logo
"This Is The $400 Million Palace In The Sky" Air Force One Gifted To Donald Trump By Qatar Sparks $1 Billion Controversy

"This Is The $400 Million Palace In The Sky" Air Force One Gifted To Donald Trump By Qatar Sparks $1 Billion Controversy

IN A NUTSHELL ✈️ The Trump administration received a **Boeing 747-8** from Qatar to serve as the new Air Force One, but modifications could cost up to **$1 billion**.
💰 Significant funds are being redirected from the **Sentinel program**, intended for nuclear missile modernization, to finance the aircraft's conversion.
🛡️ Required upgrades include **ultra-secure communications**, **missile defense shields**, and lavish interior redesigns, raising concerns about financial prudence.
⏳ Delays in other Air Force One projects and potential obsolescence by **2029** have intensified debates over strategic priorities and resource allocation.
In recent months, the Trump administration found itself in the midst of a controversy centered around a seemingly generous gift from Qatar: a Boeing 747-8 intended to serve as the new Air Force One. Initially celebrated as a diplomatic success, this aircraft has now become a political and financial quagmire. Critics are voicing concerns that the costs associated with adapting this plane to the stringent requirements of a presidential aircraft could skyrocket to nearly $1 billion. The implications of this expenditure have sparked heated debates about financial priorities and strategic credibility within the U.S. government. The Transformation of Air Force One
The newly gifted Boeing 747-8 is far from ready to serve as Air Force One. Extensive modifications are required to meet the unique demands of a presidential aircraft. These changes include the installation of ultra-secure communication systems, enhancements against electronic attacks, and the addition of missile defense shields. Moreover, the interior must be redesigned to align with the luxurious aesthetic preferences of the Trump administration. Each of these elements comes with significant costs.
While officials from the U.S. Air Force have suggested a budget cap of $400 million for these modifications, experts and lawmakers remain skeptical. Some sources indicate that the true cost, shrouded in secrecy, could well exceed $934 million, potentially reaching $1 billion. As these expenses mount, questions arise about the necessity and prudence of such an investment, particularly when considering the aircraft's anticipated service life.
Buried Reactors, Silent Power: Deep Fission's Radical Nuclear Plan Could Revolutionize How the World Feeds Its Data Machines Political and Financial Backlash
The financial implications of transforming the Boeing 747-8 into Air Force One have not gone unnoticed by political opponents. The decision to reallocate funds from the Sentinel program, initially intended for modernizing the U.S. nuclear missile arsenal, has provoked significant controversy. This program, which had an original budget of $77.7 billion, has already ballooned to $140 billion, providing a cushion for additional expenditures like this aviation endeavor.
Jeanne Shaheen, a Democratic senator from New Hampshire, voiced her concerns about this budgetary maneuver, stating that diverting funds from a critical nuclear program to finance a prestige project undermines U.S. strategic credibility. Her sentiments echo the unease felt by many in Congress, particularly within the Senate, over the potential mismanagement of military resources.
'Hotter Than Hellfire Itself': Critics Slam Fusion Reactor Part That Withstands Temperatures Higher Than Asteroid Impacts Operational Challenges and Delays
The challenges facing the new Air Force One do not end with its financial burden. The aircraft's modifications are to be undertaken in Texas at a highly secure facility that specializes in handling sensitive programs. However, these upgrades are expected to be time-consuming, raising concerns about the plane's operational viability. By 2029, the aircraft may already be considered obsolete, with plans in place for its eventual retirement to a presidential museum.
Adding to the complexity is the fact that two other Air Force One aircraft, ordered from Boeing, are already behind schedule. These delays reportedly influenced Donald Trump's decision to accept the Qatari gift despite numerous warning signs. The situation has created a logistical puzzle, as the administration must now balance the demands of multiple aircraft projects.
Slovakia Removes 7,400 Tons of Soviet Nuclear Waste as Officials Admit 'We've Been Sitting on a Toxic Time Bomb' Strategic Implications and Future Considerations
The decision to accept and modify the Qatari Boeing 747-8 has broader implications beyond financial and political concerns. It raises questions about the strategic direction of U.S. military and diplomatic engagements. By allocating substantial resources to this aircraft, the administration may be signaling a shift in priorities that could affect other critical programs.
This development also underscores the need for transparent decision-making processes, especially when national security and taxpayer dollars are at stake. As discussions continue in Congress and among defense experts, the future of this aircraft remains uncertain. The controversy has prompted a reevaluation of the balance between prestige and practicality in government expenditures.
The saga of the new Air Force One encapsulates the complexities of modern governance, where diplomacy, finance, and national security intersect. As the U.S. navigates these challenges, one question remains: How will future administrations reconcile the competing demands of prestige projects and strategic necessities?
This article is based on verified sources and supported by editorial technologies.
Did you like it? 4.5/5 (30)
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Apple to invest additional $100 bn in US
Apple to invest additional $100 bn in US

France 24

time5 hours ago

  • France 24

Apple to invest additional $100 bn in US

Trump announced the increased commitment at the White House alongside the tech giant's CEO Tim Cook, calling it "the largest investment Apple has made in America." "Apple will massively increase spending on its domestic supply chain," Trump added, highlighting a new production facility for the glass used to make iPhone screens in Kentucky. In February, Apple said it would spend more than $500 billion in the United States and hire 20,000 people, with Trump quickly taking credit for the decision. It builds on plans announced in 2021, when the company founded by Steve Jobs said it would invest $430 billion in the country and add 20,000 jobs over the next five years. "This year alone, American manufacturers are on track to make 19 billion chips for Apple in 24 factories across 12 different states," Cook said in the Oval Office. Trump, who has pushed US companies to shift manufacturing home by slapping tariffs on trading partners, claimed that his administration was to thank for the investment. "This is a significant step toward the ultimate goal of... ensuring that iPhones sold in the United States of America also are made in America," Trump said. Cook later clarified that, while many iPhone components will be manufactured in the United States, the complete assembly of iPhones will still be conducted overseas. "If you look at the bulk of it, we're doing a lot of the semiconductors here, we're doing the glass here, we're doing the Face ID module here... and we're doing these for products sold elsewhere in the world," Cook said. Apple reported a quarterly profit of $23.4 billion in late July, topping forecasts despite facing higher costs due to Trump's sweeping levies. The tariffs are essentially a tax paid by companies importing goods to the United States. This means Apple is on the hook for tariffs on iPhones and other products or components it brings into the country from abroad.

Grok, is that Gaza? AI image checks mislocate news photographs
Grok, is that Gaza? AI image checks mislocate news photographs

France 24

time7 hours ago

  • France 24

Grok, is that Gaza? AI image checks mislocate news photographs

But when social media users asked Grok where it came from, X boss Elon Musk's artificial intelligence chatbot was certain that the photograph was taken in Yemen nearly seven years ago. The AI bot's untrue response was widely shared online and a left-wing pro-Palestinian French lawmaker, Aymeric Caron, was accused of peddling disinformation on the Israel-Hamas war for posting the photo. At a time when internet users are turning to AI to verify images more and more, the furore shows the risks of trusting tools like Grok, when the technology is far from error-free. Grok said the photo showed Amal Hussain, a seven-year-old Yemeni child, in October 2018. In fact the photo shows nine-year-old Mariam Dawwas in the arms of her mother Modallala in Gaza City on August 2, 2025. Before the war, sparked by Hamas's October 7, 2023 attack on Israel, Mariam weighed 25 kilograms, her mother told AFP. Challenged on its incorrect response, Grok said: "I do not spread fake news; I base my answers on verified sources." The chatbot eventually issued a response that recognised the error -- but in reply to further queries the next day, Grok repeated its claim that the photo was from Yemen. The chatbot has previously issued content that praised Nazi leader Adolf Hitler and that suggested people with Jewish surnames were more likely to spread online hate. Radical right bias Grok's mistakes illustrate the limits of AI tools, whose functions are as impenetrable as "black boxes", said Louis de Diesbach, a researcher in technological ethics. "We don't know exactly why they give this or that reply, nor how they prioritise their sources," said Diesbach, author of a book on AI tools, "Hello ChatGPT". Each AI has biases linked to the information it was trained on and the instructions of its creators, he said. In the researcher's view Grok, made by Musk's xAI start-up, shows "highly pronounced biases which are highly aligned with the ideology" of the South African billionaire, a former confidante of US President Donald Trump and a standard-bearer for the radical right. Asking a chatbot to pinpoint a photo's origin takes it out of its proper role, said Diesbach. "Typically, when you look for the origin of an image, it might say: 'This photo could have been taken in Yemen, could have been taken in Gaza, could have been taken in pretty much any country where there is famine'." AI does not necessarily seek accuracy -- "that's not the goal," the expert said. Another AFP photograph of a starving Gazan child by al-Qattaa, taken in July 2025, had already been wrongly located and dated by Grok to Yemen, 2016. That error led to internet users accusing the French newspaper Liberation, which had published the photo, of manipulation. 'Friendly pathological liar' An AI's bias is linked to the data it is fed and what happens during fine-tuning -- the so-called alignment phase -- which then determines what the model would rate as a good or bad answer. "Just because you explain to it that the answer's wrong doesn't mean it will then give a different one," Diesbach said. "Its training data has not changed and neither has its alignment." Grok is not alone in wrongly identifying images. When AFP asked Mistral AI's Le Chat -- which is in part trained on AFP's articles under an agreement between the French start-up and the news agency -- the bot also misidentified the photo of Mariam Dawwas as being from Yemen. For Diesbach, chatbots must never be used as tools to verify facts. "They are not made to tell the truth," but to "generate content, whether true or false", he said.

ICE agents stage 'Trojan Horse' raid in Los Angeles despite court ban
ICE agents stage 'Trojan Horse' raid in Los Angeles despite court ban

France 24

time7 hours ago

  • France 24

ICE agents stage 'Trojan Horse' raid in Los Angeles despite court ban

Immigration enforcement agents on Wednesday grabbed more than a dozen people outside a Los Angeles Home Depot in a "Trojan Horse" raid, despite a court ordering them to stop using roving patrols that rights groups say amount to racial profiling. The raid, in which agents sprang from the back of a rented moving truck, was filmed by embedded journalists from Fox News. Footage showed agents – including one wearing a white cowboy hat – jumping out of the truck and racing towards a group that appeared to be largely Latino. Gregory Bovino, Commander of Operations for the US Border Patrol in California, re-tweeted the clip, adding the title "Operation Trojan Horse", a reference to the large wooden horse used in Greek mythology to take the city of Troy by surprise. "For those who thought Immigration enforcement had stopped in Southern California, think again," acting US Attorney Bill Essayli posted on X after the raid. "The enforcement of federal law is not negotiable and there are no sanctuaries from the reach of the federal government." Fox News said a total of 16 people were ultimately taken into custody, with many of them being placed in the rear of the same van. The outlet cited Department of Homeland Security officials saying the MS-13 gang has a "chokehold" on the area. Day labourers frequently gather in and around the parking lots of hardware stores in the hope of picking up casual work. One man who was there told the Los Angeles Times the raid had unfolded before 7am (1400 GMT) when a truck that appeared to have been rented from vehicle company Penske pulled up in the parking lot. A Spanish-speaking driver said he was looking for workers before masked agents jumped out of the back, sending people running. "This is the worst feeling ever," the man told the paper. 'Serious concerns' A spokesman for Penske said the company had been taken by surprise by the footage of the raid. "Penske strictly prohibits the transportation of people in the cargo area of its vehicles under any circumstances," the spokesman said. "The company was not made aware that its trucks would be used in today's operation and did not authorise this. Penske will reach out to DHS and reinforce its policy to avoid improper use of its vehicles in the future." Wednesday's raid was one of the most high-profile operations in Los Angeles since a federal court in July ordered a halt to the "roving patrols" carried out by ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) as part of President Donald Trump 's plan to deport thousands of undocumented migrants. A three-judge panel last week denied a government appeal to overturn the order, after rights groups argued that the raids appeared to be arresting people largely based on their race. The American Civil Liberties Union said "the evidence available so far" surrounding Wednesday's raid "raises serious concerns that the federal government may be in violation" of the order. "Per that order, federal agents are prohibited from stopping and detaining people based solely on generalisations about how they look, how they speak, or where they are," said ACLU attorney Mohammad Tajsar, in a statement. ICE raids around Los Angeles in early June sparked two weeks of unrest in the city, which is home to millions of migrants. In response to the largely peaceful protests, Trump sent more than 4,700 troops to the city, despite objections from local politicians and law enforcement.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store