Smart Diagnosis, Safer Outcomes: Experts Discuss the Next Frontier in Precision Medicine
New Delhi: Imagine a future where diagnostics are not only fast and accurate but also mobile, patient-friendly, and deeply integrated with artificial intelligence. At the inaugural edition of Future MedX, The Smart
Patient Care
Summit, a panel of leading experts came together to explore exactly that possibility in the session titled "
Smart Diagnosis
: The Next Frontier in Medical Accuracy & Patient Safety."
The discussion, moderated by Dr. Shweta Prabhakar, Medical Superintendent, Paras Health brought together perspectives from laboratory science, public health, microbiology, and hospital administration to examine how technology can be harnessed without compromising safety, equity, or trust.
The panel consisted of Dr. Raj Shankar Ghosh, Senior Advisor-Environmental Health, Public Health Foundation of India (PHFI); Dr. Bhupendra Kumar Rana, Chief Executive Officer, Quality & Accreditation Institute; Arpan Malhotra, Director & Chief Operating Officer, Max Lab Limited; Dr. Sonal Saxena, Director, Professor & Head, Dept. of Microbiology, Maulana Azad Medical College.
Rethinking the Meaning of 'SMART'
The session opened with a foundational question: What exactly makes a diagnosis "smart"?
Dr. Sonal Saxena began the discussion by setting the tone. 'SMART, we are interpreting here as something which is specific, measurable, accurate, reliable, and time-bound and traceable,' she said. She noted that smart diagnostics must be 'patient-centric' and emphasized the importance of information systems. 'Lab information systems go a very long way in making a smart diagnosis.'
Arpan Malhotra offered a broader take. He said, 'A diagnosis or diagnostics is SMART if it enables the objectives of diagnosis to be done better. It's an acronym, but it is also anything which is relatively better than what it was before.'
Meanwhile, Dr. Raj Shankar Ghosh introduced an alternative definition tailored for public health delivery: 'We look at SMART as something which is safe, mobile, affordable, rapid, and transparent.' He added, 'The patient does not have to travel a long distance in order to access that technology.'
Smart Diagnosis Begins Before the Lab
A recurring theme throughout the panel was the importance of pre-analytical quality. According to Arpan Malhotra, 'The most important piece is the pre-analytics, which accounts for maybe two-third of all the problems that occur.' He discussed innovations like geotagging, barcoding, and sample temperature monitoring, and emphasized that patient feedback must be integrated into the diagnostic process.
Dr. Bhupendra Rana echoed this, stressing the need for individualized care. 'Patient safety is the right results at the right time to the right patient.' He warned against a one-size-fits-all approach: 'One single diagnostic test should not be applied to all.'
He also highlighted how fragile and complex newer diagnostic tools can be. 'They need more than what traditional equipment needed because they are very fragile.' Maintenance and calibration are no longer optional; they are essential. 'Even software is a medical device,' he reminded the audience.
AI: The Double-Edged Sword of Diagnosis
Artificial Intelligence took center stage as a key enabler—and challenge—in modern diagnostics.
Dr. Raj Shankar Ghosh called AI 'inevitable' in
healthcare
, adding that it improves 'efficiency,' 'evidence quality,' and 'equity,' while also empowering both patients and providers. However, he issued a caution: 'We need to do a lot more work around the ethics of technology.'
Arpan Malhotra shared how AI tools are already improving decision-making in labs. 'The algorithms and the decision algorithms—whether it is moving averages or delta checks—are telling us that something is wrong even before we've actually entered the result.' These systems, he said, can catch errors early and make diagnostics safer.
But AI comes with its own risks. Malhotra warned about over-reliance: 'We just have to be very careful that we don't become lazy. MIT did a study, and they said that AI is making us dumb.' He emphasized that tools like ChatGPT should be 'a second brain, not the only brain.'
Dr. Sonal Saxena shared her early experience with AI in microbiology, particularly during COVID-19. 'I wished I had this kind of technology when I was a student. It really changed the way I looked at things.'
She expressed concern that over-reliance on AI in medical education may be eroding students' conceptual understanding, turning learning into blind instruction-following rather than critical thinking.
Dr. Raj brought the discussion back to patient safety, noting a critical issue in India: 'Interpretation is the biggest roadblock today,' especially in cases like antimicrobial resistance (AMR), where accurate decisions are crucial.
Operational Realities and Ground-Level Solutions
The panelists didn't shy away from highlighting operational gaps. Arpan Malhotra spoke about fragmentation across diagnostic chains: 'The biggest problem is that all the equipment companies have proprietary systems, so they do not talk to each other.'
Dr. Bhupendra Rana emphasized the need for nationwide minimum standards in diagnostics, suggesting that their implementation would significantly enhance patient safety across the country.
This need for simplicity was echoed in a powerful story shared by Dr. Sonal Saxena. A woman whose child had dengue got confused amid multiple conflicting reports. 'In the whole process, she lost the idea whether her child's NS1 is positive or negative.'
Dr. Raj also emphasized that the end goal of diagnostics must remain focused on the patient: 'If the diagnostic system is not able to translate into good decision-making for the community or the health system, then it is of no value.'
A Path Forward
In the closing phase of the discussion, Dr. Shweta Prabhakar, summarized the solution ahead: 'The solution approach is that we need to be simple.' The panel agreed the importance of integrating technologies, ensuring standards, and keeping the patient at the center of every innovation.
As the diagnostic ecosystem in India grows increasingly digital, mobile, and AI-integrated, the conversation reminded us that smart diagnosis is not just about speed or accuracy—it's about trust, transparency, and thoughtful application.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
2 days ago
- Hindustan Times
Kim Kardashian may have made face wraps viral but they're NOT for everyone — What experts are saying
$48 dollars — or a price tag just under INR 5k, seems like a pretty good deal, a steal even, if what is being promised is a new face, wrapped in some globally-renowned luxury packaging. Best case scenario, you wake up to a razor-sharp jawline and a 'naturally' lifted reflection; worst case scenario, at least the double chin is begone. Kim Kardashian has seemingly solved a real concern women the world over truly believe exists — but what are the real-time ramifications of it?(Photos: Instagram/skims, kimkardashian) The 81% Polyamide - 19% Elastane wonder bra for your face, SKIMS' seamless sculpt face wrap, boasts of a support level tagged 'strong' for 'targeted compression for shaping & sculpting', the velcro closure at the top of the head and nape of the neck with openings for the ears and hair making up it's straightforward mechanism, as mentioned on the official website. It further hard sells the product as a "must-have face wrap boast(ing) our signature sculpting fabric and features collagen yarns for ultra-soft jaw support", making it perfect for "easy, everyday wear". If you find yourself gasping at how going to bed with a compression wrap choking your face is being packaged and sold as self-care, just know that this posh product, available in colours clay and cocoa, is already sold out. Not to comment on whether it's 'right' or 'wrong' to indulge in this 'beauty routine', but if you're on the waitlist for the seamless sculpt face wrap (or any other alternative mimicking it's likeness), there's a fine print to analyse. Firstly, do face wraps work at all? Well the answer's no. Dr. Mandeep Singh, HOD of Plastic Dermatology and Cosmetic Surgery at Paras Health, Gurugram, explains, "Chinstraps or facial compression wraps can create a temporary lifted or contoured look by reducing puffiness and compressing soft tissues around the jawline and cheeks. When used consistently, they may help the face appear slimmer, especially right after use". That being said, it's in no way a permanent fix to face fat. Dr. Singh clarifies, "They don't break down fat, build muscle, or tighten skin long-term. Think of them like face shapewear, helpful for a quick fix or pre-event glow, but not a replacement for professional treatments". Self-care checklist Like with everything else, gradually introducing face wraps to your night routine is a much better approach than stifling your face for the entire night, 7 days a week. "Stick to using it for 15 to 30 minutes per session, ideally 3 to 4 times a week as daily use isn't necessary and may even cause stress to your skin. Always clean the wrap after each use to avoid bacteria buildup. Apply it over freshly cleansed and moisturized skin or a hydrating serum for better slip and comfort", shares Dr. Singh. And the most important bit? "Keep expectations realistic, it's a beauty enhancer, not a medical solution or permanent fix", he adds. As a matter of fact, if you're an absolute beginner in the endless sea of face firming options, Dr. Deepali Bhardwaj, Senior Dermatologist and Consultant at Max Hospital, Saket, asserts, "Regular usage will definitely tone the skin, lymphatic drainage will be supported, it's a great thing. But there are better exercises. You can actually do facial yoga, unless you have a health issue. If you haven't yet aged in the jowls, then yes you can wear a chinstrap maybe twice or thrice in a week, maximum". It's definitely not for everyone While skin irritation is an obvious by-product of subjecting your face to consistent compression, there are other side effects that potential users must acquaint themselves with. "In some cases, users may feel tingling or numbness due to nerve compression, especially around the jaw or ears", explains Dr. RR Dutta, HOD, Internal Medicine, Paras Health, Gurugram. Now while a certain level of trial and error is involved with these side effects, there are some who should completely forego the idea of this 'indulgence'. "People with temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disorders should steer clear — compression can worsen jaw tension and pain. If you suffer from sinus issues or chronic migraines, facial pressure may trigger discomfort or an episode. It's also not safe for anyone with active skin infections, open wounds, or recent cosmetic procedures", warns Dr. Dutta. Also, there definitely is a statute of limitations here from the perspective of age. Dr. Bhardwaj clears, "It'll remind the muscles where they have to be positioned rather than sag. But again, it's going to be a very, very temporary result. It's good for people who are into wellness, who are into gymming, who are into fitness, who haven't really sagged a lot. So maybe early 40s or mid-30s is a great time to start. If you're thinking of starting it later, then no it won't work". Skin-first For those contending with erratic skin or worse yet, diagnosed conditions, an extra layer of precaution is needed. "If you have very sensitive skin, acne-prone or very dry skin, then these chinstraps will lead to more sweating, more infection, especially if you don't maintain the hygiene of the chinstrap, because it's not silicone or disposable as of you have any skin issues like eczema or atopic dermatitis, then you have to wear it for lesser hours", shares Dr. Bhardwaj. Our final take on this? Compression wraps for the face isn't something you just add to your night routine on a whim. Consult a trusted medical professional with prior knowledge of your conditions before hopping onto yet another Insta-algorithm.
Time of India
7 days ago
- Time of India
Maharashtra govt signs MoUs with PHFI and IMMAST to strengthen health infra
Mumbai: The Maharashtra government signed MoUs with two national-level health institutions on Wednesday to upgrade the quality and capabilities of the state public health system. The MoUs with the Public Health Foundation of India (PHFI) and the Institute of Medical and Minimal Access Surgery Training (IMMAST) will usher in a new era of collaboration, technical support, and policy-level impact on Maharashtra's healthcare landscape, the Chief Minister's Office stated. Speaking on the occasion, Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis hailed the agreements as a step forward in building a more robust and skilled healthcare workforce. "These partnerships will ensure quality training, especially for nursing staff, which will benefit their careers and improve patient care," he said. The CMO stated that the PHFI has played a pivotal role in training, research, and policy-making in public health across India. The MoU will focus on Capacity-building programs for state medical officers and health workers. It will also provide guidance on public health policies, training strategies, and technical collaboration. The CMO further stated that an Indian Institute of Public Health may be set up in Maharashtra. PHFI has trained over 45,000 primary healthcare doctors and worked across 583 districts. IMMAST is a recognised national institution known for hyper-realistic simulation-based training in critical care, surgery, and nursing. It will provide modern skills training to 1,000 nurses, nursing students, and allied health professionals in Maharashtra over the next three years, as per the Memorandum of Understanding. The initiative will create a cadre of master trainers in Maharashtra, ensuring sustainable training practices. It will empower healthcare workers by enhancing their skills and confidence, the CMO added. IMMAST has already trained over 25,000 doctors and nurses across 23 super-speciality areas and operates in more than 35 countries.>
Mint
29-07-2025
- Mint
Two-thirds of Indian adolescents swayed by food ads; higher taxes on sugary, fatty foods may help curb rising obesity
New Delhi: An overwhelming 67.57% of adolescents in India are influenced by ads when making their food choices, a large nationwide survey has found, amid a focus on child obesity as a major lifestyle-related health concern. The survey of 143,000 adolescent respondents was conducted in 2022 as part of the Let's Fix Our Food initiative, a public-private partnership between the Public Health Foundation of India, the Indian Council of Medical Research, National Institute of Nutrition, and UNICEF. The findings are currently undergoing peer review for publication in a scientific journal. Unhealthy food advertising, often using celebrity endorsements and games, heavily influences young people's food choices, contributing to rising obesity and related diseases. The policy brief stated that in India, 90% of ads for children and youth on TV are for High Fat, Sugar, and Salt (HFSS) foods. Studies show such ads increase consumption; for example, children watching cartoon food ads ate 45% more. It said that current Indian advertising rules, especially the 2022 guidelines, are weak, lacking clear definitions for "junk foods" or child-targeted ads. India must strengthen these rules with clear definitions and wider scope to protect everyone, not just children. Countries like Chile and South Korea prove strong, mandatory ad restrictions work. With projections from the World Obesity Atlas 2022 indicating that over 27 million Indian children and adolescents could be affected by obesity by 2030, the survey highlighted that unhealthy eating habits and insufficient physical activity are key drivers of overweight and obesity among young people. The survey found that nearly half (49.46%) of respondents receive most of their nutrition information from schools. However, economic barriers play a significant role, with 30.7% of adolescents citing high prices as an obstacle to healthy foods. While a large majority (72.58%) of adolescents said they do read nutrition information on food products, over half (62.81%) said this information should be simplified. Additionally, around 43.88% of adolescents believe that providing more information about unhealthy food items could deter them from consumption. The outcomes of the LFOF initiative, including a detailed policy brief, were recently discussed at a high-level stakeholder consultation in the presence of Dr V.K. Paul, member, NITI Aayog, and D Rajiv Bahl, director general, ICMR. To combat this growing crisis, the initiative urges the government to tighten regulations on advertisements for unhealthy food products targeting children. Other crucial recommendations include introducing health taxes on high fat, sugar, and salt (HFSS) foods and ensuring clear, simplified nutrition information on food packaging. 'Develop guidelines for clear front-of-pack nutrition information on packaged foods and regulate HFSS food consumption. Introduce health taxes on HFSS foods. Enforce the ban on HFSS foods in and around educational institutions, as per FSSAI guidelines. Implement programs to make healthy foods more affordable and accessible and Avoid partnerships with corporations promoting HFSS foods among adolescents," the policy brief said. Prof. Monika Arora, Vice President, Research and Health Promotion, Public Health Foundation of India (PHFI), stated, 'The recommendations such as the introduction of health taxes on HFSS foods and clearer front-of-pack nutrition labelling are presently under discussion. They have been shared with relevant stakeholders. These discussions are part of a growing national and global movement towards creating healthier food environments for children and adolescents." Addressing HFSS Food Marketing On the taxation front, the document said that health taxes are crucial in India to combat obesity and related diseases driven by unhealthy foods like sugary drinks. It said that the WHO endorses taxation as a cost-effective solution, already adopted by over 70 countries. A modelling study on fiscal policies in India found that a 20% tax on sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) could reduce overweight and obesity by 3% and type 2 diabetes by 1.6% with the largest relative effect expected among young rural men. 'Extending similar strategies to unhealthy foods especially those aggressively marketed to children could play a critical role in safeguarding public health," Prof Arora said. Dr Soumya Swaminathan, former WHO Chief Scientist and ICMR Director General, welcomed the crucial findings of the survey, reiterating that the rising trends of obesity and non-communicable diseases (NCDs) in India are directly linked to the significant impact of advertising on adolescents' food choices. This, coupled with poor diet and lack of physical activity, predisposes them to NCDs, making immediate action essential to reverse the trend. She emphasized the need for strict advertising regulations to prevent unsubstantiated claims, especially for products targeting children with appealing characters or gifts, which are often high in fat and sugar. She also called for effective front-of-pack labeling, suggesting a clear A, B (healthy) and C, D (unhealthy) system based on fat, sugar, and salt content, rather than the proposed star labeling by FSSAI. Furthermore, she advocated for health taxes on tobacco, sweets, and high-fat/sugar foods, similar to those in countries like Thailand. While acknowledging that such taxes in India currently contribute to the general treasury, she stressed that ideally, these funds should directly benefit public health schemes and educational campaigns to deter unhealthy consumption. Echoing these concerns, Dr. Suranjeet Chatterjee, Senior Consultant at the Internal Medicine Department, Apollo Hospitals Indraprastha in Delhi, emphasized the critical need for strict regulation of advertisements in India. He highlighted that endorsements by film stars and other prominent figures significantly impact not only children but also adults. Dr Chatterjee stressed that food labeling must clearly indicate the amounts of fat, sugar, salt, and calories. He noted a concerning shift in food consumption patterns, leading to a rise in heart disease, blood pressure, and diabetes at much younger ages. "Earlier, very rarely would patients in the age group of 30-35 years come with problems of heart disease, but now, the percentage has increased in the age group of 25-35 years," he stated, underlining the urgency of addressing these lifestyle-related health issues. 'The findings of the report indicate that 68% of adolescents are influenced by food advertisements, and nearly 31% reported that high food prices prevent them from eating healthy. These insights highlight the urgent need to improve affordability and accessibility of nutritious foods for young people. Addressing childhood obesity must remain a national priority, with stronger policies on food environment, nutrition education, physical activity, and front of pack nutrition labeling and its skill-based literacy, supported by community engagement and cross-sectoral collaboration, said Preetu Mishra, Nutrition Specialist, UNICEF. The findings reinforce the need for system-level policy interventions to reshape the food environment. Among the key recommendations is the introduction of health taxes on HFSS foods (Food high in fat, salt and sugar), which is supported by global and regional evidence showing their impact on reducing consumption of unhealthy foods and incentivizing better industry practices. WHO recommends taxation as one of the most cost-effective tools. An increasing number of countries have taken steps to implement fiscal policies that promote healthy diets, with 115 countries taxing sugar-sweetened beverages nationally as of February 2024. An additional 41 countries have applied national taxation on a variety of unhealthy food categories, Mishra added.
