Disgraced movie mogul Harvey Weinstein's rape retrial opens in New York court
Opening statements have been heard in Harvey Weinstein's rape retrial, five years after his original trial delivered a searing reckoning for one of Hollywood's most powerful figures.
Emphasising the former studio boss's onetime influence in the movie industry, prosecutor Shannon Lucey said Weinstein used "dream opportunities as weapons" to prey on the three accusers in the case.
He is charged with raping one and forcing oral sex on the other two.
"The defendant wanted their bodies and the more they resisted, the more forceful he got," Lucey said.
The case is being retried because an appeals court threw out the landmark 2020 conviction.
The retrial is happening at the same Manhattan courthouse as the first trial and two accusers who testified then are expected to return.
Harvey Weinstein appears in state court in Manhattan as jury selection continues in his retrial, 23 April, 2025
AP Photo
Weinstein's retrial is playing out at a different cultural moment than the first, which happened during the height of the #MeToo movement.
Along with the charges being retried, he faces an additional allegation from a woman who wasn't involved in the first case.
The jury counts seven women and five men, unlike the seven-man, five-woman panel that convicted him in 2020, and there's a different judge.
The #MeToo movement, which exploded in 2017 with allegations against Weinstein, has also evolved and ebbed.
At the start of Weinstein's first trial, chants of "rapist" could be heard from protesters outside.
Related
#metoothéâtre protestors demand change at the Comédie-Française
Two Chinese #MeToo movement promoters handed 3 to 5 years prison sentence
'MeToo' movement stirs few changes in European Parliament's political groups
TV trucks lined the street and reporters queued for hours to get a seat in the packed courtroom.
His lawyers decried the "carnival-like atmosphere" and fought unsuccessfully to get the trial moved from Manhattan.
This time, over five days of jury selection, there was none of that.
Those realities, coupled with the New York Court of Appeals' ruling last year vacating his 2020 conviction and 23-year prison sentence — because the judge allowed testimony about allegations Weinstein was not charged with — are shaping everything from retrial legal strategy to the atmosphere in court.
ADVERTISEMENT
Weinstein, 73, is being retried on a criminal sex act charge for allegedly forcibly performing oral sex on a movie and TV production assistant, Miriam Haley, in 2006 and a third-degree rape charge for allegedly assaulting an aspiring actor, Jessica Mann, in a Manhattan hotel room in 2013.
Attorney Arthur Aidala, lead attorney for Harvey Weinstein, arrives at Manhattan criminal court for Weinstein's retrial, 23 April, 2025
AP Photo
Weinstein also faces a criminal sex act charge for allegedly forcing oral sex on a different woman at a Manhattan hotel in 2006.
Prosecutors said that the woman, who hasn't been named publicly, came forward days before his first trial but wasn't part of that case.
They said they revisited her allegations when his conviction was thrown out.
ADVERTISEMENT
Weinstein has pleaded not guilty and denies raping or sexually assaulting anyone.
His acquittals on the two most serious charges at his 2020 trial — predatory sexual assault and first-degree rape — still stand.
Lindsay Goldbrum, a lawyer for the unnamed accuser, said Weinstein's retrial marks a "pivotal moment in the fight for accountability in sex abuse cases" and a "signal to other survivors that the system is catching up — and that it's worth speaking out even when the odds seem insurmountable."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
12 hours ago
- Euronews
Harvey Weinstein's next retrial could happen this fall
Disgraced movie mogul Harvey Weinstein faces sentencing and a possible retrial in his New York City sex crimes case. Manhattan Judge Curtis Farber said that he could sentence Weinstein on 30 September, but only if there's no retrial on a rape charge that the last jury failed to decide. If there is a retrial, the judge wants it to happen this fall. Weinstein, 73, was convicted in June of forcing oral sex on TV and movie production assistant and producer Miriam Haley in 2006. The charge carries a possible sentence of up to 25 years in prison. At the same time, the same jury acquitted him of forcing oral sex on model Kaja Sokola, but couldn't decide a charge that he raped hairstylist and actress Jessica Mann in 2013. Manhattan prosecutors reiterated on Wednesday that they and Mann are ready for another trial on the rape charge. In this case, any conviction is punishable by up to four years in prison. Prosecutors requested a January trial date, but Farber proposed the fall. 'The case needs to be tried this year,' Farber said. Weinstein lawyer Arthur Aidala agreed, urging the judge to set the earliest possible date. If a fall trial happens, it would likely put Weinstein's high-profile #MeToo case back in court as Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg is in the final stage of his reelection bid. Bragg, a first-term Democrat who made prosecuting sex crimes cases a priority, has expressed satisfaction with Weinstein's conviction on a criminal sex act charge related to Haley. Bragg has said Mann deserves a verdict on her part of the case. 'This work, first and foremost, is about the survivors, and that's why we're prepared to go forward," Bragg said in June. Weinstein also stands convicted of sex crimes in California. He is appealing that verdict and continued to deny all of the allegations against him.
Fashion Network
16 hours ago
- Fashion Network
SMCP announces forced return of illegally transferred 15.5% stake
The 15.5% stake in SMCP (Sandro, Maje, Claudie Pierlot and Fursac) that had been improperly transferred to a trust in the British Virgin Islands by its Chinese shareholder, who defaulted in 2021, has now been returned to the Luxembourg holding company that held it, management said on Monday. "The return of this stake clarifies the shareholding situation of SMCP, which remains focused on implementing its profitable growth strategy based on the desirability of its brands, its operational agility, and its efforts to control costs," the French high-end, listed textile group said in a statement. In 2017, SMCP's majority shareholder at the time of its IPO was a Chinese conglomerate, Shandong Ruyi, via a Luxembourg-registered investment vehicle, European TopSoho (ETS). However, the heavily indebted ETS, which held a 53% stake, defaulted and, in 2021, lost most of the capital to its creditors within the GLAS entity. GLAS thus recovered 29% of the capital, leaving 8% to ETS. But European TopSoho had previously sold a stake of around 16% to Chenran Qiu, the daughter of Shandong Ruyi's founder, held in the Dynamic Treasure Group trust in the British Virgin Islands. This stake was sold for one euro "even though (its) market value was in excess of 80 million euros at the time," as Oddo analysts pointed out in a note in July 2024. For several years, GLAS had been seeking to regain access to this part of the capital, and judging the sale procedure to be irregular, it took legal action and obtained a favourable ruling from the British courts (DTC being a company incorporated under British law) in 2024, ordering the repatriation of the ETS shares to Luxembourg. However, a source close to the case told AFP that the repatriated shares were held in a bank account in Singapore, which led to the involvement of the Asian city-state's judiciary. SMCP announced on Monday that "following the decision of the Singapore High Court on July 4, 2025, the 15.5% stake in SMCP that had been sold in 2021 to Dynamic Treasure Group was returned to European Topsoho on August 11, 2025," paving the way for a capital clarification of the group. This article is an automatic translation. Click here to read the original article.
Fashion Network
16 hours ago
- Fashion Network
SMCP announces forced return of illegally transferred 15.5% stake
The 15.5% stake in SMCP (Sandro, Maje, Claudie Pierlot and Fursac) that had been improperly transferred to a trust in the British Virgin Islands by its Chinese shareholder, who defaulted in 2021, has now been returned to the Luxembourg holding company that held it, management said on Monday. "The return of this stake clarifies the shareholding situation of SMCP, which remains focused on implementing its profitable growth strategy based on the desirability of its brands, its operational agility, and its efforts to control costs," the French high-end, listed textile group said in a statement. In 2017, SMCP's majority shareholder at the time of its IPO was a Chinese conglomerate, Shandong Ruyi, via a Luxembourg-registered investment vehicle, European TopSoho (ETS). However, the heavily indebted ETS, which held a 53% stake, defaulted and, in 2021, lost most of the capital to its creditors within the GLAS entity. GLAS thus recovered 29% of the capital, leaving 8% to ETS. But European TopSoho had previously sold a stake of around 16% to Chenran Qiu, the daughter of Shandong Ruyi's founder, held in the Dynamic Treasure Group trust in the British Virgin Islands. This stake was sold for one euro "even though (its) market value was in excess of 80 million euros at the time," as Oddo analysts pointed out in a note in July 2024. For several years, GLAS had been seeking to regain access to this part of the capital, and judging the sale procedure to be irregular, it took legal action and obtained a favourable ruling from the British courts (DTC being a company incorporated under British law) in 2024, ordering the repatriation of the ETS shares to Luxembourg. However, a source close to the case told AFP that the repatriated shares were held in a bank account in Singapore, which led to the involvement of the Asian city-state's judiciary. SMCP announced on Monday that "following the decision of the Singapore High Court on July 4, 2025, the 15.5% stake in SMCP that had been sold in 2021 to Dynamic Treasure Group was returned to European Topsoho on August 11, 2025," paving the way for a capital clarification of the group.
