US announces visa restrictions for central American government officials
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Tuesday announced visa restrictions for several unnamed Central American government officials he said were connected to Cuban medical mission programs that include elements of forced labor and the exploitation of Cuban workers.
Rubio did not name the officials nor the countries they are from. "These steps promote accountability for those who support and perpetuate these exploitative practices," he said in a statement.
"The Cuban labor export program abuses the participants, enriches the corrupt Cuban regime, and deprives everyday Cubans of essential medical care that they desperately need in their homeland."
Cuba's foreign ministry did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Havana has for decades rejected such accusations.
Rubio in February expanded a visa restriction policy to target Cuban officials believed to be tied to a labor program that sends Cuban workers overseas, particularly healthcare workers.
Cuba's health service generates major export earnings by sending doctors and health workers around the world.
Since its 1959 leftist revolution, Cuba has dispatched an "army of white coats" to disaster sites and disease outbreaks around the world in the name of solidarity. In the last decade, they have fought cholera in Haiti and Ebola in West Africa.
But Cuba has also exported doctors on more routine missions in exchange for cash or goods in recent decades, an increasingly critical source of hard currency in a nation suffering a deep economic crisis.
The United States and Cuba have had a strained relationship since Fidel Castro took over in the 1959 revolution, and a US trade embargo has been in place for decades.
Rubio, a former US senator and the son of immigrants who came to Florida from Cuba in the 1950s, has long opposed more normal relations with Havana, dating back to the administration of Democratic President Barack Obama.
He has signaled a tougher stance on the communist-run island, reversing a last-minute effort by the Biden administration to loosen sanctions on long-time foe Cuba and complicating money transfers to the island.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Ro Khanna says he's certain Elon Musk would also criticize Trump for 'banning' foreign students
Ro Khanna said he always praised Elon Musk's innovations and he's certain that Elon Musk is against Donald Trump's crackdown on foreign students. Indian-origin Democratic Rep Ro Khanna of California spoke against the Donald Trump administration's ban on international students and said international students contribute $44 billion to the American economy, making this one of the best exports for those who care about lowering the trade deficit. Khanna said Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick always speaks about lowering the trade deficit and this is the sector that can actually help. "The reality is that you have people like Elon Musk who were foreign students, I mean, they have been embedded in Silicon Valley and the companies that have been created," Ro Khanna said on CNBC. "Now you like Elon Musk?" the host on the panel asked Ro Khann to which the Democrat said he always praised Elon Musk and his contribution, and the two know each other for a long time. "I have known Elon Musk for 15 years. I have always praised Tesla, SpaceX, his innovations. And you see him now expressing certain concerns. I guarantee he would criticize banning foreign students," Khanna said. The comments of the Democratic leader came as Elon Musk is ow on a warpath against President Donald Trump though he has not named the president but criticized the Congressmen who voted for the Big, Beautiful Bill which he said would increase the debt ceiling by five trillion dollars. 'You go talk to Stanford, you talk to other state colleges, many of them rely on international students to be able to have the employment they do. Foreign students who pay full freight also help defray the cost so American students don't have to pay as much," Ro Khanna said. The State Department has paused all student visa interviews to come to a decision on social media vetting. The president Wednesdat signed a proclamation restricting foreign student visas at Harvard University amid the administration's ongoing tussle with the university. Trump barred harvard to enroll international students as it did not provide the administration with details of foreign students that it sought -- but the order was stayed by a court.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Will Trump get to pick US Supreme Court justices in his second term?
Legal experts suggest that Donald Trump may have the opportunity to appoint additional Supreme Court justices during a potential second term, potentially reshaping the court's direction for decades. Justices Thomas, Alito, and Roberts may face pressure to retire, allowing Trump to install younger, like-minded individuals. Experts have said Trump might appoint loyalist justice. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Can Trump overhaul judiciary? Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Can Trump pick judges? Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Trump may seek loyalty over ideology During his first term in office, President Donald Trump appointed 226 federal court judges, including three US Supreme Court justices. Trump successfully installed judges who promoted his political agenda, including overturning the landmark ruling from 1973 that declared the Constitution guaranteed the right to abortion, Roe v. something unusual appears to be unfolding in his second term. Rather than reinforcing Trump-era policies, federal judges — even those appointed by Trump himself — are now halting key parts of the president's second-term initiatives. So, a question that keeps popping up on everyone's mind is that- Will Donald Trump appoint Supreme Court judges in the US?Trump may have the opportunity to appoint new Supreme Court justices during his second term in office, legal experts told Newsweek. During his first term in office, Trump appointed three justices to the US Supreme Court, thus significantly influencing the judiciary system. Trump may have another chance to nominate a justice in the coming years- —an appointment that could shape the Court's direction for decades. Such a move would likely have profound effects on public policy, particularly in areas like abortion, LGBTQ+ rights, immigration, and executive Justices Clarence Thomas (76), Samuel Alito (75), and Chief Justice John Roberts (70) are already facing calls from some on the right to consider retirement in the coming years. With Republicans currently holding control of the presidency and a 53-seat majority in the Senate, they are in a strong position to confirm new Supreme Court justices without Democratic argue that Republicans should take a lesson from Democrats, who have previously faced setbacks when their justices chose not to retire during favorable political Urman, a law professor at Northeastern University, told Newsweek that while it's impossible to predict exactly when a justice might step down, Justices Alito and Thomas are the most likely candidates for retirement—primarily to allow a like-minded successor to be appointed. However, he noted that this isn't a certainty, as both justices are now part of the majority after spending years as dissenting voices on the Court, a position they deeply from the right may not be convincing to the justices, he said."Judges and especially Justices are very independent, and I don't think they will be too influenced by the pressure campaign," he said. "It's ultimately a very personal decision and the Ginsburg example is important but she was older and faced more health issues than the current justices."None of the current justices on the court have publicly said they plan to retire anytime federal prosecutor Gene Rossi told Newsweek Thomas could wait until after the 2026 midterms to avoid giving Democrats a motivating issue ahead of the elections."However, if that happens, President Trump will pick a very young and conservative nominee because in his mind, he got burned with Justice Barrett," he said. "And he wants to put his further imprint on the tenor of the High Court."Former federal prosecutor Neama Rahmani told Newsweek: "It's likely Trump appoints at least one Supreme Court Justice, and maybe two. The odds increase over his four-year term, especially with Justices Thomas and Alito being in their mid-70s.""Trump's Cabinet and officer appointees during his second term have been largely loyalists without the experience or independent streaks that frustrated him during his first term. His Supreme Court appointment(s) will likely reflect those same values, especially given the importance of the judiciary in standing in the way of his executive orders."Stephen Wermiel, a constitutional law professor at American University, told Newsweek, "It's uncertain whether Trump will have another Supreme Court vacancy. But there's a good chance conservatives will begin urging Roberts, Thomas, and Alito to retire after this term so Trump could install younger, like-minded justices.'Legal analysts believe Trump may prioritize personal loyalty over ideological alignment when choosing future Supreme Court McQuade, a former federal prosecutor, told Newsweek that frustration with decisions made by Justices Barrett and Roberts may drive Trump to look for candidates who are not only conservative but personally loyal to him."Trump could seek justices who won't break from him on major rulings," McQuade said. "That could have a major impact on upcoming cases dealing with birthright citizenship, transgender healthcare, and the limits of executive power."Justice Amy Coney Barrett has occasionally sided against Trump's positions, including a ruling against deporting alleged gang members under the Alien Enemies Act of 1798. Her independent stance has drawn criticism from Trump-aligned analyst Urman agreed that loyalty may guide Trump's future selections, noting that he 'appears to value loyalty above all else in his nominees.' Any new appointments, Urman added, would likely align more closely with the judicial philosophies of Justices Thomas or Alito than Barrett.
Mint
3 hours ago
- Mint
Joe Biden slams Donald Trump, denies losing mental control, asserts, 'I made the decisions'
Former President Joe Biden firmly rejected claims questioning his control over the presidency, doubling down on his use of an autopen—a mechanical device that replicates a person's signature—to sign pardons, executive orders, and legislation. 'I made the decisions about the pardons, executive orders, legislation, and proclamations. Any suggestion that I didn't is ridiculous and false,' Biden said in a statement, according to Fox News. He further accused President Donald Trump and Congressional Republicans of using these allegations as a distraction from legislative efforts they oppose. Biden said, 'This is nothing more than a distraction by Donald Trump and Congressional Republicans who are working to push disastrous legislation that would cut essential programs like Medicaid and raise costs on American families, all to pay for tax breaks for the ultra-wealthy and big corporations,' Trump orders investigation into Biden's actions President Donald Trump escalated his criticism of Biden by directing his administration to investigate Biden's actions, alleging aides concealed Biden's cognitive decline and casting doubt on the legitimacy of his autopen use. Trump's memo described the situation as 'one of the most dangerous and concerning scandals in American history,' alleging, 'The American public was purposefully shielded from discovering who wielded the executive power, all while Biden's signature was deployed across thousands of documents to effect radical policy shifts.' Trump appointed Attorney General Pam Bondi and White House counsel David Warrington to lead the inquiry. Autopen use long established and constitutionally valid Despite Trump's accusations, the Justice Department, under both Democratic and Republican administrations, has recognised autopen use for decades. The president's pardon power is absolute and enshrined in the US Constitution. No evidence has been presented showing Biden was unaware of actions signed on his behalf. Congressional Republicans demand answers House Oversight Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.) has intensified the investigation, demanding interviews with five former senior Biden aides. Comer alleges a 'cover-up' regarding Biden's mental state and who was truly in control. 'These five former senior advisors were eyewitnesses to President Biden's condition and operations within the Biden White House,' Comer said. 'They must appear before the House Oversight Committee and provide truthful answers about President Biden's cognitive state and who was calling the shots.' Requested witnesses include White House senior advisers Mike Donilon and Anita Dunn, former Chief of Staff Ron Klain, former Deputy Chief of Staff Bruce Reed, and former counselor Steve Ricchetti. Comer also called for Biden's physician Kevin O'Connor and several former aides to testify. Comer warned that subpoenas would be issued if voluntary cooperation is not granted: 'I think that people will start coming in the next two weeks… we'll release the transcribed interviews, so it'll be very transparent.' Democrats dismiss probe as political theater Democrats have dismissed the GOP investigation as a distraction with no basis in fact. 'Chairman Comer had his big shot in the last Congress to impeach Joe Biden and it was, of course, a spectacular flop,' said Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.), ranking member of the oversight committee. 'And now he's just living off of a spent dream. It's over. And he should give up the whole thing.' GOP claims focus on final executive actions Republicans have zeroed in on Biden's final executive orders and pardons, suggesting they may be invalid due to his alleged incapacity. Rep. Brandon Gill (R-Texas) said, 'The American people didn't elect a bureaucracy to run the country. I think that the American people deserve to know the truth and they want to know the truth of what happened.' Controversy fueled by book allegations The inquiry has been partly fueled by the book Original Sin by CNN's Jake Tapper and Axios' Alex Thompson, which alleges that Biden's cognitive state limited his control, saying, 'Five people were running the country, and Joe Biden was at best a senior member of the board.' Biden's family and allies have strongly rejected the book's claims. Naomi Biden, the former president's granddaughter, called it 'political fairy smut for the permanent, professional chattering class.' Target: Family pardons, death row commutations The investigation centres on preemptive pardons Biden issued to five family members—including siblings James Biden, Frank Biden, and Valerie Biden Owens, along with their spouses—and clemency that spared 37 federal inmates from the death penalty. Biden had defended the family pardons, stating they were intended 'to protect them from future politically motivated investigations.' Hunter Biden, the president's son, who had pleaded guilty to tax violations and was convicted on firearms-related charges, was also pardoned by Biden on December 1. In the final hours of his presidency, Joe Biden issued pre-emptive pardons to several key personalities, including Dr. Anthony Fauci, retired General Mark Milley, and members of the House committee that investigated the January 6 Capitol attack. Background: Biden's declining health questions Concerns over Biden's mental acuity arose after a poor debate performance against Trump in the run up to 2024 election, where he appeared confused and misspoke several times. This performance led to his withdrawal from the presidential race and replacement by Kamala Harris, who ultimately lost the general election to Trump. Also Read | Trump and Xi speak amid stalled tariff negotiations: Chinese media
