Santander UK freezes salaries and cuts jobs in commercial banking arm
Santander UK is freezing salaries, slashing bonuses and cutting jobs across its commercial banking arm as part of a wider shake-up that could help make the bank more attractive to potential buyers.
The bank began unexpectedly changing bankers' job titles and shuffling staff into new teams earlier this month amid a larger review of the Spanish lender's UK business, where there is mounting frustration over regulations and costs.
The moves, and the abrupt way they were communicated, have upset bankers, many of whom have been forced into teams where the pay ranges are up to 25% lower than before.
While the bank cannot cut salaries, Santander has frozen the pay of staff who are now in lower pay brackets than previously. Email correspondence seen by the Guardian shows staff have also been warned over changes to their bonus schemes, which are expected to result in lower payouts.
Meanwhile, employees from the bank's Santander Navigator arm have been put at risk of redundancy, only three years after the platform was launched with much fanfare as a 'one-stop shop for international trade'.
Together the new pay measures and job cuts could affect up to 200 staff.
It comes as Santander tries to find new areas to slash costs as it steels itself for a fallout of the growing car finance commission scandal, which analysts at RBC Capital say could cost the bank up to £1.9bn in compensation to its former borrowers.
A leaner business could make the bank, which has about 14 million customers – more attractive to potential suitors. In January, it emerged that Santander UK could be put up for sale, although the Spanish owner has denied it is actively seeking to offload the lender.
Banco Santander, the parent company, which is headquartered in Madrid, reportedly rejected an £11bn bid for its UK retail bank earlier this year for being too low, according to the Financial Times.
The lower pay potential across the corporate and commercial bank will apply to new hires, and may mean that the UK bank, which is headquartered in Milton Keynes, will hire more staff outside London, where bankers may be ready to accept lower salaries.
That includes staff in Santander's international and transaction banking department – which manages cross-border payments and trade – who are now being categorised as back office staff, traditionally paid less than client-facing peers.
The Guardian also understands that the cuts have extended to extracurricular events, with the corporate and commercial bank's annual charity cricket day match, which usually takes place in June, having also been cancelled.
Santander UK started slashing about 2,000 jobs last year, and in February announced it was looking at how further 'simplification and automation' of the business could 'help drive cost efficiencies in 2025'. In March the bank revealed it was closing 95 of its 444 high street branches in the UK and reducing services or hours at a further 50 sites, putting 750 jobs at risk.
Commenting on the pay and job cuts, a spokesperson for Santander UK said: 'We are moving to a fairer, more transparent bonus structure across Santander UK, which will promote high performance at every level of the bank. We regularly review job data across the bank, and we annually agree salary increases with our recognised trade unions.'
They said the bank was responding to an evolving banking environment 'driven by changing customer expectations', adding: 'We must have a dynamic approach to our operating model that ensures our teams are organised effectively to keep the customer at the heart of our business.'
The bank said that involved launching Santander Navigator globally 'with a proposed new structure that will strengthen our 'Beyond Banking' offering to businesses who trade, or have ambitions to trade, internationally'.
Santander's spokesperson also denied that the bank was looking to offload the UK business. 'As we have made clear, the UK is a core part of Santander's diversified business model and is not for sale.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
an hour ago
- Bloomberg
Airbus Seeks Middle East Comeback After Boeing's Major May Haul
By , Siddharth Vikram Philip, and Julie Johnsson Save Airbus SE is looking to stage a comeback in June with a flurry of fresh orders after arch-rival Boeing Co. logged its biggest-ever deal this month that left the European planemaker empty-handed. The aircraft manufacturer is turning its focus to the Paris Air Show taking place in the middle of the month, where some carriers from the Middle East are poised to order more widebody aircraft.
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
How corporate America is taking a stand against Trump
In President Trump's first 100 days, institutions from big law firms and Ivy League schools to major drug manufacturers and government contractors have been quick to acquiesce to a range of demands from the administration. Unfortunately, Trump's ire does not stop at our borders, and his demands and actions are increasingly isolating America from the rest of the world. The private sector should not be short-sighted about this. U.S. companies still have the responsibility and opportunity to stand up for American ideals that support economic growth and democracy around the world. The winds of our politics may change, but the relationships and trust of our allies may not be so fickle. Damage today could take decades to rebuild. Happily, a few companies still understand this. Founded 50 years ago by high school friends Bill Gates and Paul Allen, there are few companies as American as Microsoft. Most notably, it has been taking bold steps to challenge Trump. Although the company has many faults — from its constant cybersecurity issues to restrictive licensing practices — it has acted in many ways against the Trump administration. Microsoft's pro-Europe stance took off last month when its president, Brad Smith, announced new European digital commitments to shield European data from the long arm of the Trump administration, even promising to pursue litigation against Trump's Justice Department if needed 'to protect the rights of our customers and other stakeholders.' As the relationship between the United States and Europe has otherwise grown more tense, Microsoft's latest actions have shown that U.S. companies can play a substantial role in preserving the decades-long relationships that underpin Western democracy. For this, it is to be commended. Unlike other major tech companies, Microsoft has resisted Trump's vision for America. This started in the first days of the second Trump term, with Microsoft leaders opting to attend the World Economic Forum in Davos rather than Trump's inauguration. Smith and Satya Nadella may have made the obligatory pilgrimage to Mar-a-Lago like their peers to meet with Trump and Vance before the inauguration, but when asked about their absence, Smith said the company had 'better places' to be. While the company has continuously supported increasing access to 'American AI' and was optimistic about its AI opportunities once Trump was back in office, Microsoft has struck a delicate balance between being supportive of the administration in some areas and not conceding on American values. Smith said in an interview in March that 'we support this administration in many, many areas' but that he's 'probably more worried right now about the business climate in Washington than at any point over the last 30 years.' This is admirable, considering how much Microsoft stands to lose. The company has an 85 percent share of the U.S. public sector's productivity software market and billions of dollars in federal contracts. It is also reportedly under the microscope of a wide-ranging Federal Trade Commission antitrust investigation scrutinizing its software licensing practices and cloud computing business. Other companies would have turned their backs on Europe to curry favor with Trump in an attempt to make their risks go away, yet Microsoft has not. To be clear, Microsoft is not alone. Other notable American institutions are also starting to stand up to the administration. Harvard, for instance, refused Trump's demands and has continued to challenge the administration's recent actions, including filing a lawsuit to halt the freezing of billions of dollars in government funds to the university. Top law firms Jenner and Block and WilmerHale have opposed Trump while some of their contemporaries are offering pro bono services to the administration worth millions — including one that Microsoft ditched as a result before hiring Jenner and Block. Several big corporations are also maintaining their DEI commitments and programs despite recent 'anti-woke' attacks from the White House, including Costco, Apple and Cisco, as well as Microsoft, which said 'diversity and inclusion work is more important than ever.' And after Trump threatened to take action against companies if they raised prices in response to his tariffs, Microsoft did it anyway by increasing the prices of Xbox consoles, controllers and certain games. Proctor and Gamble raised prices by 1 percent in their most recent quarter and announced their intent to sell new products at higher price points moving forward. When Trump was re-elected, many major American businesses were excited by the potential economic opportunities of a transparently quid-pro-quo administration. While some companies have benefited, others — like Meta and Amazon — have not. But there are higher stakes at hand than profit. Now is the time when we learn which institutions are willing to adhere to the principles that have defined America since its founding, as well as the relationships that defined the past century. Those are the ones that deserve our praise — not the institutions that bend the knee. Paul Rosenzweig served as deputy assistant secretary for policy at the Department of Homeland Security. He is a professorial lecturer at The George Washington University Law School and senior fellow in the Tech, Law and Security Program at the American University, Washington College of Law. He advises technology companies on cyber and national security issues, including companies that compete with Microsoft.
Miami Herald
2 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Major bank closing nearly 100 global branches
While it may not be the worst time in the world to be a retailer, it certainly isn't the best. It's probably fair to say that many of us were living in the worst age for retail about five years ago. Related: Famous retail chain closing more stores amidst chaotic new change At least as far as recent history is concerned, Covid presented something of an unprecedented disaster for retailers. As the pandemic swept through the globe, many businesses - both local and multinational - shuttered for some period of time. And some never recovered. The American Bankruptcy Institute reports that about 60% of businesses that closed during Covid did so permanently. And many more continue to struggle, even if they did make it to the other side of the pandemic. These numbers present a harsh reality for many retailers. Even if Covid is behind us, many of our habits have been permanently changed by the global event. It may seem like many of our activities are more or less back to normal these days. We still go out to dinner, see a concert, visit the beach, and travel to new or familiar destinations, and some of us still commute to work every day. More closings: Popular Mexican chain closing all restaurants, no bankruptcyIconic mall chain shuttering more stores foreverMajor gym closing multiple locations after franchisee bankruptcyAfter Chapter 11 bankruptcy, beloved retailer closes all stores But our daily routines and errands have more or less changed forever. Fewer of us go to movie theaters to see films, for example. And even fewer of us go to shopping malls for our everyday needs. Instead, we stream our movies from the comfort of our home, and we shop online for many of our household essentials. The same goes for banking, which fewer of us now do in person. Instead, many folks choose to carry out their banking needs online or via a mobile app, which offer far more convenient ways to do essential tasks like pay bills, deposit checks, and even apply for loans. This changing habit, however, has spiraled foot traffic levels ever downward. Which means it no longer makes sense for many banks to keep the lights on for a dwindling crowd. Related: Forget Rite Aid, another struggling drugstore closing down stores So Santander (SAN) has made the difficult decision to shutter 95 bank branches across the UK and Scotland. Santander, which is based out of Spain but has locations around the globe, has seen its e-commerce traffic skyrocket upward; digital transactions are up 63% compared to 2019. Conversely, in-person transactions are down by 61%. This comes after Santander announced it would shutter nearly 20 locations in the U.S., with most closing branches clustered around New England. "Santander Bank continues to refine its branch footprint and retail presence, including introducing new formats and investing in digital capabilities to better accommodate our customers and meet their evolving needs," a Santander spokesperson said of the closures. The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
