Academic Writing: Common Sentence Patterns, Part Three
From VOA Learning English, this is Everyday Grammar.
English has many patterns. Basic grammatical patterns can explain the structure of around 95 percent of sentences in English, says Martha Kolln, a grammar expert.
Learning and mastering these patterns can help you improve your writing and speaking skills.
We have discussed three common patterns in previous Everyday Grammar stories.
Today we will explore another common pattern: the intransitive verb pattern.
To start you thinking about intransitive verbs consider this passage. It is from the poem "The human family" by famous writer and poet Maya Angelou.
We love and lose in China,
we weep on England's moors,
and laugh and moan in Guinea,
and thrive on Spanish shores.
By the end of this story, you will be able to recognize and understand the intransitive verb pattern that Angelou uses many times in the stanza.
The intransitive verb pattern:
The intransitive verb pattern is unusual. It is unusual because, unlike other verb patterns, the predicate requires only the verb:
Subject + Intransitive Verb
(Predicate)
Common intransitive verbs include action verbs – go, come, walk, cry, or laugh, for example. In these verbs, the subject's action is not applied to an object. In other words, most intransitive verbs can end sentences; they do not need nouns or adjectives to their right.*
The lines from the classic American song "Just Friends" give an example of the intransitive verb pattern in its most basic form:
We loved,
we laughed,
we cried
However, sentences with just the subject and intransitive verb are not very common in writing or speaking. Usually, the sentence has more information: an adverbial structure.
Adverbials:
Adverbials are words or phrases that give information about time, place, manner, or reason. Adverbials answer questions like How often? Where? Why? When?
The two most common adverbial structures you will find are adverbs and prepositional phrases.
Adverbs, such as suddenly, quickly, here, soon, or sometimes, modify a verb.
Prepositional phrases are groups of words that begin with a preposition and are followed by an object, usually a noun phrase.
Common prepositions include in, on, at, between, above, and below.
Adverbs and prepositional phrases often follow intransitive verbs.
Think back to the basic intransitive verb pattern.
Subject + Intransitive verb
It is grammatically correct to say a simple sentence like this:
We laughed.
Subject + Intransitive Verb
You can put more information into the sentence by adding an adverb:
We laughed loudly.
Subject + Intransitive Verb + Adverb
Or you could give even more information by adding a prepositional phrase:
We laughed at the man's silly jokes.
Subject + Intransitive Verb + Prepositional Phrase
In intransitive verb patterns, adverbs or prepositional phrases are often referred to as "optional." In other words, a sentence is still grammatical without them. You, as the speaker or writer, choose how much information you want to include in the sentence.
What does this have to do with the poem?
Now, think back to the part of Maya Angelou's poem:
We love and lose in China,
we weep on England's moors,
and laugh and moan in Guinea,
and thrive on Spanish shores.
You can see that every single line uses an intransitive verb paired with a prepositional phrase.
Consider the first line: We love and lose in China.
The subject is 'we' and two intransitive verbs 'love' and 'lose'** are paired with the prepositional phrase, in China. The two verbs are joined by a conjunction, and.
The second line follows the basic intransitive verb pattern, but it has an optional prepositional phrase:
The second two lines follow the same patterns as the first two lines. This series of patterns is an example of parallelism, which you can read about in an earlier Everyday Grammar story.
What can you do?
To practice using the intransitive verb pattern, try writing four lines of poetry in the style of Angelou's poem. Post your writing in the comments section of this story, or on our Facebook page.
We/I ______ in _______
We/I ______ on _______
And ____ and ____ in/on _____
And _____ on/in ________
Remember, you should not use Angelou's exact words; rather, you should choose your own noun phrases, intransitive verbs, and prepositional phrases. Just put your own words into the pattern we discussed today.
Learning this pattern, and other patterns discussed in previous grammar stories, will not only help you study the writing of great authors. These patterns will help you write and speak in your own clear, concise sentences, too.
I'm Jill Robbins.
I'm Jonathan Evans.
And I'm John Russell.
John Russell wrote this story for Learning English. Mario Ritter was the editor.
*There are hundreds, if not thousands, of intransitive verbs. As with many grammar rules, there is a small number of exceptions to the intransitive verb pattern. A few intransitive verbs require adverbial information.
** In many contexts, love and lose operate as transitive verbs.
We want to hear from you. Write to us in the Comments Section. _______________________________________________________
Words in This Story
stanza – n. a group of lines in a poem
pattern – n. something that happens in a regular and repeated way
intransitive – adj. not taking or having a direct object
weep – v. to cry because you are very sad or are feeling some other strong emotion
moor – n. a broad area of open land that is not good for farming — used especially to refer to land in Great Britain — usually plural
moan – v. to make a long, low sound because of pain, unhappiness, or physical pleasure
thrive – v. to grow or develop successfully
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Voice of America
14-03-2025
- Voice of America
Common Adverbs in Conversation: Amplifiers, Downtoners
From VOA Learning English, this is Everyday Grammar. Imagine you are at a business meeting. You have just presented a plan to your business partners. They want to give suggestions for how to make your plan better. The conversation might sound like this: A: I really like your plan! B: Yes, it's pretty good … but it needs a little revising. A: Of course , you did a very good job. But you might need to consider a few more points. B: Yes, it will probably be more effective if you highlight the staffing requirements and expand on the budget. Whether you like business or not, this conversation gives you important grammar information that you can use in just about any situation. In particular, the exchange offers examples of some of the most important adverbs that you will hear in everyday speech. This week, we will explore special adverbs that increase or decrease the force of a statement. These adverbs are sometimes called amplifiers or downtoners.* What are adverbs? What are amplifiers? Adverbs are words that modify, or change, the meaning of adjectives, verbs, and sometimes entire sentences. They are often used to show time, a way of doing something, place, or degree – a measure of something. Some kinds of adverbs act as amplifiers. The word amplify means to make something stronger. So these amplifiers make the meaning of an adjective or sentence stronger. In American English, amplifiers have three common uses: increasing intensity, expressing certainty and showing precision. This information comes from Susan Conrad and Douglas Biber, two experts on English grammar. Words such as really and very are among the most common that increase the intensity of a statement. They usually modify an adjective. Take the adjective good, for example. Imagine you are trying some food that your friends cooked. Perhaps you want to tell them, "This food is good." You could increase the intensity of your statement by using the word very: "This food is very good." You could express certainty by using an amplifier such as definitely: "This is definitely the best food I've ever had." Or you could use an amplifier to show precision: "At exactly 5:13 p.m. on February 6th, I ate the best food I've ever had in my life!" What are downtoners? Other kinds of adverbs act as downtoners. Downtoners are the opposite of amplifiers. They reduce the force of a statement or express doubt. In other words, they set the tone of a statement. You can remember the term 'downtoner' by thinking about what it does: toning down a statement. Downtoners have three common functions: reducing intensity, expressing doubt or showing imprecision. Three common downtoners in conversational English are pretty, maybe and probably, say Conrad and Biber. How can you use downtoners to change the meaning of the statement? Take our earlier example: "This food is good." If you wanted to reduce the intensity of your statement, you could say: "This food is pretty good." You could show doubt, even raise questions, by saying: "This is maybe the best food I've ever had." Or, "This is probably the best food I've ever had." These statements express someone's opinion about the food. But they are not as strong as the example sentences that use amplifiers. In other words, saying "This food is pretty good" is not as forceful as saying, "This food is really good." Amplifiers and downtoners in a conversation So what does this discussion of food have to do with the exchange we heard at the beginning of this report? Let's think back to the business conversation: A: I really like your plan! B: Yes, it's pretty good … but it needs a little revising. A: Of course , you did a very good job, but you might need to consider a few more points. B: Yes, it will probably be more effective if you highlight the staffing requirements and expand on the budget. You might notice that one of the speakers uses amplifiers such as really and very. She is using these words to give more force to her statement. She is probably more excited about the business plan. The second speaker uses downtoners – the words pretty and probably, for example. So you might suspect that he is more guarded about the plan. Maybe he has doubts that the new plan will be better. The amplifiers and downtoners they use are also among the most common ones that you will hear in American English. These words are useful in a number of settings. They are polite and acceptable in almost any situation. Amplifiers and downtoners in writing Remember this: the amplifiers and downtoners we have discussed today are common in conversation. Different amplifiers and downtoners are more common in writing. For example, you are more likely to read words such as indeed, certainly, or approximately than you are to hear them in everyday conversation. If you use these amplifiers and downtoners in conversation, your speech will take on a very official sound. While that might be a good idea in a formal presentation or speech, it might not be the best choice for an everyday conversation. Amplifiers and downtoners are not always necessary to use in a sentence. But when you see or hear them, you are getting information about the thoughts and feelings of another person. You are learning about how strongly they feel about something. And that's the end of this really long report! I'm Jill Robbins. And I'm John Russell. *These are also often called qualifiers. John Russell wrote this story for Learning English. George Grow was the editor. We want to hear from you. Write to us in the Comments Section. ____________________________________________________ Words in This Story revise – v. to make changes especially to correct or improve (something) staff – n. the people who make a business or organization do what it does amplifier – n. (grammar) an adverb that increases the force of a statement downtoner – n. (grammar) an adverb that decreases the force of a statement function – n. the special purpose or activity for which a thing exists or is used conversation – n. an informal talk involving two people or a small group of people highlight – v. to direct attention to (someone or something) grammar – n. the set of rules that explain how words are used in a language particular – n. special or unusual adverb – n. a word that describes a verb, an adjective, another adverb, or a sentence and that is often used to show time, manner, place, or degree certainty – n. something that is certain : a fact about which there is no doubt precision – n. exactness or accuracy imprecision – n. the opposite of precision doubt – n. a feeling of being uncertain or unsure about something tone – n. a quality, feeling, or attitude expressed by the words that someone uses in speaking or writing polite – adj. having or showing good manners or respect for other people
Voice of America
13-03-2025
- Voice of America
Keeping the stories of Chinese American Texans alive
The state of Texas has the third-largest Asian American population in the U.S. Chinese Americans in the Lone Star State have roots that trace back for generations, just like those of their counterparts on the nation's East and West coasts. While the history of these Texans might not be as well known, their stories are just as intertwined with America's. VOA's Elizabeth Lee has more on this story.
Voice of America
10-03-2025
- Voice of America
Exclusive: Top US Marine says 'crisis' with amphibious ships causing coverage gaps
A shortage of amphibious warfare ships for commanders across the globe has reached a breaking point, with defense officials warning VOA the crisis has triggered a monthslong drought in critical firepower from sea-based Marines. 'I have the Marines, and I have the squadrons, and I have the battalions and the batteries … I just don't have the amphibs,' Marine Corps Commandant Gen. Eric Smith told VOA in an exclusive interview. While the amphibious warfare ships, known as amphibs, make up just 10% of the fleet, they are the go-to alternative to aircraft carriers when commanders need something more precise or expedient. They also are the only ships made for the Marine Corps' rapid reaction forces, known as Marine Expeditionary Units (MEUs), to get equipment and troops from sea to shore during an assault. 'Amphibs are vital to us. They are an existential part of who we are as Marines,' Smith said. Military's Swiss Army Knife Once deployed, these units of about 2,000 Marines and sailors are the military's Swiss Army Knife, providing everything from strike power with F-35 fighter jets, to support in non-combatant evacuation operations and disaster relief, like when the 15th MEU rushed humanitarian aid to the Philippines after deadly floods and landslides last October. It takes three amphibs – one big-deck amphib and two smaller ones – to make an Amphibious Ready Group that transports the Marines, a unit often referred to as an ARG/MEU. Smith says the military needs three of these 3-ship units deployed abroad at all times –one from the East Coast, one from the West Coast, and one from Japan – a plan known as 3.0. 'The INDOPACOM Commander, the EUCOM Commander, the AFRICOM commander have all called for an ARG/MEU, so 3.0 is the requirement.' However, Smith tells VOA he cannot achieve this requirement with the number of amphibs that are ready today. 'Running ships to ground' While the U.S. military was busy fighting two wars in the Middle East, its amphib fleet, plagued with maintenance deferments and delays, fell into disrepair, said Shelby Oakley with the Government Accountability Office. Oakley authored a GAO report in December that showed half of the 32 amphibs in the fleet are in poor material condition. 'You're running these ships to ground, not taking care of them,' she told VOA. 'This is kind of equivalent to just driving your car and never changing the oil and expecting it to last 15 years. … Key systems aren't functioning the way they are supposed to,' Oakley said. In 2022, Congress mandated the Navy keep a minimum of 31 amphibs in its fleet after the service had tried to divest six of these poorly maintained ships in their fiscal year 2023 budget plan. The Marine Corps had said a minimum of 31 amphibs would be enough to complete their missions, so long as the fleet's readiness rate remained at 80% or higher. 'Your readiness rate is down in the 50-percentile range, and it needs to be 80%, then I would say that's a crisis,' Smith told VOA. One of the amphibs – USS Tortuga – hasn't sailed in more than a decade. And there are 15 more that the Government Accountability Office says are not on track to make it to the end of their 40-year service lives. 'We're trying to keep an aging force ready and focused on what it needs to do,' Admiral Jim Kilby, the acting chief of naval operations, told VOA in an exclusive interview last month. According to Kilby, the problem extends beyond amphibious ships. 'We're running the whole Navy hard. So, when I started in the Navy, we had almost 600 ships. Now, we've got half that, but we are still doing the same mission,' Kilby said. Coverage gaps Kilby says the Navy is trying to tackle the issues dragging down its fleet the same way it fixed issues grounding its fighter jets a few years ago, closely monitoring its processes to adjust long-held practices that are slowing down change. 'The surface committee has doubled the number of ships that completed maintenance on time. It's not where I want to be. I want to get better, so it is not acceptable to have 50%,' he said. Kilby did not have a set date, though, for when the Navy planned to increase the readiness of the amphib fleet from 50% to 80%, an urgent need for the commandant who says the 'gaps in coverage' already have begun. 'There was a non-combatant evacuation operation required to get American citizens out of Sudan when violence was erupting. And because there was no ARG/MEU presence, the AFRICOM commander was forced to use commercial airlines," Smith said. Even when ARG/MEU units have deployed, they've frequently deployed incomplete. The USS America Amphibious Ready Group deployed with two ships instead of three last year because there wasn't another amphib available. And the USS Boxer Amphibious Ready Group had so many maintenance delays that the Navy had to stagger each ship's deployment last year, all months later than planned. What was supposed to be a nine-month deployment resulted in just two months with all three ships together. 'When the Boxer wasn't there, they couldn't do F-35 operations, they couldn't support an international partner as they had planned,' Oakley told VOA. 'Not a Navy requirement' The 31st MEU just completed their last patrol aboard the USS America Amphibious Ready Group earlier this month. The next ARG/MEU to deploy from the East Coast or Japan is still months away, according to officials who spoke to VOA on condition of anonymity to discuss future planning. Officials say one likely won't deploy from the West Coast until 2026. One Navy official told VOA the service only budgets to deploy one ARG/MEU at a time for only 10 months in the year. Asked about the discrepancy between the Marine's needs and the Navy's amphib availability, Kilby told VOA the Marine Corps' 3.0 requirement 'is not a Navy requirement.' 'I do not have a plan to get 3.0. I have a plan to maintain 31 ships per law in our shipbuilding plan,' Kilby said. As the Government Accountability Office points out in its report, that plan banks on the Navy keeping six of the amphibs in the fleet for several years beyond their expected 40-year service life, including some of those currently in poor condition. 'There's huge questions about whether or not they will even make it to their service, expected service life,' Oakley said. Amphibious warfare ships have generally not met the Navy's planned maintenance schedules dating back to 2010, according to Marine Corps documentation. Specifically, from 2010-2021, the Navy extended more than 70% of amphibious warfare ship maintenance beyond its original planned end date. 'This cumulatively resulted in 28.5 years of lost training and deployment time for those ships and their associated Marines,' according to the December Government Accountability Office report. A decade to fix The acting chief of naval operations said the Navy is currently planning the maintenance availabilities needed to do the work necessary to get the amphibs to a life cycle health assessment above poor. Maintenance for seven of the amphibs that were not funded in previous budgets are being funded in the budget being considered by Congress today, Kilby told VOA. 'We're committed to 31 amphibious ships … and when we get a new ship, we'll replace an old ship, because that old ship is more expensive and harder to maintain,' he said. The Government Accountability Office says that even if the planning improves, the Navy and Marine Corps may still need to revisit the overall number of ships required for its missions. 'That's the math, and that's the data that we need them to do to be able to understand how many more of these things do we need to buy, how many more do we need to get online quicker to be able to continue to meet this number,' Oakley said. Gen. Smith said the problem will take at least a decade to fix, which could compound should the United States find itself in a future conflict with China. 'The whole point of having the ARG/MEU out is to prevent conflict,' he said. Kilby says the Navy wants the problem solved by 2027 — year Chinese leader Xi Jinping has ordered the military to be prepared to take democratically ruled Taiwan by force. 'We have the Navy we have. That's the Navy we're going to have largely in 2027, and we just need to operate it more efficiently and effectively,' he said.
