Measles immunity required for migrant domestic workers in households with young children from Sept 1
Measles immunity required for migrant domestic workers in households with young children from Sept 1
SINGAPORE - From September, employers of migrant domestic workers (MDWs) must ensure that their MDW is immune to measles if there is a child under the age of seven in the household who is not fully vaccinated against the disease.
The Ministry of Manpower (MOM) said in a release on June 10 that this measure will enhance public health resilience and protect unvaccinated young children who are at higher risk of serious health complications from measles infections.
At the point of a work permit issuance for new MDWs or renewals for existing MDWs from Sept 1, employers with children below seven years old in the household will be required to declare if the MDW is already vaccinated or immune to measles.
They may also need to declare if the child in the household is fully vaccinated, or if a vaccination appointment has been scheduled for the MDW if she is not yet vaccinated, MOM added.
An MDW does not need to be vaccinated if she is already immune to measles, or if all children under seven in the household are fully vaccinated.
Measles immunity can be acquired through past infection or vaccination. The employer may provide MOM proof of this, such as a completion of vaccination, serology test result or laboratory confirmation of past infection.
To be fully vaccinated, two doses of the measles vaccine, available at GP clinics, are required. The cost of two doses is around $80 to $140.
Any costs incurred in meeting the measles immunity requirement are to be borne by the employer, said MOM.
It encourages employers with existing MDWs to review their workers' immunity status ahead of work permit renewals.
The ministry said it will conduct sample checks and may request documentary proof of the MDW's immunity.
Employers with children under seven years old who are found to have MDWs without measles immunity may have their work pass privileges suspended until valid proof of vaccination is provided.
Measles is a highly contagious viral disease that is transmitted through the air.
Despite high vaccination coverage and population immunity in Singapore, sporadic cases and small clusters of measles are still expected among individuals who are not immune due to the highly transmissible nature of the disease.
Given Singapore's position as a major travel hub, the surge in measles cases globally and regionally continues to pose public health risks, particularly for those without immunity, MOM said.
The new requirement seeks to minimise the risk of measles transmission to vulnerable children who are not fully protected against the disease.
Employers are also strongly encouraged to vaccinate or ascertain immunity of their MDWs if there are household members who have weakened immune systems.
Join ST's WhatsApp Channel and get the latest news and must-reads.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Paper
3 days ago
- New Paper
Parents, is it worth dying for a pay cheque?
We spend a lot of time at work. According to the Ministry of Manpower, Singapore workers spend 43.3 hours at work per week, among the highest in Asia. As economic, geopolitical and technological clouds gather, it is no surprise that people are putting in longer hours at work, to get more face time with their bosses, in an effort to increase job security. With longer hours on the job, workers are experiencing more stress and mental health issues in coping with work, family and commitments, such as the care of older parents. The 2018 bestseller by Stanford Professor Jeffrey Pfeffer poses a timely question. His book, Dying For A Paycheck, asks whether it is worth it for workers to lose their health, and possibly their lives, in pursuit of a monthly salary. Prof Pfeffer makes the case that long hours, economic insecurity and the conflict between work and family can be toxic to employees. He accuses corporations of pursuing profitability at all costs by squeezing the maximum productivity from their workers. In doing so, companies are hurting employee engagement, increasing worker turnover and destroying workers' physical and emotional health. The deleterious effects of workplace stress on health are so severe that doctors have assessed that unemployment and increased job demands have a greater effect on worker deaths than the inhalation of second-hand cigarette smoke. According to the book, work-related health risks are systematic and can be linked to cardiovascular disease, poor mental health and suicide. Interestingly, the book has a Singapore connection. Professor Joel Goh from the National University of Singapore collaborated with Prof Pfeffer to quantitatively research the linkage between work and health, and the impact on premature worker death. Using data from the United States, Prof Goh, who was pursuing his PhD at Stanford University at the time, estimated that there are 120,000 additional deaths a year attributable to workplace-related stress and poor management practices of companies, half of which could have been prevented. Prof Goh describes the dire situation of workers in a paper cited by the book: "layoffs, job loss and unemployment adversely affect physical and mental health and mortality... the financial stress resulting from the loss of income, and also separation from the social identity of being productively employed and social isolation from co-workers". I recently spoke to Prof Goh about his research. He believes that his work makes the argument for employer culpability, and that it is worthwhile for employers to invest in practices to support their employees' psychological and social well-being. Like Prof Pfeffer, he believes that healthy workplaces are good for business. Of the different work environments between Singapore and the US, he said: "The current environment in Singapore is tough. Issues like unemployment, underemployment and economic insecurity plague workers in Singapore too, not just in the US." There is a big difference between Singapore and the US, in that healthcare coverage is more universal here, which takes some stress off the table for many local workers. It looks like the stress from the disruption and displacement of jobs does not look to be abating any time soon. To continue being there for our children, what should parents be looking for in their workplace? Job control In the book, Prof Pfeffer shared that in Britain's civil service, government servants of higher rank had a lower incidence of mortality from cardiovascular disease. The study discovered that higher ranked civil servants had more control over their jobs and more discretion over how their work was done. So, even with greater job demands and work stress, job control turned out to be an important predictor of whether a civil servant would eventually get cardiovascular disease. Job control even beat out smoking as a predictor of disease onset. Putting this link between stress and job control into practice, parents should consider choosing employers that allow them to have more autonomy and job control. In many workplaces, it is the supervisors that generate the bulk of the work stress as part of the immediate work environment that a worker is in. Paying attention to interviews with hiring managers can help parents to identify bosses who might be micromanagers or even those who are unfriendly to families. Making informal reference checks of possible supervisors can be helpful as well. If all else fails, checking a potential boss' social media footprint to see if there are red flags could prove to be invaluable. Bullying behaviour is often discoverable via a systematic pattern of comment on social media, especially among high-profile bosses. Open discussion Parents should consider having open discussions with the family about work stress and the challenges faced at work. Frank discussions allow the children to be involved in what is happening at work and, where possible, how it affects the family's finances. As my boys were growing up, I often discussed what would happen if I were to be fired from work. During the global financial crisis of 2008, when our family was based in the US, I would share what was happening in the global financial markets during family dinners. The kids were still young at the time - six and three years old - but I wanted to prepare them for any eventualities. I also assured them that we had savings tucked away and that we had the resources to tide us through until a new job appeared on the horizon, if anything unexpected happened. I fondly remember the extra hugs at the time, as my sons' way of showing their support and encouragement during a difficult time in my life. Instead of making them anxious, I think that going through that difficult period as a family has given them greater resilience in managing their own financial affairs. It has also provided them a perspective on how they can cope with their own professional lives, should they get fired at some point. Good employers Employers need to be part of the change. In Prof Pfeffer's book, he writes that "if we changed workplace practices and environments to reduce stressful conditions, employers would no longer be damaging, even killing, their people". Employers need to take workplace safety seriously. Physical conditions like lighting, noise and temperature make a huge difference to the well-being of workers. Besides keeping the environment safe, more can be done to create a conducive setting for work. As an example, there is a link between sound and blood pressure. Good employers can provide sound protection, or noise-cancelling headphones, to create a space where productive work can take place. Companies need to consider upgrading their health plans to make employee wellness a central priority. Increasingly, progressive employers are adding mental health benefits into their overall health benefit package, to create the right conditions for employees to thrive. Over a typical employment career, a worker could spend more than 90,000 hours at work. Given how much time we will spend at work, it is so important that we parents choose employers and workplaces that are healthy, happy and fulfilling. Because it is not worth dying for a pay cheque.
Straits Times
04-08-2025
- Straits Times
The Week in Pictures: Competition in sport and for food
Aug 2 Nine-year-old Palestinian girl Mariam Dawwas, who is malnourished, being carried by her mother in the Rimal neighbourhood in Gaza City. The World Health Organisation warned on July 27 that malnutrition is reaching 'alarming levels' in Gaza. PHOTO: AFP
AsiaOne
01-08-2025
- AsiaOne
Safeguards in place to deter fraudulent injury claims at workplace: MOM, Singapore News
The Ministry of Manpower (MOM) has safeguards in place to prevent fraudulent claims under the Work Injury Compensation Act (Wica). At a media briefing on Friday (Aug 1), the ministry said that Wica is in place to balance the interest of employers and workers. All employers are required to purchase Work Injury Compensation (WIC) insurance under MOM regulations, for all manual workers regardless of salary and non-manual workers less than or equal to $2,600 per month. Under Wica, employees can make claims for medical leave wages, medical expenses and lump sum compensation in the case of permanent incapacity, current incapacity or death. On average, 28,500 WIC claims are made each year, of which around 26,800 are paid out, the ministry said. It said that the median time taken to process a claim is about six months, with around 95 per cent of claims being resolved within one year after being filed. 3 safeguards in place to protect against fraud MOM said that there are three safeguards in place, which separately come under the purview of insurers, doctors and the ministry. Insurers are the first line of defence in detecting WIC fraud, who typically engage loss adjustors to investigate suspicious claims, which will be subsequently escalated to the ministry. Doctors are the second line of defence, and refer to "prescribed and detailed guidelines for assessment of degree of permanent incapacity". In any case of disputes on the degree of permanent incapacity awarded, the parties can object, and the case can be referred to the WIC Medical Board for independent reassessment. Additionally, all parties are able to raise objections to WIC claims during the process, which will be referred to MOM for adjudication. Of all claims made, MOM gets objections to less than 3 per cent. On top of the three safeguards, the ministry has compensation caps in place to limit employer's financial liability. Around 12 claims per year investigated for fraud Both errant employers who fail to fulfill their Wica obligations and workers who make fraudulent claims will be prosecuted under MOM regulations. WIC insurance is meant to "protect employers against sudden large payouts due to work injuries", and employers who fail to fulfill their Wica obligations will face fines of up to $15,000, jail terms of up to 12 months, or both. Workers found making fraudulent claims may be fined up to $15,000 or jailed up to 12 months, or both. According to MOM, insurers refer about 12 claims per year for investigation into potential WIC fraud, with around two workers being prosecuted per year after the relevant investigations. Sumo Salad case still under investigation MOM also provided an update regarding the recent case involving Jane Lee, the owner of Sumo Salad, who died on July 19 after making two Facebook posts alleging that an employee had faked an injury to claim workplace injury compensation from the company. The ministry said the accident occurred on June 6, and that Sumo Salad had submitted a work injury incident report to it, adding that the firm was "covered by a valid insurance policy", and was fully reimbursed on June 26 and June 27 for the work injury incident reported. According to MOM, the case is still under investigation and that the claims process has not been completed. [[nid:720463]]
