WWAMI has a vital role in the health care infrastructure of the state of Idaho
For decades, Idaho WWAMI has served as the major source of physicians in Idaho. House Bill 176 will sever this source of well-trained physicians leading to an exacerbation in the physician shortage, writes guest columnist Emina Gulbis. (Getty Images)
As a current fourth year medical student at the Idaho WWAMI/University of Washington program, I'm compelled to address a major issue affecting the health of Idahoans: the proposed defunding of the Idaho WWAMI program being considered by the Idaho Legislature in House Bill 176.
Idaho WWAMI in partnership with the University of Washington School of Medicine has been providing medical education and health care to Idahoans for 53 years. This partnership between Idaho and the University of Washington allows aspiring medical students to pursue their education at an academic center of excellence while remaining in Idaho.
As I went through the medical school admission process in 2021, the drive to learn, train and return to practice in Idaho remained at the forefront of my decision. As a first-generation college graduate, I wanted to ensure I received the best medical education training I could and that I gave back to the community that supported my dream of becoming a well-trained physician. Idaho WWAMI was the clear choice in this regard.
Idaho depends on attracting and retaining rural physicians
As a student who has gone through the WWAMI program and whose set to graduate in three months, I can attest that attending the University of Washington/Idaho WWAMI was the best decision I've made. It allowed me to receive a top tier medical education and build connections with many local physician leaders while remaining in my home state of Idaho.
I have elected to pursue OB-GYN residency and plan to return to Idaho and serve Idahoans after residency training. My clinical exposures in Idaho and the WWAMI physician network has further instilled a passion to return and serve Idahoans. In fact, the retention rate for physicians who train within Idaho WWAMI is 70%. This physician retention rate is among the highest across the country.
HB 176 jeopardizes our ability to retain and recruit physicians to Idaho, which has disastrous impacts on the already strained health care network in Idaho.
Idaho currently ranks 50th among U.S. states in physicians per capita. I have had the honor to serve in various leadership roles in free clinics in Idaho that provide care to some of the most underserved patient populations in the state. In every patient interaction one trend remains clear: accessibility to physicians is scarce.
For decades, Idaho WWAMI has served as the major source of physicians in Idaho. HB 176 will sever this source of well-trained physicians leading to an exacerbation in the physician shortage. This shortage will lead to major impacts on health care accessibility across the state. Reduced health care access will in turn lead to worsening health outcomes for Idahoans.
Funding Idaho WWAMI is essential and any loss of funding of the program will have detrimental impacts to public health in Idaho. Especially because the proposed legislation does not describe an actual plan for a future program. Ensuring the continuation of WWAMI Idaho is necessary to continue to recruit and build upon the current physician workforce. Let us work together to continue funding a well-established recruiting network of exceptionally trained physicians that aim to ensure every Idahoan has access to the healthcare they deserve.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
One year without RECA: Justice delayed for radiation victims in Idaho and beyond
Craters across the Frenchman Flats in Nevada dot the landscape where the U.S. government tested hundreds of nuclear weapons. Under a proposed expansion of the Radiation Compensation Exposure Act, anyone in states like Utah or Idaho diagnosed with certain cancers caused by nuclear testing would have been eligible for compensation. But the expansion was cut from Congress' defense spending bill, and the protections in the act were allowed to expire. () June 10 marks one year since the U.S. Congress allowed the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act, or RECA, to expire — abandoning thousands of Americans who sacrificed their health in the name of national security. RECA provided critical compensation for medical expenses to uranium miners, mill workers, and 'downwinders' exposed to radiation during Cold War-era nuclear testing and weapons development. But even when it was active, RECA was incomplete, excluding entire communities — including Idahoans — who suffered the same devastating consequences. From 1945 to 1992, the U.S. government detonated over a thousand nuclear weapons, scattering radioactive fallout across the West. America's nuclear 'downwinders' deserve justice While RECA compensated some downwinders in Nevada, Utah, and Arizona, Idahoans — who endured the same invisible poison — were left out. Uranium miners employed after 1971 and St. Louis communities used as dumping grounds for Manhattan Project Waste were also excluded from RECA compensation. The consequences have been deadly. Research shows that radiation exposure leads to cancers, heart disease, genetic mutations, and immune disorders —with women and children at greatest risk. Yet for decades, the government dismissed these victims as collateral damage, treating rural Westerners and Indigenous communities as expendable. Atomic Energy Commission documents revealed the attitude of the officials making decisions, that we were just a bunch of cowboys, Indians, and Mormons, and a 'low-use segment' of the population. Western states were deemed 'low-population,' as if rural lives mattered less. The Marshall Islands, subjected to 67 nuclear tests, were treated as a sacrifice zone, and officials justified this; they are 'more like us than the mice' is the quote from an Atomic Energy Commission official in 1956. Dismissing Nevada Test Site downwinders and other nuclear weapons test victims as insignificant reflects a brutal truth: the U.S. government calculated whose life had worth and whose did not. But cancer doesn't discriminate. Families in Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, New Mexico, and beyond have watched generations suffer from rare leukemias, thyroid diseases, brain cancers, and clusters of tumors. Many never knew their illnesses were tied to nuclear testing — until it was too late. RECA should be reinstated and expanded to cover all radiation victims, including people like: Idaho downwinders Post-1971 uranium workers Other communities excluded from fallout zones Congress has a choice: pass RECA in the next must-pass Big, Beautiful, Bill, or continue to let victims die waiting. This isn't just about compensation — it's about admitting the full cost of America's nuclear legacy and justice for victims. Our representatives in Congress will make better decisions if they hear from residents about how expansion of RECA would affect them. Research your family history — were there unexplained cancers, thyroid conditions, or stillbirths? Radiation's effects linger for generations. Speak up — this isn't ancient history. Every day RECA lapses, more people suffer. We can't allow our government to wait for people to die. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Medscape
a day ago
- Medscape
Supplements Boost Postmenopausal Serum Biomarkers
Postmenopausal women who took vitamin B 12 , fish oil, or flaxseed oil as dietary supplements had significantly higher levels of accompanying serum biomarkers than those who did not use these supplements, based on new data presented at American Society for Nutrition (ASN) 2025 Annual Meeting. Dietary supplement use in the US is common among older adults, but data on the health effects of dietary supplements remain relatively mixed, said presenting author Hannah T. Baillie, MS, RD, in an interview. Hannah T. Baillie, MS, RD 'One way to measure whether or not supplements could be getting to the intended targets in the body is to measure the amount of the supplement's nutrients in the blood. This could inform whether the supplements have their intended health effects in an objective manner,' said Baillie, a PhD student at the University of Washington, Seattle. To examine the associations between dietary supplements and higher serum concentrations of corresponding biomarkers, Baillie and colleagues enrolled 153 participants in the Women's Health Initiative in a 2-week controlled feeding study. The participants consumed an individualized menu, including a habitual diet, and continued use of their usual dietary supplements. After 2 weeks, the researchers measured serum vitamin B 12 , lutein plus zeaxanthin, and phospholipid fatty acids. In a multiple linear regression analysis, the geometric mean serum concentration of vitamin B 12 was 58% higher among women who used any type of vitamin B 12 dietary supplement than among nonusers ( P < .001). In addition, the geometric mean serum concentrations of phospholipid docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) ranged from 38% to 46% higher among users of fish oil or flaxseed oil supplements than among nonusers ( P < .0001). Use of dietary supplements containing lutein plus zeaxanthin had no significant impact on serum concentrations ( P = .72). However, individuals who used two sources of a dietary supplement containing vitamin B 12 as well as two different sources of supplementation with lutein plus zeaxanthin had significantly higher serum biomarker levels than either individuals who took a single multivitamin containing B 12 and lutein plus zeaxanthin or individuals who took neither ( P < .0001 for both). 'I was surprised by how many different supplements participants were taking; I expected it to be high, but one participant was taking 18 supplements per day,' Baillie told Medscape Medical News . 'I was also surprised by the lack of association between use of lutein + zeaxanthin-containing supplements and serum lutein + zeaxanthin concentrations,' she said. The negligible increases in serum concentrations with supplement use point to potential issues with absorbing or utilizing these nutrients from supplemental sources, she noted. The study findings highlight the need for clinicians to ask patients not only about the use of dietary supplements but also about the dose of those supplements, said Baillie. The researchers also looked at serum concentrations in response to different doses of vitamin B 12 . 'We looked to see if those taking individual vitamin B 12 , just a multivitamin containing B 12 , both those supplements, or neither had different serum concentrations of vitamin B 12 ,' Baillie said. The researchers found that individuals taking > 1000 mcg in a supplement (an average amount in single B 12 supplements) did not have significantly higher serum concentrations than those taking both supplements (which would represent a larger dose). The unreliable and inadequate labeling of nutrient content on dietary supplement packaging was a main study limitation, Baillie told Medscape Medical News . 'Although the contents from labels of each dietary supplement were recorded into our database, prior research has shown there may be discrepancies in what is reported on labels and what each supplement contains,' she said. 'Additionally, labels are not consistent in how nutrient information is reported; for example, for fish oil supplements, omega-3 fatty acids are sometimes displayed as total omega-3 fatty acids, sometimes as EPA and DHA, and on other labels as total EPA + DHA,' Baillie said. This discrepancy makes consistent assessment of total nutrient intake a challenge and limits what conclusions that can be drawn from the data, she noted. Raising Awareness, Examining Intake 'Additional research investigating best practices for assessing nutrient intake from dietary supplements is needed, and this may require changes in the requirements around dietary supplement labeling,' Baillie told Medscape Medical News . Future research also should address assessing serum response among a more heterogeneous population, she added. Older women often take supplements without knowing their full effect, and the current study is important to help alert clinicians to ask patients about type, timing, and dose, said Christine M. Sager, MD, an assistant professor in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, Tennessee, in an interview. The findings were not unexpected, said Sager, who was not involved in the study. 'In clinical practice, we see similar elevations in B 12 when patients are taking B vitamins,' she said. The current study is too short and too small to make global recommendations on supplement intake, but the results suggest that the type, dose, and time of day matter for many supplements, just as with medications, although research on this topic is limited, Sager said. 'Also, serum levels do not always correlate with goals of therapy,' she noted. Looking ahead, the safety and efficacy of intravenous vitamins and supplements is an important question for additional research, Sager added.
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
When is the next full moon and does it really affect your health?
The next full moon – known as the Strawberry Moon – will appear on 10 June, peaking the following morning. It's not named for its colour, but because it marks the start of wild strawberry season. Some people say the full moon messes with their sleep, mood or energy. And it's not just superstition – scientists are now looking into whether lunar phases can influence things like sleep, hormones, heart health and mental wellbeing. So, is there anything in it? Here's what we know – and how to feel your best when the moon rolls around. Despite the name, the Strawberry Moon doesn't actually turn pink. The nickname comes from Native American and European traditions that tied full moons to seasonal events – in this case, the strawberry harvest. You might also hear it called the Rose Moon, Honey Moon or Mead Moon, depending on where in the world you are. This year's Strawberry Moon will be particularly striking. It's the lowest-hanging full moon of 2025 in the Northern Hemisphere, which means it will look bigger and more golden as it rises at dusk. No telescope needed – just head outside and look up. The idea that the moon impacts our health has been around for centuries. While not all of it is backed by stats (and results are often mixed), scientists are starting to dig deeper into potential connections. Here's what some of the research says: A 2013 study from the University of Basel found people took longer to fall asleep, got 30% less deep sleep, and slept about 20 minutes less during a full moon, even in controlled rooms without light or clocks. More recently, researchers at the University of Washington found a similar pattern: people went to bed later and slept less in the days leading up to a full moon, no matter where they lived or whether they had electric lighting. It means since moonlight and bedtime habits were ruled out, something else might be at play, in this case, maybe our body's own rhythm responding to the lunar cycle. The average menstrual cycle lasts around 28 to 30 days – similar to the lunar cycle – so it's no surprise the two have long been linked. In fact, the word 'menstruation' shares roots with the Greek word for moon (mene) and the Latin for month (mensis). A small 1980 study did find that some women were more likely to start their periods around the new moon. But a large-scale analysis from 2017 by period-tracking app Clue, covering more than 7.5 million cycles, found no consistent link between period start dates and moon phases. Studies on the moon's impact on heart health have been mixed. A 2021 Japanese study found no link between moon phases and out-of-hospital cardiac arrests. However, a small 2013 study reported that blood pressure readings were slightly lower during full and new moons – suggesting a subtle effect on circulation. The idea that the moon affects our mood goes way back. The word 'luna' (Latin for moon) was even linked to emotional shifts in ancient times. Modern research, though, doesn't show a clear link. A 2017 study in psychiatry reported no significant rise in mental health issues during different moon phases. That said, research suggests people with conditions like bipolar disorder may be more sensitive to sleep disruptions, which, as we've seen, can happen around the full moon. So if you have mood changes, it's less likely due to the moon and could be more about the knock-on effects of poorer rest. Even if you're not usually moon-sensitive, there's no harm in building a few easy habits around the full moon, especially if it helps you feel more balanced and better rested. Wind down early. Try switching off a bit sooner in the evenings before the full moon. Even 15 minutes can help signal to your brain it's time to relax. Block out the glow. Blackout curtains or an eye mask can support melatonin production, the hormone that helps you sleep. Move your body. A little gentle exercise during the day (like walking or yoga) can help regulate sleep and release stress. Skip the caffeine – or cut back after 2pm. It can sneakily mess with your sleep, even if you feel fine. Track patterns: If you notices changes, jot down how you feel during different moon phases. You might be more in sync than you realise. Read more: Strawberry moon to rise over Britain next week, but it will be in an odd place (Yahoo News UK, 3-min read) What It Means to Get Your Period on a Full Moon (21 Ninety, 3-min read) What is 'moon breathing'? The ancient technique that promises to help you fall asleep (New York Post, 3-min read)
