking of the impact of what I had done. It was a lot to take in. 'I was realizing that I was not well and that I might not have been well.' Pelletier said he realized then he would probably 'be in prison for the rest of my life' when the judge interrupted him. 'The purpose of this trial is to determine whether you are guilty or not guilty, so let's stick with your state of mind (in the days after the homicide),' the judge said. Pelletier then referred to a document that he described as 'a memo' he wrote to himself in jail. 'In there I mentioned that I really wanted to talk to someone like a doctor or a psychologist or a psychiatrist because I was ready to go completely insane, if I was not already,' Pelletier said. 'I should not (have been) in isolation given the psychological predicament I (was) in. I mentioned I have (obsessive compulsive disorder) and I'm most likely psychotic.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store