WPP boss Mark Read to step down amid AI pressure on advertising
The boss of the UK's largest advertising firm WPP is to step down at the end of the year.
Mark Read, chief executive of the business, which owns agencies including Ogilvy, has revealed his departure as the company battles the rapid growth of artificial intelligence (AI) in the sector.
Shares in the company dipped after the announcement, moving it closer to the five-year-low it struck in April.
Mr Read has been at the company for 30 years, with seven of those as chief executive.
He took over the top role in 2018 amid a period of upheaval following the resignation of Sir Martin Sorrell amid a workplace inquiry.
Mr Read led the business through a turbulent period as it sought to grow despite pressure from social media giants and the rapid expansion of AI.
In its most recent update in April, WPP reported that revenues dropped by 5% to £3.24 billion for the first quarter of 2025.
Mr Read said: 'When I took on this role our mission was to build a simpler, stronger business, and put structure and new energy behind our creativity and performance, powered by world-leading technology.
'I am proud that our teams across the business have delivered that exceptionally well.
'After seven years in the role, and with the foundations in place for WPP's continued success, I feel it is the right time to hand over the leadership of this amazing company.'
WPP has said its search for a successor is under way.
Former BT boss Philip Jansen, who was appointed WPP chairman last year, said Mr Read will continue to focus on the firm's growth strategy over the rest of the year.
Mr Jansen added: 'On behalf of the board, I would like to thank Mark for his contributions not only as CEO but throughout his more than 30 years of leadership and service to the company.
'During that time Mark has played a central role in transforming the company into a world leader in modern marketing services, with deep AI, data and technology capabilities, global presence and unrivalled creative talent, setting WPP up well for longer-term success.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
20 minutes ago
- BBC News
Rachel Reeves announces funding boosts for NHS and housing
Rachel Reeves has announced an extra £29bn per year for the NHS, along with funding boosts for defence and housing, as she set out her spending plans for the coming years. Speaking in the House of Commons, the chancellor outlined how much each department would have for day-to-day spending between 2026-29 and investment projects up until 2030. Departments that will see squeezes in their day-to-day spending include the Foreign Office and the environment department. Reeves said her Spending Review would deliver security, economic growth and "an NHS fit for the future", but Conservative shadow chancellor Mel Stride said it was a "spend now, tax later review". He predicted "a cruel summer of speculation" ahead of the autumn Budget, when he said the chancellor would announce tax rises. The spending review was the cumulation of weeks of discussions between Reeves and her cabinet have been particularly drawn out with Housing Secretary Angela Rayner and Home Secretary Yvette Cooper, with agreements not being reached until Sunday and Monday respectively. Rayner's department secured £39bn across 10 years for social housing in England. Reeves said the "spending power" of police forces would rise by 2.3% by 2029 - which is likely to include money from council tax bills - and pledged to end the use of hotels to accommodate asylum seekers by the end of the Parliament, expected in 2029. The NHS budget increased by 3% per year across three years for day-to-day running departments have lost out, including the Foreign Office which loses 6.9% a year, mainly in aid spending; Transport, which loses 5% a year over the next three years, and the Environment department which loses 2.7%.Other policies announced ahead of the spending review include £86bn for science and technology projects, £15bn for transport and an expansion of the number of children receiving free school meals at a cost of £1bn.
The Independent
20 minutes ago
- The Independent
Some Tesla owners sue Elon Musk's company for damaging their reputation
A group of Tesla owners in France is suing Elon Musk 's car company, alleging its vehicles have become "far-right totems" that are harming their reputation, according to the law firm representing the group. The group is seeking to terminate their lease contracts and recover legal costs at the Paris Commercial Court, citing the "direct and concrete" harm caused by Musk's public behaviour after he rallied in support of Donald Trump 's presidential bid and Germany's far-right AfD party. The lawsuit comes amid plummeting Tesla sales in key European markets, including France, Britain, Germany, and Italy, partly in protest of Musk's political activities and as customers favour Chinese electric vehicles due to their competitive prices. "Tesla vehicles have become powerful political symbols and are now perceived as true far-right 'totems,' much to the dismay of those who purchased them solely as innovative and eco-friendly vehicles", the plaintiffs' lawyers Patrick Klugman and Ivan Terel, at law firm GKA said. Tesla Europe did not immediately respond to an emailed request for comment. GKA said about 10 Tesla leaseholders had joined the lawsuit. Musk helped bankroll Trump's presidential campaign and spearheaded Trump's efforts to cut federal jobs and slash what the administration perceived as wasteful public spending. Musk's involvement in the so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) saw him become a political lightning rod, fueling protests and vandalism at Tesla showrooms in the United States and Europe. The GKA statement referred to a hand gesture by the billionaire during Trump's inauguration celebrations that drew online comparisons to a Nazi salute as an example of his harmful behaviour. Musk dismissed the criticism of the gesture as a "tired" attack. Musk said on Wednesday he regretted some of the remarks he made on the social media platform X, which he owns, during an acrimonious and very public falling out with Trump last week. 'I regret some of my posts about President Donald Trump last week. They went too far,' the world's richest man wrote. On the same day that Musk appeared to extend an olive branch, Trump said in a pre-recorded podcast interview that reconciliation between the pair was possible. 'Look, I have no hard feelings,' Trump said in the interview recorded on Monday. 'I was really surprised that that happened. He went after a bill that's phenomenal. …He just — I think he feels very badly that he said that, actually.'
Telegraph
22 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Reeves's spending plans were very popular with one key group: Labour MPs
Labour MPs liked it, and perhaps that should tell us everything we need to know about Rachel Reeves's spending review announcement in the Commons. Their enthusiastic shouts of 'More!' as the chancellor reached her peroration sounded genuine enough. And why wouldn't they? No chancellor of the exchequer ever became less popular by announcing large amounts of dosh for public services. Reeves painted a rosy picture of the future, a far cry from her and her boss, Keir Starmer's initial outings at the despatch box in the aftermath of last year's general election, when made Private Frazer from 'Dad's Army' sound like a ray of sunshine. They've since taken the hint and decided that a return to Labour's traditional practice of throwing loads of cash at everything helps cheer everyone up – particularly stressed Labour back benchers. One of the few cash saving schemes within her statement was perhaps not so popular with Labour MPs, and certainly not with party activists listening at home: the asylum backlog will be cut (but there was no indication of the likely scale of this cut or whether the threshold for achieving official refugee status will be lowered in order to reduce the official numbers of asylum seekers), more appeal cases will be heard and those who have no right to be here will be returned. A manifesto commitment to end the use of hotels by asylum seekers will be met by the end of the parliament, saving a billion pounds for the Treasury. But the biggest cheers from the government benches came in response to Reeves's announcement of £39 billion for new social and affordable house building. The deputy prime minister, Angela Rayner, looked especially pleased at this, which is unsurprising since her own department has responsibility for meeting her party's promise to build 1.5 million new homes by the time of the next election. But the £39 billion pledged today was not for spending in the next three or four years left of this parliament: it was for the next 10 years, which means, assuming broadly equal levels of spend each year, less than £16 billion to be spent on the project before the deadline mandated by Labour's own manifesto looms. Oddly, for a party with only five MPs, Reform UK and its leader came in for a disproportionate amount of attention from Reeves. Nigel Farage was targeted for having expressed support in the past for Liz Truss's disastrous 'fiscal event' and the unfunded tax cuts that accompanied it. It seemed odd that Reeves and her allies thought there was still mileage left in an event that happened three years ago. Maybe they'll fight next year's May elections by attacking Margaret Thatcher's poll tax. And by the time the chancellor got round to announcing the inevitable 'record' budget increases for the NHS – three per cent in each of the years covered by the spending review – she had come up with another zinger, reminding the House that Farage had once expressed support for an insurance-based health system. This might not be as productive a line of attack for the government as it blithely assumes. Given the consistently poor performance of the NHS over many years, and given that no one seriously expects things to improve, however much extra cash is thrown at it, it is not inconceivable that the kind of angry and disillusioned voter that Reform has successfully attracted to its ranks could be persuaded that maybe a different approach is, after all, worth considering. After all, most EU countries have some sort of insurance element within their funding models, yet they also manage to provide medical care free at the point of need. And aren't Labour MPs fans of everything Europe does (apart from regularly electing far-Right parties to government, of course)? The real success of fiscal events like today's can never be accurately judged until hours after everyone has left the chamber and headed to the tearoom to chat about it and stock up on publicly-subsidised calories. But even before the economics experts have had a chance to go over the details, Chancellor Reeves can congratulate herself for at least sounding more like a cheerleader for the government, rather than an undertaker. Baby steps, chancellor. Baby steps.
