Disgraced movie mogul Harvey Weinstein's rape retrial opens in New York court
ADVERTISEMENT
Opening statements have been heard in Harvey Weinstein's rape retrial, five years after his original trial delivered a searing reckoning for one of Hollywood's most powerful figures.
Emphasising the former studio boss's onetime influence in the movie industry, prosecutor Shannon Lucey said Weinstein used "dream opportunities as weapons" to prey on the three accusers in the case.
He is charged with raping one and forcing oral sex on the other two.
"The defendant wanted their bodies and the more they resisted, the more forceful he got," Lucey said.
The case is being retried because an appeals court threw out the landmark 2020 conviction.
The retrial is happening at the same Manhattan courthouse as the first trial and two accusers who testified then are expected to return.
Harvey Weinstein appears in state court in Manhattan as jury selection continues in his retrial, 23 April, 2025
AP Photo
Weinstein's retrial is playing out at a different cultural moment than the first, which happened during the height of the #MeToo movement.
Along with the charges being retried, he faces an additional allegation from a woman who wasn't involved in the first case.
The jury counts seven women and five men, unlike the seven-man, five-woman panel that convicted him in 2020, and there's a different judge.
The #MeToo movement, which exploded in 2017 with allegations against Weinstein, has also evolved and ebbed.
At the start of Weinstein's first trial, chants of "rapist" could be heard from protesters outside.
Related
#metoothéâtre protestors demand change at the Comédie-Française
Two Chinese #MeToo movement promoters handed 3 to 5 years prison sentence
'MeToo' movement stirs few changes in European Parliament's political groups
TV trucks lined the street and reporters queued for hours to get a seat in the packed courtroom.
His lawyers decried the "carnival-like atmosphere" and fought unsuccessfully to get the trial moved from Manhattan.
This time, over five days of jury selection, there was none of that.
Those realities, coupled with the New York Court of Appeals' ruling last year vacating his 2020 conviction and 23-year prison sentence — because the judge allowed testimony about allegations Weinstein was not charged with — are shaping everything from retrial legal strategy to the atmosphere in court.
ADVERTISEMENT
Weinstein, 73, is being retried on a criminal sex act charge for allegedly forcibly performing oral sex on a movie and TV production assistant, Miriam Haley, in 2006 and a third-degree rape charge for allegedly assaulting an aspiring actor, Jessica Mann, in a Manhattan hotel room in 2013.
Attorney Arthur Aidala, lead attorney for Harvey Weinstein, arrives at Manhattan criminal court for Weinstein's retrial, 23 April, 2025
AP Photo
Weinstein also faces a criminal sex act charge for allegedly forcing oral sex on a different woman at a Manhattan hotel in 2006.
Prosecutors said that the woman, who hasn't been named publicly, came forward days before his first trial but wasn't part of that case.
They said they revisited her allegations when his conviction was thrown out.
ADVERTISEMENT
Weinstein has pleaded not guilty and denies raping or sexually assaulting anyone.
His acquittals on the two most serious charges at his 2020 trial — predatory sexual assault and first-degree rape — still stand.
Lindsay Goldbrum, a lawyer for the unnamed accuser, said Weinstein's retrial marks a "pivotal moment in the fight for accountability in sex abuse cases" and a "signal to other survivors that the system is catching up — and that it's worth speaking out even when the odds seem insurmountable."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
France 24
3 hours ago
- France 24
Weinstein concedes he acted 'immorally' as jury weighs his fate
Weinstein is on trial again after a New York state appeals court threw out his 2020 convictions, citing irregularities in the presentation of witnesses at the original proceedings. The former movie industry titan's 23 year prison sentence for the initial conviction was thrown out, but he remains imprisoned for separate offenses. Although Weinstein did not take the stand, he spoke out in an interview aired by FOX5 television Friday as the jury deliberated following six weeks of testimony. "I have regrets that I put my family through this, that I put my wife through this, and I acted immorally..., but never illegal, never criminal, never anything," he said. Weinstein pointed to comments by his defense attorney Arthur Aidala who suggested the three women who testified against him at trial "had four million reasons to testify, as in dollars." Judge Curtis Farber issued instructions Thursday to jurors, one of whom had to be swapped out for an alternate after falling ill, before they retired to consider their verdict. He called on the panel to use their "common sense" for this "very important decision" and reminded them that Weinstein was "presumed innocent." On Friday, the jury panel of 12 requested to rehear the emotional testimony of two of the three women whose allegations are being prosecuted at this trial, former model Kaja Sokola and actress Jessica Mann. The jury must decide whether Weinstein -- accused by dozens of women of being a sexual predator -- is guilty of sexual assaults in 2006 on former production assistant Miriam Haley and Sokola, and of rape in 2013 of aspiring actress Mann. 'Rules apply to him' "He raped three women, they all said no," prosecutor Nicole Blumberg said Wednesday as she recounted the evidence of the three alleged victims of Weinstein who testified at the trial. The Hollywood figure had "all the power" and "all the control" over the alleged victims, which is why jurors should find him guilty, she said. "The defendant thought the rules did not apply to him, now it is the time to let him know that the rules apply to him. "There is no reasonable doubt; tell the defendant what he already knows -- that he is guilty of the three crimes." Weinstein's defense attorney insisted the sexual encounters were consensual, pointing to a "casting couch" dynamic between the movie mogul and the women. "We don't want to police the bedroom" except in cases of rape, Blumberg fired back. Weinstein, the producer of box office hits "Pulp Fiction" and "Shakespeare in Love," has never acknowledged wrongdoing. The cinema magnate, whose downfall in 2017 sparked the global #MeToo movement, has been on trial since April 15 in a scruffy Manhattan courtroom. He is already serving a 16-year prison sentence after being convicted in California in a separate for raping and assaulting a European actress more than a decade ago.
France 24
a day ago
- France 24
Jury prepares to consider Harvey Weinstein verdict
A New York state appeals court had thrown out Weinstein's 2020 convictions after irregularities in the presentation of witnesses at his original trial, forcing two victims of his alleged abuse to testify a second time. Judge Curtis Farber began giving instructions Thursday to jurors, one of whom had to be swapped out for an alternate after falling ill, before they retire to consider their verdict. After six weeks of deliberations, the jury must decide whether Weinstein, accused by dozens of women of being a sexual predator, is guilty of sexual assaults in 2006 on former production assistant Miriam Haley and former model Kaja Sokola, and of rape in 2013 of aspiring actress Jessica Mann. "He raped three women, they all said no," said prosecutor Nicole Blumberg Wednesday as she recounted the evidence of the three alleged victims of Weinstein who testified at this trial. The Hollywood figure had "all the power" and "all the control" over the alleged victims which is why jurors should find him guilty, she said. "The defendant thought the rules did not apply to him, now it is the time to let him know that the rules apply to him. "There is no reasonable doubt; tell the defendant what he already knows -- that he is guilty of the three crimes." Weinstein's defense attorney insisted the sexual encounters were consensual, pointing to a "casting couch" dynamic between the movie mogul and the women. "We don't want to police the bedroom" -- except in cases of rape, Blumberg fired back. Weinstein, the producer of box-office hits "Pulp Fiction" and "Shakespeare in Love," has never acknowledged wrongdoing. The cinema magnate, whose downfall in 2017 sparked the global #MeToo movement, has been on trial again since April 15 in a scruffy Manhattan courtroom. He is serving a 16-year prison sentence after being convicted in California of raping and assaulting a European actress more than a decade ago. Two of the accusers in this case -- Haley and Mann -- testified at Weinstein's original trial. Their accounts helped galvanize the #MeToo movement nearly a decade ago, but the case is being re-prosecuted at a new trial in New York. His 2020 convictions on charges relating to Haley and Mann, and his 23-year prison term, were overturned last year by the New York Court of Appeals. The tribunal ruled that the way witnesses were handled in the original trial was improper.
Euronews
a day ago
- Euronews
Chinese issues arrest warrants for alleged Taiwanese hackers
The Chinese government issued arrest warrants for 20 Taiwanese citizens on Thursday that it alleges carried out hacking operations on the Chinese mainland on behalf of the island's ruling party. They also banned a Taiwanese company whose owners they described as "hardcore Taiwan independence supporters." Chinese police in Guangzhou, a manufacturing hub in the south of the country, said the hacking group was led by a man named Ning Enwei. They alleged it acted under the direction of Taiwan's independence-leaning Democratic Progressive Party (DPP). Authorities did not give any details about the alleged cyber activities or specify the charges against the individuals. Meanwhile, China's government said all commercial contact had been stopped with the Sicuenes International Company Ltd., which it alleges is led by a member of the Taiwanese national legislature, Puma Shen, and his businessmen father. Beijing calls both men die-hard independence supporters. Websites mentioning the company say it specialises in sourcing bicycle parts from China. Zhu Fenglian, a spokesperson for the Taiwan Affairs Office of the Chinese government, said Sicuens "engages in trade and business cooperation with certain mainland enterprises in pursuit of economic benefits." "The mainland side will never allow enterprises related to die-hard 'Taiwan independence' supporters to seek profits in the mainland." The DPP has dismissed China's accusations. "This is clearly a case of the Chinese Communist Party fabricating a pretext to stir up trouble. When it comes to inflation, cyberattacks, cognitive warfare and grey-zone threats, the CCP is by far the most serious perpetrator," said the DPP's acting director of International Affairs, Michael Chen. "What we are seeing now is a textbook example of the bully crying foul." Taiwan is a self-ruling island which China sees as a breakaway province that must be united with the mainland, by force if necessary. China regularly sends military aircraft and ships around Taiwan and currently has an aircraft carrier southeast of the island. In response, Taiwan has bulked up its own military and some private individuals have opened training camps in guerrilla warfare.
