logo
NC House committee approves gambling loss income tax deduction

NC House committee approves gambling loss income tax deduction

Yahoo04-03-2025

Each pin represents someone placing a bet in the first hour sports gambling went live in North Carolina on March 11, 2023. (Source: NC Lottery Commission)
A proposal to allow gamblers to deduct losses on their state income taxes moved swiftly through a North Carolina House committee Tuesday on a divided but bipartisan vote.
Rep. Keith Kidwell (R-Beaufort), a gambling opponent and one of House Bill 14's sponsors, said the bill is' about fairness to taxpayers' and not about gambling.
Since online sports betting became legal in North Carolina last March, more than $6 billion has been wagered, according to state reports published before the Super Bowl.
The bill's sponsors said allowing gamblers to deduct their losses, capped at winnings, will align state policy with federal tax law.
Rep. Bryan Cohn (D-Granville), said he agreed state policy 'should follow federal guidance.'
An official calculation of how much tax revenue the state would lose if the bill becomes law was not available online.
At a committee hearing last week, Rev. Mark Creech, lobbyist for the conservative group Return America, said allowing the tax deductions would encourage gambling as he urged the committee not to approve it.
In prepared remarks he was not invited to give on Tuesday, Creech wrote the bill would be a 'gift to the gambling industry, enabling them to keep addicted individuals on the hook — the very people who generate their profits — rather than protecting the average citizen who gambles.'
Some House Commerce and Economic Development Committee members voted against the bill on Tuesday, but not enough to stop it from moving it to its next step, the House Finance Committee.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

4 Browns players on their last chance to leave a positive impression on the team
4 Browns players on their last chance to leave a positive impression on the team

USA Today

time24 minutes ago

  • USA Today

4 Browns players on their last chance to leave a positive impression on the team

4 Browns players on their last chance to leave a positive impression on the team 2025 appears set up to be a cornerstone season for the Cleveland Browns. A Super Bowl may not be in the cards, but as the team recovers from the Deshaun Watson fallout, they smartly maneuvered to reset the roster and cap space. The benefit of this is that it will be a low-expectation season, giving young players a chance to develop and prove themselves. For some, that'll be a chance to earn a long-term deal as part of the Browns' future. But, for others, it could be their final chance to prove they can be a starter in the league. Here are the players to keep an eye on as they enter a massive prove-it season. LT Dawand Jones Jones is a hulking offensive lineman entering his third season on the Browns after being a fourth-round pick in 2023. Despite his draft status, he's found himself playing more often than not, starting nine games as a rookie at right tackle for an injured Jack Conklin, and another eight games in 2024 at left tackle. The problem has been that we haven't gotten that extended look at him with both seasons ending in injury. The Browns did not address the offensive line in the draft, making Jones the lone starter on the offensive line on a rookie deal and under the age of 30 (by the start of the season). His short stints as a starter and his draft status do not give him a particularly long leash going forward, but the lack of other options guarantees him this season to prove himself. To start, he must stay healthy. Shedding over 20 pounds is a great start and also shows his commitment. From there, he'll need to improve his game and become a more reliable blind-side option. A breakout campaign from Jones would be massive for the Browns, for once, they would address the quarterback. If he can't do that, he may be best suited as a backup swing tackle on another team. OG Teven Jenkins While it didn't make headlines, the Jenkins signing was one of the more confounding of the off-season. A former second-round selection to Chicago, Jenkins slid in the draft process due to injury concerns that would follow him into the NFL. While consistently battling bruises and ailments, Jenkins managed to start 45 games in four years with the Bears and improved every season. He wasn't expected to sign for a big deal, but somehow the Browns snagged him late in free agency on a cheap one-year deal. Jenkins has some versatility to his game as a tackle or a guard, but currently, he's slated to be a backup somewhere along the line. It's a move that still doesn't make much sense. Jenkins is better than a cheap backup, and plenty of other teams needed offensive line help. It makes sense that his injuries would weaken his market, but not to this degree. Suddenly, that makes this a very important year for Jenkins. Not only will he need to earn a starting role, but he may need to compete just to stay on the roster against young linemen Zak Zinter and Luke Wypler. If he can do that, then perhaps he can parlay some quality games into a better deal after the season. RB Jerome Ford The Browns made it clear that they wanted a boost at running back after selecting Quinshon Judkins in the second round, and then Dylan Sampson in the fourth. Both were highly touted prospects that should form a fun thunder-and-lightning duo, but that leaves little room for Ford. He won't go down without a fight, however, even taking a pay cut to stay with the team. Ford enters his fourth season on the roster bubble, even after a solid 2023 season that saw him thrust into a starting role. He didn't overwhelm anyone, but he was solid for a young fifth-round draft pick. He was far more efficient than Nick Chubb last season as he returned from injury, but the team still opted to start him instead. This now becomes Ford's final chance to make an impact by holding off one or both rookies for playing time. He has the advantage of experience in the league and with the scheme, and even familiarity with Joe Flacco should he win the starting quarterback job. But the team doesn't value Ford highly by their actions over the past two seasons. That'll make 2025 an uphill battle for Ford as he tries to extend his career. CB Greg Newsome II Until the selection of Mason Graham this past draft, Greg Newsome had been the last first-round pick on the Browns for three straight seasons. Unfortunately, he hasn't lived up to that billing, showing strong flashes but never being able to close that gap of consistency. The team did pick up his fifth-year option last off-season, giving Newsome one more year to play his way into a bigger contract, whether that be for the Browns or someone else. Newsome did not get off to a strong start as he was replaced in favor of Martin Emerson last season and then went down with a hamstring injury that cut his year short. However, the team did not draft a cornerback nor add anyone of substantial threat to a starting role in free agency. That means Newsome will get significant playing time once again, and with it, one last chance to prove himself. He doesn't need to break out in a big way to maintain his position, as Denzel Ward holds down the #1 cornerback spot. But he does need to become a more reliable player and find some consistency. This will be his third year with defensive coordinator Jim Schwartz, and should the defensive line put more pressure on opposing quarterbacks this year, then perhaps Newsome will find a little more success himself.

Nick Wright Sounds Off on Shocking Jalen Hurts Ranking
Nick Wright Sounds Off on Shocking Jalen Hurts Ranking

Newsweek

time28 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Nick Wright Sounds Off on Shocking Jalen Hurts Ranking

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Since taking over as the starting quarterback for the Philadelphia Eagles, Jalen Hurts has emerged as one of the best players at the position. Fresh off leading the franchise to just its second Super Bowl victory, one NFL analyst was left stunned to see where he was ranked among his peers. Every year, former NFL quarterback Chris Simms puts together a ranking of the top QBs in the league. In his latest installment, Hurts finds himself on the back end of the top ten. The reigning Super Bowl MVP was slotted in at No. 10 behind players such as Baker Mayfield, Justin Herbert, and C.J. Stroud. "He brings a skillset to [the Eagles] offense that makes them almost indefensible with all the talent they have," Simms said. Super Bowl MVP Jalen Hurts, 2024 Offensive Rookie of the Year Jayden Daniels, and Matthew Stafford headline first batch of top ten rankings of @CSimmsQB's Quarterback Countdown, now on Chris Simms Unbuttoned and Pro Football Talk More: — NBC Sports PR (@NBCSportsPR) June 9, 2025 As expected, Simms latest QB rankings sparked debates among numerous fans and analysts. Among those to chime in with their thoughts was Nick Wright. While on FS1's First Things First, he sounded off on Simms for having Hurts so low on his latest list. "Chris Simms, if you happen to run in to mamma Hurts she's going to give you a piece of her mind," Wright said. "Having Jalen Hurts behind Justin Herbert, it's really one of things where it tells me a lot about the evaluator...I just don't know how you can say he's better than Jalen Hurts." Chris Simms ranks Jalen Hurts #10 in his 2025 QB rankings. @getnickwright reacts: 'I just don't know how you can say [Justin Herbert] is better than Jalen Hurts. That one ranking seems to me to be indefensible other than, 'eh, I just know.'' — First Things First (@FTFonFS1) June 10, 2025 On paper, Herbert has the flashier numbers. However, the proper context is needed. Hurts' passing numbers took a slight dip, but Saquon Barkley had a lot to do with that. Seeing that he put together a historic season on the ground, the Eagles had a more run-heavy attack. Nonetheless, Hurts still threw for over 2,900 yards and 18 touchdowns to just five interceptions. That's not even counting his own impact on the ground, rushing for 630 yards and 14 touchdowns. Jalen Hurts #1 of the Philadelphia Eagles looks to the sideline during Super Bowl LIX against the Kansas City Chiefs at Caesars Superdome on February 9, 2025. Jalen Hurts #1 of the Philadelphia Eagles looks to the sideline during Super Bowl LIX against the Kansas City Chiefs at Caesars Superdome on February 9, passing numbers look better, throwing for 3,870 yards and 23 touchdowns. That said, when combining scores in the air and on the ground, Hurts found the end zone more. It's also worth noting that Hurts leading the Eagles to a Super Bowl should have him at least a few spots higher on Simms' list. Wright clearly disagrees with Hurts being placed so low, but the Eagles star likely isn't fazed by it. Instead, it's something he'll use as a motivation as he looks to lead Philadelphia on another title run. Between his regular season and playoff success, along with his dynamic skill set, it's hard to argue that there are nine QBs better than Hurts right now.

Senate GOP plan would sell millions of acres of Western public land
Senate GOP plan would sell millions of acres of Western public land

Washington Post

time32 minutes ago

  • Washington Post

Senate GOP plan would sell millions of acres of Western public land

Senate Republicans have proposed selling off up to 3.3 million acres of federally owned land in 11 Western states, according to a draft legislative text offered as part of their spending and tax cut bill, prompting an outcry from conservationists and Democratic lawmakers. According to a budget blueprint released Wednesday evening by the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, the federal government would be required to sell off between 2.2 and 3.3 million acres of land owned by the Bureau of Land Management and the U.S. Forest Service over the next five years. The proposal stipulates that the sold land will have to be used to develop housing or 'community development needs,' which it said could be defined by the secretaries of the Interior or Agriculture departments. The 11 states that would be affected by the proposal are Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming. Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah), who chairs the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, said in a statement Wednesday that the draft legislative text would turn 'federal liabilities into taxpayer value, while making housing more affordable for hardworking American families.' Current law allows BLM to sell off land in some instances, such as in a specific ring around Las Vegas, at a discount if it's developed for affordable housing. But the push to scale up these land sales has spurred pushback from not just Democratic lawmakers and environmentalists but also some House Republicans, who managed to block a similar provision from being included last month in the House's tax and spending bill. Democrats and several conservation groups sharply criticized the Senate blueprint, warning that it could deprive future generations of public access to public land and suggesting much of the land sold might not be used for affordable housing. Sen. Martin Heinrich (New Mexico), the panel's top Democrat, accused Republicans of 'taking up a sledgehammer' in a 'fire sale' of public lands, in a statement Wednesday. 'We all lose access to public lands forever, jeopardizing our local economies and who we are as a nation.' In a statement, the Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership said it opposed the proposed forced sale, arguing that the budget reconciliation bill was not the right process for public-land sales of this scale. 'The Senate proposal sets an arbitrary acreage target and calls for the disposal of up to six times more land than was proposed in early versions of the House budget reconciliation bill,' said Joel Pedersen, the group's president and CEO. 'If passed, sportsmen and women would lose access to large tracts of public land.' If enacted into law, the draft text would require the Bureau of Land Management and Forest Service to sell between 0.5 and 0.75 percent of the 438 million acres of land that they own collectively. It does not include the sale of land with existing grazing rights, along with federally protected lands such as national parks, monuments and wildlife refuges. The committee projected that the land sales would generate between $5 billion and $10 billion of income between fiscal years 2025 and 2034, citing an analysis by the Congressional Budget Office.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store