logo
One year without RECA: Justice delayed for radiation victims in Idaho and beyond

One year without RECA: Justice delayed for radiation victims in Idaho and beyond

Yahooa day ago

Craters across the Frenchman Flats in Nevada dot the landscape where the U.S. government tested hundreds of nuclear weapons. Under a proposed expansion of the Radiation Compensation Exposure Act, anyone in states like Utah or Idaho diagnosed with certain cancers caused by nuclear testing would have been eligible for compensation. But the expansion was cut from Congress' defense spending bill, and the protections in the act were allowed to expire. ()
June 10 marks one year since the U.S. Congress allowed the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act, or RECA, to expire — abandoning thousands of Americans who sacrificed their health in the name of national security.
RECA provided critical compensation for medical expenses to uranium miners, mill workers, and 'downwinders' exposed to radiation during Cold War-era nuclear testing and weapons development. But even when it was active, RECA was incomplete, excluding entire communities — including Idahoans — who suffered the same devastating consequences.
From 1945 to 1992, the U.S. government detonated over a thousand nuclear weapons, scattering radioactive fallout across the West.
America's nuclear 'downwinders' deserve justice
While RECA compensated some downwinders in Nevada, Utah, and Arizona, Idahoans — who endured the same invisible poison — were left out.
Uranium miners employed after 1971 and St. Louis communities used as dumping grounds for Manhattan Project Waste were also excluded from RECA compensation.
The consequences have been deadly. Research shows that radiation exposure leads to cancers, heart disease, genetic mutations, and immune disorders —with women and children at greatest risk. Yet for decades, the government dismissed these victims as collateral damage, treating rural Westerners and Indigenous communities as expendable.
Atomic Energy Commission documents revealed the attitude of the officials making decisions, that we were just a bunch of cowboys, Indians, and Mormons, and a 'low-use segment' of the population.
Western states were deemed 'low-population,' as if rural lives mattered less. The Marshall Islands, subjected to 67 nuclear tests, were treated as a sacrifice zone, and officials justified this; they are 'more like us than the mice' is the quote from an Atomic Energy Commission official in 1956.
Dismissing Nevada Test Site downwinders and other nuclear weapons test victims as insignificant reflects a brutal truth: the U.S. government calculated whose life had worth and whose did not.
But cancer doesn't discriminate. Families in Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, New Mexico, and beyond have watched generations suffer from rare leukemias, thyroid diseases, brain cancers, and clusters of tumors. Many never knew their illnesses were tied to nuclear testing — until it was too late.
RECA should be reinstated and expanded to cover all radiation victims, including people like:
Idaho downwinders
Post-1971 uranium workers
Other communities excluded from fallout zones
Congress has a choice: pass RECA in the next must-pass Big, Beautiful, Bill, or continue to let victims die waiting. This isn't just about compensation — it's about admitting the full cost of America's nuclear legacy and justice for victims.
Our representatives in Congress will make better decisions if they hear from residents about how expansion of RECA would affect them.
Research your family history — were there unexplained cancers, thyroid conditions, or stillbirths? Radiation's effects linger for generations.
Speak up — this isn't ancient history. Every day RECA lapses, more people suffer.
We can't allow our government to wait for people to die.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Low-calorie diets linked to surprising mental health effect, new research shows
Low-calorie diets linked to surprising mental health effect, new research shows

Yahoo

time37 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Low-calorie diets linked to surprising mental health effect, new research shows

Embarking on a low-calorie diet could potentially lead to negative mental health, researchers in Toronto, Canada, have revealed. A new study, published in BMJ Nutrition, Prevention and Health, investigated how the adoption of restrictive diets could instigate depressive symptoms. Using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, researchers analyzed nearly 29,000 adults who reported their dietary habits and also completed a mental health questionnaire. Rates Of Dementia Are Lower In People Who Eat This Specific Diet, Research Shows Nearly 8% of these adults reported depressive symptoms. Compared to those who did not follow a specific diet, those who stuck to a calorie-restrictive diet — including overweight individuals — saw an increase in depressive symptom severity, the study found. Read On The Fox News App People who followed a nutrient-restricted diet saw a larger increase in symptoms, while men who followed any diet reportedly showed "higher somatic symptom scores" compared to non-dieters. The researchers concluded that there are "potential implications of widely followed diets on depressive symptoms, and a need for tailored dietary recommendations based on BMI and sex." Judith S. Beck, PhD, president of the Beck Institute for Cognitive Behavior Therapy in Pennsylvania, reacted to these findings in an interview with Fox News Digital. The expert, who was not involved in the research, noted that it only showed an association between low-calorie diets and depression. 10 Best Diets Of 2025 As Chosen By Nutrition Experts "This is an important distinction, [because] correlation does not equal causation, and having a few depressive symptoms does not mean you have the condition of depression," she said. Beck noted that depression and negative emotions can also be caused by multiple cognitive, emotional or behavioral factors that are "more directly associated with depressive symptoms." Certified holistic nutritionist Robin DeCicco in New York City commented that most Americans would benefit from losing weight, as 70% of Americans are overweight or obese, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). This can be done by reducing the intake of sugary drinks and processed foods, and learning how to incorporate more whole foods like lean protein, vegetables, fruits and nuts, recommended DeCicco, who also was not involved in the study. This Weight Loss Plan Performs Better Than Traditional Dieting, Study Finds The nutritionist also warned against following fad diets. "It's not sustainable or healthy to follow these trends because, most often, they are not educating the public on the type of nutrients you need to function mentally and physically, which is why it doesn't surprise me that people can experience depressive and cognitive-affective symptoms when losing weight." The quality of calories "matters dramatically," DeCicco noted. "While weight loss is about calories in and calories out, it's also about the type of calories and what we need for fuel, protection against disease, and mental and physical satisfaction," she said. "Food has the power to help us or harm us, and if we're not eating certain foods known to promote mental well-being, we will definitely suffer from cognitive impairment and unstable mood." As an example, cutting out fats because they're high in calories — like salmon, avocado, olive oil and nuts — also cuts out nutrients like omega-3 fatty acids, which can reduce inflammation, prevent disease and improve cognition, mood and brain health, DeCicco noted. "If someone wants to lose weight but also has a health history of cognitive decline or is diagnosed with depression, it is even more important to emphasize the food groups mentioned above," DeCicco added. Click Here To Sign Up For Our Health Newsletter Beck echoed the importance of eating in a "very healthy way," while also recommending that people consider cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). For more Health articles, visit "CBT helps people learn the cognitive (thinking) and behavioral skills they need to eat as healthily as possible given their circumstances, and to change their thinking so they can make long-term changes in their eating and improve their overall health," she said. Fox News Digital reached out to the study researchers for article source: Low-calorie diets linked to surprising mental health effect, new research shows

Conservative Josh Hawley introduces bill to raise federal minimum wage to $15 an hour
Conservative Josh Hawley introduces bill to raise federal minimum wage to $15 an hour

USA Today

time37 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Conservative Josh Hawley introduces bill to raise federal minimum wage to $15 an hour

Conservative Josh Hawley introduces bill to raise federal minimum wage to $15 an hour Show Caption Hide Caption Lawmakers advance bill to lower pay for trainees Florida lawmakers are advancing bills that would allow employers to pay certain workers in training below the minimum wage for up to 12 months. Fox - 35 Orlando WASHINGTON - Ultraconservative Missouri Sen. Josh Hawley introduced a bill on June 10 with Democratic Vermont Sen. Peter Welch to raise the federal minimum wage to $15 an hour, making him one of the few Republicans to support the cause. The bill, dubbed the 'Higher Wages for American Workers Act,' would raise the minimum wage starting in January 2026 and allow it to increase on the basis of inflation in subsequent years. The federal minimum wage is currently $7.25 per hour and it's been unchanged since 2009. It is unclear whether the legislation will be taken up for a vote. Members of Congress have previously tried to raise the minimum wage, but to no avail. In 2021, Democratic lawmakers tried to tack a $15 per hour minimum wage provision in former President Joe Biden's $1.9 trillion coronavirus package, but a Senate official ruled that the measure couldn't be included in the bill. President Donald Trump said in December 2024 that he would 'consider' raising the minimum wage. However, he revoked a 2024 executive order that set the minimum wage for federal contractors at $17.75. 'For decades, working Americans have seen their wages flatline," Hawley said in a statement. One major culprit of this is the failure of the federal minimum wage to keep up with the economic reality facing hardworking Americans every day." Welch, a member of the Senate Finance Committee, echoed a similar sentiment. 'Every hardworking American deserves a living wage that helps put a roof over their head and food on the table–$7.25 an hour doesn't even come close,' he said. The Employment Policies Institute, a think tank dedicated to researching employment growth, opposed Hawley and Welch's push, arguing that it would result in a loss of jobs. 'Sen. Hawley should know better,' Rebekah Paxton, research director of the institute, said in a news release. 'This proposal would more than double the minimum wage and slash over 800,000 jobs. An overwhelming majority of economists agree that drastic minimum wage hikes cut employment, limit opportunities for workers, and shutter businesses.' The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office found in an analysis that raising the minimum wage would 'raise the earnings and family income of most low-wage workers' but would cause other low-income workers to lose their jobs and their family income to fall. Hawley in February teamed up with progressive firebrand Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders to introduce a bill capping credit card interest rates at 10%, saying it would "provide meaningful relief to working people." He's also been a vocal critic of Medicaid cuts.

California, coalition of states sue Trump over move to revoke EV mandate
California, coalition of states sue Trump over move to revoke EV mandate

The Hill

time40 minutes ago

  • The Hill

California, coalition of states sue Trump over move to revoke EV mandate

California officials on Thursday filed their 26th lawsuit against the Trump administration, after the president signed resolutions overturning the Golden State's landmark electric vehicle (EV) mandate. 'We made a promise that if the president attempted to illegally interfere with our clean air standards, we'd hold him accountable in court,' California Attorney General Rob Bonta said at a press conference announcing the lawsuit. 'Today, we are making good on that promise,' he added. Bonta submitted the complaint in the Northern District of California together with his colleagues in Colorado, Delaware, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington. He said he filed the lawsuit moments after Trump signed three congressional resolutions, which California regulations that had aimed to phase out gas-powered cars by 2035 — and then prompted 11 other states to follow suit. Rather than directly overturning the rules, the resolutions revoked the Biden administration's authorization of the Golden State's policy. This action occurred via the Congressional Review Act (CRA), which enables the repeal of recently approved regulations with a simple majority. 'We refuse to let this unprecedented and illegal use of the CRA undermine the Clean Air Act waivers that give California the authority to enforce our own mission standards,' Bonta said. The attorney general was referring to California's unique ability to set stronger-than-federal standards through a 1970 Clean Air Act clause, written amid historic smog conditions in the Los Angeles area. To do so, however, the Golden State must first apply to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for a waiver for each proposed rule — and only following that approval can other states adopt similar such thresholds. The waiver targeted by Congress and the Trump administration through the CRA received the EPA's approval in December under then-President Biden and enabled the implementation of several key California regulations. Among the rules repealed as a result of the resolutions is California's Advanced Clean Cars II rule, which required that 35 percent of cars sold in the state in 2026 to be zero-emissions, 68 percent in 2030 and 100 percent in 2035. A second rule was the Golden State's 'Omnibus regulation,' which sought to cut heavy-duty nitrogen oxide emissions by 90 percent, revamp engine testing procedures and further extend engine warranties. A third was the Advanced Clean Trucks rule — a regulation that has focused on accelerating the state's transition to less-polluting trucks and would have required 7.5 percent of these vehicles to be emissions-free by 2035. 'Trump's all-out assault on California continues – and this time he's destroying our clean air and America's global competitiveness in the process,' Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) said in a statement on Thursday. 'We are suing to stop this latest illegal action by a President who is a wholly-owned subsidiary of big polluters.' Bonta, meanwhile, emphasized that no federal administration, Democrat or Republican, has ever voiced disapproval of California's emissions waivers. 'The federal government's actions are not only unlawful, they're irrational and wildly partisan,' he said. 'They come at the direct expense of the health and the well-being of our people, of Californians.' Accusing Trump of adhering to a 'divisive, partisan agenda' that is endangering the economy, the environment and American lives, Bonta emphasized California's commitment to ensuring that 'future generations inherit a livable planet with breathable air.' 'We don't expect the president's barrage of unlawful, chaotic and disruptive executive orders and actions to slow down, which means neither will our work ahead,' he added.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store