logo
PHOTO ESSAY: Behind-the-scenes moments as hail chasers learn about pounding and costly storms

PHOTO ESSAY: Behind-the-scenes moments as hail chasers learn about pounding and costly storms

Independent26-06-2025
Even when Mother Nature turns nasty, the weather extremes carry a sense of awesome beauty. About 60 scientists this spring and early summer went straight into hailstorms to better understand what makes them tick and learn how to reduce the $10 billion in annual in damage they cause each year in the United States.
When three Associated Press colleagues joined the scientists for several days, they found more than just hail, strong winds, rain and science in the storm. They found breathtaking sights and sounds to share.
One person charged with keeping others safe
When there are dozens of scientists — many of them students — high-tech radar, weather balloons, hail collecting devices and storms that sometimes have tornadoes in them, someone has to make sure it all goes well and no one gets hurt. For the first few weeks of Project ICECHIP that someone was Victor Gensini, Northern Illinois University meteorology professor and one of the hail team's lead scientists.
Gensini and his hand-picked students guided everyone like chess pieces via a computer program called Guru in his command vehicle. But he couldn't just sit back in the SUV and let others have the fun. He would drive close to the storm, not close enough to get the car damaged because unlike the Husky Hail Hunter he didn't have protective mesh hanging over the windshield. But he would get close enough to study, direct and just gaze in wonder at storms that would take over the horizon in the Texas panhandle and nearby Oklahoma and New Mexico.
The clouds themselves tell the story of a roiling atmosphere. At times dark and dangerous, sometimes they are light with visible vertical stripes indicating downpours. And then a large bulging tornado can form and inspire awe and fear.
There are small twisters that can also form and turn out just as dangerous. And finally if you are lucky at the end, there's a rainbow or two. One afternoon in the Texas panhandle, the hail chasing team could gaze out and see a double rainbow and a swirling twister that didn't quite reach the ground.
The clouds aren't just beautiful above the vast plains. When they frame a building, such as the one sporting the Hollis Tigers mascot in Hollis, Texas, they combine to look menacing and stark.
Two teams work to gather data before storms hit
Two teams, the Red and the Black Teams, try to go ahead of the storm to see how it develops. They release wind balloons with instruments and GPS tracking that measure moisture, wind speed and direction.
Inflating weather balloons is not a simple task. As gusty winds push, students scientists they have to inflate the balloon, tie it up, connect the instrument panel which is sealed in a disposable coffee cup with a lid on it. Then it's time to release the weather balloons. It's a two-person job with one holding the cup of instruments and the other the balloon.
Releasing weather balloons isn't just letting them go. It's got to be done with some care — usually a 'one, two, three' and release — otherwise the instrument cup could slam into the balloon holder as an Associated Press reporter nearly found out the hard way. Once released, the balloons can fly as high as 60,000 feet or more. Or they can never quite get off the ground if there's a tiny hole in the balloon.
There's also time to gawk as well as be scientists. Black Team members Evelynn Mantia and Olivena Carlisle, both of NIU, take photos of an approaching storm they have been monitoring. And once they finish, their job is to fall back a bit and then collect hail that has dropped.
A storm hits, forcing one team to take cover
The Red Team also releases weather balloons to get ahead of the storm and collect hail stones afterward. But the three students also get to go a bit into the storms. Ahead of the gathering storm, Ethan Mok and Wyatt Ficek release their balloon.
In the first several days of the ICECHIP campaign, the Red Team earned a reputation for pushing the envelope. And on this late afternoon into early evening in New Mexico, the team, with Mok at the wheel, showed why.
After releasing their balloons they went ahead into the storm as the skies darkened. The rain started coming down. Winds began to blow. They pulled over to take some pictures of the storm taking over the horizon. As they did, a semitruck sped down the road into the storm. Mok and team members laughed, saying the truck would have to turn around.
The Red Team wasn't going to turn around. Photos taken, they drove off into the storm like the truck. The skies got even darker. Winds and rain intensified. Visibility out the windshield disappeared. Somewhat reluctantly, Mok finally pulled off the tiny road and waited. They watched the semitruck come back and try to flee the storm. They vehicle shook. They stared at weather radar and outside.
Over the radio, Gensini had meteorology student Katie Wargowsky radio to them to get to safety. Mok quickly complied, trying to go south and around the storm and back to the chasers' hotel.
The storm had other ideas. It overtook the Red Team. Hail was coming down. Wind was whipping. Visibility was gone. Wargowsky radioed for them to pull into a gas station for safety. Mok said he wished he could but the stretch of road was remote and there were no gas stations for cover. He had to barrel through, finally making it to a fast food drive-thru as reward.
Scientist hail chasers see others rushing into storms
Ever since the movie 'Twister,' storm chasing has gone from a scientific pursuit to an adrenaline filled, social media-stoked touristy pastime. As the scientific team of hail hunters chased down a massive storm system near Morton, Texas, car after car of storm chasers, some with creative license plates, zipped by.
At times, storm chasers dotted the side of the road, cameras at the ready. Gensini, the project ICECHIP operations chief, often had to caution his team to be watchful of the crazy driving of the tornado chasers. They could be as much of a hazard as the storms themselves, Gensini cautioned.
Tony Illenden drives the Husky Hail Hunter, one of the team's prime vehicles that goes right into the storms. It has mesh hanging above the windshield to protect it from being cracked.
Illenden is careful with a helmet on his head to make sure it isn't cracked from hail when he goes out in the storm. Sometimes it comes awfully close. And once it came too close smacking his unprotected hand, which swelled up for a couple days and then was better.
Collecting hail is a key part of the science. So researchers, wearing gloves so as not to warm up the ice balls, pick up the hail, put them in bags and then in coolers. Then they get crushed, sliced, measured, weighed and otherwise examined.
With the red plains stretching out, a storm in its sheer magnificence forms an odd looking hole in the clouds. It's a signal of danger.
The lower cloud is the wall cloud, where energy and moisture flows up. The cloud then forms lower. The empty space is the dangerous rear flank downdraft, which is cooler air pushing down with great force, getting wrapped around the backside of the wall cloud, team forecaster David Imy said.
___
The Associated Press' climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump cuts to science research threaten his administration's own AI action plan
Trump cuts to science research threaten his administration's own AI action plan

The Guardian

time21 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Trump cuts to science research threaten his administration's own AI action plan

The Trump administration released 'America's AI Action Plan' last month with the goal of expanding US dominance when it comes to AI in order to maintain a global edge, especially over China. But Donald Trump's cuts to scientific research funding through federal agencies – including the National Intitute Health, the National Science Foundation, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency and Nasa – will undermine that goal and threaten the research environment that fostered the foundations of AI, experts in the field said. Mark Histed, chief of neural computation and behavior at NIH, said that while the effects of funding cuts on AI might not be obvious in the next year or two, they threaten 'the whole ecosystem that we have built around AI, that has been created by federal support'. 'What I see is an ecosystem, right? I see multiple different disciplines contributing different aspects to this process. I see academia playing a key role and industry playing a key role. And so as we look forward and we think about trying to advance AI, we need to be supporting that entire ecosystem,' Rebecca Willett, a computer science professor at the University of Chicago and faculty director of AI at the Data Science Institute, explained, echoing Histed. Histed and Willett both believe that AI simply would not exist in its current form without federally funded research, and offered a variety of AI technologies and companies that owe their development to federal funding. For example, self-driving cars rely on computer vision technology – federal funding has supported its development since the 1980s. Computer vision is the foundation for the vast majority of face and image recognition technologies. AlphaFold, which uses AI to help discover new medications, and Anthropic, which improves AI safety, including for the US Department of Defense, also exists thanks to federal support. AI research often takes cues from other realms of science, which in turn can help foster AI, so cuts to other disciplines will affect the intelligence's development. Histed points to the overlap between his field of neuroscience and AI. 'We're just at the beginning of understanding how networks of connected neurons create functions like memory and cognition. And if you look at a machine learning network or an AI network, that is also the case,' he said. Histed pointed out that federally funded research that brings these disciplines together has led to Nobel prize-winning work. Geoffrey Hinton and John Hopfield won the 2024 Nobel prize in physics for their work at the intersection of neuroscience and AI, and received support from the NSF. Trump's plan could also pose a threat to AI safety, which is essential to ensuring that AI is not only effective but that it operates within the boundaries of the law. The plan includes provisions to revise guidelines at the National Institute of Standards and Technology 'to eliminate references to misinformation, Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion, and climate change'. These are three of the most controversial aspects of AI, which has been demonstrated to show gender and racial bias in a variety of applications, including face recognition technology and popular applications like ChatGPT. A recent study found that ChatGPT advises women to ask for less money than men when prompted for advice about salary expectations. Histed says that the field of AI safety is also closely linked with neuroscience, because understanding how human neural networks create bias can also help us understand how AI networks create bias. Sign up to This Week in Trumpland A deep dive into the policies, controversies and oddities surrounding the Trump administration after newsletter promotion Trump's plan also calls for less red tape when it comes to building AI datacentres that can suck up huge amounts of energy. Willett said it was true that large-scale machine learning systems 'come at an enormous cost. It's a huge amount of energy, a huge amount of cooling.' But, she added, AI companies themselves should still want to reduce those costs regardless of what Trump's plan says. 'Not only do they have environmental impacts, but it's expensive for the companies that are running these systems. And so I think across the AI community, people are invested in trying to make these systems more efficient,' Willett said. Willett and Histed both say that the AI community will be under threat in the coming years if the federal government no longer funds their training at universities. Histed noted that the federally funded 'talent pipeline' is 'incredibly important', adding 'we train lots and lots and lots of people in neuroscience and related fields that are going directly to these tech companies. There's tons of overlap. All the people who are leading the technical side of the AI revolution have had contact with the academic world that trained them and is supported by US federal funding. 'One of the big ways in which tech companies benefit from universities is that we train students, right?' Willett said. 'And so they walk into these companies with cutting-edge skills that these companies need. And so right off the bat, I think universities are playing an essential role that's important to industry.'

Alien worlds may not necessarily need water, scientists find: ‘We just opened a Pandora's box'
Alien worlds may not necessarily need water, scientists find: ‘We just opened a Pandora's box'

The Independent

timean hour ago

  • The Independent

Alien worlds may not necessarily need water, scientists find: ‘We just opened a Pandora's box'

Water may not be essential to support life, and an entirely different type of liquid could do the same in alien worlds, a new study claims. Until now, water has been considered a requirement for life on other worlds, with scientists defining the habitability of other planets based on its presence. However, a new lab experiment suggests salts existing in liquid form at lower temperatures in other worlds may host life, though unlike anything resembling Earth 's water-based beings. Such liquid-salts, called ionic liquids, can exist below about 100 degrees Celsius and remain stable enough in the fluid state at wider conditions to be a hospitable environment for life-signature molecules like proteins, say researchers from the Massachussets Institute of Technology. The study, published in the journal PNAS, theorises that even planets that are too warm, or those with atmospheres at pressures too low to host liquid water, could still support pockets of ionic liquid. 'We consider water to be required for life because that is what's needed for Earth life. But if we look at a more general definition, we see that what we need is a liquid in which metabolism for life can take place,' says Rachana Agrawal, an author of the study from MIT. 'Now if we include ionic liquid as a possibility, this can dramatically increase the habitability zone for all rocky worlds,' Dr Agrawal said. On Earth, such ionic liquids are mainly only made for industries, and do not occur naturally – except for one natural case. One liquid salt is generated from the mixing of venoms produced by two rival species of ants. In the new study, scientists sought to understand the broad conditions under which ionic liquids can be naturally produced, including the range of temperatures and pressures. They started by mixing sulphuric acid with 30 different nitrogen-containing organic compounds across several temperatures and pressures. Researchers then observed whether an ionic liquid formed when they evaporated away the sulphuric acid in various vials. This work was based on previous work suggesting that some of these chemicals, considered ingredients associated with life, are surprisingly stable in sulphuric acid. Scientists also mixed the ingredients onto basalt rocks, which are known to exist on the surface of many rocky planets. 'We were just astonished that the ionic liquid forms under so many different conditions,' says Sara Seager, another author of the study. 'If you put the sulphuric acid and the organic on a rock, the excess sulphuric acid seeps into the rock pores, but you're still left with a drop of ionic liquid on the rock. Whatever we tried, ionic liquid still formed,' Dr Seager says. Researchers found that their reactions produced ionic liquid at temperatures up to 180 degrees Celsius and at extremely low pressures – much lower than that of the Earth's atmosphere. The findings suggest ionic liquids can naturally form on other planets where liquid water cannot exist, under the right conditions. 'We're envisioning a planet warmer than Earth, that doesn't have water, and at some point in its past or currently, it has to have had sulphuric acid, formed from volcanic outgassing,' Dr Seager says. 'This sulphuric acid has to flow over a little pocket of organics. And organic deposits are extremely common in the solar system,' she explained. Scientists hope to conduct further studies to see what life-signature molecules might survive and thrive in ionic liquids. 'We just opened up a Pandora's box of new research. It's been a real journey,' Dr Seager said.

The race to link our brains with AI: Inside Elon Musk and Sam Altman's battle to be first to connect mind and machine
The race to link our brains with AI: Inside Elon Musk and Sam Altman's battle to be first to connect mind and machine

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

The race to link our brains with AI: Inside Elon Musk and Sam Altman's battle to be first to connect mind and machine

The tussles between billionaires have seen vast fortunes splashed on everything from rocket ships to social media empires. But now, two titans of big tech are taking their fight to a frontier: The race to link our brains with AI. Tesla and xAI CEO Elon Musk and Sam Altman of OpenAI, the company behind ChatGPT, are vying to be the first to connect mind and machine. The former allies are now both backing rival companies trying to build brain-computer-interface (BCI) chips and put them inside humans. These devices allow people to directly control computers with their thoughts by reading the electrical signals produced in the brain. As outspoken champions of the technology, both Mr Musk and Mr Altman claim that BCIs will one day allow humanity to merge with artificial intelligence. Elon Musk's Neuralink, widely seen as the leader in the BCI field, has already tested its brain chips on patients in the US and has secured plans for UK trials. However, as reported by the Financial Times, Mr Altman is now planning to back rival firm Merge Labs with a plan to make BCIs faster and more capable using AI. Not too long ago, Musk and Altman were close collaborators who co-launched OpenAI in 2015, with Musk providing the majority of the funds. However, the pair fell out three years later after Musk dramatically quit the board following an internal battle for control over the fast-growing firm. In the following years, Musk and Altman have waged an increasingly public rivalry. This culminated in Musk suing OpenAI to prevent the company from transitioning into a for-profit, alleging a 'deceit of Shakespearean proportions'. As Musk attempts to challenge OpenAI's supremacy in AI with his problem-plagued chatbot, Grok, the former colleagues are now shifting their rivalry into the world of BCIs. BCIs use AI to convert the patterns of electrical activity found in the brain into commands that a computer can understand. Advocates argue that they have the potential to help disabled people recover their independence by remotely controlling computers, bionic limbs, or mobility aids. This technology has even gained the attention of governments, with the UK's Advanced Research and Invention Agency exploring its potential as part of a mission to explore devices that could change the world. Likewise, the Chinese Ministry of Industry and Information Technology has revealed its own BCI, used to restore hand movement in paralysed patients. Neuralink, which was founded in 2016, is leading the field for computer-brain connection research while rival startups, such as Precision Neuroscience, vie to compete. Neuralink uses a coin-sized computer chip containing 1,000 electrodes, separated into 128 tiny 'threads' each thinner than a human hair. Using a robotic surgeon, also being developed by Neuralink, the chip is placed on the surface of the brain, and the threads are inserted into the neural tissue. The chip, known as the N1, uses these electrode threads to record huge amounts of data on the brain's activity and uses AI to translate those signals. Neuralink began human trials in America last year, implanting a chip into its first human volunteer, Noland Arbaugh, who was paralysed from the neck down in a driving accident. Using the chip, Mr Arbaugh regained the ability to control a computer, enabling him to write, play chess, and even play complex video games. Since then, the company has implanted chips in a further six participants in the United States and recently received approval to recruit a further seven patients for a British study, the first of its kind in Europe. Neuralink has now implanted chips into seven patients in the United States, including Audrey Crews (pictured), who has been paralysed since she was 16 Recently, the company raised $650 million (£478m) in a funding deal, which gave it a valuation of $9 billion (£6.63bn). By contrast, very little is known about Mr Altman's rival firm, Merge Labs. Mr Altman reportedly plans to launch the company alongside his long-term collaborator Alex Blania, who runs the Altman-backed eyeball scanning digital ID project, Worldcoin. It is expected that Mr Altman will help found the company, but won't have a day-to-day role in its operations. The exact form of BCI technology Merge Labs plans to pursue remains a mystery; beyond the fact that it will make the most of recent AI advances to improve BCI function. Merge Labs is reportedly seeking $250 million (£184m) in initial funding, much of which is expected to be provided by OpenAI's ventures arm, giving the company an initial valuation of $850 million (£625m). However, despite their rivalry, both Mr Musk and Mr Altman appear to be pursuing BCI technology with a similar goal in mind. Mr Musk has said that his ambition is to make a 'general population device' that will allow for 'symbiosis with artificial intelligence'. Sam Altman wrote in a 2017 blog that merging with AI was the only way to avoid fading into an, 'evolutionary tree branch' as AI overtakes human intelligence The billionaire X owner has also insinuated that merging with computers is necessary to prevent super-intelligent AI from getting out of control. Similarly, Mr Altman wrote in a 2017 blog post titled 'The Merge' that humans and machines would become one between 2025 and 2075. In the blog, Mr Altman wrote: 'The merge can take a lot of forms: We could plug electrodes into our brains, or we could all just become really close friends with a chatbot. But I think a merge is probably our best-case scenario. 'My guess is that we can either be the biological bootloader for digital intelligence and then fade into an evolutionary tree branch, or we can figure out what a successful merge looks like.' Elon Musk's Neuralink is working to link the human brain with a machine interface by creating micron-sized devices. Neuralink was registered in California as a 'medical research' company in July 2016, and Musk has funded the company mostly by himself. It is working on what Musk calls the 'neural lace' technology, implanting tiny brain electrodes that may one day upload and download thoughts. The technology is initially planned to be used to help people suffering from severe degenerative brain disorders such as ALS, but it could have wider uses in years to come.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store