SSC MTS 2025 Registration Closes Today, Check Details
As per the SSC calendar, the computer-based examination for these posts is tentatively scheduled to be held between 20 September and 24 October 2025. However, the Commission may revise the exam dates, with timely updates to be issued on the official website.
Eligibility Criteria
Candidates applying for SSC MTS 2025 must have passed Class 10 or equivalent from a recognised board.
Age Limit
For MTS and Havildar (CBN): 18 to 25 years
For Havildar (CBIC): 18 to 27 years
Relaxation in the upper age limit is applicable for reserved categories as per government norms.
The recruitment drive will fill vacancies across several central government departments and ministries, including:
• Central Secretariat
• Press Information Bureau (PIB)
• Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT)
• Department of Telecommunications
• Central Board of Excise and Customs
• Labour Bureau
• Department of Science and Technology
• Ministry of Home Affairs
• Ministry of External Affairs
• Central Ground Water Board
• Ministry of Jal Shakti
• Central Public Works Department (CPWD)
• Ministry of Textiles
• Archaeological Survey of India (ASI)
• Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC)
Last year, over 57 lakh candidates applied for the SSC MTS 2024 exam, which had over 11,500 vacancies. With 1,075 posts available this year, competition is expected to remain high.
Candidates are advised to complete the registration process at the earliest to avoid last-minute issues.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Energy promotion policy launch today
Patna: State Govt will formally launch its New & Renewable Energy Promotion Policy-2025 and Pumped Storage Policy-2025, at a event at Gyan Bhavan on Saturday. The event will witness participation from over 100 leading renewable energy companies, along with major PSUs and industry stakeholders, an energy dept official said on Friday. State's energy secretary Manoj Kumar Singh said the launch would provide a common platform for investors and policymakers to drive the state's clean energy transformation.
Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
Youth hold the key to developed India by 2047: Haryana CM Nayab Singh Saini
KURUKSHETRA: Haryana chief minister Nayab Singh Saini on Thursday emphasised the crucial role of youth in realizing Prime Minister Narendra Modi's vision of a 'Developed India' by 2047. Speaking at the closing ceremony of the 'Ek Bharat Shreshtha Bharat Inter-State Youth Exchange Program-2025' in Kurukshetra, the CM expressed confidence that India's ambitious development goals could be achieved through the energy, talent, and determination of its youth. Addressing over 600 youth delegates from 23 States and Union Territories, CM Saini said the program served as a vibrant platform for cultural exchange, national integration, and mutual learning. 'Our diversity is our strength. Though your languages, food habits, and traditions may differ, your identity as Indians unites you all,' he stated, encouraging the youth to become ambassadors of national unity and share their experience in their home states. The event was also attended by Haryana Youth Affairs and sports minister Gaurav Gautam, who lauded the participation of youth in fostering cultural understanding and strengthening the national fabric. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Struggling With Belly Fat? Try This at Home Home Fitness Hack Shop Now Undo Highlighting the state's commitment to youth development, CM Saini said over 1.80 lakh youth have been recruited into government services through transparent, merit-based processes in the last ten-and-a-half years. Additionally, more than 2,000 job fairs have facilitated employment for over 1.06 lakh youth in the private sector. The chief minister noted the establishment of a dedicated MSME department to boost entrepreneurship and job creation. He shared five key mantras for youth empowerment: staying healthy, pursuing education as a means of acquiring knowledge and skills, fulfilling civic responsibilities, upholding integrity, and using technology constructively. 'Nation-building is a shared duty, and youth are at the forefront of shaping our future,' he said. CM Saini also highlighted initiatives like the Haryana Skill Development Mission, which has trained over 1.14 lakh youth in traditional and modern professions, and schemes such as Saksham Yuva Yojana, Drone Didi, and IT Saksham Yuva. Reiterating Haryana's leadership in implementing the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020, he noted that all universities and colleges in the state have adopted the policy. Haryana has also established India's first Skill University — Shri Vishwakarma Skill University in Palwal. In conclusion, Saini called on the youth to embrace traditional knowledge while continuously adapting to new skills, reinforcing that an empowered, skilled youth is the backbone of a self-reliant and developed India.
Indian Express
6 hours ago
- Indian Express
The Income Tax Bill does not award arbitrary power to the state by allowing digital search and seizure. Here's why
On July 21, the Parliamentary Select Committee tabled in Parliament its report on the Income Tax Bill, 2025, aimed at simplifying and reforming the country's primary legislation on income tax. The Bill was introduced in the Lower House of Parliament in February this year, and the Select Committee was tasked to sift through the text of the Bill, clause by clause, to ensure that its objects and purposes are clearly and adequately spelt out. Importantly, the Committee has retained — and rightly so — the controversial provisions dealing with powers and procedures relating to digital search and seizure. The digital search and seizure powers are contained in Clause 247 of the Bill, which empowers the tax authority to enter and search any place where an electronic media or computer system (used to store relevant information or evidence) is suspected to have been kept. Clause 261(e) seeks to define 'computer system' to include virtual digital space, that is, personal and professional communications platforms and social media accounts, among other things. The power of the tax authority to enter and search a taxpayer's digital space has been criticised on the ground that wide search and seizure powers arbitrarily infringe upon the taxpayer's fundamental right to privacy guaranteed under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution. The Income Tax Act, as it currently stands, was introduced in 1961, and came into force in 1962. Section 132 of the 1961 Act — which corresponds to Clause 247 of the Bill — has always vested wide search and seizure powers in the tax authority. The Finance Act, 2001 inserted Section 2(12A) into the Act to extend legal recognition to books of account maintained on computers, and Section 2(22AA) was inserted to include 'electronic record' within the meaning of the word 'document' defined under the Act. Subsequently, the Finance Act, 2002 inserted Section 132(1)(iib) facilitating access to electronic devices. Finally, Section 275B made it a punishable offence to refuse cooperation with the tax authority in this regard. The power to conduct digital search and seizure, therefore, has always been available with the tax authority. In defining the term 'virtual digital space', the new Bill simply makes explicit what was already implicit in the law. Not only that, search and seizure powers have survived judicial review and scrutiny of the Supreme Court. In 1973, the constitutionality of Section 132 of the 1961 Act was unsuccessfully challenged before a five-judge Bench of the Supreme Court in Pooran Mal vs Director of Inspection. There, the Court categorically held that the tax authority must possess the power to conduct search and seizure to combat tax evasion. There is no reason why the underlying legal reasoning should not extend to digital search and seizure. Of course, our jurisprudential understanding of the right to privacy has since changed, especially after 2017, when a nine-judge bench of the Supreme Court in K Puttaswamy vs Union of India recognised the right to privacy as part of the fundamental right to life and liberty under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution. The right to privacy, however, is not absolute and, even if we were to apply Puttaswamy principles, search and seizure powers would still survive the scrutiny of our constitutional courts. Importantly, Clause 247 of the Bill (much like Section 132 of the 1961 Act) has sufficient safeguards in place and satisfies the Puttaswamy test of proportionality. For instance, the law requires the tax authority to record reasons before initiating a search and seizure action, and sanction must be obtained from, and granted by, the appropriate authority. Moreover, the powers so exercised would be subject to judicial review and a constitutional court may call upon the tax authority to disclose the reasons behind the search and seizure operation and may even examine the circumstances based on which sanction was obtained and granted. In fact, in a recent decision in the case of Principal Director of Income Tax vs Laljibhai Kanjibhai Mandalia (2022), the Supreme Court applied the Wednesbury principle to allow for search powers by deferring to the wisdom of the tax authority. In the past decade, Parliament has incorporated several changes in the tax law to keep pace with the digital transformation of the society. For instance, the concept of significant economic presence was incorporated in the income tax law to tax business profits of foreign companies deriving income without having any physical presence in India. Likewise, a digital services tax was enacted (now withdrawn) to tax revenues generated from digital services offered in India by foreign digital platforms. India is also actively participating in the Pillar One tax project spearheaded by the OECD to address tax challenges posed by digitalisation. Digital search and seizure powers contained in the Bill, which facilitate recovery of incriminating digital data, have a similar objective. The writer is an advocate in the Bombay High Court. Views are personal
